Proposals for improvement of Annex I of Directive 92/43/ EEC: Central Italy

The main purpose of the 92/43/EEC Habitats Directive is to contribute to the conservation of biodiversity, understood as habitat types and species of the flora and fauna of the European Union. To achieve this goal, natural and semi-natural biodiversity as a whole must be recognized and included in its annexes. As for the conservation of biotopes, named habitat types, Italy is unfortunately lacking as it the Annex I does not include important ecosystems that are typical of its territory, rare for biogeographical reasons or threatened. Therefore, the opportunity to identify a first list of significant habitats for central Italy is discussed here. For each of the new proposed types (new habitats or new subtypes) a sheet has been prepared to highlight their salient characteristics. The new proposals concern seven habitat types and one subtype: sedge and reeds formations (Freshwater large sedge and reed beds), willow shrublands (Shrubby willow formations of river banks and fens), Apennine garrigues (Apennine hilly and montane garrigues), a new subtype of Annex I Habitat 6130 (Communities of herbaceous and dwarf shrub-suffrutescent plants of Italian ultramafic substrates), ancient olive groves ("Centuries-old olive groves" with evergreen Quercus spp. and arborescent matorral), secondary meadows (Italian submontane and montane pastured meadows dominated by Cynosurus cristatus), badlands (Pioneer halophilous and sub-halophilous communities of “calanchi” and “biancane” badlands) and hop-hornbeam woods (Italian-Balkan hop-hornbeam woods).


Introduction
The 92/43/EEC Habitats Directive (European Union 1992) represents the most important and effective tool that the European Union has for safeguarding the biodiversity of its territory (Evans 2006;Lockwood 2006).
Due to problems related to the incomplete knowledge of the biodiversity heritage at the time of accession to the Directive, and to a probable initial underestimation of the European conservation plan by the Italian State, Annexes I, II, IV, and V are unfortunately far from including the entire heritage of Italian species and habitats worthy of being protected. The same happens for other European countries (Cardoso 2012;van Swaay 2012;Hochkirch et al. 2013;Moreno-Saiz 2021).
The Habitats Directive, as mentioned in Article 19, provides for the possibility of amendments of the Annexes which are considered necessary "for adapting Annexes I, II, III, V and VI to technical and scientific progress". Even if, as some believe, this may not be the right time to request amendments since the priority should be the full implementation of the existing Directive (Maes et al. 2013), we believe it is appropriate to start discussing and hypothesizing some new entries in Annex I, as other countries have already done (Oprea and Sârbu 2009).
While for the Alpine sector the gaps are less serious as the neighboring States have included in Annex I many habitats occurring in the Italian Alps as well, for central Italy and the Apennines in particular the lack of habitats of community interest appears particularly serious, as many endemic and rare vegetation types are not mentioned, and therefore they are devoid of any form of protection. The issue is even more alarming if we consider the crucial ecological role they play also for the conservation of wild fauna and flora. The situation does not appear different if plant communities and ecosystems of a secondary origin are taken into consideration harmoniously integrated into natural contexts. Although resulting from the transformations made by human in the territory over the centuries, these traditional anthropic ecosystems are rich in biodiversity and represent an important element of the human historical and cultural heritage (Saccani 2002;Young et al. 2005;Angold et al. 2006;McNeely et al. 2006;Halada et al. 2011;Torma et al. 2018).
In the light of this awareness, and thanks to the enormous contribution of naturalists in the application of the Directive itself, a significantly deeper level of knowledge has been reached in the last 3 decades, and the scientific community is now better able to reach an exhaustive synthesis on the heritage of species, habitats, or more generally ecosystems of conservation interest. Therefore, proposals have been formulated for the inclusion of new habitats for Italy, pending the granting of the possibility of integrating Annex I by the European Commission, as required by Art. 19 of the Directive itself. At the moment of the preparation of the Italian Interpretation manual of Habitats Directive (Biondi et al. 2009(Biondi et al. , 2012 a first list of neglected habitats for Italy was compiled and sent to the Italian Ministry of Environment, soliciting their inclusion in Annex I. In the following years, this first habitat list has been updated and expanded. The most important habitats proposed for inclusion in Annex I for central Italy are here presented, paying a particular attention to the Apenninic habitat types. Similarly, in other articles in this volume, new habitats or new subtypes are proposed for Sicily and Sardinia (Guarino et al. 2021;Fois et al. 2021) and more will probably be identified for the entire Italian territory and even other countries.

Materials and Methods
The habitats are presented following a standard shared format designed to briefly illustrate their salient qualitative characteristics, deferring to future dedicated monographs a more detailed and complete analysis of each habitat, providing exhaustive descriptions of geographic variants and subtypes (when present) and phytosociological tables as well.
The new proposed habitats can fall into one of the following cases: i) New subtype or new variant of a habitat already occurring in the Annex I, in order to include aspects not foreseen in the general description of the habitat for Italy; ii) description of a new habitat not yet present in the Annex I: in this case the macrocategory and the related subcategory are indicated; iii) reporting of a habitat already included in the Annex I but not yet recognized for Italy. In the habitat sheet, the following information is provided: Name of the habitat type/subtype/variant; Macrotype: macrocategory and subcategories; Type of the proposal: new habitat, new subtype/variant, first recognition for Italy of a habitat of the Annex I, and name/s of the proposer/s; Reason for the proposal: scientific justification on the need for the inclusion of the new habitat into Annex I; Diagnostic sentence: synthetic phrase that indicates the salient characteristics of the habitat; Syntaxonomic reference: framed to the level of alliance(s), followed by the higher ranks [order(s) and class(es)] referring to the Italian Vegetation Prodrome (Biondi and Blasi 2015); Reference list of diagnostic species: a list of species (generally not more than 10) which better characterise the habitat. The species marked with an asterisk are listed in Annex II. In many cases, the list of diagnostic species should be supplemented with "regional" or endemic species, at this stage not included due to the synthetic scope of the present contribution. The plant species nomenclature and taxonomy follow Bartolucci et al (2018) and the updates of The Portal to the Flora of Italy (available at http:/dryades.units.it/floritaly accesed November 2021) Dynamic relationships and contacts: successional context of the habitat and spatial relations with other vegetation types.
Type of proposal: New Habitat Proposed (C. Angiolini, F. Fanfarillo, L. Gianguzzi, S. Maccherini, S. Pesaresi, D. Viciani) Reason for the proposal: The plant communities here proposed as deserving conservation efforts represent a very peculiar habitat type, hosting a number of native, specialized, stress-tolerant species, developing in clayey badlands (calanchi and biancane) along the Apennine chain (Zangheri 1942;Antoni 1965;Ferrari 1971;Ferrari and Grandi 1974;Ferrari and Speranza 1975;Gentile and Sartori 1975;Branconi et al. 1980;Zanotti et al. 1980;Pirone 1981aPirone , 1995Biondi et al. 1988Biondi et al. , 1990Biondi et al. , 1992Ferrari and Gerdol 1987;Loppi and De Dominicis 1990;Corbetta et al. 1991;Allegrezza et al. 1993;Chiarucci et al. 1995aChiarucci et al. , 1995bMaccherini et al. 1998;Taffettani 2000;Biondi and Pesaresi 2004;Tomei et al. 2009) and in Sicily (Brullo 1985a(Brullo , 1985bBrullo and Siracusa 1998;Brullo et al. 1980Brullo et al. , 2001Gentile and Di Benedetto 1961;Gianguzzi et al. 2008Gianguzzi et al. , 2016aMusarella et al. 2018;Pasta 2001). These sites host pioneer vegetation types dominated by chamaephytes, hemicryptophytes and therophytes, the latter being adapted to the impenetrable soil crust that develops during the summer. This vegetation type is rich in rare and endemic species, mainly halophilous and sub-halophilous. When not disturbed, the phytocoenoses of this habitat tend to be permanent, being linked to specific edaphic and micro-environmental conditions. The risk of disappearace of this habitat has two drivers: soil reclamation for agricultural purposes and the decreasing/stopping grazing pressure, which cause a decline of eroded spots. The decrease in total erosion over the whole badlands leads to the expansion of ruderal vegetation types, e.g., Avena fatua dominated grasslands (Torri et al. 2013), at the expense of pioneer halophilous communities.
Diagnostic sentence: Pioneer vegetation of badlands (calanchi and biancane) originated from Plio-Pleistocene marine clays along the Apennine chain of the Italian Peninsula and in Sicily. The different ecological conditions within the badlands originate micro-geosygmeta hosting highly specialized plant communities, rich in halophilous and/or sub-halophilous species. In the badlands of southern Italy, the coenoses of this habitat have catenal relationships with vegetation types belonging to the series of deciduous forests of the Oleo-Querceto virgilianae sigmetum. In the driest areas of Sicily, there are occasional links with shrublands of the alliance Oleo-Ceratonion (chalky outcrops) or with halo-nitrophilous vegetation types (Miocene clays) of the class Pegano-Salsoletea, and in particular with communities dominated by Salsola oppositifolia and/or Suaeda fruticosa (Brullo et al. 1985). These are generally deforested areas, largely dominated by arable land and extensive crops (Raimondo et al. 2000;Gianguzzi et al. 2014aGianguzzi et al. , 2014bGianguzzi et al. , 2016b).

Subtypes
[31XX] Freshwater large sedge and reed beds Macrotype: 3 "Freshwater habitats"; 31 "Standing water" Type of proposal: New Habitat Proposed (G. Ciaschetti, G. Pirone, R. Venanzoni) Reason for the proposal: Humid and wet environments are quite rarefied nowadays in Italy like in other countries of Mediterranean basin, mainly because of their continuous reclaim and alteration (Dudgeon et al. 2005). They are very sensitive to eutrophication and pollution by the phytosanitary products used in the agricultural practices and, when deteriorated, they can be subject to invasion by allochthonous species with serious threats to biodiversity conservation (Sartori and Bracco 1997;Malmqvist and Rundle 2002;Pỳsek and al. 2012;Lazzaro et al. 2020). As a consequence, many plant and animal species have become very rare at regional, national or european scale by now (Corbetta and Pirone 1989;Pedrotti 1990Pedrotti , 1995Venanzoni and Gigante 2000;Pirone et al. 2003;Venanzoni et al. 2003;Bacchetta and Mossa 2004;Prosser and Sarzo 2004;Presti et al. 2005;Ceschin and Salerno 2008;Tomaselli et al. 2006;Tasinazzo 2009;Mereu et al. 2012;Gianguzzi et al. 2013;Angiolini et al. 2017;Venanzoni et al. 2021). Some of these phytocoenoses, as tall sedge communities, reach their maximum level of diversity in the mountain karst plains where they represent a relict vegetation with noteworthy phytogeographic disjunctions (Pirone 1987;Biondi and Baldoni 1994;Pedrotti 2015Pedrotti , 2016Landucci et al. 2013Landucci et al. , 2020Venanzoni et al. 2018;Tardella and Di Agostino 2020;Ciaschetti et al. 2021). In recent years, a sharp decline in helophytic vegetation is clearly observed as testified by many papers on the "Reed die-back syndrome" (Gigante et al. 2011Lastrucci et al. 2016Lastrucci et al. , 2017Lastrucci et al. , 2019  [32XX] Shrubby willow formations of river banks and fens Macrotype: 3 "Freshwater habitats"; 32 "Running water" Type of proposal: New Habitat Proposed (E. Biondi, L.

Zivkovic)
Reason for the proposal: Riparian vegetation is among those most threatened and at risk of disappearing due to the reckless management of rivers. (Chapin III et al. 2000;Vörösmarty et al 2010;Stubbington et al. 2021). Especially in the middle and terminal stretches, the rivers have been profoundly remodeled also through interventions that have modified their natural course causing the change of river dynamics (Hooke 2006;Camporeale et al. 2013). Furthermore, the excavations of stone materials in the riverbed have profoundly changed the morphology of the river bed and of the banks, causing the disappearance of some communities typical of the banks (Kalníková et al. 2021). Another cause of threat is represented by the invasion of alien species such as Reynoutria japonica, Buddleja davidii, Amorpha fruticosa, Acer negundo and various herbaceous species that are highly competitive with the native willow shrub species (Kumschick et al. 2015;Van Oorschot et al. 2017).
The shrub formations of willows are therefore seriously threatened and in the process of rarefaction; therefore, it is necessary to foresee their conservation considering their important ecological role in maintaining the correct fluvial dynamics and as a place of refuge for wildlife, especially avifauna and endemic plant species (Brullo and Spampinato 1993;Brullo et al. 2000).
Given the absence in Annex I of a habitat in which to include the shrubby willows of the Mediterranean and Continental Macroregions, there is a need to establish a new habitat. Indeed, Habitat 3240 "Alpine rivers and their ligneous vegetation with Salix eleagnos" refers to a very different type of habitat that is located in the mountain stretches of the watercourse and characterized by species such as Salix eleagnos, Salix purpurea subsp. gracilis, Salix daphnoides, Salix nigricans and Hippophae rhamnoides with mainly alpine and perialpine distribution, absent or extremely rare in the Apennines and in central and southern Italy.
Diagnostic sentence: Pioneer formations of shrubby willows that colonize the river banks and the marshy areas of the alluvial plains. Other woody essences (especially Populus alba, P. nigra and Salix alba) are sporadically associated with shrubby willows and assume a clearly subordinate role. They are frequent both in the temperate macrobioclimate (in the sub-Mediterranean variant) mesotemperate bioclimatic belt and in the Mediterranean macrobioclimate, mainly in the mesomediterranean and supramediterranean bioclimatic belts. Dynamic relationships and contacts: Pioneer formations of shrubby willows represent the potential vegetation of river beds subject to periodic flooding that prevent the establishment of a more mature hygrophilous forest (Pirone 1981b(Pirone , 1991(Pirone , 2000Corbetta and Pirone 1989;Spampinato 1990, 1997;Caniglia et al. 1992;Biondi et al. 1994Biondi et al. , 1997Biondi et al. , 1999Sartori and Bracco 1995;Marchiori and Sburlino 1996;Foggi et al. 2000;Brullo et al. 2001;Merloni and Piccoli 2001;Landi et al. 2002;Arrigoni andPapini 2003, Strumia 2004;Angiolini et al. 2005;Gianguzzi and D' Amico 2006;Fascetti and Lapenna 2007) therefore they represent a primitive but long lasting stage, being conditioned by the recurrence of flood events (Pedrotti and Gafta 1996). Their occurrence is of fundamental importance for the stabilization of gravel accumulations which then favor the development of the connected terraces that host more mature hygrophilous woods.
The dynamic relationships with the previous herbaceous stages and with eventual evolutions towards woods are determined above all by the characteristics of hydrological regimes and topography. In general, there are serial connections with the vegetation of the perennial shores (Habitat 3250 "Mediterranean rivers with permanent flow with Glaucium flavum") and annual (Habitat 3270 "Rivers with muddy banks with vegetation of Chenopodion rubri p.p. and Bidention p.p."). The catenal connections occur with the riparian forests of Habitats 92A0 "Salix alba and Populus alba galleries" and 91E0* "Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae)" and with the herbaceous vegetation of the banks of the watercourses of the Habitats 3280 ("Constantly flowing Mediterranean rivers with Paspalo-Agrostidion species and hanging curtains of Salix and Populus alba") and 3290 ("Intermittently flowing Mediterranean rivers of the Paspalo-Agrostidion").
Reason for the proposal: The plant communities here proposed as deserving conservation efforts represent a very peculiar habitat type, hosting a number of stress-tolerant plant species, developed both in primarily inhospitable environments and in naturally degraded biotopes Allegrezza et al. 1997;Scoppola and Angiolini 1997;Pirone and Tammaro 1997;Bonini et al. 1999;Biondi 2000;Biondi et al. 2006;Cutini et al. 2007;Pirone et al. 2014Pirone et al. , 2018Ciaschetti et al. 2016Ciaschetti et al. , 2018. These communities are mainly composed of chamaephytes and nano-phanerophytes, and embody the typical vegetation of a narrow although ecologically well defined combination of bioclimatic and edaphic conditions occurring all along the Mediterranean basin, mostly at the interface between the Temperate and the Mediterranean Macrobioclimates. They host species from the two main climatic contexts, giving rise to peculiar and exclusive species combination, often including several narrowly distributed taxa. Some orchids genera (e.g., Ophrys and Serapias) are well represented. The already existing habitats belonging to the Macrotype "4" (e.g., 4030, 4060, 4090) do not seem appropriate to host these plant communities, due to their ecological, physiognomic, biogeographic, and bioclimatic characteristics clearly defined in their names and descriptions (Biondi et al. 2009;European Commission 2013).
Diagnostic sentence: Apenninic garrigues and dwarf-garrigues of the inland areas of the Italian peninsula, with rare occurrences also at the foot of the western Alps, characteristic of the areas mostly interested by the Submediterranean Variant of the Temperate Bioclimate, both calcicolous and silicicolous, developed on limestone, sandstone, marl, conglomerate, debris, generally subject to severe erosion. The tipically Mediterranean garigues are not included here, since they can be referred to other, already existing, Annex I Habitat types (e.g., those of the group 54 'Phrygana'). Dynamic relationships and contacts: These garrigues and dwarf-garigues develop on eroded soils, often with patches of outcropping bedrock, both in primary (e.g., steep rocky slopes, rocky ridges, gullies, and eroded ravines) and secondary sites (regressive aspects as a consequence of fire, overgrazing, etc.), on various substrates, from limestone and travertines to marl-marly limestone to siliceous sandstone, occasionally also on loose substrate. Due to their thermophilic ecology, considering the temperate macroclimatic context, they tend to settle preferentially on hot South-facing slopes, or in sunny and arid locations (Biondi 2000;Allegrezza 2003). From a syndynamic point of view, they often represent either successional stages tending towards evergreen forests (Habitat 9340 "Forests of Quercus ilex and Quercus rotundifolia"), or edapho-xerophilic aspects developed inside a successional process having the mixed deciduous/ evergreen thermophilic forests (Habitat 91AA* "Eastern oak woods"), or the dwarf junipers (Habitat 4060 "Alpine and Boreal heaths", Allegrezza et al. 2013; Ciaschetti et al. 2016) as mature stages. This vegetation can frequently come into contact with the "Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates (Festu-co-Brometalia) (*important orchid sites)" [Habitat 6210 (*)], with the "Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea" (Habitat 6220*), with the "Rupicolous calcareous or basophilic grasslands of the Alysso-Sedion albi" (Habitat 6110*), with the "Juniperus communis formations on heaths or calcareous grasslands" (Habitat 5130), with the "Arborescent matorrals of Juniperus spp. " (Habitat 5210), and less frequently with the "European dry heaths" (Habitat 4030), giving rise to articulated vegetational mosaics.
[6130] Calaminarian grasslands of the Violetalia calaminariae Macrotype: 6 "Natural and semi-natural grassland formations" 61 "Natural grasslands" Type of proposal: new subtype proposed "Communities of herbaceous and dwarf shrub-suffrutescent plants of Italian ultramafic substrates" (M. Mariotti, B. Foggi, F. Selvi, D. Viciani) Reason for the proposal: The communities of herbaceous and dwarf shrub-suffrutescent plants typical of Italian ultramafic soils have been generally referred to Habitat 6130 based on broad ecological similarity, rather than on syntaxonomical evidence. In fact, the floristic differences with Violetalia calaminariae vegetation are remarkable (Ernst 1974(Ernst , 1976. In the Italian interpretation manual, the peculiarities of the Italian vegetation types have been specified with reference mainly to the Ligurian communities. We believe that the habitats strictly associated with the Italian ultramafic soils should deserve a separate treatment in the Annex I of Directive 92/43. Since at this stage this is not feasible, however, the alternative proposed here is to adopt a more inclusive concept and diagnostic phrase for Habitat 6130, as to include several Italian variants of the ultramafic outcrops in the Alps, northern Apennines, Elba, and the old mining dumps of Sardinia and other areas. The vegetation of the ultramafic soils, rich in endemic taxa, is widespread mainly in Liguria and Toscana, but there are also examples on the outcrops of Emilia-Romagna, Lombardia, Piemonte and Val d' Aosta (Pignatti-Wikus and Pignatti 1977;Arrigoni et al. 1983;Nowak 1987;Chiarucci 1994Chiarucci , 2004Mariotti 1994Mariotti , 2008Chiarucci et al. , 1996Chiarucci et al. , 1998aChiarucci et al. , 1998bChiarucci et al. , 1998cVagge 1997;Buffa et al. 1998;Saccani 1998Saccani , 2002Adorni and Tomasselli 2002;Chiarucci and Mariotti 1999;Viciani et al. 2002Viciani et al. , 2005Foggi et al. 2006;Selvi 2007;Foggi and Venturi 2009;Marsili and Barberis 2012;D' Amico and Previtelli 2012;D' Amico et al. 2013;Saccani and Salvati 2015;Tomaselli et al. 2019aTomaselli et al. , 2019bTomaselli et al. , 2021. The plant communities on these outcrops usually form a fine mosaic due to slight geomorphological variations that support patches of different physiognomic types, such as suffrutescent, succulent herbaceous and/or therophytic communities of oligotrophic substrates and formations of graminoid herbs; there are also chasmophytic and scree communi-ties where the substrate, stable or mobile, becomes more selective. In past studies, this mosaic was analysed as a whole using large relevés surfaces, thus leading to contrasting phytosociological classifications. The assignment of these Italian plant communities to the order Violetalia calaminariae, hence to Habitat 6130, appears inadequate from a syntaxonomical point of view. In fact, some important diagnostic species of this habitat mentioned in the European Manual (European Commission 2013) -such as Viola calaminaria (now V. lutea subsp. calaminaria), Festuca ophioliticola, Cochlearia alpina (now C. pyrenaica), are not found on the Italian outcrops. For this reason, the distinctness of the vegetation of the serpentine soils in northwest and central Italy would justify an ad-hoc habitat type characterized by many endemic and/or rare species, among which Nickel hyperaccumulator taxa. At this stage, however, we propose to broaden the concept of Habitat 6130 as to include different variants often in close spatial contact within the same highly specialized geolithological context. The semi-natural formations found in abandoned or not abandoned mining sites (mines of Sulcis-Iglesiente in south-western Sardegna, of Campiglia Marittima in western Toscana, of Valganna and Valvassera in the Lombardia Alps, of Cogne in Val d'Aosta, of Raibl in Carnia, etc., see e.g. Carnelli et al. 1994;Mariotti and Carnelli 1995;Angiolini et al. 2005) can also be included in this type of habitat.
Diagnostic sentence: herbaceous or herbaceous-suffrutescent formations with sparse cover (30-50%), natural or semi-natural, on shallow soils often with rocky or gravelly outcrops, rich in heavy metals (e.g., nickel, zinc, chromium, copper), mostly of ultramafic nature, locally in mining districts. The flora is highly specialized, with taxa adapted to heavy metals and often Ni-hyperaccumulators of family Brassicaceae. Variants are recognized based on geographical distribution, floristic composition and nature of the substrate.
Syntaxonomic references: the large heterogeneity of the floristic-ecological types found on ultramafic substrates is reflected in the syntaxonomic attributions below. Dynamic relationships and contacts: Strong insolation and high selectivity of the substrate determine slow rock weathering and pedogenetic processes, resulting in durable vegetation stages of pioneer type usually connected by spatial contacts. Vegetation dynamics is very slow. In Mediterranean-climate areas the trend is, in principle, towards thermophilous (Cyclamino repandi-Quercetum ilicis) or mesophilous (Cyclamino hederifolii-Quercetum ilicis) holm oak forest types, while in cooler climates, the dynamics is towards semi-deciduous or deciduous oak forests, dominated by Quercus pubescens, Q. cerris, Q. petraea or Fagus sylvatica (Roso sempervirentis-Quercetum pubescentis and other associations). In the more western and coastal parts, the dynamic transition takes place through the formation of juniper scrubs with Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus associated with various sclerophylls (Carici humilis-Juniperetum oxycedri Chiarucci, Foggi & Selvi 1999, see ) while in inner areas J. oxycedrus is associated with and Erica scoparia, E. arborea and xerophilous deciduous broad-leaved trees (Viciani et al. 2005). In Pinus pinaster forests (mostly deriving from old plantations) and afforested areas with Pinus nigra, the topsoil layers are subject to acidification, which attenuates the direct effects of the serpentine substrate (Selvi et al. 2017). In these situations, sub-steppic grasslands appear first (Festuco robustifoliae-Caricetum humilis Viciani, Foggi, Gabellini & Rocchini 2002, see Chiarucci et al. 1996Viciani et al. 2002), followed by Bromopsis erecta communities, then by dense Brachypodium rupestre communities, progressively colonized by Fabaceae and Rosaceae shrubs (Chiarucci 1994). There are also contacts with meso-xeric grasslands, generally perennial (Habitat 6210) but sometimes annual too (Habitat 6220*) and stable stages dominated by Calluna vulgaris, locally Erica cinerea, Buxus sempervirens or Juniperus communis (Habitat 4030, 5110, 5130) or with thorny gorse, mostly Genista desoleana (Habitat 4090) on screes and cliffs (Habitat 8210) (Lombini et al. 2001;Tomaselli et al. 2019aTomaselli et al. , 2021. [63xx] Centuries-old olive groves" with evergreen Quercus spp. and arborescent matorral Macrotype: 6 "Natural and semi-natural grassland formations" 63 "Sclerophillous grazed forests (dehesas)" Type of proposal: New Habitat Proposed (E. Biondi, S. Casavecchia) Reason for the proposal: the centuries-old olive groves of the Mediterranean territories represent a peculiar aspect of the rural landscape of southern Europe, the Near East and North Africa, well integrated into landscape contexts characterized by a good level of naturalness ). These are very complex ecosystems rich in biodiversity in which cultivated and spontaneous species harmoniously coexist; some of them are species of considerable conservation interest (Gangale and Uzunov 2003;Calabrese et al. 2012;Cohena et al. 2015). The habitat is also home to numerous species of wildlife that find refuge, food and reproduce there (Carpio et al. 2016). Secular olive groves are subject to serious pressures and threats from man and, if unprotected, they could quickly disappear (Trevisani 2004;Schicchi and Raimondo 2007). The causes are many: due to the relatively low production yield and the difficulties in crop care and harvesting, they are replaced with more modern systems, with more productive varieties and more suitable for agricultural mechanization. The old olive trees are also the object of reckless trade due to their high aesthetic value. To stem this phenomenon, the Puglia Region has promulgated a regional law (L.R.n. 14/2007) entitled "Protection and enhancement of the landscape of the monumental olive trees of Puglia".
Diagnostic sentence: a characteristic and historic landscape of the Mediterranean region with groves of centuries-old olive trees that extend through areas of Thermo and Meso-Mediterranean bioclimate and areas of the Sub-Mediterranean variant of the Temperate bioclimate. The habitat is characterized by evergreen oaks in the arborescent Matorral, and especially in southern-eastern Italy, by some fruit trees and shrubs as well as perennial grasslands with chamaephytes, hemicryptophytes and geophytes, used for the grazing of sheep and goats. This is a very important habitat for terrestrial fauna and birds as well. [65xx] Italian sub-montane and montane pastured meadows dominated by Cynosurus cristatus Macrotype: 6 "Natural and semi-natural grassland formations"; 65 "Mesophile grasslands" (European Commission 2013).
Type of proposal: New Habitat Proposed (G. Ciaschetti, E. Del Vico, D. Gigante) Reason for the proposal: this habitat refers to semi-natural submontane and montane pastures and meadows usually grazed, and occasionally also mowed. Just like other Annex I Habitats (e.g., 6210) these communitites are depending on the persistence of a traditional land use (mowing, grazing), deeply related to the montane management systems: the increasing land abandonment and the consequent land use changes are causing their reduction and collapse Viciani et al. 2018). This semi-natural habitat host a remarkable rate of the montane biodiversity within the context of traditional agricultural landscapes (Gerdol and Piccoli 1980;Poldini and Oriolo 1994;Francalancia et al. 1995;Antrop 1997;Watkinson and Ormerod 2001;Ciaschetti and Pirone 2019). Compared to lowland hay meadows, these plant communities have a peculiar floristic richness, also due to the ingression of annuals colonizing the breakings in the grass turfs created as a result of the trampling action by grazing animals. The species composition tipically includes a certain rate of thorny, inappetite, or subnitrophilous species as a result of the grazing load. Rare species and various orchids can be present as well, especially in the central-southern Italian types. It is well known that traditional agricultural practices such as extensive grazing and mowing increase the vascular plant species richness and functional diversity (Hansson and Fogelfors 2000;Smith et al. 2000;Debussche et al. 2001;Pykälä 2004;Pykälä et al. 2005;Škornik et al. 2010;Vassilev et al. 2011;Blasi et al. 2012).
The plant communities belonging to the alliance Cynosurion cristati have not been considered a habitat of European concern sensu 43/92/EEC Directive, as they are a broadly ranged and hosting prevalently species with a wide distribution. Indeed, there is no Annex I Habitat corresponding to montane and submontane hay meadows and/or pastured meadows. They have been sometimes referred to 6510, however it is a stretch, since the latter refers to low altitude hay meadows. However, in Italy, in the Alpine and Apenninic context, these semi-natural pastures and pastured meadows host a particularly rich flora and a high number of endemic plants. Additionally, in the Mediterranean mountain ranges and in dry regions (such as Sardinia), they play a relic role hosting several boreal-temperate species confined to humid places (Bacchetta et al. 2012;Farris et al. 2013).
Diagnostic sentence: Mesophilous species-rich perennial grasslands dominated by hemicryptophytes, generally mowed once a year and/or extensively grazed by domestic livestock. These communities develop on flat areas or gentle slopes, including the karstic plains, on mature, nutrient-rich soils with a good water availability, mainly distributed in the Supratemperate and Mesotemperate (and, occasionally, Sub-Mesomediterranean) Bioclimatic Belts. These grasslands, characterized by a continuous and dense herb cover, are mostly dominated by Cynosurus cristatus. They are rich in biomass, hosting many other grass (often excellent as fodder, such as Lolium perenne) and leguminous species. They are typically characterized by the occurrence of plants related both to grazing and trampling as well, such as spiny and nitrophilous species. Dynamic relationships and contacts: The semi-natural meadows are, by definition, secondary cenoses whose maintenance is directly depending on the continuity of an extensive management, including yearly mowing, grazing and in some cases a sporadic light manure fertilization. The abandonment of these traditional practices leads to a rapid invasion by scrub stages, and to the re-colonization of the tree-dominated potential vegetation. The habitat is dynamically linked to shrubs of the order Prunetalia spinosae Tx. 1952(especially Berberidion vulgaris Br.-Bl 1950 in the Supratemperate Belt, and to the order Pyro spinosae-Rubetalia ulmifolii Biondi, Blasi & Casavecchia in Biondi, Allegrezza, Casavecchia, Galdenzi, Gasparri, Pesaresi, Vagge & Blasi 2014(Pruno spinosae-Rubion ulmifolii O. Bolòs 1954 (Biondi and Ballelli 1995;Catorci et al. 2007;Di Pietro et al. 2017).
[91xx] Italian-balkan hop-hornbeam woods Reason for the proposal: these are very extensive vegetation (more than 700,000 hectares in Italy) spread from Italy to the Balkan Peninsula. A high number of syntaxa and syntaxonomic review (e.g., Poldini 1988;Ubaldi 1995Ubaldi , 2003Blasi et al. 2004Blasi et al. , 2006Poldini et al. 2017) have been published in Italy. These are rare examples of vegetation whose altitudinal extension on the Alps, Apennines and Balkania is so wide as to connect them with the Mediterranean horizon where they actively participate in meso-oro-Mediterranean formations (Quercetalia ilicis) to reach the subalpine types in contact with Erico-Pinetalia and Fagetalia up to mixed shrub formations with Ostrya and Rhododendron hirsutum. The cenoses of the karst area are also very rich in Illyrian-Balkan elements which here have their only Italian localities. They are habitats with a high natural value, which host rare, endemic and / or threatened species, including numerous orchids.
Diagnostic sentence: Italo-balkan meso-xerophile mixed woods clearly dominated by Ostrya carpinifolia. They are distributed from southern slopes of the Alps (with gravitation in the South-eastern Alps) to Apennines on preferably calcareous substrates, from the mesotemperate to the lower supratemperate thermotype, with ramifications in the mesomediterranean thermotype.
Subtype C. Ostrya carpinifolia woods in the Tyrrhenian sector of the southern Apennines. Reference alliance Carpinion orientalis (sub-alliance Festuco exaltatae-Ostryenion carpinifoliae). Dynamic relationships and contacts: the forest cenoses of the new habitat typically represent the more mature term of the climatophilic series in the mesotemperate thermotype, but often also vegetations from edafoxerophilous to lithophilous, intrazonal, especially in the area of beech forests. Locally, on scree and sub-vertical walls, cenosis with a tall-shrubby structure are formed as durable formations.
In the Alpine sector, dynamic contacts are made mainly with the shrub communities of the Berberidion and Fraxino orni-Berberidenion, with the grasslands of the orders Scorzoneretalia villosae [(Habitat 62A0 "Eastern sub-mediterranean dry grasslands (Scorzoneretalia villosae)"], Seslerietalia caeruleae (Habitat 6170 "Alpine and subalpine calcareous grasslands") and Festucetalia valesi-acae [(Habitat 6210(*) " Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates (Festuco-Brometalia) (*important orchid sites)"] in the most continental part (Alto Adige, Val Venosta). In the Apennines, hop-hornbeam woods are dynamically connected with the shrub communities of the Cytision sessilifolii alliance while the thermophilic Apennine and pre-Apennine ones with those of the Pruno-Rubion ulmifolii alliance. The grasslands in dynamic contact with these cenoses belong to Phleo ambigui-Bromion erecti alliance for the typically calcicolous aspects and Bromion erecti alliance on terrigenous substrates, both referable to Habitat 6210(*).

Discussion
Although it is believed that it is more convenient and simple to propose implementations, such as adding subtypes or variants to existing habitats, we are convinced that in some cases, excessive forcing would be caused that lead to the distortion of the meaning of the habitat and its ambiguous interpretation. As an example, we can mention the attribution of Italian oak forests to Habitat 91H0* (Pannonian woods with Quercus pubescens) before the inclusion in Annex I of the Habitat 91AA* following the entry of Romania and Bulgaria into the European Union. The description of "endemic" habitats for Italy, in addition to giving value to Italian phytocenotic and ecosystem biodiversity, also represents a "political" fact as, in our opinion, it gives greater importance to the biodiversity conservation policies.
Some of the proposed new habitats/new subtypes have a geographic jurisdiction that goes beyond the "borders" of central Italy, being in fact widespread throughout the national territory such as the Italo-Balkan hop-hornbeam woods or the habitat of freshwater large sedges and reeds beds. For these habitats, their diffusion at a national level is highlighted in the sheet, although the aspects relating to the conditions in which they occur in central Italy have been more in-depth discussed. As already mentioned, in the next future other articles about single habitats will be provided.
In general, it can be highlighted that the relative majority of the proposed habitats fall into macro-categories 3 (Fresh water habitats) and 6 (Natural and semi-natural grassland formations), together making up 60% of the new proposals.
This result is perfectly in line with the biodiversity conservation emergencies reported globally in relation to wet ecosystems which, due to global warming and the unsustainable exploitation of water resources, currently represent the ecosystems most threatened with disappearance (Titus 1988;Findlay and Bourdages 2000;Gibbs 2000;Nichols 2004;Coleman et al. 2008;Davidson and Nick 2014;Hu et al. 2017). On the other hand, grasslands represent an emergency at European level since, especially for secondary grasslands of anthropogenic origin, we are witnessing a significant rarefaction of this habitat due to the social transformations that involve the abandonment of traditional agro-pastoral practices on secondary grasslands. When abandoned, they are destined to disappear due to the natural processes of recovery by the woody vegetation. On the contrary, if they are subjected to intensive management, they undergo a deep transformation in terms of species composition to the advantage of more productive and profitable herbaceous crops but, consequently, of lesser or no naturalistic interest. Substituting traditional sheeps and goats flocks with more productive and less expensive cows and horses herds produce negative impact on these habitats too.
Alongside these general considerations, with regard to individual habitats, some comments can be added.
[31xx] Freshwater large sedge and reed beds: three subtypes can be identified concerning this habitat. The first subtype is related to the vegetation dominated by large sedges, that are developed on the edge of lakes, humid depressions and peat bogs, on more or less submerged soils that remain soaked in water for the entire year. Many sedge species are involved, some of them very rare in Italy as Carex buxbaumii, C. disticha, C. vulpina and C. acuta (Pirone 1987;Pedrotti 2015Pedrotti , 2016Ciaschetti et al. 2021;Venanzoni et al. 2021). In these cases, the habitat can be considered as priority. Other species not listed in the sheet are Carex paniculata, C. riparia, C. rostrata, C. acutiformis, C. otrubae, C. microcarpa, C. randalpina, C. appropinquata, C. hispida, C. diandra, C. lasiocarpa, and Cyperus longus. The second subtype is related to the vegetation dominated by graminoid helophytes developed in stations permanently submerged by stagnant or slowly flowing waters, often subject to seasonal fluctuations. Other species, besides those listed in the sheet, are Schoenoplectus lacustris, Schoenoplectiella mucronata, Typha domingensis, T. latifolia, T. laxmannii, T. shuttleworthii.
The third subtype is about sedges, graminoids and tallherb communities of banks that grow on-stabilized organic substrates (floating mass of vegetation built by the communities themselves) that are partly or completely floating.
[32xx] Shrubby willow formations of river banks and fens: for this new habitat, two subtypes are currently known. The first subtype deals with shrubby willow grooving on flat, hilly and Mediterranean-mountain areas: pioneer shrubby willows communities (Salix purpurea subsp. purpurea, subsp. lambertiana and subsp. eburnea, S. triandra, S. brutia, S. amplexicaulis, S. pedicellata, S. ionica) that colonize the gravelly-pebbly river deposits, subject to periodic flooding, especially in autumn and winter. They represent the first stage of colonization of the river banks by wood species. The second subtype consists of shrublands of swampy areas characterized by gray willow (Salicion cinereae): shrub formations dominated by Salix cinerea that colonize the swampy areas of the alluvial plains and the edges of lakes and ponds that remain swamped even during the summer period.
[40xx] Apennine hilly and montane garrigues: the floristic composition of this habitat is very rich; indeed, alongside the species cited as the most significant at a diagnostic level, other important rare species occur, such as Alyssoides utriculata, Lotus hirsutus, Artemisia alba, sometimes in very restricted areas such as the case of Ephedra major and Cytisus decumbens. Finally, it is important to underline that the communities strictly found on ultramafic cliffs and screes deposits (chasmophytic, comophytic and glareicolous) should be referred to other types of Habitats (8220 [62.21 and/ or 62.28] and 8130 respectively). Further problems arise from the comparison with the Habitats 4090, 6110 and 8230 with which they share some diagnostic species and some ecological and site characteristics.
[63xx] "Centuries-old olive groves" with evergreen Quercus subsp. and arborescent matorral: one of the most important diagnostic species is Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris (Mill.) Leht (Olea europaea subsp. oleaster (Mill.) Rouy ex Hegi) spontaneous taxon of the Mediterranean shrubland, mainly occurring in the coastal areas of southern Italy and Sardinia (Pignatti 2018); the wild variety is no longer considered to have any taxonomic value (Bartolucci et al. 2018) but, despite this, considering its phytosociological significance (a characteristic entity of the alliance Oleo-Ceratonion) and its importance in the recolonization processes of the maquis, it was considered appropriate to put it among the diagnostic species. Concerning the species of flora that participate in the composition of the habitat, it is worth mentioning: [65xx] Italian submontane and montane pastured meadows dominated by Cynosurus cristatus: the habitat holds a huge geographical variability, reverberating in the floristic composition that allows the detection of five subtypes. The first one is related to the Alps, with coenoses more similar to those of Central Europe and charachterized by a strong presence of Eurasian, boreal and orophile species. A second subtype groups the C-N-Apennine communities, that can be interpreted as transition aspects between the Alpic and southern coenoses, with characteristic ingressions of species coming from more or less xerophilic Bromopsis erecta dominated prairies. The third subtype is spread in C-S-Apennine in a transitional oceanic climate, so with more mediterranean influence both by a biogeographical and climatic point of view, leading to the presence of thermophilous and annual species. Sardinian communities represent a fourth subtype linked to upper mesotemperate to lower supratemperate humid bioclimates, characterized by the richness of sardinian endemic species, some of which are worthy of particular attention. The last subtype concerns with the coenoses of Sicily, more thermophilous, with a strong presence of species endemic to Sicily or Aspromonte.
[91xx] Italian-Balkan hop-hornbeam woods: the diagnostic sentence reported in the sheet refers to the main distribution of the habitat in Italy whose maximum expression with the clearly dominant Ostrya carpinifolia is achieved from the south-eastern Alps to the Apennine ridge. In this first phase, the localized distribution of the habitat in Sardinia (Bacchetta et al. 2009) was not considered, as well as the ravine formations of Sicily (Bartolo et al. 1990) and southern Italy (Brullo et al. 2001) where O. carpinifolia has relictual character. However, syntaxonomic updates are in progress, some of which have already been partially published in Poldini et al. (2017).

Conclusion
In conclusion, some reflections are needed. First of all, it should be emphasized again that the list of habitats presented here and briefly discussed can be integrated with other new habitats or subtypes. Furthermore, it is necessary to better define the distribution range of these habitats through detailed analyses and necessary insights through the involvement of the entire scientific community that has been dealing with the conservation of biodiversity and problems related to the Natura 2000 network for decades.
Although the list presented here is certainly not exhaustive and the new types of habitats must certainly be better defined, we want to underline once again the need to include all the biodiversity of Italian natural and semi-natural biotopes in the application of the Directive, also considering their very important role as biological corridors that are necessary for the conservation not only of the floristic-vegetational component but also of microand macro-fauna.