Research Article |
Corresponding author: Mauro Raposo ( mraposo@uevora.pt ) Corresponding author: Carlos Pinto-Gomes ( cpgomes@uevora.pt ) Academic editor: Carmelo Maria Musarella
© 2023 Mauro Raposo, Sara del Río, Francisco Vázquez-Pardo, José Carlos Costa, Ana Cano-Ortiz, Carlos Pinto-Gomes.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Raposo M, del Río S, Vázquez-Pardo F, Costa JC, Cano-Ortiz A, Pinto-Gomes C (2023) New plant communities to define the southern boundary of the European Atlantic Province in mainland Portugal. Plant Sociology 60(2): 39-55. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2023602/03
|
This study identifies and analyzes the plant communities that allow the definition of the geographic limits between Temperate and Mediterranean macrobioclimates, for the center of Portuguese mainland. The altitude of Serra da Estrela, Açor and Lousã, combined with the increase in atmospheric humidity, allows the presence of vegetation typical of a Temperate macrobioclimate. Thus, based on the phytosociological methodology, floristic relevés were carried out in order to identify the series of vegetation existing in these territories. Through these relevés carried out, four new plant associations were identified: Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova, Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova, Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae ass. nova that lives in the submediterranean bioclimatic variant, mesotemperate humid to hyper-humid. A new association namely Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova with two subassociations were also identified. Based on the vegetation distribution, new biogeographic limits are proposed. Thus, it was intended to identify the southern limits of the European Atlantic Province (Atlantic Orolusitania Subrovince) based on the vegetation cover, namely the distinction between the Estrela Sierran District and a new Biogeographical District, the Alvo-Gardunhense.
Biogeography, geobotany, native forest, relict vegetation, vegetation cover dynamics
Despite the Temperate macrobioclimate's presence on all continents, it's more expressive in Eurasia and in North America (
In the southernmost part of Portugal, the European Atlantic Province is delimited by the Estrela Sierran District, which is characterized by the submediterranean variant. This variant, although inserted in the temperate macrobioclimate, is defined by the existence of at least one month during the summer's quarter with an average precipitation in millimeters that is 2.8 tenths lower than the average temperature in degrees Celsius (
Due to the terrain's elevation, the submediterranean variant extends to the central part of Portuguese mainland, through the Serra da Estrela, Açor and Lousã mountain ranges, constituting a block to the humid Atlantic winds that favor the precipitations of the relief (
On the other hand, there is some difficulty in defining the boundaries for the Estrela Sierran District, considering the frequent erosion of the schist substrates at the lowest levels, due to strong slopes, promoting soil thiness and even the occurrence of outcrops. In these substrates, typical temperate plant communities (more demanding in terms of moisture) find it difficulty in settling, taking refuge in deep soils and north facing slopes exposed to the north quadrant (
Thus, since the main ecological characteristic of plants and plant communities is fidelity, based on plant bioindicators (
The studied territory is part of the mountains of the center of mainland Portugal, whose maximum elevation is located at 1,993 meters of altitude, including the Lousã-Açor-Estrela mountain range. It is a territory dominated by the Mediterranean pluviseasonal oceanic bioclimate and temperate oceanic, meso to supra, humid to ultrahyperhumid, semi-hyperoceanic to euoceanic (
Taxonomic and syntaxonomic nomenclature follows up the work of
For the numerical analysis, we collected 18 field relevés, which were compared with another 106 relevés from the literature review (Table
Communities | Original relevés | Bibliographic relevés | Authors |
Quercus robur L. s.l. | 7 | . | |
. | 5 |
|
|
. | 11 |
|
|
. | 4 |
|
|
. | 4 |
|
|
. | 8 |
|
|
Corylus avellana L. | 3 | . | |
. | 14 |
|
|
. | 8 |
|
|
. | 11 |
|
|
Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm. | 5 | . | |
. | 4 |
|
|
. | 6 |
|
|
Sambucus nigra L. | 3 | . | |
. | 4 |
|
|
. | 9 |
|
|
Total | 18 | 88 |
The fieldwork allowed a more detailed recognition of the Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector southern zone floristic identity (Atlantic Orolusitania Subprovince, European Atlantic Province). With the relevés and floristic analyzes four new plant communities and two subassociation of climatophilous oak forests of Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae were identified. These plant communities are typical of climatophilous and tempori-hygrophilous positions and have their own geographic identity, which contributes to the definition of biogeographical boundaries. Most of the identified associations belong to ecological positions of deep soils, taking into account the dynamics of the climatophilous oak forest series.
Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova hoc loco
Synecology and Synstructure
: Siliceous community dominated by Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm. that colonizes clearings and forest edges on deep soils (Holotypus associationis hoc loco: Table
Relevés of Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova hoc loco (Cytisetea scopario-striati, Cytisetalia scopario-striati, Ulici europaei-Cytision striati).
Nº of relevé | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5* | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 560 | 450 | 770 | 690 | 680 | |
Area (m²) | 60 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | |
Cover (%) | 75 | 80 | 90 | 85 | 95 | |
Slope (%) | 10 | 8 | 15 | 10 | 15 | |
Average height (m) | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | |
Exposition | SE | NO | SO | E | N | |
Nº of taxa | 16 | 17 | 18 | 20 | 29 | |
Characteristics | ||||||
Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | V |
Cytisus grandiflorus (Brot.) DC. | 2 | + | . | 1 | 2 | IV |
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuntz | 1 | . | + | 2 | 1 | IV |
Genista falcata Brot. | + | . | + | 2 | 1 | IV |
Adenocarpus complicatus (L.) J. Gay | + | 1 | . | . | . | II |
Orobanche rapum-genistae Thuill. | . | . | . | . | + | I |
Companions | ||||||
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. | + | 1 | + | 1 | 2 | V |
Halimium alyssoides (Lam.) C. Koch | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | IV |
Cistus psilosepalus Sweet | + | . | 1 | 1 | + | IV |
Pterospartum lasianthum (Spach) Willk. | 1 | . | + | + | 1 | IV |
Erica aragonensis (Willk) Cout. | 1 | + | + | . | + | IV |
Agrostis curtisii Kerguélen | + | 1 | . | + | + | IV |
Campanula lusitanica L. | . | + | 1 | + | + | IV |
Arbutus unedo L. | . | + | 1 | + | + | IV |
Erica arborea L. | . | 1 | . | + | + | III |
Agrostis castellana Boiss. & Reut. | . | 1 | + | . | + | III |
Digitalis purpurea L. | . | + | . | 1 | + | III |
Genista triacanthos Brot. | . | . | 1 | + | + | III |
Quercus broteroana O. Schwartz | + | . | + | . | + | III |
Lithodora prostrata (Loisel) Griseb. | + | + | . | + | . | III |
Erica cinerea L. | + | . | + | + | . | III |
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | . | + | + | . | + | III |
Arenaria montana L. | . | + | . | + | + | III |
Lavandula luisieri (Rozeira) Rivas Mart. | . | . | + | + | + | III |
Cistus populifolius L. | + | . | . | + | . | II |
Viburnum tinus L. | + | . | . | . | + | II |
Holcus lanatus L. | . | + | . | . | + | II |
Castanea sativa Mill. | . | . | + | . | + | II |
Linaria triorniphophora (L.) Willd. | . | . | + | . | + | II |
Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | . | . | + | + | II |
Summary table of associations dominated by Cytisus striatus. A) Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova; B) Lavandulo viridis-Cytisetum striati; C) Ulici latebracteati-Cytisetum striati.
A | B | C | |
Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm | V | V | V |
Cytisus grandiflorus (Brot.) DC. | IV | . | . |
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuntz | IV | II | IV |
Genista falcata Brot. | IV | . | . |
Adenocarpus complicatus (L.) J. Gay | II | . | . |
Orobanche rapum-genistae Thuill. | I | . | . |
Lavandula viridis L’Hér. | . | V | . |
Erica arborea L. | . | III | III |
Ulex latebracteatus (Mariz) Rothm. | . | . | IV |
Cytisus multiflorus (L’Hér.) Sweet | . | . | II |
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link | . | . | II |
Adenocarpus lainzii Castrov. | . | . | I |
Dendrogram of Cytisus striatus communities. Rels 1–5: Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova; rels 6–11: Lavandulo viridis-Cytisetum striati Pinto-Gomes, Cano-Ortiz, Quinto-Canas, Vila-Viçosa & Martínez-Lombardo 2012; rels 12–15: Ulici latebracteati-Cytisetum striati Rivas-Martínez ex J.C. Costa, Izco, Lousã, Aguiar & Capelo in J.C. Costa, Capelo, Lousã, Antunes, Aguiar, Izco & Ladero 2000.
Synchorology : The soil's strong erosion has reduced the potential area for this gyestal occurrence; however, the new Alvo-Gardunhense District here defined is its ecological optimum. This association is well represented in Serra do Açor, as well as in the União de Freguesias de Vide e Cabeça.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : This broom constitutes a replacement stage and integrates the edge of the climatophilous series of oak-alvarinho of Viburno tini-Querco broteroanae sigmetum. It frequently comes into contact with the Portuguese-laurel of Frangulo alni-Prunetum lusitanicae and with the heliophilous communities of the Calluno-Ulicetea class´s degraded soils.
Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova hoc loco
Synecology and Synstructure
: Siliceous community dominated by Sambucus nigra that develops along water courses and surface runoff of nitrophilous water, on deep soils with high organic matter. It occurs in territories influenced by a submediterranean bioclimate, with a meso to supratemperate thermotype, a humid to hyper-humid shoulder type and a semi-hyperoceanic continentality. In its composition, the presence of several elements of the Galio-Urticetea class, namely Urtica dioica L., Scrophularia grandiflora DC. and Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande (Holotypus associationis hoc loco: Table
However, several taxa distinguish these associations, especially the presence of elements with a more temperate hue such as Scrophularia grandiflora, Hypericum androsaemum L., Prunus lusitanica, Ilex aquifolium L., Quercus broteroana, Primula acaulis L. and Salix salviifolia Brot. (Figure
Relevés of Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova hoc loco.
Nº of relevé | 1 | 2 | 3* | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 510 | 560 | 670 | |
Area (m²) | 80 | 80 | 100 | |
Slope (%) | 15 | 20 | 30 | |
Cover (%) | 90 | 90 | 85 | |
Exposition | N | NE | N | |
Average height (m) | 2.5 | 3 | 2.5 | |
Nº of taxa | 15 | 17 | 19 | |
Characteristics | ||||
Sambucus nigra L. | 4 | 5 | 5 | V |
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | 2 | 1 | 1 | V |
Urtica dioica L. | 1 | + | 2 | V |
Scrophularia grandiflora DC. | + | 1 | + | V |
Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande | . | + | 2 | IV |
Tamus communis L. | . | + | 1 | IV |
Lonicera hispanica (Boiss.& Reut.) Nyman | . | + | + | IV |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | + | . | . | II |
Companions | ||||
Chelidonium majus L. | 1 | 2 | 1 | V |
Polystichum setiferum (Forssk.) Woynar | + | 2 | 1 | V |
Digitalis purpurea L. | 1 | + | + | V |
Hypericum androsaemum L. | 1 | + | 1 | V |
Geranium purpureum Vill. | + | + | + | V |
Quercus broteroana O. Schwartz | + | + | + | V |
Ulmus minor Mill. | . | + | 2 | IV |
Primula acaulis (L.) L. | . | + | 1 | IV |
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuntz | + | + | . | IV |
Salix salviifolia Brot. | + | + | . | IV |
Arum neglecti Mill. | + | . | + | IV |
Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | + | + | IV |
Prunus lusitanica L. | . | . | 1 | II |
Summary table of associations dominated by Sambucus nigra. A) Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova; B) Rubo vigoi-Sambucetum nigrae; C) Clematido vitalbae-Sambucetum nigrae.
A | B | C | |
Sambucus nigra L. | V | V | V |
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | V | V | V |
Scrophularia grandiflora DC. | V | . | . |
Urtica dioica L. | V | . | . |
Tamus communis L. | IV | . | . |
Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande | IV | . | . |
Lonicera hispanica (Boiss.& Reut.) Nyman | IV | III | . |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | II | III | . |
Rubus vigoi Roselló, Peris & Stübing | . | V | . |
Clematis vitalba L. | . | . | V |
Cornus sanguinea L. | . | . | II |
Rubus caesius L. | . | . | II |
Solanum dulcamara L. | . | . | I |
Euonymus europaeus L. | . | . | I |
Rosa canina L. | . | . | I |
Bryonia dioica Jacq. | . | . | I |
Synchorology : This syntaxon has a reduced distribution area due to anthropic action over the last decades, which is why only three phytosociological relevés could be carried out. This syntaxon occurs in the mountains of central Portugal, corresponding in biogeographic terms to the Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector, having its ecological optimum in Mata da Margaraça-Serra do Açor.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : The Sambucus nigra community occurs in conditions very similar to the position of Ulmus glabra Huds., and may represent the first stage of this forest's replacement that is currently very altered. In the study area, it was observed in the most hygrophilous variants of the edges of the new potential oak groves of Quercus broteroana here proposed (Genisto falcatae-Querco broteroanae), also integrating the boundary of the ammias of Scrophulario scorodonae-Alno glutinosae sigmetum.
Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae ass. nova hoc loco
Synecology and Synstructure
: In the mountains of central Portugal, a community of Corylus avellana was identified accompanied by a set of plants distinct from the only association previously mentioned for Portugal (
Summary table of associations dominated by Corylus avellana. A) Linario triorniphophylae-Coryletum avellanae; B) Laserpitio eliasii-Coryletum avellanae; C) Chamaeiris foetidissimo-Coryletum avellanae; D) Omphalodo nitidae-Coryletum avellanae; E) Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae ass. nova.
A | B | C | D | E | A | B | C | D | E | ||
Corylus avellana L. | V | V | V | V | V | Ribes alpinum L. | . | III | . | . | . |
Sorbus aucuparia L. | V | . | . | II | . | Chamaeiris foetidissimus L. | . | . | V | . | . |
Quercus petraea (Matt.), Liebl. | V | . | . | II | . | Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl | . | . | V | . | . |
Stellaria holostea L. | V | V | . | . | . | Narcissus portensis Pugsley | . | . | V | . | . |
Linaria triornithophora (L.) Willd. | V | . | . | . | . | Ranunculus ficaria L. | . | . | IV | . | . |
Vaccinium myrtillus L. | IV | . | . | . | . | Vitis sylvestris (C.C. Gmel.) Hegi | . | . | III | . | . |
Melampyrum pratense L. | IV | III | . | . | . | Carex pendula Huds. | . | . | III | . | . |
Sorbus aira (L.) Crantz | IV | III | . | . | . | Salix atrocinerea Brot. | . | . | III | II | . |
Teucrium scorodonia L. | IV | . | . | . | . | Fraxinus excelsior L. | . | . | . | V | . |
Crepis lampsanoides (Gouan) Tausch | IV | V | . | . | . | Ulmus glabra Huds. | . | . | . | IV | . |
Poa nemoralis L. | IV | III | . | . | . | Ilex aquifolium L. | . | . | . | IV | V |
Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott | IV | III | . | . | . | Castanea sativa Mill. | . | . | . | IV | . |
Hepatica nobilis Schreb. | . | V | . | . | . | Fagus sylvatica L. | . | . | . | IV | . |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | . | V | . | . | . | Acer pseudoplatanus L. | . | . | . | III | . |
Mercurialis perennis L. | . | V | . | . | . | Quercus broteroana O. Schwartz | . | . | . | IV | IV |
Melica uniflora Retz | . | V | . | . | . | Prunus avium L. | . | . | . | III | . |
Laserpitium eliasii Sennen & Pau | . | V | . | . | . | Acer campestre L. | . | . | . | II | . |
Milium effusum L. | . | V | . | . | . | Tilia platyphyllos Scop. | . | . | . | II | . |
Primula columnae (Ten.) Maire & Petitm. | . | V | . | . | . | Tilia cordata Mill. | . | . | . | II | . |
Sanicula europaea L. | . | V | . | . | II | Salix caprea L. | . | . | . | I | . |
Helleborus occidentalis (Reut.) Schiffn. | . | V | . | . | . | Crataegus laevigata (DC.) Baranec | . | . | . | I | . |
Rosa canina L. | . | V | . | . | . | Quercus pyrenaica Willd. | . | . | . | I | . |
Viola reichenbachiana Jord. ex Boreau | . | V | . | . | . | Hedera hibernica Bean | . | . | . | . | V |
Polystichum aculeatum (L.) Roth | . | V | . | . | . | ||||||
Ranunculus nemorosus DC. | . | IV | . | . | . | Blechnum spicant L. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Daphne laureola L. | . | IV | . | . | . | Viola riviniana Rchb. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Lilium martagon L. | . | IV | . | . | II | Primula acaulis (L.) L. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Amelanchier ovalis Medik. | . | III | . | . | . | Holcus mollis L. | . | . | . | . | II |
Pimpinella major (L.) Huds. | . | III | . | . | . | Aquilegia vulgaris L. | . | . | . | . | II |
Viburnum lantana L. | . | III | . | . | . | Luzula forsteri (Sm.) DC. | . | . | . | . | II |
Dendrogram of Corylus avellana communities. Rels 1–14: Omphaloto nitidae-Coryletum avellanae Amigo, G. Azcárate & Romero 1994; rels 15–17: Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae ass. nova; rel. 18–25: Chamaeiris foetidissimo-Coryletum avellanae Nicolau & Sánchez-Mata 2015; rels 26–32: Laserpitio eliasii-Coryletum avellanae Puente, M.J. López, Penas & F. Salegui 2002; rels 33–36: Linario triorniphophylae-Coryletum avellanae R. Alonso, Puente, Penas & F. Salegui 2002.
Nº of relevé | 1 | 2 | 3* | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 720 | 820 | 630 | |
Area (m²) | 80 | 70 | 70 | |
Exposition | N | NE | N | |
Slope (%) | 30 | 40 | 15 | |
Average height (m) | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
Cover (%) | 85 | 80 | 95 | |
Nº of taxa | 17 | 18 | 31 | |
Characteristics | ||||
Corylus avellana L. | 3 | 4 | 4 | V |
Ilex aquifolium L. | 2 | 1 | 1 | V |
Viola riviniana Rchb. | + | . | + | IV |
Primula acaulis (L.) L. | . | + | + | IV |
Lilium martagon L. | . | . | + | II |
Aquilegia vulgaris L. | . | . | + | II |
Sanicula europaea L. | . | . | + | II |
Diferentials | ||||
Hedera hibernica Bean | 3 | 1 | 2 | V |
Quercus broteroana O. Schwartz | 1 | . | 1 | IV |
Blechnum spicant L. | . | + | 1 | IV |
Holcus mollis L. | . | + | . | II |
Luzula forsteri (Sm.) DC. | . | . | + | II |
Companions | ||||
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | 1 | + | 1 | V |
Polystichum setiferum (Forssk.) Woynar | + | + | 1 | V |
Viburnum tinus L. | + | + | + | V |
Castanea sativa Mill. | 1 | . | 1 | IV |
Sambucus nigra L. | 1 | . | + | IV |
Lonicera hispanica (Boiss.& Reut.) Nyman | + | . | 1 | IV |
Prunus lusitanica L. | . | 1 | + | IV |
Arbutus unedo L. | . | 1 | + | IV |
Ulmus glabra Huds. | . | + | 1 | IV |
Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl | + | + | . | IV |
Hypericum androsemum L. | + | . | + | IV |
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuntz | + | . | + | IV |
Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | + | + | IV |
Asplenium onopetris L. | . | + | + | IV |
Brachypodium sylvaticum (Huds.) P. Beauv. | . | + | + | IV |
Quercus pyrenaica Willd. | . | 1 | . | II |
Both ecologically and floristically, this new association is very close to the azereiro communities of Frangulo alni-Prunetum lusitanicae, similarly to what happens in the north of the Iberian Peninsula (
Synchorology : The new association develops in the Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector, with its main population centres in the Municipality of Seia (Portugal). These hazel trees correspond to the southern limit of associations dominated by Corylus avellana for mainland Portugal.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : In dynamic terms, this syntaxon represents the first stage of replacement or forest edge of the oak-alvarinho communities of Genisto falcatae-Querco broteroanae sigmetum and of riparian galleries of white borrazeira riparian galleries of Salico salviifoliae minorisigmetum. The tree cover's destruction promotes the appearance of a thicket of the association Lonicero hispanicae-Rubetum ulmifoliae. Catenally, it comes into contact with the temporary-hygrophilous Portuguese-laurel of the association Frangulo alni-Prunetum lusitanicae and with the alders of Galio broteriani-Alno glutinosae sigmetum.
Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova hoc loco
Synecology and Synstructure
: Oak groves of Quercus broteroana from central Portugal were initially described as a subassociation of Rusco aculeati-Quercetum roboris, belonging to viburnetosum tini (
Of all the associations of Quercus robur, the one that most closely resembles it is the Viburno tini-Quercetum broteroanae by the absence of thermal elements, such as Smilax aspera and Asparagus aphyllus L., and the presence of Prunus lusitanica in climatophilous position, Genista falcata and Quercus pyrenaica (Table
Dendrogram of Quercus robur s.l. communities. Rels 1–4: Vaccinio myrtilli-Quercetum roboris P. Silva, Rozeira & Fontes 1950 corr. Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955; rels 5–9: Rusco aculeati-Quercetum roboris Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955 em. Amigo, Izco, J. Guitián & Romero 1998; rels 10–20: Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova; rels 21–31: Hyperico androsaemi-Quercetum roboris Honrado, Rocha, P. Alves & B. Caldas in Honrado, P. Alves, Nepomuceno & B. Caldas 2022; rels 32–39: Viburno tini-Quercetum broteroanae (Br.- Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955) J.C. Costa, Capelo, Honrado, Aguiar & Lousã 2002.
Relevé of subassociations of Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae subass. typicum (rels 1–8); Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae subass. asphodeletosum bento-rainhae (rels 9–11).
N.º relevé | 1 | 2 | 3* | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11+ | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 500 | 700 | 480 | 760 | 760 | 690 | 580 | 475 | 620 | 690 | 570 | |
Slope (%) | 25 | 30 | 15 | 50 | 25 | 12 | 30 | 40 | 15 | 20 | 10 | |
Exposure | N | W | N | S | W | NW | N | W | N | NE | NW | |
Coverage (%) | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 85 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | |
N.º of taxa | 18 | 21 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 28 | 33 | 34 | 17 | 21 | 29 | |
Characteristics | ||||||||||||
Quercus broteroana O. Schwartz | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | V |
Teucrium scorodonia L. | . | 2 | + | 2 | . | + | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | V |
Hedera hibernica Bean | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | + | . | 2 | 2 | + | . | 3 | V |
Genista falcata Brot. | . | . | + | . | 1 | . | + | 2 | + | + | + | V |
Quercus pyrenaica Willd. | . | . | + | 1 | . | 1 | . | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | IV |
Viola riviniana Rchb. | . | . | 1 | . | . | + | + | + | + | + | . | IV |
Luzula forsteri (Sm.) DC. | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | . | III |
Ilex aquifolium L. | . | . | + | . | . | + | 2 | . | . | . | + | III |
Prunus lusitanica L. | . | . | 1 | . | . | + | 2 | . | . | . | . | II |
Omphalodes nitida (Willd.) Hoffmanns. & Link | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | II |
Blechnum spicant L. | . | . | + | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | II |
Holcus mollis L. | . | 2 | . | 3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Stellaria holostea L. | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Crepis lampsanoides (Gouan) Tausch | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | I |
Primula acaulis (L.) L. | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Eryngium juresianum (Laínz) Laínz | . | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I |
Arenaria montana L. | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Polygonatum odoratum (Miller) Druce | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | I |
Physospermum cornubiense (L.) DC. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
Euphorbia amygdaloides L. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Lilium martagon L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I |
Veronica micrantha Hoffmann. & Link | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | I |
Prunus avium L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Characteristics asphodeletosum | ||||||||||||
Asphodelus bento-rainhae P. Silva | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | II |
Companions | ||||||||||||
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuntz | 1 | 2 | + | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | 2 | + | 2 | 1 | V |
Castanea sativa Mill. | + | . | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | V |
Lonicera hispanica (Boiss.& Reut.) Nyman | 1 | 3 | + | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | . | . | 2 | V |
Ruscus aculeatus L. | + | 4 | . | . | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | 1 | V |
Arbutus unedo L. | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | + | + | . | 2 | 2 | 1 | IV |
Erica arborea L. | + | . | + | . | + | 1 | . | 1 | . | + | + | IV |
Cytisus striatus (Hill) Rothm. | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | + | . | + | . | IV |
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | 1 | . | . | + | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | III |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | 2 | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | III |
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | + | . | . | + | + | III |
Frangula alnus Mill. | + | + | + | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | III |
Tamus communis L. | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | . | III |
Rubia peregrina L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | 1 | 1 | III |
Viburnum tinus L. | . | . | 1 | . | + | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | III |
Digitalis purpurea L. | + | + | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | III |
Lithodora lusitanica (Samp.) Holub. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | III |
Asplenium onopteris L. | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | III |
Agrostis stolonifera L. | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | III |
Cytisus grandiflorus (Brot.) DC. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | II |
Asplenium onopeteris L. | . | . | 1 | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | II |
Holcus lanatus L. | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | II |
Agrostis curtisii Kerguélen | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | II |
Laurus nobilis L. | + | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | II |
Polystichum setiferum (Forssk.) Woynar | . | . | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | II |
Fragaria vesca L. | . | . | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | II |
Linaria triornitpphylla (L.) Willd. | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | + | II |
Pterospartum lasianthum (Spach) Willk | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | + | II |
Clinopodium arundanum (Boiss.) Nyman | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | I |
Rubus sp. | . | 2 | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Pinus pinaster Aiton | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | I |
Cytisus multiflorus (L’Hér.) Sweet | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Ceratocapnos claviculata (L.) Lidén | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I |
Polypodium interjectum Shivas | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Dactylis hispanica Roth | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Jasione montana L. | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | I |
Silene nutans L. | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | I |
Hypericum androsaemum L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | I |
Quercus suber L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | I |
Summary table of associations dominated by Quercus robur s.l. in mainland Portugal. A) Vaccinio myrtilli-Quercetum roboris; B) Rusco aculeati-Quercetum roboris; C) Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova; D) Hyperico androsaemi-Quercetum roboris; E) Viburno tini-Quercetum broteroanae.
A | B | C | D | E | A | B | C | D | E | ||
Quercus robur s.l. | V | V | V | V | V | Veronica montana L. | . | . | . | + | . |
Vaccinium myrtillus L. | V | . | . | . | . | Smilax aspera L. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Rubus lusitanicus R.P.Murray | V | . | . | . | . | Luzula baetica P. Monts. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Galium rotundifolium L. | V | . | . | . | . | Vinca difformis Pourr. | . | . | . | . | IV |
Laserpitium thalictrifolium Samp. | IV | . | . | . | . | Asparagus aphyllus L. | . | . | . | . | III |
Melittis melissophyllum L. | IV | . | . | . | . | Phillyrea latifolia L. | . | . | . | . | III |
Prunella grandiflora (L.) Scholler | IV | . | . | . | . | Other plants | |||||
Picris longifolia (Boiss. & Reuter) P.D. Sell | II | . | . | . | . | Teucrium scorodonia L. | V | V | V | . | V |
Aquilegia dichroa Freyn | . | I | . | . | . | Lonicera periclymenum L. | V | V | + | . | V |
Scilla verna Huds. | . | I | . | . | . | Polygonatum odoratum (Miller) Druce | V | II | I | . | . |
Veronica chamaedrys L. | . | I | . | . | . | Hypericum pulchrum L. | V | III | . | . | . |
Hieracium sabaudum L. | . | I | . | . | . | Lilium martagon L. | V | . | + | . | . |
Melampyrum pratense L. | . | I | . | . | . | Ilex aquifolium L. | IV | II | II | . | IV |
Lonicera hispanica (Boiss.& Reut.) Nyman | . | . | IV | . | . | Quercus pyrenaica Willd. | IV | II | IV | . | . |
Luzula forsteri (Sm.) DC. | . | . | IV | . | . | Physospermum cornubiense (L.) DC. | IV | II | + | . | . |
Primula acaulis L. | . | . | II | . | . | Pyrus cordata Desv. | IV | II | . | . | . |
Blechnum spicant L. | . | . | II | . | . | Anemone trifolia L. | IV | I | . | . | . |
Asphodelus bento-rainhae P. Silva | . | . | II | . | . | Eryngium juresianum (Laínz) Laínz | IV | . | II | . | . |
Prunus lusitanica L. | . | . | II | . | . | Viola riviniana Rchb. | III | V | III | . | IV |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | . | . | II | . | . | Satureja vulgaris (L.) Halácsy | III | III | . | . | . |
Veronica micrantha Hoffmann. & Link | . | . | I | . | . | Crepis lampsanoides (Gouan) Tausch | III | II | I | . | . |
Prunus avium L. | . | . | + | . | . | Arenaria montana L. | III | II | I | . | . |
Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch | . | . | + | . | . | Euphorbia amygdaloides L. | II | II | + | . | . |
Polystichum setiferum (Forssk.) Woynar | . | . | . | V | . | Omphalodes nitida Hoffmanns. & Link | II | I | II | . | . |
Acer pseudoplatanus L. | . | . | . | V | . | Euphorbia dulcis L. | II | I | . | . | . |
Hedera canariensis Willd. | . | . | . | V | . | Castanea sativa Willd. | . | III | V | . | . |
Fraxinus angustifolia L. | . | . | . | IV | . | Holcus mollis L. | . | II | I | . | IV |
Salix atrocinerea Brot. | . | . | . | III | . | Genista falcata Brot. | . | II | IV | . | . |
Osmunda regalis L. | . | . | . | III | . | Stellaria holostea L. | . | II | I | . | . |
Woodwardia radicans (L.) Sm. | . | . | . | III | . | Hedera hibernica Bean | . | . | V | . | V |
Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. | . | . | . | II | . | Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | . | III | IV | V |
Helleborus foetidus L. | . | . | . | II | . | Arbutus unedo L. | . | . | III | . | V |
Lysimachia nemorum L. | . | . | . | II | . | Tamus communis L. | . | . | II | . | IV |
Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.) Newman | . | . | . | I | . | Laurus nobilis L. | . | . | I | V | . |
Sanicula europaea L. | . | . | . | I | . | Asplenium onopteris L. | . | . | I | IV | . |
Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm. | . | . | . | + | . | Viburnum tinus L. | . | . | I | . | V |
Carex remota L. | . | . | . | + | . | Rubia peregrina L. | . | . | + | . | V |
Mercurialis perennis L. | . | . | . | + | . | Corylus avellana L. | . | . | + | IV | . |
Thalictrum speciosissimum L. | . | . | . | + | . | Hypericum androsaemum L. | . | . | + | III | . |
For Serra da Gardunha we point out the subassociation asphodeletosum bento-rainhae (Holotypus associationis hoc loco: Table
Synchorology : Both subassociations have their ecological optimum in the new Alvo-Gardunhense District (Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector Montemuro-Estrelense, Atlantic Orolusitania Subprovince, European Atlantic Province). The typus association occurs in Serra da Estrela, Açor and Lousã, while asphodeletosum bento-rainhae occurs from the northern slope of Serra da Gardunha to Sertã. The Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova distribution area corresponds to the southern limit of the Atlantic European Province.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts
: The forests of Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae represent the climatic stage (Figure
Community of Brachypodium phoenicoides
Synecology and Synstructure : Lively meadow dominated by Brachypodium phoenicoides that develops in mesotemperate humid to hyper-humid semi-hyperoceanic to euoceanic on siliceous substrates derived from schists, quartzites, granites and sandstones. Therefore, it clearly differs from Galio concatenati-Brachypodietum phoenicoidis Pinto-Gomes & P. Ferreira 2005 and Phlomido lychnitidis-Brachypodietum phoenicoidis Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955 because it grows on calcareous substrates, where plants such as Galium concatenatum Coss., Centaurea occasus Fern.Casas, Salvia sclareoides Brot., Teucrium chamaedrys L. and Phlomis lychnitis L. are absent.
This new community occurs mainly on recently abandoned paths, sparsely grazed areas or scrub clearings. Although it occurs on acidic substrates, it differs from Hyacinthoido transtaganae-Brachypodietum phoenicoidis, which occurs in sandy substrates in a tempori-hygrophilous position in the lower Tagus and Sado basins, consisting of plants such as Festuca ampla subsp. simplex (Pérez Lara) Devesa, Hyacinthoides vicentina subsp. transtagana Franco & Rocha Afonso, Avenula sulcata subsp. gaditana Romero Zarco, Serratula monardii Dufour and Lepidophorum rapandum (L.) DC. (
Therefore, this silicic community is accompanied by plants such as Dactylis glomerata subsp. lusitanica (Stebbins & Zohary) Rivas-Mart. & Izco, Ranunculus bupleuroides Brot., Narcissus triandrus subsp. pallidulus (Graells) Rivas Goday ex Fern. Casas, Arenaria montana L. and Hypericum linariifolium Vahl. However, deeper studies are needed to interpret the syntaxonomic position of this plant community.
Synchorology : This community occurs in the Lousã, Açor and Estrela mountains, corresponding in biogeographic terms to the Sierran Montemuro-Estrelense Sector.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : This lively lawn is part of the stage of replacement of the oak-alvarinho forests of Genisto falcatae-Querco broteroanae sigmetum. In catenal terms, it is in contact with the Cytisetea scopario-striati scrub and the Calluno-Ulicetea scrub.
Community of Ulmus glabra
Synecology and Synstructure
: Mesophilous and tempori-hygrophilous communities that develop on deep soils and cool slopes, with a preference for sheltered areas. Due to this specie´s reduction, derived from the elm graphiosis (Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi) pest in recent decades, there are few representative areas of this species, which is why there are no dense or well-preserved forests (
Synchorology : In the study area, one of the best places to observe this species is Mata da Margaraça, but it has also been observed along streams, namely in Vale de Loriga, Lapa dos Dinheiro (Seia), Cascata da Forja (Vide) and near Donas (North slope of Serra da Gardunha). Thus, we think that the presence of Ulmus glabra can help define the Alvo-Gardunhense District boundaries.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : The communities of Ulmus glabra are in contact catenally with the climatophilous oaks of Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae and with the edaphohygrophilous amylias of Scrophulario scorodoniae-Alnetum glutinosae. As the main replacement step, we identified a community of Sambucus nigra from Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova.
Community of Betula celtiberica
Synecology and Synstructure : Although not very representative, some forest fragments of Betula celtiberica were identified in the study area. From an ecological point of view, the Betula forests form secondary communities that descend at 450 meters. Although their presence is residual, they are of great interest due to the coexistence with characteristic plants of Quercetea ilicis, namely, Viburnum tinus, Ruscus aculeatus, Erica arborea, Rubia peregrina and Phillyrea angustifolia L., which could represent a new syntaxon. This occurs in the semihyperoceanic to euoceanic hyperhumid mesotemperate level. Due to the low expression it was not possible to carry out phytosociological relevés. Frequent plants: Betula celtiberica, Quercus broteroana, Prunus lusitanica, Ilex aquifolium, Viburnum tinus, Frangula alnus, Dryopteris affinis, Viola riviniana, Pteridium aquilinum, Hedera hibernica, Rubus ulmifolius, Castanea sativa, Rubia peregrina, Ulex minor, Brachypodium sylvaticum, Teucrium scorodonia, Polystichum setiferum, Avenella flexuosa, Genista falcata, Crataegus monogyna, Daphne gnidium and Prunus avium.
They differ from the Geresian association of Carici reuterianae-Betuletum celtibericae by the presence of a set of lauroid elements, as well as taxa belonging to Quercetea ilicis. Carici reuterianae-Betuletum celtibericae has a hygrophilous character and occurs in upper mesotemperate and supratemperate thermotypes, affiliated with Osmundo regalis-Alnion glutinosae, where taxa as Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth, Salix atrocinerea, Oenanthe crocata L., Osmunda regalis L. occur with a high degree of coverage (
This birchwood is geographically close to the association Saxifrago spathularidis-Betuletum celtibericae, however, they are differentiated through the thermotype, normally occurring above 1,000 meters, in the above supra to orotemperate thermotypes of the Estrela and Oresano-Sanabriense territories, as well as by the absence taxa of lauroid, Quercetea ilicis and Saxifraga spathularis (L.) Link, Taxus baccata L., Sorbus aucuparia L., Festuca elegans Boiss. and Cytisus oromediterraneus Rivas-Mart., T.E. Díaz, Fern., Prieto, Loidi & Penas.
Synchorology : These relict communities occur in the low altitudes of the Estrela and Açor mountains, corresponding to the southern limit of the Betula celtiberica's natural distribution area in mainland Portugal. In biogeographic terms, they help to define the Alvo-Gardunhense District.
Syndynamics and catenal contacts : Betula communities occupy a secondary position in the potential forests of Genisto falcatae-Querco broteroanae sigmetum. In catenal terms, it contacts the amyal of Scrophulario scorodoniae-Alno glutinosae sigmetum.
The improvement knowledge of the syntaxa's range has made it possible to identify a new territorial domain with its own identity and to distinguish it from surrounding biogeographic territories. Within the Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector, depending on the orientation of the slopes, the vegetation change occurs, on average, between 900 and 1,000 m a.s.l. This altitude is close to the work by
Proposal for the limits of the new Biogeographic District: Alvo-Gardunhense (Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector, Atlantic Orolusitania Subprovince, Atlantic European Province). F.a.-P.l., Frangulo alni-Prunetum lusitanicae; G.f.-Q.b., Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae; P.l.-C.a., Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae; S.g.-S.n., Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova.
At elevations above 1,000 meters, the natural potential vegetation is represented by the series of black oak from Holco mollis-Querco pyrenaicae sigmetum, corresponding to the Estrelense District. This District is influenced by the submediterranean variant, supra to orotemperate hyper-humid to ultra-hyper-humid. In order to differentiate and consequente definition of the adjacent sectors' biogeographic boundaries, the potential climatophilous vegetation corresponding to each territory is presented in Table
Main series of potential vegetation that allow to distinguish the different biogeographical sectors.
Biogeographical units | Divisorio Portuguese Sector | Montemuro and Estrela Sierras Sector | Oretana Range and Tajo Sector |
Edafoxerophilous | Lonicero implexae-Querco rotundifoliae S. | Teucrio salviastri-Querco rotundifoliae S. Teucrio salviastri-Querco suberis S. | Pyro bourgaeanae-Querco rotundifoliae S. |
Asparago aphylli-Querco suberis S. | Holco mollis-Querco pyrenaicae S. | ||
Climatophilous | Arisaro simorrhini-Querco broteroi S. | Genisto falcatae-Querco broteroanae S. | Smilaco asperae-Querco suberis S. Arisaro simorrhini-Querco pyrenaicae S. |
Arisaro simorrhini-Querco pyrenaicae S. | |||
Viburno tini-Querco broteroanae S. | |||
Edafohygrophilous | Ficario ranunculoidis-Fraxino angustifoliae S. | Salico salviifoliae S. | Salico salviifoliae S. |
Scrophulario scorodoniae-Alno glutinosae S. | Scrophulario scorodoniae-Alno glutinosae S. |
Based on the ecological fidelity of plants and plant communities, it was possible to improve the Atlantic European Province´s southern limits definition in mainland Portugal, which now corresponds to the Alvo-Gardunhense District. The potential climatophilous forests that best define this District are Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae subass. typicum and subass. asphodeletosum bento-rainhae. These territories, mostly mesotemperate, are thus separated from the Estrelense District characterized by the supra and orotemperate thermotypes, where Quercus broteroana communities are absent. However, it is necessary to conduct more studies in order to understand the real distribution of the Viburno tini-Quercetum broteroanae, since the thermotempered territories are outside the European Atlantic Province and belong to the Portuguese Divisive Sector.
In order to help characterize this new Biogeographic District, the main stages of replacement of the series of potential climatophilous vegetation were identified, some of which were new to the scientific community. Although other syntaxa may help this biogeographic territory´s definition, the humanization of the landscape and climate change may contribute to its limits's redution, due to the tendency of future lower precipitation. Therefore, Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova must be considered a relict vegetation series that needs urgent special conservation measures.
CYTISETEA SCOPARIO-STRIATI Rivas-Martínez 1974
Cytisetalia scopario-striati Rivas-Martínez 1974
Ulici europaei-Cytision striati Rivas-Martínez, Báscones, Díaz, Fernandez-González & Loidi 1991
Cytisetum grandifloro-striati ass. nova
RHAMNO CATHARTICAE-PRUNETEA SPINOSAE Rivas Goday & Borja ex Tüxen 1962
Prunetalia spinosae Tüxen 1952
Pruno spinosae-Rubion ulmifolii O. Bolòs 1954
Rosenion carioti-pouzinii Arnáiz ex Loidi 1989
Scrophulario grandiflorae-Sambucetum nigrae ass. nova
QUERCO-FAGETEA SYLVATICAE Br.-Bl. & Vlieger in Vlieger in Ned. Kruidk 1937
Betulo pendulae-Populetalia tremulae Rivas-Martínez & Costa 2002
Betulion fontqueri-celtibericae Rivas-Martínez & Costa 2002
Betulenion fontqueri-celtibericae Rivas-Martínez & Costa 2011
Pruno lusitanicae-Coryletum avellanae ass. nova
Quercetalia roboris Tüxen 1931
Quercion pyrenaicae Rivas-Goday ex Rivas-Martínez 1964
Quercenion robori-pyrenaicae (Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955) Rivas-Martínez 1975
Genisto falcatae-Quercetum broteroanae ass. nova
Arisaro simorrhini-Quercetum broteroi Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1955 corr. Rivas-Martínez 1975; Arisaro simorrhini-Quercetum pyrenaicae Pinto-Gomes, P. Ferreira, Aguiar, Lousã, J.C. Costa, Ladero & Rivas-Martínez in Pinto- Gomes, P. Ferreira & Meireles 2007 corr. Pinto-Gomes & J.C. Costa 2012; Asparago aphylli-Quercetum suberis J.C. Costa, Capelo, Lousã & Espírito Santo 1996; Calluno vulgaris-Ulicetea minoris Br.-Bl. & Tüxen ex Klika & Hadač 1944; Carici reuterianae-Betuletum celtibericae (Honrado, P. Alves, Aguiar, Ortiz & B. Caldas 2003) Honrado 2004; Chamaeiris foetidissimo-Coryletum avellanae Nicolau & Sánchez-Mata 2015; Clematido vitalbae-Sambucetum nigrae O.
The first results of this work were presented at the XIV INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR - BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION on “Biodiversity and Sustainability: two important keywords for the future” which took place in Serra San Bruno (Vibo Valentia, Italy) from 6 to 11 June 2022, organized by the Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria (Italy).
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table