A first checklist of the alien-dominated vegetation in Italy
expand article infoDaniele Viciani, Marisa Vidali§, Daniela Gigante|, Rossano Bolpagni, Mariacristina Villani#, Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta¤, Michele Adorni«, Michele Aleffi», Marina Allegrezza˄, Claudia Angiolini˅, Silvia Assini¦, Simonetta Bagellaˀ, Gianmaria Bonariˁ, Maurizio Bovio, Francesco Bracco, Giuseppe Brunduˀ, Gabriella Buffa, Marco Caccianiga, Lucilla Carnevali, Simona Ceschin, Giampiero Ciaschetti, Annalena Cogoni, Valter Di Cecco, Bruno Foggi, Anna Rita Frattaroli, Piero Genovesi, Rodolfo Gentili, Lorenzo Lazzaro, Michele Lonati‡‡, Fernando Lucchese, Andrea Mainetti‡‡, Mauro Mariotti§§, Pietro Minissale||, Bruno Paura¶¶, Mauro Pellizzari##, Enrico Vito Perrino¤¤««, Gianfranco Pirone»», Laura Poggio˄˄, Livio Poldini§, Silvia Poponessi˅˅, Irene Prisco¦¦, Filippo Prosserˀˀ, Marta Puglisiˁˁ, Leonardo Rosati₵₵, Alberto Selvaggiℓℓ, Lucio Sottovia₰₰, Giovanni Spampinato₱₱, Angela Stanisci₳₳, Adriano Stinca₴₴, Roberto Venanzoni˅˅, Lorenzo Lastrucci₣₣
‡ University of Florence, Department of Biology, Florence, Italy
§ University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| University of Perugia, Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Perugia, Italy
¶ Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
# Botanical Garden of Padua, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
¤ University of Rome 3, Department of Sciences, Rome, Italy
« Via degli Alpini 7, 43037 Lesignano de’ Bagni (Parma), Italy
» University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
˄ Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
˅ University of Siena, Siena, Italy
¦ University of Pavia, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pavia, Italy
ˀ University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
ˁ Masaryk University, Brno, Czechoslovakia
₵ Comitato Scientifico, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali “Efisio Noussan”, Saint Pierre (AO), Italy
ℓ Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
₰ Università Ca’ Foscari Dorsoduro 3246, 30123 Venezia, Venezia, Italy
₱ University of Milan, Department of Biosciences, Milano, Italy
₳ Affiliation, City, Italy
₴ Department of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
₣ Ufficio Botanico, Parco Nazionale della Majella, Via Badia 28, Sulmona (L’Aquila), Italy
₮ University of Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
₦ Via Napoli 50, Fara San Martino (Chieti), Italy
₭ Department of Biology, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
₲ University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
‽ Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, and Chair IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group, Italy, Rome, Italy
₩ Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
₸ University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
‡‡ Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
§§ Università di Genova. DISTAV. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita, Genova, Italy
|| Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
¶¶ Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, Campobasso, Italy
## Istituto Comprensivo “Bentivoglio”, Poggio Renatico (FE), Italy
¤¤ CIHEAM – Istituto Agronomico Mediterraneo di Bari, Bari, Italy
«« CIHEAM, Valenzano, Italy
»» Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
˄˄ Scientific Research and Biodiversity Service, Gran Paradiso National Park, Cogne (AO), Italy
˅˅ University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
¦¦ Universita degli studi Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
ˀˀ Fondazione Museo Civico di Rovereto, Largo Santa Caterina 41, 38068 Rovereto (Trento), Italy
ˁˁ University of Catania, Catania, Italy
₵₵ University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
ℓℓ IInstitute for Timber Plants and the Environment, Turin, Italy
₰₰ Ufficio Biodiversità e Rete Natura 2000, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento, Italy
₱₱ Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy
₳₳ Università degli studi del Molise, Termoli, Italy
₴₴ University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
₣₣ Sistema Museale di Ateneo, Firenze, Italy
Open Access


This study provides a first step toward the knowledge of the alien-dominated and co-dominated plant communities present in Italy. The first ever checklist of the alien phytocoenoses described or reported in literature for the Italian territory has been compiled, produced by data-mining in national and local thematic literature. The resulting vegetation-type draft-list has been checked in the light of the most recent syntaxonomic documentation and updated with regards to syntaxonomy and nomenclature, with special reference to the frame proposed in the Italian Vegetation Prodrome. The list includes 27 vascular and one bryophyte vegetation classes, hosting 194 low rank alien-dominated syntaxa. The different vegetation types detected for each syntaxonomic class and macro-vegetation group, defined by physiognomical and ecological attributes, are discussed.


biodiversity, conservation, habitat, Invasive Alien Species, phytosociology, plant communities, syntaxonomy, threats


Biological invasions are an ever-increasing global process arising from the intentional or accidental human-mediated introduction of species to areas outside their native range, overcoming natural dispersal mechanisms and biogeographic barriers (Richardson and Pyšek 2006; Blackburn et al. 2014; Seebens et al. 2018).

The consideration and debate on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) date back to long ago (Allan 1936; Egler 1942; Baker 1948; Elton 1958). In the last few decades, invasion science has emerged, becoming a relevant discipline of its own (Richardson et al. 2000; Richardson and Pyšek 2006; Richardson 2011), also as a consequence of the increasing rates of alien species’ introductions at the global scale (Seebens et al. 2017, 2018) with no exception in Europe (DAISIE 2009) and in the Mediterranean (Hulme et al. 2008).

Biological invasions are nowadays widely recognized as an important component of human-induced global environmental change (Vitousek et al. 1997; Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Vilà et al. 2011; Vilà and Hulme 2017), being the second most common threat associated to species that underwent extinction in recent times (Bellard et al. 2016). Despite the accumulation of rigorous evidence of its importance to science and society, invasion biology has been the target of criticisms from scientists and academics who do not agree on the role of alien taxa as one of the greatest extinction threat at global scale (Davis 2011; Richardson and Ricciardi 2013; Pearce 2015; Russell and Blackburn 2017; Ricciardi and Ryan 2018). However, it is renowned that the establishment and spread of IAS can drastically affect the native biodiversity by changing community composition, biotic interactions and other ecosystem processes (Vilà et al. 2011; Pyšek et al. 2012; Vilà and Hulme 2017), as well as by replacing it with common and widespread taxa (McKinney and Lockwood 1999; Hahs and McDonnell 2016), and can promote alternative successional trajectories that may dramatically affect the landscape (Williamson 1996; McKinney and Lockwood 1999; Weber 2003; Acosta et al. 2007; Del Vecchio et al. 2013; Gaertner et al. 2014; Stinca et al. 2015; Malavasi et al. 2018).

An alien organism needs to overcome geographical, environmental, and reproductive barriers to colonize a new region and spread over wide areas. In this process, some factors and traits can be more significant than others in explaining its success and therefore its invasiveness (Van Kleunen et al. 2015). Particularly, the concept of invasiveness of plant species has been integrated with that of propagule pressure and of "invasibility" of habitats and plant communities, i.e. the susceptibility of an environment to invasions by alien species, as different habitats and phytocoenoses may be more invasible than others and show different degrees of resistance/resilience (Rejmánek 1989; Lonsdale 1999; Rejmánek et al. 2005; Richardson and Pyšek 2006). All these concepts have been included in the unifying theory of invasion syndromes (Perkins and Nowak 2013).

Patterns of distribution and abundance of IAS depend on a number of drivers including introduction history and pathways, life traits, availability of potentially invasible ecosystems, residence time, disturbance (Wilson et al. 2007; Carranza et al. 2010; Richardson et al. 2011; Comin et al. 2011; Dainese and Poldini 2012; Jucker et al. 2013). It is acknowledged that anthropogenic drivers play a crucial role in the establishment and spread of alien species (Pyšek and Richardson 2006; Pyšek et al. 2010a, 2010b; Bolpagni and Piotti 2015; Lazzaro et al. 2017; Stinca et al. 2017), however alien species showed to be largely constrained also by the same broad environmental factors acting on the native vegetation (Rouget et al. 2015). The same applies to IAS populations as well, as it has been demonstrated that what is good for natives is good for aliens too (Pyšek and Richardson 2006; Dalle Fratte et al. 2019).

Vascular plants are the most investigated taxonomic group in the field of invasive biology, and Europe devoted great efforts to their study, being the second continent (after North America) for investigative endeavour on plant invasions (Pyšek et al. 2009; Early et al. 2016). However, in spite of a huge scientific production about alien species numbers, ecology, impacts and distribution (for a synthesis at the European level, see DAISIE 2009 and Galasso et al. 2018 for Italy), their patterns and co-occurrence dynamics have only recently started to be in the spotlight, together with the factors driving alien plant assemblages (Hui et al. 2013; Pyšek and Chytrý 2014; Rouget et al. 2015).

A number of studies addressed the key role of cover and dominance of alien species to understand the invasion patterns (Lundholm and Larson 2004; Smith et al. 2004; Crall et al. 2006; Chytrý et al. 2008, 2009; Pyšek et al. 2010a, 2010b). This seems to some extent more important than alien species number, suggesting the hypothesis that the more an alien taxon becomes dominant in a vegetation type, the stronger the impact on native species diversity might be. This approach gave a pulse to research on alien plant species assemblages, and recently investigations on IAS have been addressed also at the community scale and benefitted from the currently available large databases of vegetation plots (see, e.g., Dengler et al. 2011; Landucci et al. 2012; Del Vecchio et al. 2015; Chytrý et al. 2016; Sperandii et al. 2018; Bonari et al. 2019).

A study by Chytrý et al. (2008) demonstrated that the habitat type is a reliable predictor of the level of plant invasion. This paper took into account patterns of plant invasions across habitats at the European scale, suggesting precious insights for biodiversity conservation and habitat monitoring, especially when considering the acknowledged correspondence between syntaxonomic types and habitats sensu Dir. 92/43/EEC (European Commission 1992, 2013; Evans 2010; Biondi et al. 2012; Viciani et al. 2016). Indeed, alien species have been listed among the causes of habitat decline and loss also in the most recent red-list assessments, both at European (Janssen et al. 2016) and Italian scale (Gigante et al. 2018).

Some authors started to qualify and quantify the role of alien species in different vegetation and habitat types, and to point out the functional role that alien species play in plant communities (Celesti-Grapow et al. 2010; Pyšek and Chytrý 2014; Prisco et al. 2016). Moreover, habitat misclassification can be favoured by the presence of alien species (Sarmati et al. 2019). However, to date only few studies focussed on alien-dominated plant communities and the role of aliens in natural assemblages. With notable exceptions (e.g. Jurko 1964; Hadač and Sofron 1980; Ubaldi 2003; Vítková and Kolbek 2010; Sîrbu and Oprea 2011; Allegrezza et al. 2019), the large majority of vegetation studies, especially outside Europe, are still mostly focused on natural and semi-natural phytocoenoses with few or no aliens (Chytrý et al. 2009; Pyšek and Chytrý 2014).

Despite a long-dated Italian tradition of phytosociological studies, a national synthesis of the alien-dominated (and co-dominated) plant communities thriving in Italy has never been produced yet. Therefore, the present research aims at taking the first step toward the filling of this knowledge gap.

The European and national projects dedicated to IAS, which involved and currently still involve research academic centres and institutions, are numerous in Italy. Some of them have helped to gather a significant amount of information on invasive plant and animal species. Among the most recent, addressing non-native plant species, their impact and their management, as well as the awareness of the general public on these topics, we can mention: LIFE ASAP (, LIFE GESTIRE IP2020 (, LIFE REDUNE (, MARITTIMO ALIEM (

The present work is the result of a research agreement between SISV (the Italian Society for Vegetation Science) and ISPRA (the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research), with financial support from the Italian Ministry of Environment, aimed at supporting the implementation of Regulation EU 2014/1143 (updated by EU Reg. 2017/1263) on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. In particular, the general agreement focused on: i) the update of the Database of Italian Alien Species (DIAS) with reference to their impacts on the ecosystems and the most threatened habitats and ii) the identification of the alien-dominated or co-dominated plant communities occurring in Italy. The outcomes of the latter are here presented. The research on alien plant communities and habitats was carried out through the collaboration of a wide working group of experts led by a Coordinating Committee composed by SISV members.


A dedicated SISV working team, formed by national and local experts, collected all the thematic literature related to terrestrial and freshwater alien-dominated and co-dominated vegetation. On the basis of this bibliographic dataset, a selection of all vegetation data was carried out, with special attention to nomenclature and syntaxonomic classification. All the existing national and regional vegetation databases (e.g. LiSy –; Poldini et al. 1985; Poldini 1991, 2002, 2009; Gallizia Vuerich et al. 1999; Brullo et al. 2001; Gigante et al. 2012; Landucci et al. 2012; Evangelista et al. 2016), together with the regional bibliographic sources (e.g. Poldini 1989; Poldini and Vidali 1989; Poldini et al. 1991, 1999), were consulted. Data concerning each phytocoenosis were selected if one or more alien species played a substantial role in the analysed vegetation unit. In particular, the SISV Coordinating Committee collected and checked the information and selected the data whenever:

the analysed low rank syntaxon (association, subassociation, phytocoenon) was dominated or co-dominated by one or more alien plant species; a cover value ≥ 3 according to the "Braun-Blanquet" scale (Braun-Blanquet 1979) for alien species cover in each relevé has been set as threshold; if, instead of the "Braun-Blanquet" scale, the "Pignatti" scale was used in the bibliographical reference (Pignatti and Mengarda 1962), the cover value threshold was set to ≥ 2, i.e. 20-40%;

the alien species name was included in the name of the syntaxon, by that implying that it is a characteristic/differential/diagnostic or somehow important taxon for the definition of the syntaxon, or even dominating and determining its vertical structure (as stated in Art. 10b of the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature: Theurillat et al. 2020).

Starting from this selected dataset, a draft syntaxonomic list was produced. The names of the plant communities and their syntaxonomic attributions at higher ranks have been acknowledged (and are here reported) in the same form as published by the original Authors. In case of inconsistencies or discrepancies, a specific comment has been provided.

The syntaxonomic scheme has then been updated in accordance with the Italian Vegetation Prodrome (Biondi et al. 2014;, which however does not take into considerations syntaxa below the alliance level. Relevant differences and discrepancies with other syntaxonomic frames, especially regarding the EuroVegChecklist (Mucina et al. 2016), have been commented.

Plant nomenclature in the text follows the Checklists of the vascular flora of Italy (Bartolucci et al. 2018; Galasso et al. 2018) and later updates reported in the “Portal to the flora of Italy” (, to which we referred also to identify the species to be considered as aliens to Italy, including archaeophytes (e.g. Arundo donax, Acanthus mollis subsp. mollis) as well. New hybridogenic species due to xeno-speciation events (e.g. some species of Oenothera or Vitis) were taken into account, when considered as alien taxa by Galasso et al. (2018). In case of species considered alien to an administrative region and native to another one, only the communities reported for the region where the species is alien have been recorded (e.g.: a community dominated by Acanthus mollis subsp. mollis was considered alien to Liguria but not to Sicily, where this species is considered as native, see Minissale et al. 2019).

This process allowed to produce a first checklist of the Italian alien-dominated plant communities. On this ground, some statistics were calculated considering the number of alien vegetation units with reference to i) each resulting syntaxonomic class and ii) homogeneous groups of the resulting syntaxonomic classes, clustered according to their physiognomic and ecological characteristics.

Results and discussion

A comprehensive and annotated checklist of the alien-dominated and co-dominated plant communities occurring in Italy is provided in Appendix I. All phytocoenoses have been framed in an updated syntaxonomic scheme. A specific bibliographical list with references for all the syntaxa quoted in the checklist is available in Appendix II.

The checklist includes a total of 27 classes of vascular plant vegetation and one of bryophyte vegetation, including plant communities dominated or co-dominated by aliens to Italy. The total number of low rank syntaxa (associations/subassociations/communities) amounts to 194.

The number of communities for each class is reported in Fig. 1. As expected, the class with the highest number of alien-dominated plant communities resulted by far Stellarietea mediae, followed by Artemisietea vulgaris. The presence of some higher-rank syntaxa named after and mainly formed by IAS (e.g. the class Robinietea, the order Nicotiano glaucae-Ricinetalia communis) is worth to be noted, which highlights the coenological and physiognomic-structural autonomy of these communities.

The 27 identified classes and some subordinate syntaxa have been grouped in clusters based on their physiognomy and ecology. The considered groups are as follows:

Forest vegetation (Querco-Fagetea, Quercetea ilicis);

Anthropogenic woody vegetation (Robinietea and part of Rhamno-Prunetea);

Alluvial, marshy and riparian woody vegetation (Alnetea, Salici-Populetea, Salicetea, Alnion incanae);

Perennial herbaceous hygrophilous and hygro-nitrophilous vegetation (Galio-Urticetea, Filipendulo-Convolvuletea, Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, Phragmito-Magnocaricetea);

Perennial ruderal herbaceous vegetation (Artemisietea);

Annual ruderal herbaceous vegetation (Stellarietea, Polygono arenastri-Poetea annuae);

Annual herbaceous hygro-nitrophilous vegetation (Bidentetea);

Hydrophitic freshwater vegetation (Potametea, Lemnetea);

Psammophilous vegetation (Euphorbio-Ammophiletea, Cakiletea, Helichryso-Crucianelletea).

Results of the community rates per class groups are shown in Fig. 2. The group including the classes of annual ruderal herbaceous vegetation (Stellarietea mediae and Polygono arenastri-Poetea annuae) hosts about 25% of the total number of the detected alien-dominated communities. Stellarietea mediae is by definition characterized by high rates of alien plant species, especially archaeophytes ( However, data analysis showed that this explains only part of the story. Actually, the involved alien species and genera are mainly represented by neophytes (e.g. Robinia pseudoacacia, Artemisia, Amaranthus, Erigeron, Euphorbia, Solidago Indeed, it is known that neophytes mostly occur in strongly anthropogenic areas, whose habitats appear to be not only the most invaded, but also the most invasible (Pyšek et al. 2002, 2005; Deutschewitz et al. 2003; Kühn et al. 2003; Chytrý et al. 2008). On the contrary, relatively low- or non-anthropized ecosystems, such as nutrient-poor environments or montane habitats, are least or not invaded (Chytrý et al. 2008; Angiolini et al. 2019). For these reasons, heavily human-impacted environments (i.e. arable lands and fallow fields, urban and industrial areas, aquatic and riparian habitats) show the highest levels of neophyte invasion, as already suggested by previous studies, at least in continental areas (Kowarik 1995; Walter et al. 2005; Richardson and Pyšek 2006; Chytrý et al. 2009; Myśliwy 2014) and, as a consequence, the highest number of alien-dominated plant communities (Bolpagni and Piotti 2015).

Figure 1. 

Number of alien-dominated communities for each syntaxonomic class of the checklist reported in Appendix I.

Figure 2. 

Percentages of alien-dominated communities in physiognomically and ecologically homogeneous groups of classes and subordinate syntaxa, based on the checklist reported in Appendix I.

Also the coastal areas are highly impacted by IAS (Acosta et al. 2007; Carboni et al. 2010; Del Vecchio et al. 2013, 2015; Lazzaro et al. 2017). Indeed, the close connection between invasibility, propagule pressure and habitat disturbance is a widely accepted relationship (Di Castri 1990; Vitousek et al. 1997; Pino et al. 2006; Perkins and Nowak 2013). This is indirectly confirmed in this study, by the fact that many of the less represented groups of alien-dominated communities refer to scarcely invasible environments, such as screes (Thlaspietea rodundifolii) or Mediterranean grass-dominated vegetation (Lygeo-Stipetea). Unexpectedly, our data seem to suggest that psammophilous coastal vegetation experiences low rates of alien community occurrence (Figs 1, 2). However, to correctly interpret this outcome, it should be considered that the collected data might outline a biased picture due to a lack of syntaxonomic investigation and classification for some communities. In support of this hypothesis, it should be noted that many alien coastal communities dominated by Yucca, Agave, Opuntia or Acacia have been noted although not syntaxonomically described yet (Carboni et al. 2010; Santoro et al. 2012; Del Vecchio et al. 2013; Lazzaro et al. 2014, 2015, 2017; Stinca et al. 2017). Moreover, low numbers of alien-dominated communities described for a particular environment do not imply low rates of invasion, as even few IAS can spread dramatically to the detriment of native plant communities. For instance, the neo-phytocoenoses formed by just two species of Carpobrotus are nowadays massively distributed along the coasts of the whole Europe (Souza-Alonso et al. 2019), possibly leading to a peculiar coenological diversity which, however, has never been formalized in syntaxonomic terms yet.

Disturbance regimes are often related to fluctuation in resource availability, indicated as a key driver for invasions, in relation to the intermittent resource enrichment or release (Alpert et al. 2000; Davis et al. 2000; Richardson and Pyšek 2006). For this reason, besides strongly anthropized habitats, also aquatic and riparian ecosystems are particularly susceptible and extremely vulnerable to biological invasions and generally show high rates of alien species, due to their intrinsically medium-high levels of disturbance (Di Castri 1990; Rauchich and Reader 1999; Pyšek and Prach 1993; Alpert et al. 2000; Bolpagni 2013; Bolpagni and Piotti 2015). As it is known, alien hydrophytes often become dominant in these environments, and give rise to species-poor alien communities. This is confirmed by our results (Figs 1, 2) where, despite the relative scarcity of ecological niches in aquatic environments, the percentage of alien hygrophytes communities is relevant (Lazzaro et al. 2019). This can have severe consequences considering that alien aquatic plants, as primary producers and often structural component of the ecosystems, can drastically transform the structure of freshwater habitats and their water quality (Valley and Bremigan 2002; Rommens et al. 2003; Perna and Burrows 2005; Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2011; Brundu et al. 2012; Brundu 2015; Ceschin et al. 2016, 2019).

Other habitats also linked to water (and to the related high levels of disturbance) show a high number of alien-dominated communities. It is the case of riparian non-woody habitats, or of annual and perennial herbaceous hygrophilous and hygro-nitrophilous vegetation types (Fig. 2), which reach high percentages (the latter more than 18%).

Also the alien communities attributed by many authors to Querco-Fagetea have a prevalent mesohygrophilous character (Appendix I). The most relevant woody invasive alien species, also found in the anthropogenic neophytic woody vegetation (e.g. Robinia pseudoacacia, Ailanthus altissima, Amorpha fruticosa, and many others) can be defined as “ecosystem engineers”, i.e. species that shape habitats and/or cause changes to their state and resources availability (Vitousek 1986; Schmitz et al. 1997; Jones et al. 1997; Crooks 2002; Başnou 2009; Başnou and Vilá 2009; Djurdjevic et al. 2011; Benesperi et al. 2012; Cierjacks et al. 2013; Vítková et al. 2017; Lazzaro et al. 2018). The replacement of native species by alien plants, even when apparently ecologically equivalent, almost always negatively affects the ecosystems, especially if those species act as “ecosystem engineers” (Brown et al. 2006; Wilson and Ricciardi 2009; Lazzaro et al. 2018; Sitzia et al. 2018; Uboni et al. 2019).

In the checklist we also recorded a bryophyte community dominated by the alien Campylopus introflexus, which in Europe is considered a neophytic moss, introduced from the Southern hemisphere and rapidly expanding (Hill et al. 2006). It was detected along Mediterranean ponds and neighbouring wood glades (Cogoni et al. 2002; Puglisi et al. 2016; Poponessi et al. 2016, 2018) and its distribution deserves to be monitored.

Few considerations can be made on the number of alien species involved in the communities reported in the checklist. According to Galasso et al. (2018), there are 791 non-native naturalized species in the Italian territory, 221 of which are considered invasive in at least one region. Our checklist shows that, based on the current knowledge, less than one hundred of these species (precisely 88) perform a dominant or co-dominant role in the considered plant communities. Only five of these (Ailanthus altissima, Elodea nuttallii, Lagarosiphon major, Myriophyllum aquaticum, Cenchrus setaceus) are considered IAS of Union Concern (see, however this number grows considerably when downscaling at the national level, with 76 of them (i.e. more than 86% of the total) to be considered as IAS in Italy (Galasso et al. 2018). Again, this can be traced back to the fact that most of these IAS are neophytes, many have been introduced in relatively recent times, and probably there was not enough time to give rise to such a degree of invasion to be relevant at European scale yet. Additionally, also at the national scale these invasions are often very localized or at very early stages, and their study from the phytosociological point of view is still a minor topic (although emergent).

At the same time, the continuous rate of introduction-naturalisation-invasion of new alien plants is an ongoing process that should be detected just in early stages, in order to prevent serious damage to native biodiversity. The numbers here reported raise the alarm for planning conservation biodiversity studies, monitoring protocols and management activities.


The here presented first checklist of the alien-dominated plant communities in Italy should not be considered exhaustive. It is the first step toward a better understanding of distribution, ecology and invasion processes of alien species at community level in this country. Our review represents a screenshot of the current knowledge and suggests that a serious lack of investigation for certain vegetation types (and probably for certain areas of the country) has to be highlighted.

The present checklist of the alien vegetation in Italy can represent a very useful tool, not only for stimulating further studies and investigations but also for prevention, management and monitoring purposes. As emphasized by Olaczek (1982), the phytosociological school, taking into account the whole floristic composition of plant communities, was one of the first approaches able to detect the effects of alien species on the diversity of natural phytocoenoses and to include these new communities in the syntaxonomical vegetation classification. In fact, the “floristic and phylogenetic homogenization” (e.g. Pino et al. 2009) and the “degeneration of phytocoenoses” by means of a progressive modification of structure and floristic composition due to the alien species invasion, concepts expressed by Olaczek (1982) and Faliński (1998a, 1998b), can transform a native plant community into an athropogenic one, or even in a “novel ecosystem” (Lugo 2015), susceptible to be classified in a new syntaxonomic frame.

This becomes particularly important when considering the close link between plant communities syntaxonomically described and Natura 2000 habitat types, as listed in the Annex I to the Directive 92/43/EEC (European Commission 1992, 2013). It is mandatory for Member States to conserve Annex I habitats in Europe in a favourable conservation status (Evans 2012; Gigante et al. 2016). Undoubtedly, a better understanding of the processes by which a plant community and a habitat type are firstly invaded and then dominated by alien species, together with the comprehension of the successional (and syntaxonomic) implications of those processes, can effectively support the monitoring and management of biodiversity and protected areas.


  • Acosta A, Carranza ML, Ciaschetti G, Conti F, Di Martino L, D'Orazio G, et al. (2007) Specie vegetali esotiche negli ambienti costieri sabbiosi di alcune regioni dell'Italia Centrale. Webbia 62(1): 77–84.
  • Allan HH (1936) Indigene versus alien in the New Zealand plant world. Ecology 17: 187–193.
  • Allegrezza M, Montecchiari S, Ottaviani C, Pelliccia V, Tesei G (2019) Syntaxonomy of the Robinia pseudoacacia communities in the central peri-adriatic sector of the Italian peninsula. Plant Biosystems 153(4): 616–623.
  • Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics 3: 52–66.
  • Angiolini C, Viciani D, Bonari G, Zoccola A, Bottacci A, Ciampelli P, et al. (2019) Environmental drivers of plant assemblages: are there differences between palustrine and lacustrine wetlands? A case study from the northern Apennines (Italy). Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 420 (34): 11 pp.
  • Baker HG (1948) Stages in invasion and replacement demonstrated by species of Melandrium. Journal of Ecology 36: 96–119.
  • Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, Albano A, Alessandrini A, Ardenghi NMG, et al. (2018) An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosystems 152(2): 179–303.
  • Başnou C. (2009) Robinia pseudoacacia L., black locust (Fabaceae, Magnoliophyta). In: DAISIE (Ed.) Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 357.
  • Başnou C, Vilá M (2009) Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, tree of heaven (Simaroubaceae, Magnoliophyta). In: DAISIE (Ed.) Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 342.
  • Bellard C, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2016) Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions. Biology Letters 12: 20150623.
  • Benesperi R, Zanetti S, Giuliani C, Gennai M, Mariotti-Lippi M, Guidi T, et al. (2012) Forest plant diversity is threatened by Robinia pseudoacacia (Black-Locust) invasion. Biodiversity and Conservation 22(8): 1679–1690.
  • Biondi E, Blasi C, Allegrezza M, Anzellotti I, Azzella MM, Carli E, et al. (2014) Plant communities of Italy: The Vegetation Prodrome. Plant Biosystems 148(4): 728–814.
  • Biondi E, Burrascano S, Casavecchia S, Copiz R, Del Vico E, Galdenzi D, et al. (2012) Diagnosis and syntaxonomic interpretation of Annex I Habitats (Dir. 92/43/EEC) in Italy at the alliance level. Plant Sociology 49(1): 5–37.
  • Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kuhn I, et al. (2014) A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts. PLOS Biology 12 (5): e1001850
  • Bolpagni R (2013) Macrophyte richness and aquatic vegetation complexity of the Lake Idro (Northern Italy). Annali di Botanica Roma 3: 35–43.
  • Bolpagni R, Piotti A (2015) Hydro-hygrophilous vegetation diversity and distribution patterns in riverine wetlands in an agricultural landscape: a case study from the Oglio River (Po Plain, Northern Italy). Phytocoenologia 45(1-2): 69–84.
  • Bonari G, Knollová I, Vlčková P, Xystrakis F, Çoban S, Sağlam C, et al. (2019) CircumMed Pine Forest Database: An electronic archive for Mediterranean and Submediterranean pine forest vegetation data. Phytocoenologia 49(3): 311–318.
  • Braun-Blanquet J (1979) Fitosociologia. Bases para el estudio de las comunidades vegetales. Blume, Madrid, 820 pp.
  • Brown CJ, Blossey B, Maerz JC, Joule S (2006) Invasive plant and experimental venue affect tadpole performance. Biological Invasions 8: 327–338.
  • Brullo S, Scelsi F, Spampinato G (2001) La vegetazione dell’Aspromonte. Studio fitosociologico. Laruffa Editore, Reggio Calabria, 370 pp.
  • Brundu G (2015) Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Hydrobiologia 746(1): 61–79.
  • Brundu G, Stinca A, Angius L, Bonanomi G, Celesti-Grapow L, D’Auria G, et al. (2012) Pistia stratiotes L. and Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms.: emerging invasive alien hydrophytes in Campania and Sardinia (Italy). Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 42(3): 568–579.
  • Carboni M, Santoro R, Acosta ATR (2010) Are some communities of the coastal dune zonation more susceptible to alien plant invasion? Journal of Plant Ecology 3(2): 139–147.
  • Carranza ML, Carboni M. Feola S, Acosta ATR (2010) Landscape-scale patterns of alien plant species on coastal dunes: the case of iceplant in central Italy. Applied Vegetation Science 13: 135–145.
  • Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV, Assini S, Banfi E, Barni E, et al. (2010) Non-native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats. Plant Biosystems 144(1): 12–28.
  • Ceschin S, Abati S, Leacche I, Iamonico D, Iberite M, Zuccarello V (2016) Does the alien Lemna minuta show an invasive behaviour outside its original range? Evidence of antagonism with the native L. minor L. in Central Italy. International Review of Hydrobiology 101(5-6): 173–181.
  • Ceschin S, Abati S, Traversetti L, Spani F, Del Grosso F, Scalici M (2019) Effects of the alien duckweed Lemna minuta Kunth on aquatic animals: an indoor experiment. Plant Biosystems 153(6): 749–755.
  • Chytrý M, Hennekens SM, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Knollová I, Dengler J, Jansen F, et al. (2016) European Vegetation Archive (EVA): An integrated database of European vegetation plots. Applied Vegetation Science 19(1): 173–180.
  • Chytrý M, Jarosík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová O, Tichý L, Danihelka J (2008) Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89: 1541–1553.
  • Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Wild J, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M (2009) European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Diversity and Distributions 15: 98–107.
  • Cierjacks A, Kowarik I, Joshi J, Hempel S, Ristow M, von der Lippe M, Weber E (2013) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. Journal of Ecology 101(6): 1623–1640.
  • Cogoni A, Flore F, Aleffi M (2002) Survey of bryoflora on Monte Limbara (Northern Sardinia). Cryptogamie, Bryologie 23(1): 73–86.
  • Comin S, Ganis P, Poldini L, Vidali M (2011) A diachronic approach to assess alien plant invasion: The case study of Friuli Venezia Giulia (NE Italy). Plant Biosystems 145(1): 50–59.
  • Crall AW, Newman GJ, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Evangelista P, Guenther D (2006) Evaluating dominance as a component of non-native species invasions. Diversity and Distributions 12: 195–204.
  • Crooks J (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97: 153–166.
  • Dainese M, Poldini L (2012) Does residence time affect responses of alien species richness to environmental and spatial processes? NeoBiota 14: 47–66.
  • DAISIE (2009) Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 400 pp.
  • Dalle Fratte M, Bolpagni R, Brusa G, Caccianiga M, Pierce S, Zanzottera M, Cerabolini BEL (2019) Alien plant species invade by occupying similar functional spaces to native species. Flora 257: 151419.
  • Davis MA (2011) Researching invasive species 50 years after Elton: a cautionary tale. In: Richardson DM (Ed.) , Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 269–276.
  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528–534.
  • Del Vecchio S, Acosta A, Stanisci A (2013) The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats. Comptes Rendus de Biologies 336: 364–369.
  • Del Vecchio S, Pizzo L, Buffa G (2015) The response of plant community diversity to alien invasion: evidence from a sand dune time series. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 371–392.
  • Dengler J, Jansen F, Glöckler F, Peet RK, De Cáceres M, Chytrý M, et al. (2011) The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 582–597.
  • Deutschewitz K, Lausch A, Kühn I, Klotz S (2003) Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 299–311.
  • di Castri F (1990) On invading species and invaded ecosystems: the interplay of historical chance and biological necessity. In: di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (Eds.) , Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodretch, 3–16.
  • Djurdjević L, Mitrović M, Gajić G, Jarić S, Kostić O, Oberan L, Pavlović P (2011) An allelopathic investigation of the domination of the introduced invasive Conyza canadensis L. Flora 206: 921–927.
  • Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, et al. (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nature Communication 7: 12485
  • Egler FE (1942) Indigene versus alien in the development of arid Hawaiian vegetation. Ecology 23: 14–23.
  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London, 181 pp.
  • European Commission (1992) Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal L206. Retrieved July 22, 1992 (Consolidated version 1.1.2007).
  • European Commission (2013) Interpretation manual of European Union Habitats, vers. EUR28. Brussel: European Commission, DG Environment.
  • Evangelista A, Frate L, Stinca A, Carranza ML, Stanisci A (2016) VIOLA - the vegetation database of the central Apennines: structure, current status and usefulness for monitoring EU habitats (92/43/EEC). Plant Sociology 53(2): 47–58.
  • Evans D (2010) Interpreting the habitats of Annex I. Past, present and future. Acta Botanica Gallica 157(4): 677–686.
  • Evans D (2012) Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation 1: 11–26.
  • Faliński JB (1998a) Invasive alien plants and vegetation dynamics. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M (Eds.) , Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 3–21.
  • Faliński JB (1998b) Invasive alien plants, vegetation dynamics and neophytism. Phytocoenosis 10 (N.S.) Suppl. Cartogr. Geobot. 9: 163–187.
  • Gaertner M, Biggs R, Te Beest M, Hui C, Molofsky J, Richardson DM (2014) Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Diversity and Distributions 20: 733–744.
  • Galasso G, Conti F, Peruzzi L, Ardenghi NMG, Banfi E, Celesti-Grapow L, et al. (2018) An updated checklist of the vascular flora alien to Italy. Plant Biosystems 152(3): 556–592.
  • Gallizia Vuerich L, Ganis P, Oriolo G, Poldini L, Vidali M (1999) La banca dati fitosociologica del Friuli-Venezia Giulia: struttura e applicazioni. Archivio Geobotanico 4(1) (1998): 137–141.
  • Gigante D, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Armiraglio S, Assini S, Attorre F, et al. (2018) Habitat conservation in Italy: the state of the art in the light of the first European Red List of Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 29(2): 251–265.
  • Gigante D, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Cambria VM, Casavecchia S, et al. (2012) VegItaly: Technical features, crucial issues and some solutions. Plant Sociology 49(2): 71–79.
  • Gigante D, Attorre F, Venanzoni R, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Aleffi M, et al. (2016) A methodological protocol for Annex I Habitats monitoring: the contribution of Vegetation science. Plant Sociology 53(2): 77–87.
  • Hadač E, Sofron J (1980) Notes on syntaxonomy of cultural forest communities. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 15: 245–258.
  • Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2016) Moving beyond biotic homogenization: searching for new insights into vegetation dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 27(3): 439–440.
  • Hill MO, Bell N, Bruggeman-Nannenga MA, Brugués M, Cano MJ, Enroth J, et al. (2006) An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia. Journal of Bryology 28: 198–267.
  • Hui C, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Le Roux JJ, Kučera T, Jarošík V (2013) Increasing functional modularity with residence time in co-distribution of native and introduced vascular plants. Nature Communications 4: 2454.
  • Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, Minchin D, et al. (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 403–414.
  • Jzco J (2002) Authors of syntaxon names. In: Rivas-Martínez S, Díaz TE, Fernández-González F, Izco J, Loidi J, Lousã M, Penas Á, Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Addenda to the Syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. Itinera Geobotanica 15(1-2): 5–922.
  • Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, García Criado M, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, et al. (2016) European Red List of Habitats. Part 2. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 38 pp. ISBN 978-92-79-61588-7.
  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946–1957.
  • Jucker T, Carboni M, Acosta ATR (2013) Going beyond taxonomic diversity: deconstructing biodiversity patterns reveals the true cost of iceplant invasion. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1566–1577.
  • Jurko A (1964) Feldheckengesellschaften und Uferweidengebüsche des Westkarpatengebietes. Biologicke práce 10: 1–100.
  • Kowarik I (1995) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (Eds.) , Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publ., Amsterdam, 83–103.
  • Kühn I, Brandl R, May R, Klotz S (2003) Plant distribution patterns in Germany: will aliens match natives? Feddes Repertorium 114: 559–573.
  • Landucci F, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Biondi E, Cambria VM, et al. (2012) VegItaly: The Italian collaborative project for a national vegetation database. Plant Biosystems 146(4): 756–763.
  • Lazzaro L, Bolpagni R, Barni E, Brundu G, Blasi C, Siniscalco C, Celesti-Grapow L (2019) Towards alien plant prioritization in Italy: methodological issues and first results. Plant Biosystems 153: 740–746.
  • Lazzaro L, Giuliani C, Benesperi R, Calamassi R, Foggi B (2015) Plant species loss and community nestedness after leguminous tree Acacia pycnantha invasion in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Folia Geobotanica 50(3): 229–238.
  • Lazzaro L, Giuliani C, Fabiani A, Agnelli AE, Pastorelli R, Lagomarsino A, et al. (2014) Soil and plant changing after invasion: The case of Acacia dealbata in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment 497: 491–498.
  • Lazzaro L, Mazza G, D'Errico G, Fabiani A, Giuliani C, Inghilesi AF, et al. (2018) How ecosystems change following invasion by Robinia pseudoacacia: Insights from soil chemical properties and soil microbial, nematode, microarthropod and plant communities. Science of the Total Environment 622-623: 1509–1518.
  • Lazzaro L, Viciani D, Dell’Olmo L, Foggi B (2017) Predicting risk of invasion in a Mediterranean island using niche modelling and valuable biota. Plant Biosystems 157(2): 361–370.
  • Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536.
  • Lugo AE (2015) Forestry in the Anthropocene. Science 349(6250): 771.
  • Lundholm JT, Larson DW (2004) Dominance as an overlooked measure of invader success. Biological Invasions 6: 505–510.
  • Malavasi M, Acosta ATR, Carranza ML, Bartolozzi L, Basset A, Bassignana M, et al. (2018) Plant invasions in Italy: An integrative approach using the European LifeWatch infrastructure database. Ecological Indicators 91: 182–188.
  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 450–453.
  • Minissale P, Magro V, Raimondo FM (2019) Why did Acanthus mollis, native to West Mediterranean, become a so relevant artistic and symbolic element arising from ancient Greece? Flora Mediterranea 29: 119–128.
  • Mucina L, Bültmann H, Dierßen K, Theurillat J-P, Raus T, Čarni A, et al. (2016) Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science 19: 3–264.
  • Myśliwy M (2014) Plant invasions across different habitat types at floristic survey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 12(1): 193–207.
  • Olaczek R (1982) Synanthropization of phytocoenoses. Memorabilia Zoologica 37: 93–112.
  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37.
  • Pearce F (2015) The new wild: why invasive species will be nature’s salvation. Beacon press, Boston, 245 pp.
  • Perkins LB, Nowak RS (2013) Invasion syndromes: hypotheses on relationships among invasive species attributes and characteristics of invaded sites. Journal of Arid Land 5(3): 275–283.
  • Perna C, Burrows D (2005) Improved dissolved oxygen status following removal of exotic weed mats in important fish habitat lagoons of the tropical Burdekin River floodplain, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51: 138–148.
  • Pignatti S, Mengarda F (1962) Un nuovo procedimento per l’elaborazione delle tabelle fitosociologiche. Acc. Naz. Lincei, Rend. cl. Sc. fis. mat. nat. (s.8) 32: 215–222.
  • Pino J, Seguì JM, Alvarez N (2006) Invasibility of four plant communities in the Llobregat delta (Catalonia, NE of Spain) in relation to their historical stability. Hydrobiologia 570: 257–263.
  • Pino J, Font X, De Cáceres M, Molowny-Horas R (2009) Floristic homogenization by native ruderal and alien plants in north-east Spain: the effect of environmental differences on a regional scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18(5): 563–574.
  • Poldini L (1989) La vegetazione del Carso isontino e triestino. Ed. Lint, Trieste, 315 pp.
  • Poldini L (1991) Atlante corologico delle piante vascolari nel Friuli-Venezia Giulia. Inventario floristico regionale. Regione Autonoma Friuli-Venezia Giulia - Direzione Regionale Foreste e Parchi, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Dipartimento di Biologia, Udine, 900 pp.
  • Poldini L (2002) Nuovo atlante corologico delle piante vascolari nel Friuli Venezia Giulia. Regione Autonoma Friuli-Venezia Giulia - Azienda Parchi e Foreste regionale, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Dipartimento di Biologia, Udine, 529 pp.
  • Poldini L (2009) Guide alla Flora - IV. La diversità vegetale del Carso fra Trieste e Gorizia. Lo stato dell’ambiente. Le guide di Dryades 5 - Serie Florae IV (F - IV). Ed. Goliardiche, Trieste, 732 pp.
  • Poldini L, Vidali M (1989) Studio dell'antropizzazione del Carso triestino e goriziano mediante l'uso della Banca Dati Floristica. Informatore Botanico Italiano 21(1-3): 224–234.
  • Poldini L, Lagonegro M, Ganis P, Vidali M (1985) Flora computerizzata del Carso triestino e goriziano. In: Poldini L (Ed.) , Studio naturalistico del Carso triestino e goriziano. Regione Autonoma Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Università di Trieste, Trieste, 39–52.
  • Poldini L, Martini F, Ganis P, Vidali M (1991) Floristic databanks and the phytogeographic analysis of a territory. An example concerning northeastern Italy. In: Nimis PL, Crovello TJ (Eds.) , Quantitative Approaches to Phytogeography. Tasks for Vegetation Science 24. Kluwer Academic Publishes, The Hague - Boston – London, 159–181.
  • Poldini L, Rizzi Longo L, Pizzulin Sauli M (1999) Le cenosi sinantropiche di Trieste. I. Indagine sui biotopi antropizzati lungo la direttrice dello scirocco. Bollettino della Società Adriatica di Scienze in Trieste 78(1997-98): 227–276.
  • Poponessi S, Aleffi M, Gigante D, Venanzoni R (2016) Updates on the bryophyte flora of the lowland woods and temporary ponds west of Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy). Flora Mediterranea 26: 151–162.
  • Poponessi S, Aleffi M, Maneli F, Venanzoni R, Gigante D (2018) Bryophytic vegetation of fragile and threatened ecosystems: the case of the Mediterranean temporary ponds in inland Central Italy. Plant Sociology 55(1): 31–44.
  • Prisco I, Stanisci A, Acosta ATR (2016) Mediterranean dunes on the go: Evidence from a short term study on coastal herbaceous vegetation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 182: 40–46.
  • Puglisi M, Minissale P, Sciandrello S, Privitera M (2016) The bryophyte vegetation of the Mediterranean temporary ponds in Italy. Plant Sociology 52(2): 69–78.
  • Pyšek P, Chytrý M (2014) Habitat invasion research: where vegetation science and invasion ecology meet. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 1181–1187.
  • Pyšek P, Prach K (1993) Plant invasion and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20: 413–420.
  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2006) The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. Journal of Biogeography 33: 2040–2050.
  • Pyšek P, Chytrý M, Jarosík V (2010a) Habitats and land-use as determinants of plant invasions in the temperate zone of Europe. In: Perrings C, Mooney HA, Williamson M (Eds.) , Bioinvasions and globalization: ecology, economics, management and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 66–79.
  • Pyšek P, Jarošik V. Kucera T (2002) Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biological Conservation 104: 13–24.
  • Pyšek P, Jarošik V, Chytrý M, Kropác Z, Tichý L, Wild J (2005) Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86: 772–785.
  • Pyšek P, Jarošik V, Hulme PE, Kuehn I, Wild J, Arianoutsou M, et al. (2010b) Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 12157–12162.
  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner Vilà M (2012) A global assessment of alien invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biology 18: 1725–1737.
  • Pyšek P, Lambdon PW, Arianoutsou M, Kühn I, Pino J, Winter M (2009) Alien Vascular Plants of Europe. In: DAISIE, Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 43-61.
  • Rauchich J, Reader RJ (1999) An experimental study of wetland invisibility by purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 1499–1503.
  • Rejmánek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (Eds.) , Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 369–388.
  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2005) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: Van der Maarel E (Ed.) , Vegetation Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, 332–355.
  • Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2011) Impacts of Biological Invasions on Freshwater Ecosystems. In: Richardson DM (Ed.) , Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 211–224.
  • Ricciardi A, Ryan R (2018) The exponential growth of invasive species denialism. Biological Invasions 20(3): 549–553.
  • Richardson DM (Ed.) (2011) Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2006) Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 409–431.
  • Richardson DM, Ricciardi J (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1461–1467.
  • Richardson DM, Carruthers J, Hui C, Impson FA, Miller JT, Robertson MP, et al. (2011) Human-mediated introductions of Australian acacias - a global experiment in biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 17: 771–787.
  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6: 93–107.
  • Rommens W, Maes J, Dekeza N, Inghelbrecht P, Nhiwatiwa T, Holsters E, et al. (2003) The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). I. Water quality. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 158: 373–388.
  • Rouget M, Hui C, Renteria J, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU (2015) Plant invasions as a biogeographical assay: Vegetation biomes constrain the distribution of invasive alien species assemblages. South African Journal of Botany 101: 24–31.
  • Russell JC, Blackburn TM (2017) The rise of invasive species denialism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32(1): 3–6.
  • Santoro R, Jucker T, Carboni M, Acosta ATR (2012) Patterns of plant community assembly in invaded and non-invaded communities along a natural environmental gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science 23(3): 483–494.
  • Sarmati S, Bonari G, Angiolini C (2019) Conservation status of Mediterranean coastal dune habitats: anthropogenic disturbance may hamper habitat assignment. Rendiconti Lincei Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 30(3): 623–636.
  • Schmitz DC, Simberloff D, Hofstetter RH, Haller W, Sutton D (1997) The ecological impact of nonindigenous plants. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (Eds.) , Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington D.C., 39–61.
  • Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, et al. (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature Communications 8: 14435.
  • Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, et al. (2018) Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115(10): E2264-E2273.
  • Sîrbu C, Oprea A (2011) Contribution to the study of plant communities dominated by Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, in the Eastern Romania (Moldavia). Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova 44(3/147): 51–74.
  • Sitzia T., Campagnaro T, Kotze DJ, Nardi S, Ertani A (2018) The invasion of abandoned fields by a major alien tree filters understory plant traits in novel forest ecosystems. Scientific Reports 8(1): 1–10.
  • Smith MD, Wilcox JC, Kelly T, Knapp AK (2004) Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie. Oikos 106: 253–262.
  • Souza-Alonso P, Guisande-Collazo A, Lechuga-Lago Y, González L (2019) The necessity of surveillance: medium-term viability of Carpobrotus edulis propagules after plant fragmentation. Plant Biosystems 153(5): 736–739.
  • Sperandii MG, Prisco I, Acosta ATR (2018) Hard times for Italian coastal dunes: insights from a diachronic analysis based on random plots. Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 633–646.
  • Stinca A, Chianese G, D’Auria G, Del Guacchio E, Fascetti S, Perrino EV, et al. (2017) New alien vascular species for the flora of southern Italy. Webbia 72(2): 295–301.
  • Stinca A, Chirico GB, Incerti G, Bonanomi G (2015) Regime Shift by an Exotic Nitrogen-Fixing Shrub Mediates Plant Facilitation in Primary Succession. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123128.
  • Theurillat JP, Willner W, Fernández-González F, Bültmann H, Čarni A, Gigante D, et al. (2020) International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition. Applied Vegetation Science. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12491
  • Ubaldi D (2003) Flora, fitocenosi e ambiente. Elementi di Geobotanica e Fitosociologia. Clueb, Bologna, 334 pp.
  • Uboni C, Tordoni E, Brandmayr P, Battistella S, Bragato G, Castello M, et al. (2019) Exploring cross-taxon congruence between carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and vascular plants in sites invaded by Ailanthus altissima versus non-invaded sites: The explicative power of biotic and abiotic factors. Ecological Indicators 103: 145–155.
  • Valley RD, Bremigan MT (2002) Effect of macrophyte bed architecture on largemouth bass foraging: implications of exotic macrophyte invasions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 234–244.
  • Van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Maurel N (2015) Characteristics of successful alien plants. Molecular Ecology 24: 1954–1968.
  • Viciani D, Dell’Olmo L, Ferretti G, Lazzaro L, Lastrucci L, Foggi B (2016) Detailed Natura 2000 and Corine Biotopes habitat maps of the island of Elba (Tuscan Archipelago, Italy). Journal of Maps 12(3): 492–502.
  • Vilà M, Hulme PE (Eds.) (2017) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Vol. 12. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, et al. (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14(7): 702–708.
  • Vítková M, Kolbek J (2010) Vegetation classification and synecology of Bohemian Robinia pseudacacia stands in a Central European context. Phytocoenologia 40(2-3): 205–241.
  • Vítková M, Müllerová J, Sádlo J, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2017) Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: A story of an invasive tree in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 384: 287–302.
  • Vitousek PM (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA, Drake J (Eds.) , Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer Verlag, New York, 163–176.
  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 1–16.
  • Walter J, Essl F, Englisch T, Kiehn M (2005) Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects. Neobiota 6: 13–25.
  • Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CAB International Publ., Wallingford.
  • Weber HE, Moravec J, Theurillat JP (2000) International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 3rd edition. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 739–768.
  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Wilson SJ, Ricciardi A (2009) Epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities on Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and native milfoils Myriophyllum sibiricum and Myriophyllum alterniflorum in eastern North America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66: 18–30.
  • Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş Ş, Amis MA, Henderson L, Thuiller W (2007) Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions 13: 11–22.


Appendix I.Download as CSV 

Alien-dominated and co-dominated plant communities in Italy (Syntaxa authors are abbreviated according to Izco 2002)

Class Order Alliance Association/Phytocoenon Reference number in the specific bibliographical list of Supplement 1
2 LEMNETEA MINORIS O. Bolòs & Masclans 1955
2.1 LEMNETALIA MINORIS O. Bolòs & Masclans 1955
Lemna minuta community 115
2.1.1 Lemnion minoris O. Bolòs & Masclans 1955
Azollo filiculoidis-Lemnetum minuscolae Felzines & Loiseau 1991 82, 83, 90
Ceratophyllo-Azolletum filiculoidis Nedelcu 1967 56, 58
Lemna minuta community 110
Lemnetum minuto-gibbae Liberman Cruz, Pedrotti & Venanzoni 1988 56
Lemno-Azolletum filiculoidis Br.-Bl. 1952 40, 115
3 POTAMETEA PECTINATI Klika in Klika & V. Novák 1941
3.1.1 Potamion pectinati (Koch 1926) Libbert 1931
Callitricho-Elodeetum canadensis Passarge 1964 ex Passarge 1994 39
Elodea canadensis and Potamogeton crispus community 91
Elodea nuttallii community 28
Elodeo-Potametum crispi (Pignatti 1953) Passarge 1994 40
Elodeo-Ranunculetum Richard 1975 114
Lagarosiphon major community 28
Myriophyllum aquaticum community 64
Potametum crispi Soó 1927 Myriophyllum aquaticum variant 64
Potametum lucentis Hueck 1931 Lagarosiphon major variant 116
3.1.2 Nymphaeion albae Oberdorfer 1957
Hydrocotyletum ranunculoidis Corbetta & Lorenzoni 1976 42
3.1.3 Ranunculion aquatilis Passarge 1964
Callitriche stagnalis and Myriophyllum aquaticum community 64
Lemno-Callitrichetum cophocarpae (Mierwald 1988) Passarge 1992
Myriophyllum aquaticum variant
12 BIDENTETEA TRIPARTITAE Tüxen, Lohmeyer & Preising ex Von Rochow 1951
12.1 BIDENTETALIA TRIPARTITAE Br.-Bl. & Tüxen ex Klika in Klika & Hadac 1944
12.1.1 Bidention tripartitae Nordhagen 1940
Bidens frondosus community 57
Bidenti-Polygonetum mitis (Von Rochow 1951) Tüxen 1979
Bidens frondosa variant
Bidenti-Polygonetum mitis (Von Rochow 1951) Tüxen 1979
echinochloetosum crus-galli Baldoni & Biondi 1993
Polygonetum hydropiperis Passarge 1965 Bidens frondosus facies 61
Xanthio italici-Polygonetum persicariae O. Bolòs 1957 61, 60
Xanthio italici-Persicarietum maculosae O. Bolòs 1957 nom. mut. propos.
Abutilon theophrasti variant
Xanthium orientale subsp. italicum community 46
12.1.2 Chenopodion rubri (Tüxen 1960) Hilbig & Jage 1972
Cyperetum esculenti Wisskirchen 1995 62
Polygono-Xanthietum italici Pirola & Rossetti 1974 1, 7, 13, 20, 29, 38, 43, 44, 46, 53, 55, 63, 68, 70, 75, 76, 81, 92, 94, 95
Polygono-Xanthietum italici Pirola & Rossetti 1974
Ambrosia artemisiifolia variant
16.1.1 Phragmition communis Koch 1926
Scirpetum maritimi (Christiansen 1934) Tüxen 1937
Paspalum distichum variant
16.3.1 Magnocaricion elatae Koch 1926
Cyperus eragrostis community 16
Cyperus glomeratus community 43
16.5.1 Glycerio fluitantis-Sparganion neglecti Br.-Bl. & Sissingh in Boer 1942
Eleocharitetum palustris Schennikov 1919
paspaletosum paspaloidis Biondi et al. 2002
EUPHORBIO PARALIAE-AMMOPHILETEA AUSTRALIS Géhu & Rivas-Martínez in Rivas-Martínez, Asensi, Díaz-Garretas, Molero, Valle, Cano, Costa & T.E. Díaz 2011
20.1.1 Ammophilion australis Br.-Bl. 1933 em. Géhu & Géhu-Franck 1988
Carpobrotus acinaciformis community 88
Carpobrotus edulis community 88
Xanthietum-Ammophiletum Pignatti 1953 91
21 CAKILETEA MARITIMAE Tüxen & Preising ex Br.-Bl. & Tüxen 1952
21.1.1 Euphorbion peplis Tüxen 1950
Cakilo-Xanthietum italici Pignatti 1953 1, 9, 12, 38, 91, 93
Salsolo kali-Cakiletum maritimae Costa et Mansanet 1981 corr. Rivas-Martínez et al. 1992
xanthietosum (Pignatti 1953) Géhu & Scoppola 1984
17, 24, 48, 70, 91,106
Xanthio italici-Cenchretum incerti Biondi, Brugiapaglia, Allegrezza & Ballelli 1992 24, 100, 109
Xanthio italici-Cenchretum longispini Poldini et al. 1999 100, 106
HELICHRYSO-CRUCIANELLETEA MARITIMAE (Sissingh 1974) Géhu, Rivas-Martínez & & Tüxen 1973 em. Sissingh 1974
HELICHRYSO-CRUCIANELLETALIA MARITIMAE Géhu, Rivas-Martínez & Tüxen 1973 em. Sissingh 1974
22.1.1 Crucianellion maritimae Rivas Goday & Rivas-Martínez 1958
Crucianello-Helichrysetum microphylli Bartolo, Brullo, De Marco, Dinelli, Signorello & Spampinato 1992 Carpobrotus acinaciformis variant 125
Ephedro-Helichrysetum microphylli Valsecchi & Bagella 1991
Carpobrotus acinaciformis variant
31.1.1 Parietarion judaicae Segal 1969
Cheiranthetum cheirii Segal 1962 46
Erigeronetum karvinskiani Oberdorfer 1969 46, 54, 70
Oenothera biennis and Scrophularia canina community 114
34 ARTEMISIETEA VULGARIS Lohmeyer, Preising & Tüxen ex Von Rochow 1951
Sporobolus vaginiflorus community 104
Senecio mikanioides community 101
Helianthus tuberosus community 99, 104
Solidago gigantea community 70, 120
Senecio inaequidens community 99
34.1.1 Arction lappae Tüxen 1937
Artemisietum verlotorii Lang 1973 41, 99, 101
Arundo donax community 43
Saponario-Artemisietum verlotorum Biondi & Baldoni 1993 15, 63, 72
Sileno albae-Acanthetum mollis Biondi, Allegrezza & Filigheddu 1990 21
34.2 AGROPYRETALIA INTERMEDII-REPENTIS Oberdorfer, Müller & Görs in Müller & Görs 1969
34.2.1 Convolvulo arvensis-Agropyrion repentis Görs 1966
Artemisia verlotiorum community 13, 127
Sorghum halepense community 46
34.4.4 Bromo-Oryzopsion miliaceae O. Bolòs 1970
Boerhaavio-Oryzopsietum miliaceae Brullo 1984 33
34.5 ONOPORDETALIA ACANTHII Br.-Bl. & Tüxen ex Klika in Klika & Hadač 1944
Reynoutria japonica community 118
Artemisia verlotiorum community 104
Helianthus tuberosus community 29
Senecio inaequidens community 29
Solidago gigantea community 29
34.5.1 Onopordion acanthii Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936
Erigeron canadense and Broussonetia papyrifera community 91
34.5.2 Dauco carotae-Melilotion albi Görs 1966
Artemisia verlotiorum community 47, 118
Artemisio absinthii-Senecionetum inaequidentis Pirone 2001 45, 96
Echio-Melilotetum Tüxen 1947
Senecio inaequidens and Erigeron annuus variant
Echio-Melilotetum Tüxen 1947 Oenothera biennis (aggr.) variant 31
Erigeron annuus community 78
Helianthus tuberosus community 29
Oenothera biennis community 123
Senecio inaequidens community 29, 31, 129
Solidago gigantea community 29
34.6 CARTHAMETALIA LANATI Brullo in Brullo & Marcenò 1985
34.6.2 Onopordion illyrici Oberdorfer 1954
Carduo pycnocephali-Nicotianetum glaucae Biondi, Blasi, Brugiapaglia, Fogu & Mossa 1994 23
36 ORYZETEA SATIVAE Miyawaki 1960
36.1.1 Oryzo sativae-Echinochloion oryzoidis O. Bolòs & Masclans 1955
Heteranthera community 39
NICOTIANO GLAUCAE-RICINETALIA COMMUNIS Rivas-Martínez, Fernández-González & Loidi 1999
Nicotiano glaucae-Ricinion communis Rivas-Martínez, Fernández-González & Loidi 1999
Nicotiano glaucae-Ricinetum communis (Br.-Bl. & Maire 1924) de Foucault 1993 37, 87
Polycarpo-Nicotianetum glaucae Sunding 1972 37
POLYGONO ARENASTRI-POETEA ANNUAE Rivas-Martínez 1975 corr. Rivas-Martínez, Báscones, T.E. Diáz, Fernández-González & Loidi 1991
Eleusinetum indicae (Slavnic 1951) Pignatti 1953 30
Euphorbio-Oxalidetum corniculatae Lorenzoni 1964 30
38.2.1 Polycarpion tetraphylli Rivas-Martínez 1975
Eleusine indica community 91
Eleusinetum indicae (Slavnic 1951) Pignatti 1953 46, 70, 99, 104
Euphorbietum maculatae Poldini 1989 70, 99, 101, 104
Euphorbio-Oxalidetum corniculatae Lorenzoni 1964 38, 99, 101
39 STELLARIETEA MEDIAE Tüxen, Lohmeyer & Preising ex Von Rochow 1951
SOLANO NIGRI-POLYGONETALIA CONVOLVULI (Sissingh in Westhoff, Dijk, Passchier & Sissingh 1946) O. Bolòs 1962
Digitario ischaemi-Setarion viridis Sissingh in Westhoff, Dijk, Passchier & Sissingh 1946
Amarantho-Chenopodietum albi (Morariu 1943) Soó 1957 101
Amarantho-Digitarietum sanguinalis Pignatti 1953 67, 71, 91, 101
Chenopodium album and Amaranthus retroflexus community 99
Cynodonto-Sorghetum halepensis (Laban 1974) Kojic 1979 38
Echinochloo-Setarietum pumilae Felföldy 1942 corr. Mucina 1993
xanthietosum italici Poldini et al. 1998
Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi (Br.-Bl. 1921) Sissingh (1942) 1946 (*) 66, 67, 91
Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi (Br.-Bl. 1921) Sissingh (1942) 1946
Galinsoga parviflora (*) subassociation
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
sorghetosum halepensis Baldoni 1995 (*)
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
Acalypha virginica (*) facies
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
Echinochloa oryzoides (*) facies
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
Panicum capillare (*) subassociation
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
Datura stramonium and Portulaca oleracea (*) variant
Panico sanguinalis-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953
Bolboschoenus maritimus and Paspalum distichum (*) variant
Euphorbio-Galinsogetum ciliatae Passarge 1981 79
Galeopsido tetrahit-Galinsogetum parviflorae Poldini et al. 1998 105
Galinsogo-Portulacetum Br.-Bl. 1949 ex Pedrotti 1959 78, 91
Setario-Echinochloetum colonum A. & O. Bolòs ex O. Bolòs 1956 34, 38
Setario-Galinsogetum parviflorae (Beck 1941) Tüxen 1950 em. Müller & Oberdorfer 70
Setario ambiguae-Cyperetum rotundi Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001 38
Diplotaxion erucoidis Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936 em. Brullo & Marcenò 1980
Amaranthus retroflexus community 86
39a.3.5 Fumarion wirtgenii-agrariae Brullo in Brullo & Marcenò 1985
Oxalis pes-caprae community 85, 87
39b.1 CHENOPODIETALIA MURALIS Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936
39b.1.1 Chenopodion muralis Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936
Amarantho blitoidis-Chenopodietum ambrosoidis O. Bolòs 1967 46
Amarantho muricati-Chenopodietum ambrosioidis O. Bolòs 1967 34
Amarantho-Chenopodietum ambrosioidis O. Bolòs 1967 34, 38, 99
Conyzetum albidae-canadensis Baldoni & Biondi 1993
Lolium multiflorum variant
Conyzetum albido-canadensis Baldoni & Biondi 1993 46, 101
Conyzo canadensis-Oenotheretum biennis Biondi, Brugiapaglia, Allegrezza & Ballelli 1992 24
Xanthio italici-Daturetum stramoni Fanelli 2002 46
Amaranthus deflexus and Polycarpon tetraphyllon community 91
Datura stramonium community 21
39b.2 THERO-BROMETALIA (Rivas Goday & Rivas-Martínez ex Esteve 1973) O. Bolòs 1975
39b.2.1 Echio plantaginei-Galactition tomentosae O. Bolòs & Molinier 1969
Erigeron canadensis community 121
Galactito-Isatidetum canescentis Brullo 1983 32
39b.3 SISYMBRIETALIA OFFICINALIS J. Tüxen ex W. Matuszkiewicz 1962
39b.3.1 Sisymbrion officinalis Tüxen, Lohmeyer & Preising ex Von Rochow 1951
Artemisietum annuae Fijalcowski 1967 30
Artemisietum annuae Fijalcowski 1967 ambrosietosum Siniscalco & Montacchini 1989 118, 119
Conyzo-Lactucetum serriolae Lohmeyer in Oberdorfer 1957 3, 31, 104
Datura stramonium and Malva neglecta community 67, 91
Erigeron canadensis community 70, 86
Hordeion leporini Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936 corr. O. Bolòs 1962
Bassia scoparia and Chenopodium ambrosioides community (**) 91
URTICO-SCROPHULARIETALIA PEREGRINAE Brullo ex Biondi, Blasi, Casavecchia & Gasparri in Biondi, Allegrezza, Casavecchia, Galdenzi, Gasparri, Pesaresi, Vagge & Blasi 2014
Oxalis pes-caprae community 70
39b.4.1 Veronico-Urticion urentis Brullo in Brullo & Marcenò 1985
Bromo-Brassicetum sylvestris Brullo & Marcenò 1985 34
Artemisia verlotiorum community 30
Robinia pseudoacacia community 39
40.1.1 Petasition officinalis Sill. 1933 em. Kopecký 1969
Robinia pseudoacacia community 5
40.1.2 Geo-Alliarion Lohmeyer & Oberdorfer ex Görs & Müller 1969
Solidago canadensis community 5, 89
40.1.5 Allion triquetri O. Bolòs 1967
Acantho-Smyrnietum olusatri Brullo & Marcenò 1985 34, 70
Acanthus mollis community 70, 117
CALYSTEGIETALIA SEPIUM Tüxen ex Mucina 1993 nom. mut. propos. Rivas-Martínez, T.E. Díaz, Fernandez-Gonzales, Izco, Loidi, Lousã & Penas 2002
Reynoutria japonica community 31
Helianthus tuberosus community 31
Solidago canadensis and Erigeron annuus community 31
Erigeron annuus community 31
Calystegion sepium Tüxen ex Oberdorfer 1957 nom. mut. propos. Rivas-Martínez, T.E. Díaz, Fernandez-Gonzales, Izco, Loidi, Lousã & Penas 2002
Amorpha fruticosa community 81
Artemisia verlotiorum community 127
Arundini-Convolvuletum sepium (Tüxen & Oberdorfer) O. Bolòs 1962
Artemisia verolotiorum variant
Arundini-Convolvuletum sepium (Tüxen & Oberdorfer 1958) O. Bolòs 1962 11, 15, 34, 40, 46, 80, 99, 101
Arundo donax community 43
Calystegio sylvaticae-Arundinetum donacis Brullo, Scelsi & Spampinato 2001 35, 38, 73, 84, 85, 87
Calystegio-Asteretum lanceolati (Holzner et al. 1978) Passarge 1993 63
Helianthus tuberosus community 15, 63, 71, 127
Humulus scandens communtity 39
Rubus caesius and Amorpha fruticosa community 89
Solidago canadensis community 81, 83
Solidago gigantea community 39, 63, 127
TUBERARIETEA GUTTATAE (Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952) Rivas Goday & Rivas-Martínez 1963 nom. mut. propos. Rivas-Martínez, T.E. Díaz, Fernández-González, Izco, Loidi, Lousa & Penas 2002
50.2 MALCOLMIETALIA Rivas Goday 1958
50.3.2 Laguro ovati-Vulpion fasciculatae Géhu & Biondi 1994
Ambrosio coronopifoliae-Lophochloetum pubescentis Biondi, Brugiapaglia, Allegrezza & Ballelli 1992 95, 99, 102
Sileno coloratae-Vulpietum membranaceae (Pignatti 1953) Géhu & Scoppola 1984 ambrosietosum coronopifoliae Pirone 2005 97
LYGEO SPARTI-STIPETEA TENACISSIMAE Rivas-Martínez 1978 nom. conserv. propos. Rivas-Martínez, T.E. Díaz, Fernández-González, Izco, Loidi, Lousa & Penas 2002
55.2 HYPARRHENIETALIA HIRTAE Rivas-Martínez 1978
55.2.1 Hyparrhenion hirtae Br.-Bl., P. Silva & Rozeira 1956
Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae Gianguzzi, Ilardi & Raimondo 1996 36, 52
56.4.4 Paspalo distichi-Agrostion semiverticillatae Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952
Aster squamatus and Inula viscosa community 94
Loto tenuis-Paspaletum paspaloidis Biondi, Casavecchia & Radetic 2002 25, 68
Paspalo distichi-Polypogonetum viridis Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936 nom. mut. propos. Rivas-Martínez et al. 2002
(= Paspalo distichi-Agrostidetum verticillati Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952)
15, 41, 46, 60, 61, 63, 68, 70, 76, 93, 94, 95, 99, 101, 115
Paspalo distichi-Polypogonetum viridis Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Gajewski, Wraber & Walas 1936 nom. mut. propos. Rivas-Martínez et al. 2002
facies with Cyperus eragrostis
Paspalum distichum (= paspaloides) community 19, 81, 103
56.5 PLANTAGINETALIA MAJORIS Tüxen ex Von Rochow 1951
56.5.1 Lolio perennis-Plantaginion majoris Sissingh 1969
Juncetum macri (Diemont et al. 1940) Tüxen 1950 78
Eleusine indica community 91
61.1.1 Cisto cretici-Ericion manipuliflorae Horvatić 1958
Opuntia ficus-indica community 69, 85
Robinia pseudoacacia and Rubus ulmifolius community 6
Robinia pseudoacacia and Sambucus nigra community 70
64.1.1 Berberidion vulgaris Br.-Bl. 1950
"Corno sanguineae-Ligustretum vulgaris” sensu Biondi et al. 1999 non Horvat 1956 amorphetosum fruticosae Biondi, Vagge, Baldoni & Taffetani 1999 27
64.1.2 Cytision sessilifolii Biondi in Biondi, Allegrezza & Guitian 1988
Cercido siliquastri-Rhoetum coriariae Biondi, Allegrezza & Guitian 1988 22
64.3.1 Pruno-Rubion ulmifolii O. Bolòs 1954
Clematido vitalbae-Arundinetum donacis Biondi & Allegrezza 2004 18
65 ALNETEA GLUTINOSAE Br.-Bl. & Tüxen ex Westhoff, Dijk & Passchier 1946
65.1 SALICETALIA AURITAE Doing ex Westhoff in Westhoff & Den Held 1969
65.1.1 Salicion cinereae Müller & Görs 1958
Salicetum cinereae Zolyomi 1931 Amorpha fruticosa variant 65
SALICI PURPUREAE-POPULETEA NIGRAE Rivas-Martínez & Cantó ex Rivas-Martínez, Báscones, T.E. Díaz, Fernández-González & Loidi 2001
68.1 POPULETALIA ALBAE Br.-Bl. ex Tchou 1948
Robinia pseudoacacia community 122
68.1.1 Populion albae Br.-Bl. ex Tchou 1948
Acer negundo community 46
Ailanthus altissima and Robinia pseudoacacia community 6
69.1.1 Salicion albae Soó 1930
Amorpho fruticosae-Salicetum albae Poldini, Vidali, Bracco, Assini & Villani in Poldini, Vidali & Ganis 2011 13, 27, 48, 71, 107
Sicyos angulatus community 40, 112
69.1.2 Salicion triandrae Müller & Görs 1958
Salicetum triandrae (Malcuit 1929) Noirfalise 1955 Amorpha fruticosa variant 27
69.1.4 Salicion incanae Aichinger 1933
Salicetum incano-purpureae Sillinger 1933 Amorpha fruticosa variant 27, 62
70 QUERCETEA ILICIS Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952
Sequoia sempervirens community 49
70.1 QUERCETALIA ILICIS Br.-Bl. ex Molinier 1934
70.2.2 Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae Br.-Bl. ex Guinochet & Drouineau 1944
Asparago acutifolii-Oleetum sylvestris Bacchetta et al. 2003
Opuntia ficus-indica variant
71 QUERCO ROBORIS-FAGETEA SYLVATICAE Br.-Bl. & Vlieger in Vlieger 1937
Acacia melanoxylon community 49
Euonymus europaeus and Robinia pseudoacacia community 77
Festuca heterophylla and Robinia pseudoacacia community
Arrhenatherum elatius variant
Festuca heterophylla and Robinia pseudoacacia community
Rubus macrophyllus variant
Pinus canariensis community 49
Pinus radiata community 49
Robinia pseudoacacia community 50
Robinia pseudoacacia and Prunus serotina community 113
Sambucus nigra and Robinia pseudoacacia community
Chelidonium majus variant
Sambucus nigra and Robinia pseudoacacia community
Poa trivialis variant
Sambucus nigra and Robinia pseudoacacia community
Rubus gr. discolores variant
71.1 FAGETALIA SYLVATICAE Pawłowski in Pawłowski, Sokołowski & Wallisch 1928
71.1.4 Tilio platyphylli-Acerion pseudoplatani Klika 1955
Robinia pseudoacacia community 50
71.1.6 Carpinion betuli Issler 1931
Prunus serotina community 113
71.1.10 Alnion incanae Pawlowski in Pawlowski, Sokolowski & Wallisch 1928
Amorpha fruticosa community 40
Populus nigra and Robinia pseudoacacia community 26
Robinia pseudoacacia and Rubus ulmifolius community 55
Buddleja davidii community 74
71.2.1 Quercion roboris Malcuit 1929
Robinia pseudoacacia community 50
71.3.3 Crataego laevigatae-Quercion cerridis Arrigoni 1997
Sambuco nigrae-Robinietum pseudacaciae Arrigoni 1997 10
75 ROBINIETEA Jurko ex Hadac & Sofron 1980
75.1 CHELIDONIO-ROBINIETALIA Jurko ex Hadac & Sofron 1980
75.1.1 Balloto nigrae-Robinion Jurko ex Hadac & Sofron 1980
Ailanthus altissima community 88
75.1.2 Bryonio-Robinion Ubaldi, Melloni & Cappelletti in Ubaldi 2003
Ailanthus altissima community 46
Bryonio-Robinietum Ubaldi, Melloni & Cappelletti in Ubaldi 2003 124
Robinia pseudoacacia community 46, 98, 128, 130
Lauro nobilis-Robinion pseudoacaciae Allegrezza, Montecchiari, Ottaviani, Pelliccia & Tesei 2019
Melisso altissimae-Robinietum pseudoacaciae Allegrezza, Montecchiari, Ottaviani, Pelliccia & Tesei 2019 2
Rubio peregrinae-Robinietum pseudoacaciae Allegrezza, Montecchiari, Ottaviani, Pelliccia & Tesei 2019 2
Ceratodonto purpurei-Polytrichetea piliferi Mohan 1978
Polytrichetalia piliferi von Hübschmann 1975
Campylopodion polytrichoidis Giacomini 1951
Campylopus introflexus community 108, 111
(*) In Poldini et al. (1998) the associations Panico-Polygonetum persicariae Pignatti 1953 and Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi (Br.-Bl. 1921) Sissingh (1942) 1946 are considered syntaxonomic synonyms of Echinochloo-Setarietum pumilae Felföldy 1942 corr. Mucina 1993. The authors reached this result by elaborating the synthetic tables of only a part of the works published at national level with the name Panico-Polygonetum and Oxalido-Chenopodietum. Beside this, in Poldini et al. (1988) the numbers of tables and relevés taken into account for the analysis were not indicated. These authors did not also consider any subassociations and variants described. For these reasons, we prefer to report the names of the associations as they were indicated in the original works, without including them as synonyms in the name Echinochloo-Setarietum.
(**) This association was described for the north-Adriatic Italian coasts, published by Pignatti (1952-53) as " nom. prov.", therefore not validly, according to ICPN (Art. 3b, Weber et al., 2000). It cannot be attributed to Atriplicion littoralis sensu Nordhagen 1940, as already highlighted by Mucina et al. (2016, p. 137), according to whom it must be referred to ruderal communities of Atriplicion Passarge 1978 (Sisymbrietalia). After examining the original table in Pignatti (1952-53), we agree with the comments of Mucina et al. (2016). Anyway, in the Italian Vegetation Prodrome, the alliance Atriplicion Passarge 1978 is not reported, so we provisionally prefer to attribute this association to Hordeion leporini, the most similar alliance from the eco-coenological point of view present in the Italian Vegetation Prodrome.

Soon after the development and data analysis of this article, Pellizzari (2020) hypothesized a reinterpretation of Cyperus glomeratus, currently considered alien species in Italy, as a probable native. We are currently sticking to the consolidated position of Galasso et al. (2018), pending a reassessment of the chorology of this species

Appendix II.Download as CSV 

Specific bibliographical list with reference numbers for all the syntaxa quoted in the checklist of Appendix I.

N. References
1 Acosta A., Carranza M.L., Ciaschetti G., Conti F., Di Martino L., D’Orazio G., Frattaroli A., Izzi C.F., Pirone G. & Stanisci A., 2007. Specie vegetali esotiche negli ambienti costieri sabbiosi di alcune regioni dell’Italia Centrale. Webbia 62: 77-87.
2 Allegrezza M., Montecchiari S., Ottaviani C., Pelliccia V. & Tesei G., 2019. Syntaxonomy of the Robinia pseudoacacia communities in the central periadriatic sector of the Italian peninsula. Plant Biosystems 153 (4): 616–623.
3 Andreucci F., 2006. Flora e vegetazione spontanea della città di Alessandria (Piemonte-Italia). Fitosociologia 43 (2): 77-95.
4 Andreucci F. & Castelli M., 2006. Alcuni aspetti di vegetazione erbacea nelle aree golenali del torrente Scrivia (Piemonte, Italia settentrionale). Arch. Geobot. 8 (1-2) (2002): 49-68.
5 Andreucci F. & Castelli M., 2008. Stadi evolutivi nel processo di colonizzazione di Robinia pseudoacacia L. in ex coltivi del Piemonte meridionale (Italia). Arch. Geobot. 11 (1-2) (2005): 1-14.
6 Angiolini C., Chiarucci A., De Dominicis V., Gabellini A., Morrocchi D. & Selvi F., 2002. Lineamenti vegetazionali dell’Area Naturale Protetta del Fiume Elsa. Atti Accademia dei Fisiocritici Siena Ser. 15, 18 (1999): 101-122.
7 Angiolini C., Landi M., Boddi M. & Frignani F., 2006. La vegetazione dell’alveo fluviale del sito d’importanza regionale torrente Trasubbie (Grosseto, Toscana meridionale). Atti Soc. tosc. Sci. nat., Mem., Ser. B, 112 (2005): 127-151.
8 Apruzzese A., Gigante D. & Venanzoni R., 2001. La ricolonizzazione di ex-coltivi in ambiente perilacuale: modalità di recupero della vegetazione semi-naturale e strategie di miglioramento. Riv. Idrobiol. 40 (2-3): 335-366.
9 Arrigoni P. V., 1990. Flora e vegetazione della Macchia lucchese di Viareggio (Toscana). Webbia 44 (1): 1-62.
10 Arrigoni P.V., 1997. Documenti per la carta della vegetazione delle Cerbaie (Toscana settentrionale). Parlatorea 2: 39-71.
11 Arrigoni P.V. & Papini P., 2003. La vegetazione del sistema fluviale Lima - Serchio (Toscana meridionale). Parlatorea 6: 95-129.
12 Arrigoni P.V., Nardi E. & Raffaelli M., 1985. La vegetazione del Parco Naturale della Maremma (Toscana). (con carta in scala 1:25.000). Univ. degli Studi di Firenze Dip. Biol. Veg. 39 pp.
13 Assini S., 2004. The alluvial vegetation of the Po River in the central-west Padana Plain (Po Plain - Northern Italy). Coll. Phytosoc. 28: 333-360.
14 Baldoni M., 1995. Vegetazione infestante le colture erbacee delle Marche e dei piani carsici dell’Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano (Italia centrale) e serie di vegetazione. Coll. Phytosoc. 24: 787-812.
15 Baldoni M. & Biondi E., 1993. La vegetazione del medio e basso corso del fiume Esino (Marche - Italia centrale). Studia Botanica 11: 209-257.
16 Barberis G. & Mariotti M., 1981. Ricerche geobotaniche sulle zone umide del Gruppo di Voltri (Appennino ligure-piemontese). Archivio Bot. Biogeogr. Ital. 57: 50-91.
17 Bertacchi A., Lombardi T. & Bocci G., 2009. Il paesaggio vegetale dell’ambiente dunale di Calambrone nel litorale pisano (Toscana settentrionale). Inform. Bot. Ital. 41 (2): 281-292.
18 Biondi E. & Allegrezza M., 2004. Lettura e modellizzazione sinfitosociologica del paesaggio vegetale del Bacino del Fosso della Selva. In: Biondi E. & Allegrezza M. (Eds.), L’ambiente della Selva di Galliano. I Quaderni della Selva 2: 36-57.
19 Biondi E. & Bagella S., 2005. Vegetazione e paesaggio vegetale dell’arcipelago di La Maddalena (Sardegna nord-orientale). Fitosociologia 42 (2) suppl. 1: 3-99.
20 Biondi E. & Baldoni M., 1994. La vegetazione del fiume Marecchia (Italia Centrale). Biogeographia n.s. 17 (1993): 51-87.
21 Biondi E., Allegrezza M. & Filigheddu R.S., 1990. Su alcune associazioni di vegetazione nitrofila della Sardegna settentrionale. Boll. Soc. Sarda Sci. Nat. 27: 221-236.
22 Biondi E., Allegrezza M. & Guitian J., 1988. Mantelli di vegetazione nel piano collinare dell’Appennino centrale. Doc. Phytosoc. n.s. 11: 479-490.
23 Biondi E., Blasi C., Brugiapaglia E., Fogu M.C. & Mossa E.L., 1994. Nitrofilous vegetation of the town of Cagliari (Sardegna). Allionia 32: 303-323.
24 Biondi E., Brugiapaglia E., Allegrezza M. & Ballelli S., 1992. La vegetazione del litorale marchigiano (Adriatico centro-settentrionale). Coll. Phytosoc. 19: 429-460.
25 Biondi E., Casavecchia S. & Radetic Z., 2002. La vegetazione dei “guazzi” e il paesaggio vegetale della pianura alluvionale del tratto terminale del Fiume Musone (Italia centrale). Fitosociologia 30 (1): 45-70.
26 Biondi E., Vagge I., Baldoni M. & Taffetani F., 1997. La vegetazione del Parco fluviale regionale del Taro (Emilia-Romagna). Fitosociologia 34: 69-110.
27 Biondi E., Vagge I., Baldoni M. & Taffetani F., 1999. La vegetazione del Parco Fluviale Regionale dello Stirone (Emilia-Romagna). Fitosociologia 36 (1): 67-93.
28 Bolpagni R., 2013. Macrophyte richness and aquatic vegetation coplexity of the lake Idro (Northern Italy). Ann. Bot. (Roma) 3: 35-43.
29 Bracco F., Sartori F. & Terzo V., 1984. Indagine geobotanica per la valutazione di un’area della Bassa Padania occidentale. Atti Ist. Bot. Lab. Critt. Univ. Pavia 7 (3): 5-50.
30 Brandes D., 1987. Zur Kenntnis der Ruderalvegetation des Alpensüdrandes. Tuexenia 7: 121-138.
31 Brandes D. & Brandes E., 1981. Ruderal- und Saumgesellschaften des Etschtals zwischen Bozen und Rovereto. Tuexenia 1: 99-133.
32 Brullo S., 1983. Le associazioni subnitrofile dell’Echio-Galactition tomentosae in Sicilia. Boll. Acc. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania 15: 405-452.
33 Brullo S., 1984. L’ Alleanza Bromo-Oryzopsion miliaceae in Sicilia. Boll. Acc. Gioenia Sci. Nat. 17: 239-258.
34 Brullo S. & Marcenò C., 1985. Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione nitrofila della Sicilia. Coll. Phytosoc. 12: 23-148.
35 Brullo S. & Sciandrello S., 2006. La vegetazione del bacino lacustre “Biviere di Gela” (Sicilia meridionale). Fitosociologia 43 (2): 21-40.
36 Brullo C., Brullo S., Giusso Del Galdo G., Guarino R., Minissale P., Scuderi L., Siracusa G., Sciandrello S. & Spampinato G., 2010. The Lygeo-Stipetea class in Sicily. Ann. Bot. (Roma) 10: 57-84.
37 Brullo S., Giusso Del Galdo G., Guarino R., Minissale P., Sciandrello S. & Spampinato G., 2012. Syntaxonomic survey of the class Pegano harmalae-Salsoletea vermiculatae Br.-Bl. & O. Bolos 1958 in Italy. Plant Biosystems 147 (2): 472-492.
38 Brullo S., Scelsi F. & Spampinato G., 2001. La vegetazione dell’Aspromonte. Studio Fitosociologico. Laruffa Editore, Reggio Calabria.
39 Brusa G., Castiglioni L. & Cerabolini B., 2006. La vegetazione dell’istituenda Riserva naturale Oasi di Lacchiarella (Parco agricolo sud Milano). Pianura 20: 5-41.
40 Ceschin S. & Salerno G., 2008. La vegetazione del basso corso del Fiume Tevere e dei suoi affluenti (Lazio, Italia). Fitosociologia 45 (1): 39-74.
41 Ceschin S., Cutini M. & Caneva G., 2006. Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione ruderale delle aree archeologiche romane (Roma). Fitosociologia 43(1): 97-139.
42 Corbetta F. & Lorenzoni G.G., 1976. La vegetazione degli stagni del golfo di Oristano (Sardegna). Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 7 (Suppl. Scritti in memoria di Augusto Toschi): 271-319.
43 Crisanti M. A. & Taffetani F., 2015. Diachronic analysis of variations induced on the flora and vegetation of river ecosystems by actions taken to reduce the risk of flooding. Case study of the River Chienti (central Adriatic, Italy). Plant Sociology 52 (1): 41-64.
44 D’Auria G. & Zavagno F., 1995. La vegetazione alveale del fiume Brembo, alla confluenza con l’Adda, in relazione a morfologia e substrato. Pianura 7: 5-38.
45 Di Franco C., Salerno G., Carranza M.L. & Stanisci A., 2012. Ambienti umidi salmastri in Molise: biodiversità e vulnerabilità. Territori 7: 47-53.
46 Fanelli G., 2002. Analisi fitosociologica dell’area metropolitana di Roma. Braun-Blanquetia 27: 1-276.
47 Fascetti S. & Veri L., 1983. Alcuni aspetti della vegetazione sinantropica della città dell’Aquila e dei dintorni (Abruzzo-Italia centrale). Coll. Phytosoc. 12: 429-447.
48 Francescato C., 2012. Paesaggi vegetali, biodiversità cenotica e funzionalità fluviale. Il caso del fiume Tagliamento. Tesi di dottorato, XXIV ciclo Metodologie di biomonitoraggio dell’alterazione ambientale, Università degli Studi di Trieste.
49 Gentile A., 1996. Esempi di integrazione di specie forestali esotiche in contesti vegetazionali mediterranei italiani. Coll. Phytosoc. 24 (1995): 123-130.
50 Gentile S., 1996. Robinia pseudoacacia L. in formazioni forestali miste dell’Italia Nord-occidentale. Coll. Phytosoc. 24 (1995): 11-18.
51 Gerdol R. & Piccoli F., 1979. Considerazioni sulla sinsistematica della vegetazione infestante delle colture sarchiate del Ferrarese. Arch. Bot. Biogeogr. Ital. 55 (4): 113-123.
52 Gianguzzi L., Ilardi V. & Raimondo F. M., 1996. La vegetazione del promontorio di Monte Pellegrino (Palermo). Quad. Biol. Amb. Appl. 4: 79-137.
53 Gigante D. & Venanzoni R., 2004. Flora e Vegetazione. In: AA. VV., Relazione sullo stato dell’Ambiente in Umbria. ARPA, Regione dell’Umbria, pp. 305-334, Perugia.
54 Kumbaric A., Ceschin S., Zuccarello V. & Caneva G., 2012. Main ecological parameters conditioning the colonization of higher plants in the biodeterioration of stone embankments of Lungotevere (Rome). Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 72: 31-41.
55 Landi M., Angiolini C. & De Dominicis V., 2002. Analisi fitosociologica dei fiumi della Toscana meridionale: il tratto medio-basso del Merse (Italia centrale). Studia Botanica 21: 37-88.
56 Landucci F., Gigante D. & Venanzoni R., 2011. An application of the Cocktail method for the classification of the hydrophytic vegetation at Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy). Fitosociologia 48 (2): 3-22.
57 Lastrucci L. & Becattini R., 2009. La vegetazione delle aree umide presso Bosco ai Frati (Firenze, Toscana). Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. mem. Ser. B 115 (2008): 57-67.
58 Lastrucci L., Bonari G, Angiolini C., Casini F., Giallonardo T., Gigante D., Landi M., Landucci F., Venanzoni R. & Viciani D., 2014. Vegetation of Lakes Chiusi and Montepulciano (Siena, central Italy): updated knowledge and new discoveries. Plant Sociology 51(2): 29-55.
59 Lastrucci L., Ferretti G., Mantarano N. & Foggi B., 2019. Vegetation and habitat of conservation interest of the lake Acquato (Grosseto – Central Italy). Plant Sociology 56(1): 19-30.
60 Lastrucci L., Foggi B., Selvi F. & Becattini R., 2007. Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione e della flora delle aree umide nel comprensorio di Capalbio (provincia di Grosseto, Italia Centrale). Arch. Geobot. 10 (1-2)(2004): 1-30.
61 Lastrucci L., Landi M. & Angiolini C., 2010. Vegetation analysis on wetlands in a Tuscan agricultural landscape (central Italy). Biologia 65 (1): 54-68.
62 Lastrucci L., Landucci F., Gonnelli V., Barocco R., Foggi B. & Venanzoni R., 2012. The vegetation of the upper and middle River Tiber (Central Italy). Plant Sociology 49(2): 29-48.
63 Lastrucci L., Paci F. & Raffaelli M., 2010. The wetland vegetation of the Natural Reserves and neighbouring stretches of the Arno river in the Arezzo province (Tuscany, Central Italy). Fitosociologia 47 (1): 29-59.
64 Lastrucci L., Valentini E., Dell’Olmo L., Vietina B. & Foggi B., 2015. Hygrophilous vegetation and habitats of conservation interest in the area of the Lake Porta (Tuscany, Central Italy). Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat., Mem., Serie B 122: 131-146.
65 Lastrucci L., Viciani D., Nuccio C. & Melillo C., 2008. Indagine vegetazionale su alcuni laghi di origine artificiale limitrofi alla Padule di Fucecchio (Toscana, Italia centrale). Ann. Mus. Civ. Rovereto 23 (2007): 169-203.
66 Lorenzoni G.G., 1963. La vegetazione infestante del mais nel Friuli nel Veneto e in Lombardia. Maydica 2: 5-55.
67 Lorenzoni G.G., 1964. Vegetazioni infestanti e ruderali della provincia di Vicenza. Lav. Bot. Ist. Bot. Univ. Padova 27: 1-46.
68 Maiorca G., Crisafulli A., Cameriere P. & Spampinato G., 2007. Flora vascolare e vegetazione della Riserva Naturale Regionale “Foce del Fiume Crati” (Calabria, Italia meridionale). Webbia 62 (2): 121-174.
69 Margani I., Poli Marchese E., Di Benedetto L., Grilo M., & Razzara S., 1999. Valutazione della naturalità su basi vegetazionali del territorio di Castel di Judica (Sicilia orientale). Arch. Geobot. 5 (1-2): 157-193.
70 Mariotti M.G., 1995. Osservazioni sulla vegetazione della Liguria. Atti dei Convegni Lincei 115: 189-227.
71 Martini F. & Poldini L., 1980. Il paesaggio vegetale del fiume Noncello nell’area urbana di Pordenone. Gortania 2: 123-156.
72 Mereu L., Lastrucci L. & Viciani D., 2012. Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione del fiume Pesa (Toscana, Italia centrale). Stud. Bot. 29 (2010): 105-143.
73 Minissale P., Sciandrello S. & Spampinato G., 2007. Analisi della biodiversità vegetale e relativa cartografia della Riserva Naturale Orientata “Pantalica, Valle dell’Anapo e Torrente Cava Grande” (Sicilia sudorientale). Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 18: 241-303.
74 Mondino G.P. & Scotta M., 1988. L’evoluzione della vegetazione nelle discariche di cava della Valle Ossola. Riv. Piem. St. Nat. 9: 69-76.
75 Montanari C., 1988. Note illustrative della carta della vegetazione dell’alta Val di Vara. Atti Ist. Bot. Lab. Critt. Univ. Pavia, serie 7, 6 (suppl.): 1-59.
76 Montanari C., 1988. Aspetti di vegetazione erbacea nei corsi d’acqua dell’Appennino Ligure. Boll. Mus. St. Nat. Lunigiana 6-7: 103-107.
77 Parolo G., 2000. La dinamica delle comunità a Robinia pseudoacacia L. in Valtellina. Arch. Geobot. 6 (2): 133-154.
78 Pedrotti F., 2004. Ricerche geobotaniche al Laghestel di Piné (1967- 2001). Braun-Blanquetia 35: 1-54.
79 Pedrotti F., 2010. Neofitismo e associazioni vegetali. Braun-Blanquetia 46: 345-349.
80 Pellizzari M., 2006. Studio della vegetazione e valutazione degli habitat dell’Idrovia Ferrarese. Ann. Mus. Civ. St. nat. Ferrara 7: 53-64.
81 Pellizzari M., 2009. La vegetazione del Po Ferrarese da Porporana all’Isola Bianca. Quad. Staz. Ecol. civ. Mus. St. nat. Ferrara 19: 49-80.
82 Pellizzari M. & Piccoli F., 2001. La vegetazione dei corpi idrici del Bosco della Mesola (Delta del Po). Quad. Staz. Ecol. civ. Mus. St. nat. Ferrara 13: 7-24.
83 Pellizzari M., Piubello F. & Fogli S. 2005. Aspetti vegetazionali del biotopo Brusà - Vallette (Cerea - Verona) e proposte per la conservazione degli habitat. Quad. Staz. Ecol. civ. Mus. St. nat. Ferrara 15: 23-51.
84 Perrino E.V., 2006. Vegetazione del Gargano (fasce costiera e collinare). Tesi di Dottorato in Scienze Ambientali I (Fitogeografia dei territori mediterranei).
85 Perrino E.V. & Calabrese G., 2014. Vascular flora of ancient olive groves of Apulia (southern Italy). Natura Croatica 23 (1): 189-218.
86 Perrino E.V., Ladisa G. & Calabrese G., 2014. Flora and plant genetic resources of ancient olive groves of Apulia (southern Italy). Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 61 (1): 23-53.
87 Perrino E.V., Signorile G. & Marvulli M., 2013. A first checklist of the vascular flora of the Polignano a Mare coast (Apulia, southern Italy). Natura Croatica 22 (2): 295-318.
88 Perrino E.V., Tomaselli V., Costa R. & Pavone P., 2013. Conservation status of habitats (Directive 92/43 EEC) of coastal and low hill belts in a mediterranean biodiversity hot spot (Gargano - Italy). Plant Biosystems 147 (4): 1006-1028.
89 Petraglia A., Tomaselli M., Borghi M.L., Cavozzi C. & Bolpagni R., 2005. Flora e vegetazione della Riserva Naturale Orientata della Parma Morta (Italia settentrionale). Acta Naturalia de “L’Ateneo Parmense” 41 (1/2): 5-34.
90 Piccoli F. & Pellizzari M., 2003. Note ecologiche sulle comunità pleustofitiche a Lemna minuta H., B. & K. nel Parco Regionale del Delta del Po. Atti del Convegno Nazionale “Botanica delle zone umide” Vercelli - Albano Vercellese 10-11 novembre 2000. Mus. Reg. Sci. nat. Torino, pp. 221-230.
91 Pignatti S., 1952 - 1953. Introduzione allo studio fitosociologico della pianura veneta orientale con particolare riguardo alla vegetazione litoranea. Arch. Bot. 28 (4): 265-329 (1952), 29 (1): 1-25 (1953), 29 (2): 65-98 (1953), 29 (3): 129-174 (1953).
92 Pirola A. & Rossetti A., 1974. Polygono-Xanthietum italici ass. nova, vegetazione di greto del corso medio del Reno (Bologna). Not. Fitosoc. 8: 15-27.
93 Pirone G., 1983. La vegetazione del litorale pescarese (Abruzzo). Not. Fitosoc. 18: 37-62.
94 Pirone G., 1991. Flora e vegetazione del Fiume Saline (Abruzzo). Micol. Veget. Medit. 6 (1): 45-76.
95 Pirone G., 1997. La vegetazione del litorale di Martinsicuro nel contesto dell’ambiente costiero dell’Abruzzo: aspetti e problemi. In: Le dune di Martinsicuro nel sistema costiero dell’Abruzzo. Comune di Martinsicuro (TE), pp. 21-75.
96 Pirone G., 2001. Due nuove associazioni di margine stradale dell’Abruzzo (Italia centrale). Studia Geobotanica 20: 33-39.
97 Pirone G., 2005. Aspetti geobotanici del territorio di Roseto degli Abruzzi (Teramo, Italia Centrale) - 1. La vegetazione. Micol. e Veget. Medit. 20 (1): 67-96.
98 Pirone G., 2015. Alberi, arbusti e liane d’Abruzzo. Cogecstre Edizioni, Penne (PE).
99 Pirone G. & Ferretti C., 1999. Flora e vegetazione spontanee della città di Pescara (Abruzzo, Italia). Fitosociologia 36 (1): 111-155.
100 Pirone G., Ciaschetti G., Di Martino L., Cianfaglione K., Giallonardo T. & Frattaroli A.R., 2014. Contribution to the knowledge of the coastal vegetation of Abruzzo (central Adriatic). Plant Sociology 51 Suppl.1: 57-64.
101 Pirone G., Corbetta F. & Dragani G., 2006. La vegetazione urbica della città di Ortona (Abruzzo). Arch. Geobot. 9 (1-2) (2003): 25-56.
102 Pirone G., Corbetta F., Frattaroli A.R. & Ciaschetti G., 2001. Aspetti della vegetazione costiera dell’Abruzzo. Biogeographia 22: 171-191.
103 Pisanu S., Farris E., Caria M.C., Filigheddu R., Urbani M. & Bagella S., 2014. Vegetation and plant landscape of Asinara National Park. Plant Sociology 51 (1): 31-57.
104 Poldini L., 1989. La vegetazione del Carso isontino e triestino. Ed. Lint, Trieste, pp. 315.
105 Poldini L., Oriolo G. & Mazzolini G., 1998. The segetal vegetation of vineyards and crop fields in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (NE Italy). Studia Geobot. 16: 5-32.
106 Poldini L., Vidali M. & Fabiani M.L., 1999. La vegetazione del litorale sedimentario dell’Alto Adriatico con particolare riguardo al Friuli-Venezia Giulia (NE Italia). Studia Geobot. 17: 3-68.
107 Poldini L., Vidali M. & Ganis P., 2011. Riparian Salix alba Scrubs of the Po lowland (N-Italy) from an European perspective. Plant Biosystems 145 (Suppl. 1): 132-147.
108 Poponessi S., Aleffi M., Gigante D. & Venanzoni R., 2016. Updates on the bryophyte flora of the lowland woods and temporary ponds west of Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy). Fl. Medit. 26: 151-162.
109 Prisco I., Stanisci A. & Acosta A.T.R., 2016. Mediterranean dunes on the go: evidence from a short term study on coastal herbaceous vegetation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 182: 40-46.
110 Prosser F. & Sarzo A., 2002. Flora e vegetazione dei fossi nel settore trentino del fondovalle dell’Adige (Trentino - Italia settentrionale). Ann. Mus. civ. Rovereto, Sez. Arch., St., Sc. Nat. 18: 89-144.
111 Puglisi M., Minissale P., Sciandrello S. & Privitera M., 2015. The bryophyte vegetation of the Mediterranean temporary ponds in Italy. Plant Sociology 52 (2): 69-78.
112 Salerno G., Ceschin S., Notamurzi C. & Iannuzzi E., 2006. Notulae floristica: Sicyos angulatus L. (Cucurbitaceae). Inform. Bot. Ital. 38 (1): 212.
113 Sartori F., 1988. Prunus serotina Ehrh. en Italie. Coll. Phytosoc. 14 (1985): 185-203.
114 Sartori F. & Bracco F., 1995. Flora e vegetazione del Po. Acc. Sc. Torino - Quaderni 1: 139-191.
115 Sburlino G. , M. Tomasella, G. Oriolo & L. Poldini, 2004. La vegetazione acquatica e palustre dell’Italia nord-orientale. 1 - La classe Lemnetea Tuxen ex O. Bolòs et Masclans 1955. Fitosociologia 41 (1) suppl. 1: 27-42.
116 Sburlino G., Tomasella M., Oriolo G., Poldini L. & Bracco F., 2008. La vegetazione acquatica e palustre dell’Italia nord-orientale. 2 – La classe Potametea Klika in Klika et V. Novák 1941. Fitosociologia, 45 (2): 3-40.
117 Sciandrello S., Minissale P. & Sturiale G., 2017. Plant communities supported by the geological setting: the case history of the Isole dei Ciclopi (east Sicily). Lazaroa 38 (1): 27-51.
118 Siniscalco C. & Barni E., 1994. L’incidenza delle specie esotiche nella flora e nella vegetazione della città di Torino. Allionia 32: 163-180.
119 Siniscalco C. & Montacchini F., 1989. Relation between ruderal and turfgrass vegetation in the city of Torino (Italy). Braun-Blanquetia 3: 127-136.
120 Siniscalco C., Minciardi M.R., Bari A., Potenza A., Zanini E. & Caramiello R., 1996. Historical-cartographic, vegetational and pedological study of Isolone del Ritano in the bed of the Dora Baltea River. Arch. Geobot. 2 (2): 97-112.
121 Taffetani F., Lancioni A. & Zitti S., 2011. Studio vegetazionale del bosco Fantine. I quaderni della selva “Il Bosco Fantine” 4: 46-81.
122 Tomaselli R. & Gentile S., 1971. La riserva naturale integrale “Bosco Siro Negri” dell’Università di Pavia. Atti. Ist. Bot. Lab. Critt. Univ. Pavia, serie 6, 7: 41-70.
123 Tomaselli V., Perrino E.V. & Cimmarusti G., 2008. Paludi Sfinale e Gusmay, due aree umide di rilevante interesse naturalistico nel Parco Nazionale del Gargano. Inform. Bot. Ital. 40 (2): 183-192.
124 Ubaldi D., 2003. Flora, fitocenosi e ambiente. Elementi di Geobotanica e Fitosociologia. Clueb, Bologna, 334 pp.
125 Vagge I., Corradi N., Ferrari M., Balduzzi I. & Mariotti L.M., 2007. Aspetti vegetazionali e morfo-sedimentologici dei campi dunari di Platamona-Marritza con particolare riguardo all’area di Marina di Sorso (Sardegna settentrionale). Fitosociologia 44 (1): 33-48.
126 Venanzoni R. & Gigante D., 2000. Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione degli ambienti umidi dell’Umbria (Italia). Fitosociologia 37 (2): 13-63.
127 Villani M., 2001. La vegetazione ripariale del fiume Adige. Tesi di dottorato in Geobotanica XII ciclo, Università degli Studi di Pavia.
128 Villani M., 2004. Carta delle vocazioni apistiche del territorio dei Colli Euganei. Unpublished technical report. Available on:
129 Wagensommer R.P., Perrino E.V. & Russo G., 2017. Senecio inaequidens DC. (Asteraceae) + PUG. Italian Botanist 3: 63-64.
130 Zavagno F. & Gaiara S., 1997. Boschi relitti tra Milano e il Ticino: vegetazione, fenologia e dinamica evolutiva. Pianura 9: 27-61.
login to comment