Corresponding author: Giuseppe Bazan ( giuseppe.bazan@unipa.it ) Academic editor: Gianluigi Bacchetta
© 2020 Lorenzo Gianguzzi, Giuseppe Bazan.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gianguzzi L, Bazan G (2020) The vegetation of a historic road system in the suburban area of Monte Pellegrino (Palermo, Sicily). Plant Sociology 57(2): 71-103. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2020572/02
|
Knowledge of the processes by which plants colonize old structures is a key element for nature-based design both in urban and suburban contexts. This paper analyses the natural vegetation on walls and in other microhabitats of the roadway structures of Monte Pellegrino (606 m a.s.l.) near Palermo (Sicily), built in the first half of the 1900s. The historical road has particular construction and architectural features, and its characteristics have been maintained to this day. The route, approximately 16 kilometers long, is well integrated within a site of high naturalistic value which has been designated as a Special Area of Conservation (ITA020014) of the Natura 2000 network, and it is also a regional natural reserve. The survey was carried out on different homogeneous ecological contexts based on different microhabitats (masonry retaining walls, masonry guardwalls, road margins, and rock cut slopes) which are diversified according to other environmental factors (building materials, inclination, height, and exposure). The phytosociological and statistical analysis has led to the description of six new associations (Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov., Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov., Helichryso panormitani-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov., Diantho siculi-Helichrysetum panormitani Gianguzzi ass. nov., Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei Gianguzzi ass. nov., Teucrio flavi-Rhoetum coriariae Gianguzzi ass. nov.) and one sub-association (Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997 artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov.). Other chasmophytic formations (Centranthetum rubri Oberd. 1969, Antirrhinetum siculi Bartolo & Brullo 1986) were reported for the first time in this area.
Asplenietea trichomanis, chasmophytic vegetation, colonization, man-made habitat, wall vegetation, syntaxonomy
Road systems have accompanied humans since their earliest civilizations, profoundly affecting ecosystems and landscape characteristics in many parts of the world. In addition, they also provide new anthropogenic habitats for flora and plant communities, as well as for fauna (
Although road systems may differ according to their age, construction methods, and types of building materials, all these different systems form specific ecosystems due to the great variety of habitats they provide (walls, masonry parapets, road margins, cut slopes). Plants colonize these different habitats, driven by ecological gradients that define specific “microgeoseries” (sensu
Before the use of concrete as a building material, road routes made use of mortared masonry walls or dry-laid walls as retaining structures. These were built by specialized craftsmen who selected and shaped the rocks at the work site, and surfaces were paved with cobblestones instead of asphalt. In Italy, as well as in various other areas of the Mediterranean, these types of road layouts are widespread today, although most of them have been modified by adding asphalt on top of the cobblestone layer. These kinds of roadways persist mainly in mountainous areas or in places with steep and rugged terrain where they resist exposure to severe weather conditions as well as the normal wear and tear that occurs over time. Overall, the architectural beauty of these works stands out, as does, in particular, the building effectiveness of the stone masonry walls which bridge differences in height by creating steep hairpin bends on mountainsides. These structures characterize mountain landscapes like that of the Stelvio Pass’s hairpin bends (
The old structures of road systems offer considerable new spaces for plant colonization and are covered by plant communities which are micromorphologically diversified in relation to their floristic and physiognomic aspects (inclination, exposition, height of surfaces).
A number of botanical and ecological studies of suburban road systems have focused on the role of road margins primarily as corridors for the diffusion of allochthonous species that use these communication routes as expansion corridors (Kowarick 2003;
The aim of this work is the phytosociological investigation of vegetation on walls and in other microhabitats of the road system of Monte Pellegrino (the mountain towering above the city of Palermo) and the interpretation of species composition patterns of plant communities along the roadway structures. The road system can be considered “historical”; in fact, it was inaugurated in 1924. Its route, approximately 16 kilometers long, climbs along the slopes of the mountain with hairpin bends and short straightaways, and it is well integrated within an area of particular naturalistic value which has been designated as a Special Area of Conservation (ITA020014) of the Natura 2000 network and is a regional natural reserve.
The study also addresses the issue of bio-ecological and phytocoenotic stability established in the road system that has been triggered by the slow colonization process within the different microhabitats (masonry retaining walls, masonry guardwalls, road margins, and rock cut slopes) and which are diversified according to other environmental factors (building materials, inclination, height, and exposure).
There are not many other studies in the Mediterranean area about plants growing on all components of a road system. Therefore, the data collected are suitable for two practical applications: (I) knowledge of so-called biodeteriogens that can be of use for the conservation of road artefacts; (II) potential use of the plants of the investigated communities for the sustainable design of environmental redevelopment interventions or mitigation measures (e.g., for excavations, rock cuts, cut slopes, fill slopes, walls, etc.).
The road system under investigation climbs up Monte Pellegrino (606 m a.s.l.), a well-known limestone mountain that rises to the northwest of Palermo in the northern coastal belt of Sicily (
In terms of the geological setting, the study area is part of the Apennine–Maghrebian chain (Grasso, 2001). The lithostratigraphy is characterized by different formations described by
In terms of climate, the study published by
Bioclimatic indices of the area, calculated according to
On the northern slopes, the local bioclimate tends to be Thermo-Mesomediterranean, from sub-humid to humid, due to the high cliffs shaped like a north-facing theater. Here, the vegetation consists of Rhamno alaterni-Querco ilicis pistacio terebinthi sigmetosum. In this vegetation series, the mature formation is a wood dominated by Quercus ilex and characterized by the presence of thermophilous deciduous broadleaves such as Pistacia terebinthus and Rhus coriaria. The seral stages are more frequently represented by maquis, dominated by the above-mentioned deciduous broadleaves and by perennial dry grasslands o Helictotricho-Ampelodesmetum mauritanici (
On the western and southwestern sides of Monte Pellegrino, contrasting microclimatic conditions, created by different slope aspects and steepness, result in a tendency towards the Thermomediterranean lower dry (also verging on the Inframediterranean). Climatophilous vegetation can be referred to the oleaster series (Ruto chalepensis-Oleo sylvestris sigmetum), whose head of series is the Olea europaea var. sylvestris xerophilous wood (
On the eastern sides, the bioclimate is Thermomediterranean and ranges from upper dry to lower subhumid (north-east). Climatophilous vegetation is represented by a more xerophilous holm oak series (Rhamno alaterni-Querco ilicis pistacio lentisci sigmetosum) in which Hyparrhenia hirta grassland (Hyparrenietum hirtae s.l.) is the most significant and widespread degradation aspect.
The three climatophilous series come into contact with the microgeosigmeta of the inland cliff communities of the alliance Dianthion rupicolae (Asplenietea trichomanis), such as Scabioso creticae-Centaureetum ucriae (
Monte Pellegrino’s vegetation mosaic hosts a rich flora, counting 741 infrageneric taxa (
Archaeological evidence in the Allaura caves (on the northern slopes of the mountain) dates the human presence in the area back to the Upper Paleolithic period (
However, due to its proximity to the city of Palermo, the protected area has been affected by anthropic disturbances, such as recurring fires, a prevalence (in terms of biomass) of exotic species over native ones, and waste dumping that afflicts even the most inaccessible areas, which damage the site’s natural heritage.
The road system of Monte Pellegrino is located within the administrative area of the City of Palermo and, consequently, the roads are named following the toponyms of the urban streets. It is divided in four parts (Fig.
The first two stretches of the road system, with a total length of 16 km, are the historical part of the road system. Via Pietro Bonanno is 9 km long and was named after the mayor who promoted its construction. It was designed at the end of the 19th century by the engineer Giuseppe Damiani Almeyda, who started construction in 1903 (
Due to the rugged morphology of the area, it was necessary to carry out large excavations in order to adapt the rocky terrain to the planned road layout. To level the road cross section, it was necessary to cut the rock and raise the lower part of the slopes using substantial masonry retaining walls along the entire route.
The second part of the road – via Monte Ercta – was built from Gabriele Ascione’s design. The excavation works began in 1949, and the construction work was initiated in July 1952, lasting five years. The road was made following the same construction methods as the first part. However, being on the northwestern part of the mountain where the slopes are steeper, it was necessary to build even higher retaining walls, especially in the tight curves above Mondello.
At the same time, the area was reforested with non-native species, especially conifers from the genus Pinus (P. halepensis, P. pinea, etc.) and Cupressus (C. sempervirens, C. arizonica, etc.), as well as broad-leaved trees of the genus Eucalyptus (E. camaldulensis, E. globulus, E. gomphocephala, etc.) and other species (Robinia pseudacacia, Ailanthus altissima, etc.).
In some cases, reforestation influenced the vegetation colonizing the base of the retaining walls by creating shady conditions. In the period between 1927 and 1933, other exotic species were also introduced into the area, such as Agave americana, A. sisalana, Opuntia ficus-indica, and O. maxima, which spontaneously spread between the escarpments and the reforested parts, sometimes forming hedges along the road margins, especially on the xeric slopes facing south/southwest, such as near Castello Utveggio.
The ecological conditions of the anthropogenic micro-habitats created by the construction of the road system reflect the adaptive specialization of the species and plant communities that have settled in them. The studied plant communities were distributed in relation to the following drivers: a) topographical characteristics of the surfaces (horizontal on the road margins, more or less vertical on the walls and rock walls); b) nature of the substrate (stone walls with mortar, asphalt, rocky outcroppings), which generally presents soil poverty, alkaline pH (given the nature of the lithic materials), a lack of nutrients, poor humidity; c) various climatic stresses (e.g., daily and annual temperature ranges, etc.).
Figure
1) Retaining walls – These continuously delimit the downhill side of the entire road route, with a height ranging from a few meters up to about 20 m (along the hairpin bends near Mondello). They are made of stone blocks cemented with mortar, built with a (a) base plinth, (b) sloping face, (c) and vertical face. Here lithophilous species, whose roots penetrate the cracks and cavities between the stone blocks, have different settling difficulties, depending on the topographical location (
2) Masonry guardwalls (downhill side of the road) – Here vegetation finds space in two different types of cavities in which accumulations of soil and humidity are generated. They are respectively located: a) on the upper surface of the guardwalls, following the crumbling of the materials due to the weather; b) at the base of the guardwall, at the interface between two types of construction materials (both inside and outside the road surface) which generates a certain water availability in the interstices.
3) Road margins (uphill side) – This habitat is located beyond the rainwater collection canals which have more nitrophilic and cooler ecological characteristics than the previous habitat. In fact, vegetation finds more favorable conditions here as there is more shade as well as a greater supply of nutrients and humidity thanks to the rainwater that flows down the slopes and walls above.
4) Rock cut slopes – These delimit the uphill part of the road margins and were created by excavating the limestone substrate. They are up to about 15 meters high (on some curves on the Mondello side), giving space to typically rocky communities that develop along the rock walls, according to ecological gradients that can be attributed to purely natural environments. In the upper part, they are true chasmophytic communities dominated by species of the Asplenietea trichomanis class, replaced towards the base of the walls by elements attributable to the Parietarietea judaicae class.
5) Natural slopes – This habitat, completely unrelated to the road profile, is colonized by phytocenotic vegetation linked to the different vegetation series that characterize the Monte Pellegrino promontory (
The vegetation was studied according to the phytosociological method (
The syntaxonomical nomenclature follows the “International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature” (
The survey, carried out between 2016 and 2019, was based on stratified random sampling. The study area was divided into different homogeneous ecological contexts based on both construction typology (masonry retaining wall, guardwall, uphill-side road margin, artificial rock cut slope) and exposition (north, west/southwest), and random sampling was conducted within each of these habitats (
To evaluate the distribution pattern of the habitats studied in terms of their specific composition, we used detrended correspondence analysis (DCA; Hill and Gauch 1980) using the RStudio (Version 1.1.463) free software and some functions of the vegan package (
Similarity among different phytocoenoses was evaluated using the “Jaccard Index” (
The life form analysis of the data in the phytosociological table was made by establishing: the percentage distribution of presence in the species list (flora); the percentage distribution of presence in the relevés (frequency), the percentage distribution of the coverage value in the relevés (cover).
Cl.: CYMBALARIO-PARIETARIETEA DIFFUSAE Oberd. 1969
Perennial vegetation with hemicryptophytes, nitrophilous and synanthropic, chasmo-comophytic, found on rocky walls and cliffs.
Ord.: TORTULO-CYMBALARIETALIA
Chasmo-nitrophilous and thermophilous vegetation of built-up areas of the Mediterranean and Atlantic, mild winter to subcontinental regions of temperate Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa.
All.: GALIO VALANTIAE-PARIETARION JUDAICAE Rivas-Mart. ex O.
Thermomediterranean chasmophytic vegetation of limestone walls of the Iberian Peninsula and the western Tyrrhenian archipelago.
1) CREPIDO BURSIFOLIAE-PARIETARIETUM JUDAICAE ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6* | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 330 | 340 | 420 | 425 | 430 | |
Slope (°) | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | |
Aspect | N | N | NE | E | E | N | NE | W | NW | NW | NW | NW | |
Area (m2) | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | |
Total cover (%) | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 85 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Average height (cm) | 50 | 50 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 45 | 45 | 50 | |
Species per relevé | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 9 | |
Characteristic and differential species of association | |||||||||||||
Parietaria judaica L. | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
Mercurialis annua L. | . | . | + | . | + | . | + | + | . | 2 | 1 | + | 7 |
Crepis bursifolia L. | 1 | + | + | + | . | + | + | . | . | + | + | + | 9 |
Erigeron bonariensis L. | . | + | + | + | + | 1 | + | . | + | . | . | . | 7 |
Oxalis pes caprae L. | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | 1 | . | + | . | 5 |
Char. of the alliance | |||||||||||||
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | + | 1 | 1 | + | + | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 9 |
Hyoscyamus albus L. | . | + | . | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | 2 |
Char. of the order and class | |||||||||||||
Sonchus tenerrimus L. | 2 | + | + | . | 2 | + | + | . | + | + | + | 1 | 10 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | + | + | + | 5 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | 2 |
Cymbalaria muralis G.Gaertn., B.Mey. et Scherb. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Sedum dasyphyllum L. subsp. dasyphyllum | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Other species | |||||||||||||
Piptatherum miliaceum (L.) Coss. | 1 | . | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Poa annua L. | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum (Link) Arcang. | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | + | + | . | 3 |
Dactylis glomerata L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | 3 |
Briza maxima L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | 3 |
Lagurus ovatus L. subsp. ovatus | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | + | + | 3 |
Hirschfeldia incana (L.) Lagr.-Foss. subsp. incana | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Polycarpon tetraphyllum (L.) L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Campanula erinus L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | 2 |
Solanum villosum Mill. | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | 2 |
Scrophularia peregrina L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Polygonum aviculare L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Boerhavia repens L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Sisymbrium officinale (L.) Scop. | . | . | . | 2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin et Clemants | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Avena barbata Pott ex Link | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Polypodium cambricum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 |
Vicia villosa subsp. varia (Host) Corb. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Lolium perenne L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Acanthus mollis L. subsp. mollis | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Bromus sterilis L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Holotypus:
Rel. 6, Table
Diagnostic species: Parietaria judaica (dom.), Mercurialis annua, Oxalis pes-caprae, Crepis bursifolia, Erigeron bonariensis.
Floristic-syntaxonomical notes
: Based on the interpretation of various authors (
Description: It is a hemicryptophytic, sciophilous-nitrophilous, paucispecific formation clearly dominated by Parietaria judaica, located on the lower part of walls. It tends to form a more or less continuous and lush belt of vegetation 40-60 (80) cm tall, that normally has coverage between 75-100% with a minimum area of 6-8 m2. The phytocoenosis is subjected to high levels of eutrophication that occurs in wall cracks and interstices between materials (rocks, mortar, concrete, soil, etc.) of different chemical composition. Here, small accumulations of well-humidified and nitrified soil are created from the flow of rainwater on the wall, as well as from the contributions of internal circulation within the wall. Other associated species can be frequent but with low coverage values, some of which have their vegetative optimum in the winter-spring period (e.g., Oxalis pes-caprae) while others have it in the spring-summer period (es. Erigeron bonariensis, Crepis bursifolia, Mercurialis annua, etc.). In particular, Oxalis pes-caprae, a South-African species in expansion in the Mediterranean area, is an element of the Stellarietea mediae class; Mercurialis annua is a paleotemperate species, typical of manured fields and belonging to the Stellarietea mediae class; Erigeron bonariensis is native to tropical America and has almost become a cosmopolite species belonging to the Chenopodion (Sisymbrietalia, Stellarietea mediae) alliance; Crepis bursifolia is an endemic Italian species that is rather widespread in the Tyrrhenian area, typical of pavements, trampled environments, and road margins, and is also an element of the Trisetario-Crepidetum bursifoliae association (Polygono-Poetea annuae).
Syndynamism:
This phytocoenosis plays a pioneering role at the base of masonry and rock walls and takes part in the shady-mesic geosigmetum (north-northwestern-facing slope) of the road system in question (Fig.
The association is in contact with: (a) the vegetation of horizontal surfaces, such as trampled areas (cl. Polygono-Poetea annuae), flower beds, cultivated areas (cl. Stellarietea mediae), as well as serial aspects of the slope vegetation of Rhamno-Querco ilicis sigmetum; (b) vegetation on the tops of walls, dominated by Parietaria judaica (Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov.), Hypochaeris laevigata (Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov.), and Lomelosia cretica (Scabioso-Centauretum ucriae).
Synchorology: The association, quite common in the study area, probably has a wider distribution in Sicily and the Tyrrhenian area.
2) ATHAMANTO SICULAE-PARIETARIETUM JUDAICAE ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus:
Rel. 3, Table
Diagnostic species: Parietaria judaica (dom.), Athamanta sicula, Antirrhinum siculum, Campanula erinus.
Description:
It is a hemicryptophytic, sciophilous-nitrophilous, paucispecific formation, clearly dominated by Parietaria judaica, typical of cool and shady upper parts of walls (Fig.
Syndynamism: The association plays a pioneer role in the colonization of walls and takes part in the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the Monte Pellegrino road system where it is north-facing.
It establishes the following contacts: a) Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov. (lower parts of the walls); b) Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani ass. nov. (exposed parts of older, higher walls).
Synchorology: The phytocoenosis is frequent in the study area and probably has a wider distribution in Sicily and the Tyrrhenian area.
3) HELICHRYSO PANORMITANAE-HYPOCHAERIDETUM LAEVIGATAE ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus:
Rel. 3, Table
Diagnostic species: Hypochaeris laevigata (dom.), Helichrysum panormitanum, Antirrhinum siculum.
Description:
It is a chamaephytic-hemicryptophytic, sciophilous-nitrophilous formation dominated by Hypochaeris laevigata and associated, among other species, with the endemic Helichrysum panormitanum and Antirrhinum siculum, which are differentials of the phytocoenosis (Fig.
Syndynamism: The association plays a pioneer role in the colonization of walls and takes part in the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the road system. It establishes catenal contacts with the following coenoses: a) Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov. (middle part of walls); b) Centranthetum rubri (less exposed vertical parts of walls); c) Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani ass. nov. (exposed parts of old higher walls).
Synchorology: The association was observed along the northern slope of Monte Pellegrino, but presumably it is present in other similar contexts of the mountains of the Palermo area.
4) CENTRANTHETUM RUBRI Oberd. 1969
Phytosociological data:
Table
Lectotypus:
Rel. 16, Table
Diagnostic species: Centranthus ruber (dom.).
Description: It is a chasmo-nitrophilous heliophilous coenosis dominated by Centranthus ruber and located in the upper parts of less exposed walls and other masonry structures. The association prefers cooler habitats where it benefits from a certain amount of edaphic humidity due to water percolation inside the embankment.
Syndynamism: In the local area, this phytocoenosis belongs to the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the north-facing slope of the promontory located, in particular, on the more sheltered walls of the hairpin bends of Contrada Allaura. The association establishes catenal contacts with the following coenoses: a) Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. (near the base of old walls shaded by tree foliage); b) Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani ass. nov. (exposed upper parts of old walls, above 6-8 m); c) groupment with Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus (upper parts of walls at 4-6 m).
Synchorology:
The association is spread across the Mediterranean area in the thermomediterranean and lower mesomediterranean bioclimatic belts, and is present in Sicily to some extent (
5) ANTIRRHINETUM SICULI Bartolo & Brullo 1986
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus:
Rel. 2, Table
Diagnostic species: Antirrhinum siculum (dom.).
Description:
It is a chasmo-nitrophilous paucispecific formation with an open structure, heliophilous and thermo-xerophilous, dominated by Antirrhinum siculum (Fig.
Syndynamism: The phytocoenosis belongs to the more xeric geosigmetum of the study areas, where it is found mostly on the southern and western slopes. It comes into catenal contact with the following associations: a) Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov. (both at the base of the walls and on the upper parts, in particular on guardwalls); b) Capparidetum rupestris (in the upper parts of some walls); Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu and Biondi 1997 artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov. (guardwalls of sunny and sheltered walls).
Synchorology:
The association is endemic in the southern parts of the Italian Peninsula (Brullo et al. 2001;
All.: ARTEMISIO ARBORESCENTIS-CAPPARIDION SPINOSAE Biondi, Blasi et Galdenzi in
Thermomediterranean chasmophytic vegetation of limestone walls of the Apennine Peninsula, Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and Malta.
6) CAPPARIDETUM RUPESTRIS O. Bolòs et Molinier 1958
Lectotypus: Rel. 1, Table 18, Bolòs & Molinier (1958).
Phytosociological data:
Table
Diagnostic species: Capparis spinosa (dom.).
Description:
It is a chasmo-nitrophilous paucispecific formation with an open structure, heliophilous and xerophilous, dominated by large bushes of Capparis spinosa, typical of calcareous rocks and masonry walls (Fig.
Syndynamism: The phytocoenosis is a mature, permanent vegetation that grows on the most xeric geosigmetum of walls, located mostly on the southern slopes of the promontory. Here, it establishes catenal contacts with the following coenoses: a) Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov. (both at the base of the walls and on the upper parts, in particular on the guardwalls); b) Antirrhinetum siculi (on the upper parts of some walls); c) Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997 artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov. (on sunny and sheltered guardwalls).
Synchorology:
The association, described by De Bolós and Molinier (1958), is widespread in the Mediterranean area (
Cl.: ASPLENIETEA TRICHOMANIS (Br.-Bl. in Meier et Br.-Bl. 1934) Oberd. 1977
Chasmophytic vegetation of crevices, rocky ledges and faces of rocky cliffs and walls of Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Arctic archipelagos and Greenland.
Ord.: ASPLENIETALIA GLANDULOSI Br.-Bl. in Meier & Br.-Bl. 1934
Thermo-mesomediterranean chasmophytic vegetation of sunny calcareous rock faces and crevices of the western Mediterranean.
All.: DIANTHION RUPICOLAE Brullo & Marcenò 1979
Siculo-Calabrian Tyrrhenian coasts and the islands of Malta.
7) DIANTHO SICULAE-HELICHRYSETUM PANORMITANI Gianguzzi ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus:
Rel. 5, Table
Diagnostic species: Helichrysum panormitanum subsp. panormitanum (dom.), Dianthus rupicola, Micromeria fruticulosa, Antirrhinum siculum.
Floristic-syntaxonomical notes:
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. subsp. panormitanum (= H. rupestre (Raf.) DC. var. panormitanum (Guss.) Lojac.) is an endemic chasmophyte of the coastal capes to the west of Palermo, from Mt. Pellegrino to Castellammare del Golfo (
Description: It is a chasmophilous, paucispecific, heliophilous, and mesophilous formation dominated by Helichrysum panormitanum subsp. panormitanum, typical of the highest parts of old walls, above 4-6 m. The association is located in sunny and xeric places which are not well nitrified, mainly on the north-facing walls and rarely on natural or artificial rocky cliffs. Species of the class Parietarietea judaicae (Ceterach officinarum, Parietaria judaica, Antirrhinum siculum, Capparis spinosa), with low coverage values, as well as several elements of the class Asplenietea trichomanis (Dianthus rupicola, Lomelosia cretica, Matthiola incana subsp. rupestris, Seseli bocconei, etc.) are associated with it. The community forms dense vegetation belts due to thick patches of the dominant species covering the cracks between the stone blocks.
Syndynamism: The association is well represented in the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the road stretches located in the north/northwest-facing slopes of the promontory. It establishes contacts with the following phytocoenoses: a) Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. (at the base of walls shaded by the crowns of trees); b) Centranthetum rubri (at the base of sunny walls); c) Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus groupment (upper parts of the highest walls).
Synchorology: The phytocoenosis is spread along the entire road system of Monte Pellegrino, especially on the highest and most exposed stretches of the northern and western sides (via Monte Ercta).
8) SCABIOSO CRETICAE-CENTAURETUM UCRIAE Brullo et Marcenò 1979 subass. TYPICUM
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus: Rel. p. 139, in Brullo et Marcenò (1979).
Diagnostic species: Lomelosia cretica (dom.), Helichrysum panormitanum, Euphorbia bivonae subsp. bivonae, Centaurea panormitana (= C. ucriae Lacaita), Convolvulus cneorum, Dianthus rupicola, Seseli bocconei, Silene fruticosa, Iberis semperflorens.
Description: It is a chasmophilous, heliophilous, and mesophilous formation, widespread on the upper parts of cliffs and rocky cut slopes, more or less shaded, dominated by Lomelosia cretica.
Syndynamism:
Pioneer vegetation that plays an edaphoclimatic role in the colonization processes of fresh and humid artificial rocky cut slopes and natural cliffs. In fact, on slopes shaped by the excavation of limestone that have been left undisturbed, the chasmophytic association appears naturally restored. It is in catenal contact with the following associations: a) Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. (at the base of shady and nitrified walls); b) Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov. (at the base of sunny and xeric walls); grasslands associated with Penniseteto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae and aspects of the Ruto-Oleo sylvestris sigmetum located on the slopes above the road system (Fig.
Synchorology: This phytocoenosis is frequent on the cliffs and cut slopes of Monte Pellegrino. It is also widespread in the mountains of Palermo and Trapani areas (up to 900 m a.s.l.) and has been reported for small and isolated locations in the Nebrodi Mountains at Rocche del Crasto (Brullo and Marcenò 1979).
Cl.: STIPO-TRACHYNIETEA DISTACHYAE S. Brullo in S. Brullo et al. 2001
Mediterranean calciphilous annual and ephemeroid swards and grasslands
Ord.: BRACHYPODIETALIA DISTACHYI Rivas-Mart. 1978
Western Mediterranean ephemeral winter pastures on shallow sandy and loamy soils over limestone, dolomite, and gypsum.
All.: HYPOCHOERIDION ACHYROPHORI Biondi & Guerra 2008
Annual community, xerophytic, pioneer, basiphilous, of the European Central Mediterranean area in the thermomediterranean and mesotemperate bioclimatic belts. It is part of the Trachynion distachyae alliance of the western Mediterranean, and reaches its western distribution limit in the Mediterranean area around Provence.
9) Groupment with STIPELLULA CAPENSIS
Phytosociological data:
Table
Diagnostic species: Stipellula capensis (dom.).
Description: Therophytic heliophilous and xerophilous formation, with spring phenology, growing in the soil accumulated on the tops of old guardwalls on the road margin (parapets) due to deterioration caused by weathering events. The phytocoenosis is physiognomically dominated by Stipellula capensis, which is associated with other ephemeral species.
Syndynamism: Pioneer vegetation mainly related to the more xeric geosigmetum of the road system. It is in catenal contact with ruderal and wall formations, such as the Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov.
Synchorology:
Stipellula capensis vegetation is quite widespread in Sicily (
Cl.: ARTEMISIETEA VULGARIS Lohmeyer et al. in Tx. Ex von Rochow1951
Perennial (sub)xerophilous ruderal vegetation of the temperate and submediterranean regions of Europe.
Ord.
: ELYTRIGIO REPENTIS-DITTRICHIETALIA VISCOSAE Mucina in
Anthropogenic sub-ruderal and ruderal grasslands and herblands of submediterranean and Mediterranean Southern Europe.
All.: BROMO-ORYZOPSION MILIACEAE O. Bolòs 1970
Thermomediterranean sub-ruderal perennial grasslands on disturbed road margins of the Mediterranean.
10) OLOPTO MILIACEI-PENNISETETUM SETACEI Gianguzzi ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table 21 in
Synonym:
Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae var. with Oryzopsis miliacea (L.) Asch. & Schweinf (in
Holotypus
: Rel. 1, Table 21, in
Diagnostic species: Pennisetum setaceum (dom.), Oloptum miliaceum (= Oryzopsis miliacea), Lobularia maritima, Foeniculum vulgare subsp. piperitum, Sixalis atropurpurea subsp. maritima.
Floristic-syntaxonomical notes:
Pennisetum setaceum, native of the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula, has now become thermo-cosmopolite (EPPO 2020) and an invasive alien species that is widespread in the Mediterranean area (
Description:
It is a hemicryptophytic, thermo-xerophilous and paucispecific formation, whose physiognomy is dominated by Pennisetum setaceum which forms a continuous vegetation belt located along the road margins in the more xeric and sunny parts (Figs
Syndynamism: The association belongs to the more xeric geosigmetum of the road system. In the absence of maintenance works, it tends to colonize the edges of walls that act as parapets, where it is located both inside and outside the road surface, and sometimes also on top. The association is in catenal contact with the following coenoses: a) Trachynia distachya groupment (therophytic grassland located in the soil accumulations among the clumps); b) Capparidetum rupestris (chasmo-nitrophilous vegetation of the upper parts of sunny and sheltered walls); c) Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997 artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov. (guardwalls of sunny and sheltered parts of the road system).
Synchorology:
The phytocoenosis is widespread in the study area, especially along the most xeric parts of the southern and western slopes of the promontory. It is booming in Sicily, mostly along the roads and railways of the coastal belt and, in some cases, in the interior (
Cl.: QUERCETEA ILICIS Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952
Thermo-mesomediterranean pine and oak forests and associated Mediterranean maquis.
Ord.: PISTACIO LENTISCI-RHAMNETALIA ALATERNI Rivas-Martínez 1975
Thermo-mesomediterranean low-growth matorral, maquis, and garrigue of the Mediterranean Basin.
All.: OLEO SYLVESTRIS-CERATONION SILIQUAE Br.-Bl. ex Guinochet et Drouineau 1944
Thermomediterranean calcicolous maquis of the Liguro-Tyrrhenian seaboards.
11) RHAMNO ALATERNI-EUPHORBIETUM DENDROIDIS Géhu & Biondi 1997 ARTEMISIETOSUM ARBORESCENTIS subass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Holotypus:
Rel. 5, Table
Diagnostic species: Euphorbia dendroides (dom.), Artemisia arborescens, Pennisetum setaceum.
Syntaxonomic notes:
The scrub vegetation with Euphorbia dendroides of Sicily is referred to the association Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997 (= Oleo-Lentiscetum euphorbietosum Molinier 1954; Oleo-Euphorbietum dendroidis Trinajstic 1974; Oleo-Euphorbietum dendroidis Trinajstic 1975), divided into the following subassociations, to be considered as geographic vicariants: a) subass. typicum; b) subass. phlomidetosum fruticosae (Brullo & Marcenò 1985)
Description: Thermo-xerophilous, heliophilous, and nitrophilous, paucispecific maquis formations, clearly dominated by Euphorbia dendroides, associated with Artemisia arborescens and Pennisetum setaceum, with high cover values. The phytocoenosis is typical of warm, sunny, and xeric slopes on carbonate substrata and tends generally to colonize anthropogenic habitats. In particular, it is spread on old walls and ruins.
Syndynamism:
In the road system in question, the phytocoenosis takes part in the more xeric geosigmetum, related to the road margins of the southern and western slopes of the promontory (Fig.
Synchorology: The phytocoenosis was mainly detected along the more xeric parts of the road system on the southern and western sides of the promontory.
12) TEUCRIO FLAVI-RHOETUM CORIARIAE Gianguzzi ass. nov.
Phytosociological data:
Table
Synonym:
Groupment with Rhus coriaria (in
Holotypus:
Rel. 2, Table
Diagnostic species: Rhus coriaria (dom.), Teucrium flavum subsp. flavum, Bituminaria bituminosa.
Floristic-syntaxonomical notes:
Rhus coriaria is a species with a southern range (
Description:
It is a shrubby, paucispecific, xerophilous, heliophilous formation, sometimes shady, dominated by Rhus coriaria, which is associated with other elements of the Oleo-Ceratonion alliance (Euphorbia dendroides, Olea europaea var. sylvestris, and Teucrium fruticans) and other sporadic species of the order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni. On this basis, it is here proposed as a new association belonging to these syntaxa. The coenosis is related to rocky slopes with poor soil, screes, and outcrops of carbonate nature (limestone, dolomite, marl, etc.). In the study area, it extends to the road margins and road cut slopes (Fig.
Syndynamism:
The phytocoenosis covers the detritic slopes of the reliefs of carbonate nature. It is a secondary aspect of the holm oak series of Rhamno alaterni-Querco ilicis pistacio terebinthi sigmetosum (
Along the road system of Monte Pellegrino, it belongs to the shady-mesic geosigmetum related to the slopes above the roads. Here, it comes in catenal contact with the following coenoses: a) Helictotricho convoluti-Ampelodesmetum mauritanici Minissale 1994 (Ampelodesmos mauritanicus grassland); b) Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis
Synchorology:
This vegetation is frequent on the northern and western sides of Monte Pellegrino, in the Allaura area (
13) Groupment with RHAMNUS ALATERNUS and PISTACIA TEREBINTHUS
Phytosociological data:
Table
Diagnostic species: Rhamnus alaternus (dom.), Pistacia terebinthus.
Description:
It is a maquis or scrub formation dominated by Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus, associated with other species of the order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni. This vegetation is linked to the upper parts of old walls (5-10 m high) located on the cool and shady slopes of Contrada Allaura, whose toponym refers to the presence of Laurus nobilis, a species quite widespread in Sicily (
Syndynamism: It belongs to the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the road system linked to the northern face of Monte Pellegrino. It is in catenal contact with the following coenoses: a) Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. (on lower shady walls); b) Centranthetum rubri (on stretches of cool and sheltered walls); c) Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani ass. nov. (on the upper parts of the highest walls).
Synchorology: The vegetation was identified on the northern slopes of Monte Pellegrino, where it forms vegetation strips linked to the upper parts of old retaining walls. Although the phytocoenosis is not very abundant in the area, it has an important documentary value.
The resulting dataset is composed of 185 taxa divided into 95 samples (relevés). The mean value of the floristic richness is 30 taxa for the retaining wall communities. The most species-rich of the wall communities are the Diantho rupicolae-Helichrysetum panormitani (58 taxa), Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae (38 taxa), and Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae (36 taxa). These are followed by Capparidetum rupestris, Antirrhinetum siculi, Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum judaicae, and Centranthetum rubri, with 25, 19, 16, and 15 taxa, respectively.
The Stipellula capensis guardwall groupment includes 28 taxa. In the road margins, the richest communities are the Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis (52 taxa) and Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei (49 taxa), while the Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis and the groupment with Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus have 22 and 18 taxa, respectively. The overall mean value for the road margin communities is 35 taxa. The Scabioso creticae-Centaureetum ucriae of the road cut slopes is the phytocoenosis with the highest species richness (61 taxa), comparable only to Diantho rupicolae-Helichrysetum panormitani.
Species nestedness (the average co-occurrence of species, Table
The “Jaccard similarity Index” (Table
The results obtained from detrended correspondence analysis show a clear distribution of communities. The ordination plot (Fig.
From a structural point of view, the life form analysis (Table
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3* | 4 | 5 | 6 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 150 | 170 | 410 | 410 | 417 | 420 | |
Slope (°) | 95 | 95 | 95 | 70 | 70 | 80 | |
Aspect | SE | E | N | N | N | N | |
Area (m2) | 8 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 10 | |
Total cover (%) | 60 | 65 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 80 | |
Average height (cm) | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 40 | 40 | |
Species per relevé | 11 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 8 | |
Characteristic and differential species of association | |||||||
Parietaria judaica L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Athamanta sicula L. | . | 1 | + | 1 | + | 1 | 5 |
Campanula erinus L. | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | + | + | 6 |
Char. of the alliance | |||||||
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | 1 | 1 | . | + | . | + | 4 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | 1 | 1 | + | . | + | + | 5 |
Char. of the order and class | |||||||
Sonchus tenerrimus L. | + | + | 1 | . | . | + | 4 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | + | + | . | 1 | + | + | 5 |
Hypochaeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. et Gibelli | . | + | 1 | + | 1 | . | 4 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | + | 1 | . | + | + | . | 4 |
Cymbalaria muralis G.Gaertn., B.Mey. et Scherb. | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 |
Other species | |||||||
Lagurus ovatus L. subsp. ovatus | + | . | + | + | . | . | 3 |
Pinus halepensis Mill. | + | + | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Trachynia distachya (L.) Link | + | + | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | + | + | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Asphodelus ramosus L. subsp. ramosus | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 |
Musci | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3* | 4 | 5 | 6 | Presence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altitude (m) | 90 | 95 | 100 | 90 | 130 | 135 | |
Slope (°) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
Aspect | N | N/NE | N | N | N/NW | N | |
Area (m2) | 10 | 20 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Total cover (%) | 30 | 40 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
Average height (cm) | 30 | 30 | 35 | 20 | 30 | 35 | |
Species per relevé | 19 | 22 | 16 | 13 | 19 | 17 | |
Characteristic and differential species of association | |||||||
Hypochaeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. et Gibelli | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. subsp. panormitanum | + | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | + | + | + | . | + | . | 4 |
Char. of the alliance, order and class | |||||||
Parietaria judaica L. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | + | 1 | + | 1 | + | + | 6 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | 1 | + | + | . | + | + | 5 |
Anogramma leptophylla (L.) Link | + | + | + | + | . | + | 5 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | + | + | . | . | + | . | 3 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | . | . | + | . | . | + | 2 |
Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Transgressive species of the class Asplenietea trichomanis | |||||||
Polypodium cambricum L. | 1 | 1 | . | + | + | 1 | 5 |
Dianthus rupicola Biv. | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 3 |
Iberis semperflorens L. | . | 1 | . | . | + | 1 | 3 |
Cymbalaria pubescens (C.Presl) Cufod. | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | 2 |
Athamanta sicula L. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Quercetea ilicis | 0 | ||||||
Allium subhirsutum L. | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | 1 | 5 |
Pistacia terebinthus L. subsp. terebinthus | + | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 3 |
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 3 |
Prasium majus L. | 1 | . | . | . | + | 1 | 3 |
Artemisia arborescens L. | + | . | + | . | . | . | 2 |
Arisarum vulgare O.Targ.Tozz. | + | . | . | . | 1 | . | 2 |
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T.Durand et Schinz | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | 2 |
Selaginella denticulata (L.) Spring | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | 2 |
Euphorbia dendroides L. | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 |
Other species | |||||||
Campanula erinus L. | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 5 |
Theligonum cynocrambe L. | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | + | + | 6 |
Mercurialis annua L. | 1 | + | . | . | . | + | 3 |
Carlina sicula Ten. | + | . | . | . | . | 1 | 2 |
Galium murale (L.) All. | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Oxalis pes caprae L. | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | 2 |
Hypochaeris achyrophorus L. | . | . | . | + | + | . | 2 |
Valantia muralis L. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Geranium lucidum L. | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Stellaria neglecta Weihe subsp. neglecta | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Micromeria fruticulosa (Bertol.) Šilić (Bertol.) Guinea | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 90 | 95 | 90 | 95 | |
Slope (°) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
Aspect | N | N/NE | N | N/NE | |
Area (m2) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
Total cover (%) | 50 | 45 | 50 | 45 | |
Average height (cm) | 40 | 45 | 40 | 45 | |
Species per relevé | 12 | 10 | 14 | 12 | |
Guide species | |||||
Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Char. of the class Parietarietea judaicae | |||||
Hypochaeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. et Gibelli | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Parietaria judaica L. | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | + | + | + | + | 4 |
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | 1 | . | 1 | + | 3 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | . | + | + | + | 3 |
Transgr. of the class Asplenietea trichomanis | |||||
Dianthus rupicola Biv. | . | 1 | + | 1 | 3 |
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. | . | 1 | . | 1 | 2 |
Other species | |||||
Campanula erinus L. | 1 | + | 1 | + | 4 |
Galium murale (L.) All. | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 4 |
Hypochaeris achyrophorus L. | + | . | + | + | 3 |
Euphorbia dendroides L. | 1 | . | 1 | . | 2 |
Arisarum vulgare O.Targ.Tozz. | + | . | + | . | 2 |
Selaginella denticulata (L.) Spring | + | . | + | . | 2 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 570 | 550 | 350 | 330 | 550 | |
Slope (°) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
Aspect | S | SW | S | W | SW | |
Area (m2) | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
Total cover (%) | 45 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 45 | |
Average height (cm) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
Species per relevé | 18 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 15 | |
Guide species | ||||||
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Char. of the alliance, order and class | ||||||
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | + | 4 |
Transgr. of the class Tuberarietea guttatae | ||||||
Misopates orontium (L.) Raf. | + | + | + | 1 | + | 5 |
Carduus pycnocephalus L. | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | + | 5 |
Hypochaeris achyrophorus L. | 1 | + | 1 | + | + | 5 |
Avena barbata Pott ex Link | 1 | + | 1 | . | + | 4 |
Anisantha fasciculata (C.Presl) Nevski | + | + | + | . | + | 4 |
Campanula erinus L. | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Lagurus ovatus L. subsp. ovatus | + | + | . | . | + | 3 |
Char. of the alliance, order and class | ||||||
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | + | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Sonchus tenerrimus L. | 1 | 1 | + | + | 1 | 5 |
Theligonum cynocrambe L. | + | + | 1 | + | + | 5 |
Trifolium stellatum L. | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | . | 3 |
Mercurialis annua L. | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Echium parviflorum Moench | + | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Euphorbia dendroides L. | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | 2 |
Asparagus albus L. | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 90 | 92 | 150 | 180 | 6 | 6 | |
Slope (°) | 85 | 85 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
Aspect | E | E | E | E | N | NE | |
Area (m2) | 8 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
Total cover (%) | 60 | 55 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 30 | |
Average height (cm) | 60 | 50 | 70 | 65 | 60 | 60 | |
Species per relevé | 11 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 10 | |
Characteristic and differentials species of association | |||||||
Capparis spinosa L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
Char. of the class Parietarietea judaicae | |||||||
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | . | + | 5 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | + | + | + | . | + | + | 5 |
Parietaria judaica L. | 1 | 1 | . | + | + | + | 5 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | + | . | . | + | . | + | 3 |
Sonchus tenerrimus L. | . | . | . | + | + | + | 3 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | . | + | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Hyoscyamus albus L. | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 |
Ficus carica L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Asplenietea trichomanis | |||||||
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
Dianthus rupicola Biv. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
Seseli bocconei Guss. | . | . | + | 1 | 2 | ||
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | + | 1 | . | . | 2 | ||
Other species | |||||||
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | 1 | 1 | . | . | + | + | 4 |
Micromeria fruticulosa (Bertol.) Šilić | 1 | . | + | 1 | . | . | 3 |
Campanula erinus L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | 2 |
Sachys major (L.) Bartolucci et Peruzzi | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | 2 |
Galium cinereum All. | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Euphorbia dendroides L. | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | 2 |
Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G.L.Nesom | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Valantia muralis L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Lomelosia cretica (L.) Greuter et Burdet | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 |
Pinus halepensis Mill. | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 |
Fumaria capreolata L. subsp. capreolata | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5* | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Presence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altitude (m) | 150 | 110 | 150 | 160 | 186 | 190 | 160 | 170 | 150 | 180 | 330 | 330 | 300 | 300 | 270 | |
Slope (°) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 85 | 90 | 85 | 85 | 85 | |
Aspect | N | N | N | N | NW | NW | E | E | E | E | W | W | SW | SW | W | |
Area (m2) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 20 | 30 | 20 | |
Total cover (%) | 55 | 55 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 50 | |
Average height (cm) | 50 | 50 | 35 | 40 | 40 | 45 | 45 | 40 | 55 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 50 | |
Species per relevé | 20 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 19 | 17 | |
Characteristic and differentials species of association | ||||||||||||||||
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
Dianthus rupicola Biv. | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
Micromeria fruticulosa (Bertol.) Šilić | 1 | . | + | + | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | . | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | + | + | . | + | + | + | . | . | + | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | . | 9 |
Char. of the alliance Dianthion rupicolae and class Asplenietea trichomanis | ||||||||||||||||
Lomelosia cretica (L.) Greuter et Burdet | 1 | + | . | + | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | + | . | 1 | 1 | 13 |
Galium cinereum All. | + | . | . | 1 | + | 1 | + | + | + | + | . | + | . | + | . | 10 |
Seseli bocconei Guss. | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | 1 | + | . | . | 1 | . | 8 |
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 | + | 1 | 8 |
Hypochaeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. et Gibelli | + | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 7 |
Iberis semperflorens L. | + | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 5 |
Centaurea panormitana Lojac. | 1 | . | + | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Matthiola incana (L.) W.T.Aiton subsp. rupestris | . | + | + | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Silene fruticosa L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | 3 |
Athamanta sicula L. | . | + | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Ballota hispanica (L.) Benth. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Teucrium flavum L. subsp. flavum | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Brassica rupestris Raf. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 2 |
Sedum dasyphyllum L. subsp. dasyphyllum | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Coronilla valentina L. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Convolvulus cneorum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 |
Char. of the class Parietarietea judaicae | ||||||||||||||||
Capparis spinosa L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | 7 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | 7 |
Parietaria judaica L. | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | + | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | 6 |
Sedum sediforme (Jacq.) Pau | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | + | + | 1 | + | 6 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | + | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | + | . | . | 4 | |
Sonchus tenerrimus L. | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 3 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Quercetea ilicis | ||||||||||||||||
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T.Durand et Schinz | + | . | 1 | + | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | 6 |
Euphorbia dendroides L. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | + | 1 | + | 6 |
Prasium majus L. | . | . | . | + | + | + | 1 | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | 6 |
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Artemisia arborescens L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 3 |
Pinus halepensis Mill. | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Emerus major Mill. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Cytisus infestus (C.Presl) Guss. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Asparagus acutifolius L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Pistacia terebinthus L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Euphorbia bivonae Steud. subsp. bivonae | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 |
Asparagus albus L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Other species | ||||||||||||||||
Campanula erinus L. | . | + | . | . | + | + | + | . | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | 7 |
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt. | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Prospero autumnale (L.) Speta | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | 4 |
Valantia muralis L. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | 3 |
Reseda alba L. | . | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Mercurialis annua L. | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Avena barbata Pott ex Link | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Anthyllis maura Beck | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Dittrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter subsp. viscosa | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Asphodelus ramosus L. subsp. ramosus | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | 2 |
Theligonum cynocrambe L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Echium plantagineum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Charybdis maritima (L.) Speta | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 |
Trachynia distachya (L.) Link. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 |
Shady-mesic slopes of the road system: A view of via Monte Ercta; B Athamanto-Parietarietum judaicae; C Helichryso-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae; D vegetation of the Olopto-Pennisetetum setacei (road margins) and Diantho-Helichrysetum panormitanae (walls); E vegetation of the Teucrio flavi-Rhoetum coriariae; F woody plants at the base of masonry guardwalls.
Xerophilous slopes of the road system: A view of via Bonanno; B Antirrhinetum siculi; C Capparidetum rupestris; D aspects of the series Ruto-Oleo sylvestris sigmetum; E Olopto-Pennisetetum setacei (road margins) and Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum (slope); F vegetation of the Rhamno-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. artemisietosum arborescentis.
Scabioso creticae-Centauretum ucriae Brullo et Marcenò 1979 subass. typicum.
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Presence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altitude (m) | 47 | 165 | 170 | 180 | 250 | 330 | 330 | |
Slope (°) | 88 | 85 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 85 | 90 | |
Aspect | NW | N | NW | NW | NW | W | W | |
Area (m2) | 20 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 30 | 20 | |
Total cover (%) | 60 | 60 | 50 | 55 | 55 | 65 | 60 | |
Herbaceous cover (%) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Average height (cm) | 24 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 29 | 28 | 23 | |
Characteristic and differential species of association | ||||||||
Lomelosia cretica (L.) Greuter et Burdet | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Helichrysum panormitanum Guss. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | + | + | 7 |
Euphorbia bivonae Steud. subsp. bivonae | 1 | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | 3 |
Centaurea panormitana Lojac. | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 2 |
Convolvulus cneorum L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Char. of the alliance Dianthion rupicolae and class Asplenietea trichomanis | ||||||||
Dianthus rupicola Biv. | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Seseli bocconei Guss. | 1 | + | . | . | + | + | . | 4 |
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | + | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Iberis semperflorens L. | + | + | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | 5 |
Matthiola incana (L.) W.T.Aiton subsp. rupestris | 1 | + | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | 5 |
Coronilla valentina L. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 4 |
Brassica rupestris Raf. | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | 4 |
Ballota hispanica (L.) Benth | + | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | 4 |
Hypochaeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. et Gibelli | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | + | 4 |
Sedum dasyphyllum L. subsp. dasyphyllum | + | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | 3 |
Silene fruticosa L. | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Glandora rosmarinifolia (Ten.) D.C.Thomas | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 |
Teucrium flavum L. subsp. flavum | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Parietarietea | ||||||||
Ceterach officinarum Willd. | . | . | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Antirrhinum siculum Mill. | . | + | 1 | + | + | . | . | 4 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | + | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | 3 |
Sedum sediforme (Jacq.) Pau | . | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | 3 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | . | + | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | 3 |
Parietaria judaica L. | + | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Capparis spinosa L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Quercetea ilicis | ||||||||
Euphorbia dendroides L. | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | + | 5 |
Prasium majus L. | . | + | . | . | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Asparagus acutifolius L. | + | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | 3 |
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T.Durand et Schinz | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | 3 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Asparagus albus L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Melica minuta L. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Cytisus infestus (C.Presl) Guss. | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Artemisia arborescens L. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Other species | ||||||||
Galium cinereum All. | 1 | 1 | + | + | 1 | . | . | 5 |
Micromeria fruticulosa (Bertol.) Šilić | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 5 |
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt. | 1 | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Allium polyanthum Schult. et Schult.f. | . | 1 | 1 | + | + | . | . | 4 |
Campanula erinus L. | . | . | . | . | + | + | 1 | 3 |
Asphodelus ramosus L. subsp. ramosus | + | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Prospero autumnale (L.) Speta | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Elaeoselinum asclepium (L.) Bertol. | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | 2 |
Calendula suffruticosa Vahl subsp. fulgida (Raf.) Guadagno | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Echium parviflorum Moench | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | 2 |
Hirschfeldia incana (L.) Lagr.-Foss. subsp. incana | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Dactylis glomerata L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Narcissus tazetta L. | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Charybdis maritima (L.) Speta | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Jacobaea delphiniifolia (Vahl) Pelser et Veldkamp | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | 1 |
Theligonum cynocrambe L. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Veronica persica Poir. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Valantia muralis L. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Smyrnium olusatrum L. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 1 |
Lathyrus clymenum L. | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 |
Avena barbata Pott ex Link | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 |
Convolvulus elegantissimus Mill. | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 |
Reseda alba L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Ferula communis L. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Carlina sicula Ten. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 150 | 180 | 300 | 350 | |
Slope (°) | 1 | 5 | 8 | 10 | |
Aspect | S | S | SE | SE | |
Area (m2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Total cover (%) | 75 | 85 | 85 | 90 | |
Average height (cm) | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | |
Species per relevé | 21 | 20 | 18 | 23 | |
Dominant species | |||||
Stipellula capensis (Thunb.) Röser et H.R.Hamasha | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
Char. of the alliance | |||||
Trachynia distachya (L.) Link | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Euphorbia exigua L. | + | + | 1 | + | 4 |
Trisetaria aurea (Ten.) Pignatti | + | 2 | . | + | 3 |
Sagina apetala Ard. | . | . | + | 1 | 2 |
Char. of the order and class | |||||
Anisantha fasciculata (C.Presl) Nevski | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Silene colorata Poir. | 2 | + | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Trifolium campestre Schreb. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 4 |
Trifolium scabrum L. | 1 | + | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Catapodium hemipoa (Delile ex Spreng.) M.Laínz | 2 | 1 | + | 1 | 4 |
Plantago afra L. | + | + | + | + | 4 |
Hypochaeris achyrophorus L. | + | + | 2 | + | 4 |
Arenaria leptoclados (Rchb.) Guss. | + | + | . | 1 | 3 |
Bellis annua L. | + | . | + | + | 3 |
Crupina crupinastrum (Moris) Vis. | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Other species | |||||
Lotus ornithopodioides L. | 1 | + | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Geranium molle L. | 1 | + | 1 | + | 4 |
Lagurus ovatus L. subsp. ovatus | + | 1 | . | 1 | 3 |
Hyoseris radiata L. | + | . | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Misopates orontium (L.) Raf. | . | + | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Polypodium cambricum L. | 1 | + | . | . | 2 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | + | 1 | . | . | 2 |
Lotus edulis L. | + | + | . | . | 2 |
Trifolium suffocatum L. | + | . | + | + | 2 |
Asphodelus ramosus L. subsp. ramosus | . | 1 | . | . | 1 |
Carduus pycnocephalus L. | . | . | . | + | 1 |
Umbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC. | . | . | . | + | 1 |
Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997 subass. artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov.
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5* | 6 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 300 | 310 | 320 | 350 | 350 | 380 | |
Slope (°) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Aspect | SW | W | W | SW | SW | SW | |
Area (m2) | 40 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
Total cover (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 80 | 90 | |
Average height (cm) | 40 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
Species per relevé | 9 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 11 | |
Characteristic and differential species of the association and subass. | |||||||
Euphorbia dendroides L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Artemisia arborescens L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Char. of the alliance, order and class | |||||||
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | 1 | 2 | 2 | + | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Pistacia terebinthus L. | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | . | 1 | 5 |
Asparagus albus L. | 2 | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | . | 4 |
Euphorbia bivonae Steud. subsp. bivonae | 1 | . | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris (Mill.) Lehr. | . | 1 | . | + | . | + | 3 |
Asparagus acutifolius L. | . | . | . | . | + | + | 2 |
Other species | |||||||
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt. | 3 | 2 | 2 | + | . | . | 4 |
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | . | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Carlina sicula Ten. | . | 1 | . | 1 | + | . | 3 |
Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze | + | . | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Lomelosia cretica (L.) Greuter et Burdet | . | . | + | . | . | + | 2 |
Reseda alba L. | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | 2 |
Spartium junceum L. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Silene fruticosa L. | . | . | 2 | . | . | . | 1 |
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2* | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altitude (m) | 145 | 140 | 150 | 120 | 180 | 100 | 8 | 8 | 150 | 90 | 95 | 90 | |
Slope (°) | 5 | 5 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | Presence |
Aspect | N | N | NE | NE | NE | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | |
Area (m2) | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 50 | |
Total cover (%) | 100 | 100 | 70 | 70 | 80 | 95 | 80 | 70 | 90 | 95 | 90 | 85 | |
Shrubby cover (%) | 70 | 75 | 70 | 70 | 75 | 70 | 70 | 50 | 85 | 90 | 85 | 80 | |
Herbaceous cover (%) | 35 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 65 | 70 | 50 | |
Average height (cm) | 3 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 | |
Species per relevé | 28 | 25 | 19 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 14 | 15 | 23 | 25 | 19 | 25 | |
Characteristic and differential species of the association | |||||||||||||
Rhus coriaria L. | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 |
Teucrium flavum L. subsp. flavum | 2 | + | 3 | + | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | + | . | + | 11 |
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt. | 1 | + | 1 | + | . | 2 | . | + | + | + | + | + | 10 |
Char. of the alliance Oleo-Ceratonion | |||||||||||||
Euphorbia dendroides L. | + | 1 | . | + | + | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | 2 | 7 |
Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris (Mill.) Lehr. | 1 | + | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | 4 |
Teucrium fruticans L. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Char. of the order Pistacio lentisci-Rhamnetalia alaterni and class Quercetea ilicis | |||||||||||||
Rubia peregrina L. | 3 | 2 | + | + | . | 1 | + | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 11 |
Asparagus acutifolius L. | 1 | 1 | + | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 8 |
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | + | 1 | . | . | 1 | + | . | + | 8 |
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T.Durand et Schinz | 3 | 1 | + | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | 7 |
Clematis cirrhosa L. | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | + | + | . | + | . | 5 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | 6 |
Hedera helix L. | + | . | + | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | . | + | . | 6 |
Arisarum vulgare O.Targ.Tozz. | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | . | + | 6 |
Fraxinus ornus L. | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | + | 1 | 1 | + | 6 |
Pistacia terebinthus L. | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | + | 5 |
Smilax aspera L. | 2 | 1 | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | 5 |
Ruta chalepensis L. | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | 4 |
Euphorbia characias L. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | + | . | . | 4 |
Rosa sempervirens L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Prasium majus L. | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Phillyrea latifolia L. | 1 | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Quercus ilex L. | . | . | . | + | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Lonicera implexa Aiton | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Pistacia lentiscus L. | 2 | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Anagyris foetida L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Osyris alba L. | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Emerus major Mill. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Transgr. of the class Crataego-Prunetea | |||||||||||||
Rubus ulmifolius Schott | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 12 |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Rosa canina L. | . | . | 1 | . | . | 2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 |
Prunus spinosa L. | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Other species | |||||||||||||
Vicia villosa subsp. varia (Host) Corb. | 2 | 1 | . | . | + | . | + | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 9 |
Oxalis pes caprae L. | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
Acanthus mollis L. subsp. mollis | 2 | 2 | + | + | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | + | 6 |
Brachypodium retusum (Pers.) P.Beauv. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 5 |
Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | + | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Ferula communis L. | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | . | 5 |
Carlina sicula Ten. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | 4 |
Scrophularia canina L. | . | + | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 |
Galium cinereum All. | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | + | . | 3 |
Seseli bocconei Guss. | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | 2 |
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | + | . | 2 |
Ranunculus millefoliatus Vahl | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | . | 2 |
Daucus carota L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | 2 |
Briza maxima L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | 2 |
Charybdis maritima (L.) Speta | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | 2 |
Smyrnium olusatrum L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Oloptum miliaceum (L.) R.ser et H.R.Hamasha | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Asphodelus ramosus L. subsp. ramosus | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 |
Dactylis glomerata L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 |
DCA ordination of the community of Monte Pellegrino road system. Legend: 1. Crepido-Parietarietum; 2. Athamanto-Parietarietum; 3. Helichryso-Hypochaeridetum; 4. Centranthetum; 5. Antirrhinetum; 6. Capparidetum; 7. Diantho Helichrysetum; 8. Scabioso-Centauretum; 9. Gr. Stipellula; 10. Olopto-Pennisetetum 11. Rhamno-Euphorbietum; 12. Teucrio-Rhoetum; 13. Gr. Rhamnus and Pistacia.
Relevé (n°) | 1 | 2 | Presence |
Altitude (m) | 80 | 120 | |
Slope (°) | 90 | 90 | |
Aspect | N | N | |
Area (m2) | 40 | 30 | |
Total cover (%) | 100 | 100 | |
Average height (cm) | 40 | 40 | |
Species per relevé | 13 | 17 | |
Guide species | |||
Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus | 5 | 5 | 2 |
Pistacia terebinthus L. | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Char. of the alliance, order and class | |||
Euphorbia dendroides L. | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Asparagus acutifolius L. | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Teucrium flavum L. subsp. flavum | + | + | 2 |
Artemisia arborescens L. | 1 | . | 1 |
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T.Durand et Schinz | . | 1 | 1 |
Allium subhirsutum L. | . | 1 | 1 |
Rubia peregrina L. | . | 1 | 1 |
Smilax aspera L. | . | 1 | 1 |
Fraxinus ornus L. | . | 1 | 1 |
Emerus major Mill. | . | 1 | 1 |
Other species | |||
Acanthus mollis L. subsp. mollis | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Phagnalon saxatile (L.) Cass. | + | 1 | 2 |
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Pennisetum setaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. | 3 | . | 1 |
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H.Stirt. | 1 | . | 1 |
Carlina sicula Ten. | + | . | 1 |
Reseda alba L. | + | . | 1 |
Galium cinereum All. | . | 2 | 1 |
Oloptum miliaceum (L.) Röser et H.R.Hamasha | . | 1 | 1 |
Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | . | 1 | 1 |
Shared species (‘a’ component of the “Jaccard Index”) among communities of the road system.
A value | C-Pa | A-Pa | H-Hy | Cen | Ant | Cap | D-He | S-Ce | g-St | O-Pe | R-Eu | T-Rh |
A-Pa | 9 | |||||||||||
H-Hy | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||
Cen | 6 | 7 | 15 | |||||||||
Ant | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | ||||||||
Cap | 8 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 8 | |||||||
D-He | 11 | 14 | 24 | 11 | 12 | 20 | ||||||
S-Ce | 11 | 9 | 21 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 45 | |||||
g-St | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 3 | ||||
O-Pe | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | |||
R-Eu | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 | ||
T-Rh | 8 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 17 | 1 | 10 | 9 | |
g-Rh | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 17 |
Jaccard | C-Pa | A-Pa | H-Hy | Cen | Ant | Cap | D-He | S-Ce | g-St | O-Pe | R-Eu | T-Rh |
A-Pa | 0.20 | |||||||||||
H-Hy | 0.16 | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Cen | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.43 | |||||||||
Ant | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.21 | ||||||||
Cap | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.22 | |||||||
D-He | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.32 | ||||||
S-Ce | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.61 | |||||
g-St | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | ||||
O-Pe | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.01 | |||
R-Eu | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.12 | ||
T-Rh | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.15 | |
g-Rh | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
Life form of the communities of the road system (C-Pa: Crepido-Parietarietum; A-Pa: Athamanto-Parietarietum; H-Hy: Helichryso-Hypochaeridetum; Cen: Centranthetum; Ant: Antirrhinetum; Cap: Capparidetum; D-He: Diantho-Helichrysetum; S-Ce: Scabioso-Centauretum; 9. F-St: gr. Stipellula; O-Pe: Olopto-Pennisetetum; R-Eu: Rhamno-Euphorbietum; T-Rh: Teucrio-Rhoetum; g-Rh: Gr. Rhamnus and Pistacia).
Flora | C-Pa | A-Pa | H-Hy | Cen | Ant | Cap | D-He | S-Ce | g-St | O-Pe | R-Eu | T-Rh | g-Rh |
CH | 7.9 | 6.3 | 25.7 | 33.3 | 10.5 | 28.0 | 29.3 | 29.5 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 16.7 | 9.6 | 13.6 |
G | 10.5 | 18.8 | 11.4 | 20.0 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 4.5 |
H | 28.9 | 31.3 | 22.9 | 20.0 | 15.8 | 20.0 | 22.4 | 24.6 | 11.1 | 47.9 | 22.2 | 26.9 | 27.3 |
NP | 2.6 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 10.5 | 8.0 | 13.8 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 27.8 | 19.2 | 22.7 |
P | 2.6 | 6.3 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 27.8 | 26.9 | 13.6 |
T | 47.4 | 37.5 | 28.6 | 20.0 | 57.9 | 32.0 | 19.0 | 19.7 | 81.5 | 35.4 | 5.6 | 7.7 | 18.2 |
Freq. | C-Pa | A-Pa | H-Hy | Cen | Ant | Cap | D-He | S-Ce | g-St | O-Pe | T-Rh | R-Eu | g-Rh |
CH | 9.6 | 7.3 | 27.4 | 29.2 | 13.5 | 31.8 | 44.4 | 42.4 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 11.3 | 9.4 | 16.7 |
G | 10.5 | 12.7 | 13.2 | 18.8 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 2.4 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 3.3 |
H | 32.5 | 38.2 | 24.5 | 25.0 | 18.9 | 21.2 | 23.7 | 21.8 | 6.1 | 60.2 | 27.4 | 23.0 | 23.3 |
NP | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 32.3 | 19.6 | 23.3 |
P | 0.9 | 3.6 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 25.8 | 27.7 | 16.7 |
T | 44.7 | 38.2 | 26.4 | 22.9 | 56.8 | 27.3 | 15.8 | 13.3 | 91.5 | 26.2 | 3.2 | 10.6 | 16.7 |
Cover | C-Pa | A-Pa | H-Hy | Cen | Ant | Cap | D-He | S-Ce | g-St | O-Pe | T-Rh | R-Eu | g-Rh |
CH | 0.6 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 74.9 | 75.7 | 13.6 | 87.4 | 86.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 6.9 | 0.0 |
G | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 10.4 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 24.4 |
H | 91.8 | 88.5 | 79.7 | 7.4 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 85.0 | 34.6 | 9.7 | 66.5 |
NP | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 77.3 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 57.8 | 9.0 | 0.2 |
P | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 5.7 | 57.6 | 0.5 |
T | 6.7 | 8.4 | 6.8 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 99.0 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 7.2 | 8.3 |
The phytocoenoses detected along the Monte Pellegrino road system are the result of a process of sponteaneous plant colonization on man-made infrastructure, built in a context of particular naturalistic value. These communities have gradually evolved in an almost undisturbed way, as maintenance has been limited to the sporadic removal or cutting of vegetation only at the road margins and the edges of drainage ditches. The masonry works and rock walls delimiting the uphill and downhill sides of the entire road system have been completely unmaintained.
The rock walls created from the excavation of the limestone substrate, have also been subjected to a slow colonization process by chasmophytic species, typical of natural rock faces, which are also very common in the area. Disturbances of these areas have been limited to the placing of metal mesh in a few sections to stabilize the slope. However, this did not preclude the settlement of rupicolous associations, such as Scabioso creticae-Centauretum ucriae (shady-mesic slopes) and Capparidetum rupestris (xeric slopes), both previously noted in this area (Brullo and Marcenò 1979;
The syndynamic diversification of the road system is primarily related to the main habitats characterizing the individual stretches of road, such as retaining walls, road embankments and rocky walls, masonry guardwalls and road margins.
Indeed, it can be observed that, under conditions of microtopographic homogeneity in a road section (e.g., along the straightaways), the phytocoenoses tend to maintain their homogeneity. On the contrary, as certain ecological factors vary (slope, exposure of the individual stretch of road, altitude, available shade, nitrophilia, availability or lack of nutrients, etc.), the arrangement of the coenoses tends instead to vary with substitutions or interpenetrations.
Overall, depending on the microclimatic diversification of the Monte Pellegrino promontory where the roadway under investigation was built, it is possible to distinguish two different microgeoseries of the road system: respectively a xerophilous and a shady-mesic one.
The xerophilous microgeoseries can be found along the stretches of the southern and western slopes, starting from the foot of the mountain, the so-called “falde di Monte Pellegrino”. The most representative features of this microgeoseries are schematized in Fig.
The shady-mesic microgeoseries of the road system is, instead, found on the northern slope of the promontory; its exemplary characteristics are schematized in Fig.
Among the new associations described, two of them concern communities dominated by Parietaria judaica (Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum ass. nov. and Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum ass. nov.), related to different areas of the masonry structures. Here, in fact, the widespread presence of the aforementioned vital and invasive dominant species tends to impose similar physiognomies on different ecological contexts, making it difficult to concretely identify phytocoenoses. However, those which are settled at the base tend to have a floristic composition rich in synanthropic and ruderal elements of the classes Stellarietea, Lygeo-Stipetea (Bromo-Oryzopsion) and Polygono-Poetea annuae, differently from the slightly higher parts of the walls. There, in fact, the Parietaria vegetation reveals a total absence of such elements and is, instead, enriched with other, rather rare chasmophytic species of the class Asplenietea trichomanis (e.g., Athamanta sicula), allowing a clear diversification of the coenoses.
Generally, plant communities growing on these kinds of walls normally form anthropogenic coenoses characterized by nitrophilic and nutrient needy plants as they are subjected to the crumbling of their underlying materials (rocks and mortar) which allow for the fertilization and humidification of the surfaces. The wall plants thus tend to form relatively unstable formations in the long term, also due to anthropic disturbances (cleaning, restoration, reconstruction, etc.) which benefit neophytes and species arriving via anthropochory dissemination (
Along the old walls of the Monte Pellegrino road system, conversely, the absence of these human disturbances has led, over time, to the establishment of communities that are partly unique, as in the case of Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. and Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani Gianguzzi ass. nov., both dominated by Asteraceae with anemophilous distribution. These are two peculiar, endemic coenoses of this local area.
Among the vegetation aspects of the road margins, Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei Gianguzzi ass. nov. stands out. This is a nitrophilic-ruderal coenosis of the Bromo-Oryzopsion miliaceae alliance, dominated by Pennisetum setaceum, a rapidly expanding invasive exotic along the coastal roads of Sicily, linked to the more xeric bioclimatic zone. On the road embankments of the northern slope, it is substituted by vegetation dominated by Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Helictotricho convoluti-Ampelodesmetum mauritanici), presenting prairie aspects linked to the holm oak series (Rhamno alaterni-Querco ilicis sigmetum). The shrubby phytocoenoses linked to the less disturbed road margins are: Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis artemisietosum arborescentis subss. nov., Teucrio flavi-Rhoetum coriariae Gianguzzi ass. nov., and a maquis dominated by Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus, while the chasmophytic associations tied to rupicolous habitat are Capparidetum rupestris and Scabioso creticae-Centauretum ucriae.
The phytosociological analysis of the various anthropogenic habitats (masonry retaining wall, masonry guardwall, road margins, rock cut slope) has shown that these communities, though autonomous, have floristic relationships and affinities both with the natural phytocoenoses of Monte Pellegrino, external to the road system, and with the phytocoenoses of the other habitats that are part of the road system. The latter, in fact, develop in contact with each other within the habitat sequence.
Among the natural phytocoenoses, there are mainly rupicolous communities, grassland and Mediterranean maquis formations, which are quite extended throughout the promontory. They constitute the source habitats of the main species which, in turn, play an important pioneer role in the gradual colonization process of the artificial micro-habitats characterizing the road system. These are closely related phytocoenoses, which differ according to variations of ecological gradient within the sequence in the respective geosigmeta.
The phytosociological study of the vegetation connected to the Monte Pellegrino road system allowed us to differentiate 10 associations, 1 sub-association and 2 groupment, in turn ascribed to 5 different classes of vegetation. These plant communities settled down through a slow colonization process that lasted about a century, distributed across the artificial microhabitats of the route according to the topography and the microclimatic factors of the sites. Recent anthropogenic factors (direct and indirect) are of limited significance, restricted to sporadic cleaning of the road margins and slopes. There was no maintenance of the retaining walls, where chasmophytic vegetation was able to settle and evolve undisturbed. It should also be noted that the disturbance of the wall vegetation by fires was almost nonexistent given their low frequency in the area. On this basis, peculiar and endemic phytocoenoses could also develop, such as Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov. and Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani Gianguzzi ass. nov.
The different phytocoenoses detected reflect the high number of microhabitats present in the road system under investigation, which are differentiated according to the slopes and the altitude of this suburban road. Some of these communities have been described as new associations or sub-associations, while other chasmophytic formations (e.g., Centranthetum rubri and Antirrhinetum siculi) were not reported for this area in a previous contribution on vegetation (
The chasmophytic vegetation includes some phytocoenoses whose microtopographic location is closely linked to the different conditions present along the profile of the walls and rock faces. In fact, the species that grow towards the base are normally more numerous than those that are typical of the upper parts of the walls, where survival is more difficult. This is due, above all, to a lack of suitable hollows – which are also poor in soil, moisture, and useful nutrients – in addition to more direct wind exposure and a higher temperature range (daily and annual). This obviously made the initial establishment, as well as the growth and development of plants, more difficult. Additionally, the dispersion of seeds – regardless of the diffusion vector, biotic (animals, insects, etc.) or abiotic (wind, water, etc.) – as well as germination tend to decrease in almost direct proportion to distance from the ground.
In the floristic settlement of the coenoses there are several exotic and alien species (e.g., Boerhavia repens, Pennisetum setaceum, Oxalis pes-caprae, etc.), some of which are even dominant and characteristic of specific plant communities (Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirto-pubescentis,
It can therefore be said that the Monte Pellegrino promontory acts as a refuge site in both floristic and coenological terms, in particular on the more xeric (southern and western) slopes. Some of these elements are even in the process of expansion, having found important ecological spaces, and not only on Monte Pellegrino; this is the case of Pennisetum setaceum which, in addition to being invasive to grassland (with the association Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae, which is also increasing on neighboring hills, such as Monte Gallo, Monte Palmeto, Monte Pecoraro, etc.), also tends to expand along the road margins of the most xeric areas of Sicily.
In conclusion, the Monte Pellegrino promontory, despite some current threats, retains floristic and phytocoenotic distinctiveness and good coenological diversity which is partly of anthropogenic nature. On the basis of these considerations, it can be confirmed that suburban and rural road systems created with traditional techniques can sometimes take on important roles as reservoirs of biodiversity.
Schematic transect of the xeric geosigmetum of the Monte Pellegrino road system (via Pietro Bonanno, on the slopes of Arenella before the hairpin bend overlooking Palermo, 120 m a.s.l.): 1) grassland vegetation with Pennisetum setaceum (Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae); 2) thermo-chasmophytic wall vegetation with Capparis spinosa (Capparidetum rupestris); 3) road margin hemicryptophytic, nitrophilous vegetation with Pennisetum setaceum (Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov.); 4) chasmophytic cliff vegetation with Lomelosia cretica (Scabioso-Centauretum ucriae); 5) artificial forest plantations with Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Pinus halepensis.
Schematic transect of the xeric geosigmetum of the Monte Pellegrino road system (upper part of via Monte Ercta, near the tunnel on the slopes above the Favorita park of Palermo, 310 m a.s.l.): 1) grassland vegetation with Pennisetum setaceum (Penniseto setacei-Hyparrhenietum hirtae); 2) chamaephytic wall vegetation dominated by Antirrhinum siculum (Antirrhinetum siculi); 3) hemichryptophytic nitrophilous vegetation of the road margins with Pennisetum setaceum (Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei ass. nov.); 4) nitro-xerophilous vegetation with Euphorbia dendroides and Artemisia arborescens (Rhamno-Euphorbietum artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov.); 5) chasmo-nitrophilous, sciaphilous vegetation with Parietaria judaica (Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov.); 6) chasmophytic coenosis with Lomelosia cretica (Scabioso-Centauretum ucriae); 7) vegetation with Olea europaea var. sylvestris (Ruto chalepensis-Oleetum sylvestris); 8) artificial forest plantation with Eucalyptus camaldulensis; 9) artificial forest plantation with Pinus halepensis.
Schematic transect of the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the Monte Pellegrino road system (via Monte Ercta, descending toward Mondello, at the first harpin bend in the slopes above Contrada Allaura, 240 m a.s.l.): 1) grassland with Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Helictotricho-Ampelodesmetum mauritanici); 2) chasmo-nitrophilous, heliophilous coenosis of lower and cooler walls with Centranthus ruber (Centranthetum rubri); 3) chasmophytic, heliophilous vegetation of higher old and cool walls with Helichrysum panormitanum subsp. panormitanum (Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani ass. nov.); 4) chasmophytic coenosis with Lomelosia cretica (Scabioso-Centauretum ucriae); 5) artificial forest plantation with Pinus halepensis.
Schematic transect of the shady-mesic geosigmetum of the Monte Pellegrino road system (via Monte Ercta, at the last harpin bend on the slopes above Contrada Allaura, descending toward Mondello, 120 m a.s.l.): 1) chasmo-nitrophilous with Parietaria judaica (Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov.); 2) cemicryptophytic-camaephytic, sciaphilous vegetation on old walls with Hypochaeris laevigata (Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov.); 3) nitrophilous maquis of old walls (Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus groupment); 4) secondary maquis of detritic slopes (Teucrio flavi-Rhoetum coriariae Gianguzzi ass. nov.); 5) artificial forest plantation with Eucalyptus camaldulensis; 6) artificial forest plantation with Pinus halepensis.
Phytosociological and statistical analyses of the vegetation allowed us to organize the phytocoenoses listed in the following syntaxonomic scheme.
CYMBALARIO-PARIETARIETEA DIFFUSAE Oberd. 1969
TORTULO-CYMBALARIETALIA
Galio valantiae-Parietarion judaicae Rivas-Mart. ex O.
Crepido bursifoliae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov.
Athamanto siculae-Parietarietum judaicae ass. nov.
Helichryso panormitanae-Hypochaeridetum laevigatae ass. nov.
Centranthetum rubri Oberd. 1969
Antirrhinetum siculi Bartolo & Brullo 1986
Artemisio arborescentis-Capparidion spinosae Biondi, Blasi et Galdenzi in Biondi et al. 2014
Capparidetum rupestris O. Bolòs & Molinier 1958
ASPLENIETEA TRICHOMANIS (Br.-Bl. in Mei. & Br.-Bl. 1934) Ober. 1977
ASPLENIETALIA GLANDULOSI Br.-Bl. & Meier in Meier & Br.-Bl. 1934
Dianthion rupicolae Brullo & Marcenò 1979
Diantho siculae-Helichrysetum panormitani Gianguzzi ass. nov.
Scabioso creticae-Centauretum ucriae Brullo & Marcenò 1979
STIPO-TRACHYNIETEA DISTACHYAE S. Brullo in S. Brullo et al. 2001
BRACHYPODIETALIA DISTACHYAE Rivas-Martínez 1978
Hypochoeridion achyrophori Biondi & Guerra 2008
Groupment with Stipellula capensis
ARTEMISIETEA VULGARIS Lohmeyer et al. in Tx. Ex von Rochow 1951
Elytrigio repentis-Dittrichietalia viscosae Mucina in Mucina et al. 2016
Bromo-Oryzopsion miliaceae O. Bolòs 1970
Olopto miliacei-Pennisetetum setacei Gianguzzi ass. nov.
QUERCETEA ILICIS Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952
Pistacio lentisci-Rhamnetalia alaterni Rivas-Martínez 1975
Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae Br.-Bl. ex Guinochet & Drouineau 1944
Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis Géhu & Biondi 1997
artemisietosum arborescentis subass. nov.
Teucrio flavi-Rhoetum coriariae Gianguzzi ass. nov.
Groupment with Rhamnus alaternus and Pistacia terebinthus
Financial supports from “Fondo di Finanziamento della Ricerca di Ateneo (FFR2019)”.
The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful readings and suggestions that improved the overall quality of the text.
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table