Research Article |
Corresponding author: Lorenzo Gianguzzi ( lorenzo.gianguzzi@unipa.it ) Academic editor: Federico Fernández-González
© 2022 Lorenzo Gianguzzi, Orazio Caldarella, Salvatore Pasta.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gianguzzi L, Caldarella O, Pasta S (2022) A new association of relict maquis with Ptilostemon greuteri (Oleo-Ceratonion, Quercetea ilicis), located in a circumscribed area of north-western Sicily. Plant Sociology 59(1): 67-83. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2022591/06
|
This paper illustrates the results of a survey aimed at deepening available knowledge on the ecology of Ptilostemon greuteri (Asteraceae), a very rare palaeoendemic and relict nano-phanerophyte discovered about 15 years ago on Monte Inici, near Castellammare del Golfo (province of Trapani, north-western Sicily). Two plant communities characterised by P. greuteri are described in detail; they occur in the locus classicus and in a second, recently discovered stand, which is also very localised and threatened by fire. The field investigations revealed that the sites where the species grows are very similar from the ecological point of view; in fact, both of them are located on the steep slopes of deep gullies, benefitting from constantly cool and shady microclimatic conditions, and allowed to a) better identify the currently preferred habitat (ledges, screes at the base of cliffs), b) analyse from a floristic and phytosociological point of view the maquis communities where P. greuteri grows as co-dominant or dominant species, referable to the class Quercetea ilicis, c) to identify the syndynamic role that these coenoses play within the series and microgeoseries of local vegetation. As far as syntaxonomy is concerned, the Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri ass. nova is described, a basiphilous, thermophilous and shade-tolerant maquis framed in the Oleo-Ceratonion alliance. Moreover, two subassociations are described: 1) typicum subass. nova, corresponding to a pioneer maquis community prevailing on the coarse, loose and mobile debris located along the slopes at the base of rock cliffs, where P. greuteri is clearly dominant and shows a nano-phanerophytic habitus, and 2) euphorbietosum bivonae subass. nova, a primary aspect found of the ledges of carbonate cliffs, where the species can play either a dominant or co-dominant role with other elements of the maquis (Euphorbia bivonae, Chamaerops humilis, etc.), sometimes showing a slightly smaller size.
evergreen Mediterranean maquis, phytosociology, Pistacio lentisci-Rhamnetalia alaterni, relict vegetation, syntaxonomy
Ptilostemon greuteri is a very rare woody species belonging to the Asteraceae family, described by Raimondo & Domina (2006) for a single locality in north-western Sicily (Mount Inici, municipality of Castellammare del Golfo, Trapani province) just some 15 years ago. This sympodial nanophanerophyte can exceed a height of 3 m and is crown bears 8-10 branches, white-tomentose at the apex, branch off from its striated monocauline stems, forming a dense, globular crown. In contrast to the Mediterranean woody sclerophylls, characterised by small, leathery and strongly cutinous leaves, P. greuteri has persistent, soft, long lanceolate, lauriphyllic leaves. Numerous and densely imbricated, these leaves are pinnate, lanceolate and subsessile, flat or slightly convex upwards, their apex obtuse to acute; they grow on the mid-terminal portion of the branches - where they persist for a long time even after drying - and give the plant a very distinctive habitus (Fig.
The size of the leaves of P. greuteri represents a remarkable anomaly in the framework of native woody species from Sicily and the Mediterranean in general: in fact, their large surface area appears a trait that does not fit in well with the long-lasting summer thermo-hydric stress typical of the climatic conditions of the entire basin. In view of its morpho-anatomical peculiarities, P. greuteri is considered a palaeoendemic (Brullo & Brullo 2021) whose extreme rarity is presumably a consequence of the glacial and post-glacial climatic changes occurred during the Quaternary. At present, the species grows wild only in two sites (Pasta et al. submitted), both of which are of high environmental and conservation value. The phylogenetic position of P. greuteri within the genus is still debated; the species was in fact referred to the section Ptilostemon by Raimondo & Domina (2006), while subsequent molecular investigations (
The survival of this species is threatened by the frequent recurrence of summer fires, the last of which occurred on 2 July 2017 and affected a vast area of Mt. Inici, completely wiping out the adult population of the locus classicus (
Drawing on the above observations and considerations, the present work aims at improving the available knowledge on the synecology of the species and its syndynamic role in the plant communities of the area where it grows. Indeed, P. greuteri had hitherto been considered a species linked to the local thermophilic chasmophytic communities (Raimondo & Domina 2006;
a) Ptilostemon greuteri; b) view of the deep gully beneath Cozzo Monaco, on the N-facing slopes of Mount Inici; c) pioneer maquis referred to Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri subass. typicum, on the scree of locality Pedrazzi; d) Malva olbia, differential species of the coenosis; e-f) subass. euphorbietosum bivonae, linked to the rocky ledges in locality Il Finestrone (e) and in locality Pedrazzi (f).
For the geolithological and geomorphological characteristics of the two locations of P. greuteri, the work of
The bioclimatic characterisation of the territory according to the indices of
For the classification of the vascular plants found during field surveys, reference was made to the Pignatti et al. (2017–2019), while the nomenclatural treatment of the vascular plant taxa follows
Monthly and annual averages of maximum and minimum temperatures (in °C), daily ranges, absolute maximum and minimum values recorded at the thermometric station of Calatafimi (Province of Trapani; from
Calatafimi (350 m a.s.l.) | ||||||
Month | Max | Min | Med | Temp. range | Abs. Max. | Abs. Min. |
January | 11.9 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 5.9 | 20.0 | -1.5 |
February | 12.3 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 6.5 | 22.4 | -0.8 |
March | 15.4 | 7.2 | 11.3 | 8.2 | 26.5 | -0.9 |
April | 19.1 | 9.3 | 14.2 | 9.8 | 29.1 | 3.0 |
May | 22.9 | 11.9 | 17.4 | 11.0 | 38.2 | 5.6 |
June | 28.6 | 16.5 | 22.6 | 12.1 | 39.3 | 5.6 |
July | 32.4 | 19.2 | 25.8 | 13.2 | 41.0 | 10.0 |
August | 31.3 | 19.7 | 25.5 | 11.6 | 41.7 | 13.4 |
September | 27.0 | 17.3 | 22.2 | 9.7 | 39.3 | 11.5 |
October | 22.8 | 14.1 | 18.5 | 8.7 | 38.4 | 6.2 |
November | 18.1 | 10.5 | 14.3 | 7.6 | 27.3 | 4.0 |
December | 13.7 | 7.4 | 10.6 | 6.3 | 24.0 | -2.0 |
Year | 21.3 | 12.1 | 16.7 | 9.2 | 41.7 | -2.0 |
Monthly and annual average values of rainfall (mm/m2) and number of rainy days recorded at the rainfall station in Castellammare del Golfo (Province of Trapani; from
CASTELLAMMARE DEL GOLFO (15 m a.s.l.) | ||
Month | mm | Rainy days |
January | 94.2 | 12 |
February | 84.9 | 11 |
March | 66.7 | 9 |
April | 46.5 | 7 |
May | 22.5 | 4 |
June | 9.6 | 2 |
July | 3.9 | 1 |
August | 11.9 | 2 |
September | 42.4 | 4 |
October | 77.9 | 8 |
November | 87.9 | 10 |
December | 98.7 | 12 |
Year | 647.1 | 82 |
Fig.
The study area concerns the northern slopes of Mt. Inici (1,064 m a.s.l.), which falls within the municipal territory of Castellammare del Golfo (Trapani province), where the two stands of P. greuteri are located. Both sites share many ecological patterns (Pasta et al. submitted): they are located at intermediate altitudes between Cozzo Monaco (771 m a.s.l.), Pizzo Brando (635 m a.s.l.), Pizzo Stagnone (783 m a.s.l.) and Pizzo del Dottore (620 m a.s.l.); morevoer, they both fall within two Natura 2000 sites, the Special Protection Areas ITA010029 “Monte Cofano, Capo San Vito e Monte Sparagio” and ITA010015 “Complesso dei Monti di Castellammare del Golfo”. From a geolithological point of view, both sites are characterised by Trias-Lias carbonate platform deposits, ascribed to the Trapanese Domain and mainly referred to the “Monte Bonifato-Calatubo” Unit, which is covered by sediments belonging to the “Monte Inici” Unit. The substrates are made of dolomitic limestones with megalodonts, stromatolitic and lopheritic dolomites, calcilutites rich in algae and foraminifera (
According to the classification proposed by
From a biogeographical point of view, the area belongs to the Mediterranean Biogeographical Region, Western Mediterranean Subregion, Italo-Tyrrhenian Province, Sicilian Sector (
P. greuteri counts two separate subpopulations whose main physiographic, geolithological, bioclimatic and physiognomic characteristics are described below.
The stand of locality Pedrazzi represents the locus classicus of the species (Raimondo & Domina 2006) (Fig.
Phytosociological table of Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri subass. typicum (a) and subass. euphorbietosum bivonae (b).
a | b | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Life form | Relevé number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Presence | Frequency |
Altitude (m a.s.l.) | 295 | 340 | 340 | 380 | 390 | 400 | 375 | 380 | 360 | 380 | 390 | 390 | |||
Slope (°) | 30 | 50 | 35 | 37 | 30 | 35 | 38 | 45 | 35 | 70 | 60 | 60 | |||
Aspect | N | NE | N | NW | W | W | N | N | W | NW | NW | NW | |||
Area (m2) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 60 | |||
Total cover | 100 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 90 | 95 | 90 | 90 | |||
Shrub cover (%) | 95 | 90 | 90 | 95 | 95 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 85 | |||
Herb cover (%) | 50 | 80 | 65 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 30 | 45 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 40 | |||
Average vegetation height (m) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | |||
Nb. of species per relevé | 34 | 41 | 35 | 36 | 40 | 37 | 31 | 33 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 17 | |||
Char. of association | |||||||||||||||
NP | Ptilostemon greuteri Raimondo & Domina | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | V |
P caesp | Malva olbia (L.) Alef. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | V |
Ch suffr | Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | 1 | 2 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 11 | V |
Ch frut | Teucrium flavum L. | + | 1 | . | + | 2 | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | . | + | 10 | V |
Char. of subassociation typicum | |||||||||||||||
H scap | Acanthus mollis L. | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | + | 1 | . | . | . | + | 9 | IV |
G rhiz | Dryopteris pallida (Bory) Maire & Petitm. subsp. pallida | 2 | + | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 8 | IV |
P lian | Clematis cirrhosa L. | . | + | 1 | 2 | 1 | . | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 6 | III |
H scap | Helminthotheca aculeata (Vahl) Lack | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 6 | III |
H bienn | Smyrnium olusatrum L. | + | + | + | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
Char. of subassociation euphorbietosum bivonae | |||||||||||||||
NP | Euphorbia bivonae Steud. | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | III |
P caesp | Erica multiflora L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | II |
Ch suffr | Silene fruticosa L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | + | . | 3 | II |
Char. of all. Oleo-Ceratonion and ord. Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni | |||||||||||||||
P caesp | Pistacia terebinthus L. | 1 | 1 | + | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | 11 | V |
NP | Chamaerops humilis L. | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 2 | . | . | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | IV |
Ch frut | Stachys major (L.) Bartolucci & Peruzzi | 1 | 2 | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | . | + | 1 | . | 6 | III |
P caesp | Rhamnus alaternus L. | + | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
NP | Teucrium fruticans L. | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | 4 | II |
P caesp | Pistacia lentiscus L. | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | I |
Char. of cl. Quercetea ilicis | |||||||||||||||
H caesp | Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T. Durand & Schinz | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12 | V |
G rhiz | Smilax aspera L. | 1 | 1 | + | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 10 | V |
P lian | Rubia peregrina L. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | + | . | . | 10 | V |
H caesp | Melica minuta L. subsp. latifolia (Coss.) W. Hempel | + | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | . | 9 | IV |
G rhiz | Asparagus acutifolius L. | 1 | 1 | . | 2 | + | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | + | . | 9 | IV |
G rhiz | Arisarum vulgare Targ. Tozz. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 7 | III |
P scap | Fraxinus ornus L. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | 7 | III |
NP | Emerus major Mill. subsp. emeroides (Boiss. & Spruner) Soldano & F. Conti | 1 | 1 | . | + | . | . | . | . | 3 | + | 1 | 2 | 7 | III |
P scap | Quercus ilex L. | . | 2 | 1 | 1 | . | . | 1 | 2 | . | 1 | . | 2 | 7 | III |
G rad | Dioscorea communis (L.) Caddick &Wilkin | . | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | . | 1 | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | 6 | III |
G bulb | Cyclamen hederifolium Aiton | . | + | 1 | . | + | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
G rhiz | Ruscus aculeatus L. | . | + | 1 | . | + | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
P caesp | Lonicera implexa Aiton | . | . | + | . | 2 | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | 5 | III |
G bulb | Allium subhirsutum L. subsp. subhirsutum | + | . | . | + | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
P lian | Hedera helix L. | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 2 | 2 | . | . | . | 1 | 4 | II |
NP | Rosa sempervirens L. | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
H ros | Asplenium onopteris L. | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
P caesp | Rhus coriaria L. | 2 | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
P caesp | Phillyrea latifolia L. | 1 | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
H scap | Pulicaria odora (L.) Rchb. | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
H scap | Carex caryophyllea Latourr. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
P scap | Quercus suber L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
NP | Euphorbia characias L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
Other species | |||||||||||||||
H caesp | Brachypodium retusum (Pers.) P. Beauv. | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | . | 1 | 2 | . | 1 | . | 9 | IV |
NP | Rubus ulmifolius Schott | 1 | 1 | . | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | . | . | . | . | 7 | III |
H ros | Polypodium cambricum L. | + | 1 | . | 2 | + | . | 1 | . | + | + | . | . | 7 | III |
NP | Cistus creticus L. subsp. eriocephalus (Viv.) Greuter & Burdet | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | 3 | . | . | 1 | + | + | 2 | 7 | III |
H scap | Parietaria judaica L. | 2 | . | 2 | + | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
T scap | Mercurialis annua L. | 2 | . | + | + | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
P scap | Pinus pinea L. | 3 | . | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
H scap | Foeniculum vulgare Mill. subsp. vulgare | 2 | . | + | + | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | 5 | III |
G rhiz | Arum italicum Mill. | + | . | + | 2 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
H caesp | Oloptum miliaceum (L.) Röser & H.R. Hamasha | 1 | . | 2 | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
H scap | Thapsia asclepium L. | . | + | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 4 | II |
Ch suffr | Brassica villosa Biv. subsp. bivonana (Mazzola & Raimondo) Raimondo & Mazzola | . | 1 | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | + | . | 4 | II |
P caesp | Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC. | . | + | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
H bienn | Silene latifolia Poir. | . | + | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
G bulb | Oxalis pes-caprae L. | . | . | + | . | 2 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
NP | Coronilla valentina L. | . | . | . | + | 1 | 2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3 | II |
H bienn | Sonchus oleraceus L. | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
H scap | Carlina sicula Ten. subsp. sicula | . | + | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
H scap | Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C.H. Stirt. | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
H scap | Ferula communis L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
T scap | Theligonum cynocrambe L. | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
P caesp | Spartium junceum L. | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
G bulb | Charybdis pancration (Steinh.) Speta | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | II |
T scap | Lathyrus oleraceus Lam. subsp. biflorus (Raf.) H. Schaef., Coulot & Rabaute | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H ros | Hyoseris radiata L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
T scap | Tordylium apulum L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
T scap | Geranium lucidum L. | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H scap | Clinopodium vulgare L. subsp. arundanum (Boiss.) Nyman | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H ros | Hypochoeris laevigata (L.) Ces., Pass. & Gibelli | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H scap | Origanum vulgare L. subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
G rhiz | Asphodelus ramosus L. | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H scap | Pimpinella anisoides V. Brig. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H bienn | Vicia dasycarpa Ten. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H bienn | Geranium robertianum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
H scand | Convolvulus silvaticus Kit. | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
P caesp | Ulmus minor Mill. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | I |
Ch suffr | Centaurea panormitana Lojac. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | 1 | I |
Ch frut | Lomelosia cretica (L.) Greuter & Burdet | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | 1 | I |
Ch suffr | Helichrysum pendulum (C. Presl) C. Presl | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | 1 | I |
Schematic transect of the landscape units occurring on the N-facing slopes of Locality Pedrazzi, on the right streamside of Torrente Vaddunicchio: (1) pioneer maquis with Ptilostemon greuteri on debris slopes (Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri subass. typicum); (2) lithophilous maquis co-dominated by Ptilostemon greuteri, Chamaerops humilis and Euphorbia bivonae on rocky ledges (Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri subass. euphorbietosum bivonae); (3) thicket with Fraxinus ornus and Pistacia terebinthus (aggr. with F. ornus and P. terebinthus); (4) woodland with Quercus ilex and thermophilous deciduous trees (Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis subass. pistacietosum terebinthi); (5) grassland with Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Helictotricho convoluti-Ampelodesmetum mauritanici) and garrigue with Erica multiflora and Micromeria fruticulosa (Erico multiflorae-Micromerietum fruticulosae); (6) chasmophytic community (all. Dianthion rupicolae); (7) grasslands with Hyparrhenia hirta on S-SE facing xeric slopes (all. Hyparrhenion hirtae); (8) scrub with Chamaerops humilis (Pistacio lentisci-Chamaeropetum humilis); (9) small nuclei of tall maquis with Olea europaea var. sylvestris (Ruto chalepensis-Oleetum sylvestris); (10) artificial forest stands with Pinus pinea.
The second stand of P. greuteri of Locality Il Finestrone, was found at intermediate altitudes on the eastern slope of Mt. Inici, on the right side of a deep gully, between the carbonate outcrops of Pizzo Brando (546 m a.s.l.) and Cozzo Monaco (774 m a.s.l.). This subpopulation is located at altitudes between 320 and 420 m a.s.l., with prevalent N-NW exposure. Part of local subpopulation is distributed on the ledges unevenly dispersed over the sub-vertical rock cliffs of Pizzo Monaco. Notwithstanding their small surface, being exposed to moist sea breeze, almost inaccessible to grazing herbivores and sheltered from frequent fires, these ledges play a key role as refuge areas for P. greuteri, and probably favoured its survival until present day. In this context, the species grows together with numerous elements of the thermoxerophilous Mediterranean scrub, building a pioneer scrub coenosis.
Larger and taller individuals of P. greuteri grow scattered on the moving scree that covers the bottom of the gully below the cliffs, dominated by a very dense scrub community.
This second subpopulation of P. greuteri extends over about 1.9 hectares and is estimated to contain around 200-300 mature individuals (Pasta et al. submitted).
Tab.
MALVO OLBIAE-PTILOSTEMONETUM GREUTERI ass. nova (Tab.
- TYPICUM subass. nova
Diagnostic species of the association and of subass. typicum: Ptilostemon greuteri (dominant), Malva olbia, Centranthus ruber, Teucrium flavum, Acanthus mollis, Dryopteris pallida subsp. pallida, Clematis cirrhosa, Helminthotheca aculeata, Smyrnium olusatrum.
Short description: rather dense and in places luxuriant secondary scrub, 2 to 3 m high, bound to detrital-clastic slopes [Fig.
Substratum: loose and coarse calcareous debris and boulders located at the base of N-NW-facing slopes, mostly in the shadow cone of steep rocky cliffs (30-40°).
Bioclimate: oceanic pluviseasonal Mediterranean, upper thermo-Mediterranean thermotype with lower sub-humid ombrotype.
Syndynamism: the presence and distribution of this community is linked to the frequent rock collapses from the adjacent cliffs. In fact, P. greuteri colonises the shaded microhabitats of torrential incisions, and takes part to a community that tends towards the climatophilous holm oak forest ascribed to the Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis (Brullo & Marcenò 1985;
Distribution: this coenosis was detected in Locality Pedrazzi, along the gulley called Vaddunicchio, i. e. the locus classicus of P. greuteri. Repeated observations over the last few years show that this scrub community is fastly spreading, probably benefiting from the drastic thinning of the artificial forest cover (Pinus pinea), caused by the extensive fire that broke out on 2 July 2017. In fact, recent repeated fire events probably provided a new opportunity to local plant communities, triggering a dynamic process towards the recovery of the local series-head represented by the holm oak forest (Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis).
On the one hand, the development of pine canopy following the reforestation carried out around the 1950s-60s on the slope has probably compromised local subpopulation of P. greuteri, reduced to small nuclei relegated on the nearby ledges and rock cliffs. On the other hand, after last fire, P. greuteri was able to exploit the new clearings created by the collapse of dead pines, finding favourable growth conditions, and participating the fast and still ongoing dynamic process of local native vegetation, apparently pointing towards the recovery of holm oak forest.
- EUPHORBIETOSUM BIVONAE subass. nova (Tab.
Diagnostic species: Ptilostemon greuteri (dominant or co-dominant), Euphorbia bivonae, Erica multiflora, Silene fruticosa.
Short description: lithophilous, shade-tolerant and thermophilous maquis, 1 to 2 m high, linked to rocky ledges located on calcareous cliffs within the coolest and shadiest sector of deep gullies. P. greuteri can thrive under these suboptimal but undisturbed conditions, showing a smaller size (average height 0.8-1.2 m) and only rarely playing a dominant role (Rel. 9: Locality Pedrazzi), more frequently behaving as co-dominant (Rels 10–12: below Pizzo Monaco) together with Euphorbia bivonae, a summer-deciduous woody spurge with a southern-Mediterranean distribution, only occurring on the calcareous cliffs along the coast between Palermo and Trapani, and in some steep S-facing slopes of the Sicani Mountains (
Substratum: N-NW-facing small ledges (average slope of 30-40°), located in cool and shady stations, on limestone-dolomitic cliffs present on the northern slopes of M. Inici, unreachable by herbivores and sheltered from fire.
Bioclimate: pluviseasonal-oceanic Mediterranean, in the upper thermo-Mediterranean belt with a lower sub-humid ombrotype.
Syndynamism: this low-growing edapho-climacic and pioneer maquis occurs on unspoiled primary habitats of extremely high conservation interest, being poorly accessible to herbivores and protected from fire damages [Fig.
Distribution: this coenosis is frequent in locality Il Finestrone and below Pizzo Monaco [Fig.
Tab.
Based on field observations and the semi-quantitative analysis of the survey data, the authors propose to include this community in the class Quercetea ilicis (order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni, alliance Oleo-Ceratonion). This choice is based on the high number of plants (12-15 taxa per relevé: see Tab.
Despite being dominated by an extremely narrow-ranged palaeoendemic plant, the Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri shows a surprising high vitality and ecological plasticity. The primary aspects - referred to the subass. euphorbietosum bivonae - characterise fragments of shade-tolerant and relict low maquis (rels 9–12), located on almost inaccessible rocky ledges and small cracked surfaces on steep carbonatic cliffs. Here, P. greuteri and Euphorbia bivonae, often co-dominant, are associated with many other phanerophytes, like Chamaerops humilis, Pistacia terebinthus, Teucrium flavum, Prasium majus, etc., and with the perennial tussock grass Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (common in many primary communities of the class Quercetea ilicis; see Gianguzzi et al. 2015, 2016). Other frequently occurring species are proposed among the characteristics of the association, like Centranthus ruber, Malva olbia - seldom recorded within the Oleo-Ceratonion communities and considered by several authors as a characteristic of the Pruno-Rubion alliance (class Crataego-Prunetea) - and several lianas referred as characteristics of both the class Crataego-Prunetea and Quercetea ilicis, like Smilax aspera, Rubia peregrina, and Lonicera implexa.
A secondary aspect of the investigated community - referred to subass. typicum – mostly occurs on scree, and is currently spreading, especially in locality Pedrazzi. This plant community plays an important role in local vegetation dynamics, representing the stage that precedes the development of the holm oak woodland of the association Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis. Even if its dynamic role could induce to interpret this community as a mantle assemblage and to frame it into the class Crataego-Prunetea, the authors believe that it is more correct to treat it as a secondary scrub formation belonging to Oleo-Ceratonion, just like other synecologically similar associations, such as Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis. Indeed, this latter coenosis may be considered a vicariant of the Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri on the screes, steep slopes and ledges of the carbonatic mountains between Palermo and Trapani (northwestern Sicily), albeit under more xeric climatic conditions. In these contexts, infact, Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis plays a secondary role as well, tending towards the holm oak woodland referred to the Rhamno alaterni-Querco ilicis sigmetum series (Brullo & Marcenò 1985;
Overwhelmed by the dominance of P. greuteri, the species of the class Quercetea ilicis found in the relevés of the Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri typicum generally perform low cover but are nonetheless very frequent (usually 12-15 taxa and half of the total species number per relevé: see Tab.
Further interesting remarks arise from the analysis of Tab.
Simplified synoptic table of the Sicilian associations referred to the alliance Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae. The values into squares refer to characteristic or differential species, while the symbol (*) points out the dominant species of a given association (see Appendix II).
Association number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb. of relevés | 20 | 6 | 7 | 17 | 20 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
Char. of association and subassociation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Euphorbia dendroides L. | V* | V* | V* | V* | I | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | III | V | . | V* | I | IV | . | . | . | . | . |
Phlomis fruticosa L. | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | I | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
Euphorbia bivonae Steud. | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | III |
Ephedra major Host subsp. major | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Rhamnus lycioides L. subsp. oleoides (L.) Jahand. & Maire | . | . | . | V | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Celtis tournefortii Lam. subsp. aetnensis (Tornab.) Raimondo & Schicchi | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Poterium spinosum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Myrtus communis L. | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | II | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Ephedra fragilis Desf. | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | III | V | V | . | . | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Lycium europaeum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam. subsp. lotus | . | . | . | . | ., | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Quercus coccifera L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Pyrus spinosa Forssk. | . | I | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | I | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . |
Salvia fruticosa Mill. subsp. thomasii (Lacaita) Brullo, Guglielmo, Pavone & Terrasi | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Juniperus turbinata Guss. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Acanthus mollis L. | . | . | . | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | .III | . | . | V | I | . | V | . | I | IV |
Artemisia arborescens (Vaill.) L. | II | . | I | I | I | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | III | II | V* | . | . | . | I | . |
Anagyris foetida L. | I | . | I | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | III | . | V* | . | . | . | . |
Emerus major Mill. subsp. emeroides (Boiss. & Spruner) Soldano & F. Conti | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | I | . | . | V | . | IV | III |
Bupleurum fruticosum L. | . | . | . | . | .. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* | V* | V* | . |
Spartium junceum L. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | IV | ||
Ptilostemon greuteri Raimondo & Domina | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V* |
Malva olbia (L.) Alef. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
Centranthus ruber (L.) DC. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | V |
Char. alliance Oleo-Ceratonion | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Olea europaea L. var. sylvestris (Mill.) Lehr. | IV | II | V | V | III | I | II | II | IV | III | II | I | I | IV | IV | V* | V* | . | I | . | . | II | . |
Chamaerops humilis L. | III | II | V | I | V* | . | V* | II | V | IV | . | IV | I | II | III | I | V | I | I | . | . | . | IV |
Teucrium flavum L. | II | I | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | III | . | II | I | . | . | IV | V | I | V |
Asparagus horridus L. | . | . | . | . | . | III | I | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Char. order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stachys major (L.) Bartolucci & Peruzzi | IV | V | V | V | III | II | IV | V | IV | IV | . | III | III | V | II | V | IV | III | III | I | . | I | III |
Teucrium fruticans L. | IV | II | II | III | IV | . | IV | V | V | V | . | II | I | V | II | III | III | . | . | I | . | II | II |
Pistacia lentiscus L. | III | . | II | V | V* | . | III | V | V* | IV | . | II | I | IV | V | IV | V | . | . | . | . | III | I |
Rhamnus alaternus L. | II | IV | IV | . | II | . | . | V | . | . | I | . | . | IV | I | IV | III | . | IV | . | II | III | II |
Asparagus albus L. | I | I | V | . | III | . | III | . | . | IV | I | . | IV | III | I | III | IV | V | IV | . | . | . | . |
Osyris alba L. | I | III | I | . | . | II | . | . | . | III | I | . | . | IV | . | II | III | II | III | I | II | II | . |
Pistacia terebinthus L. | . | II | I | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | IV | . | III | I | . | I | . | . | . | V |
Ceratonia siliqua L. | III | . | . | . | II | . | . | I | I | . | . | . | . | III | I | II | I | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Clematis cirrhosa L. | . | . | II | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | III | II | I | . | . | . | I | III |
Char. class Quercetea ilicis | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Asparagus acutifolius L. | IV | IV | V | V | IV | V | V | V | V | V | IV | V | IV | V | IV | V | V | II | V | V | V | IV | IV |
Rubia peregrina L. | II | . | V | II | III | IV | . | III | IV | V | IV | III | IV | III | II | IV | IV | I | III | V | V | V | V |
Smilax aspera L. | II | . | II | . | III | III | . | II | IV | V | II | IV | II | II | . | IV | IV | . | II | III | . | III | V |
Arisarum vulgare Targ. Tozz. | II | IV | I | II | II | . | IV | IV | II | V | V | II | IV | . | . | V | V | . | IV | III | I | I | III |
Cytisus infestus (C. Presl) Guss. subsp. infestus | IV | II | IV | . | V | . | IV | . | III | IV | . | III | V* | V | IV | II | II | . | . | III | . | IV | . |
Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (Poir.) T. Durand & Schinz | IV | I | V | III | III | I | . | . | . | . | I | . | III | II | . | III | III | II | . | I | IV | V | V |
Daphne gnidium L. | II | . | I | I | I | IV | . | . | II | II | . | I | II | IV | . | I | II | . | . | . | I | . | . |
Ruta chalepensis L. | I | . | IV | IV | . | V | . | . | . | . | I | . | V | V | . | III | I | III | IV | . | . | . | . |
Phillyrea latifolia L. | . | . | I | III | I | I | II | . | IV | . | . | V | . | I | III | II | I | . | . | . | . | . | II |
Dioscorea communis (L.) Caddick & Wilkin | I | II | I | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | II | I | . | . | II | . | I | III |
Allium subhirsutum L. | I | I | I | II | I | IV | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | V | V | . | IV | . | . | . | II |
Rosa sempervirens L. | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | II | I | I | III | III | IV | III | II |
Euphorbia characias L. | . | . | . | . | . | V | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | I | I | . | V | II | I | I | I |
Lonicera implexa Aiton | I | II | . | I | . | . | . | . | III | . | . | II | . | . | I | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | III |
Cyclamen hederifolium Aiton | . | . | IV | . | . | IV | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | I | . | . | II | II | . | . | III |
Fraxinus ornus L. | I | I | I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | III | I | II | III |
Cyclamen repandum Sm. | I | . | . | I | . | IV | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | III | . | . | . | . | . | I | . |
Quercus ilex L. | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | IV | . | I | III |
The screes where P. greuteri vegetation occurs are very dynamic habitats and are subject to frequent natural disturbance due to the continuous inflow of clastic material collapsing from the cliffs above, but the species seems to be perfectly adapted to deal with this natural disturbance factor. According to the IUCN-CMP Unified Classification of Direct Threats (IUCN-CMP 2011), the main threats to the species and coenosis belong to the following categories: “1.1 - Habitat loss/degradation, agriculture”: a decrease in available habitat was found, as the stands are located within reforested areas; “10.5 - Human disturbance, fire”: both stands are exposed to the frequent burning; the rocky and detrital-clastic habitats that the vegetation prefers, however, appear less exposed to the passage of fire or able to limit permanent damages; “12.1 - Other threats”: an intrinsic risk factor is given by the fragmentation of the habitat and the small size of both populations. Even if P. greuteri is a relative of several palatable Asteraceae (e.g., Cynara, Scolymus), grazing-browsing disturbance does not worth being listed among the risk factors affecting this species. In fact, although some dozens of goats are regularly present near one subpopulation and the porcupines are extremely active in the other, any biting or trampling damage due to herbivore mammals has never been noticed on its leaves and stems.
Recent field observations allow to emphasise the strongly deleterious effects of many insane reforestation activities carried out in Sicily in the past, often referred to - yesterday as today - with the misleading term of “environmental restoration” interventions. In particular, the massive reforestation carried out in the post-World War II period along the slopes of Mt. Inici presumably caused serious and prolonged damage to the residual population of P. greuteri, an unknown species at that time. In fact, in a first phase, the preparatory work required for the planting of the young pines probably had a heavy effect on the slope’s pedomorphology (cutting local maquis, digging holes, opening service roads, etc.). Later, the growth of the pines and the development of their canopy took away suitable space and light for the species living in the understorey, and the thickening of the reforestation must have caused a further shrinkage of local subpopulation of P. greuteri and of the entire community linked to the scree (subass. typicum); consequently, only the few individuals relegated to the cliffs or rocky ledges survived (subass. euphorbietosum bivonae). Paradoxically, the large fire that devastated the locus classicus of Locality Pedrazzi on 2 July 2017 seems to have favoured the recent global population increase, despite wiping out all the adult individuals, totally unable to resprout (Pasta et al. submitted). Indeed, there is a rapid recovery of scrub vegetation ascribed to Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri. Under the permanently cool and shady microclimatic conditions of these screes, this coenosis plays therefore a key pioneer-constructive role and tends to evolve towards the head of local series, locally represented by holm oak forest Rhamno alaterni-Quercetum ilicis (
The establishment of the scrubland ascribed to the subass. typicum, rather luxuriant and often continuous and rich in taxa characteristic of the class Quercetea ilicis, was probably facilitated by the increased availability of light and space in the understorey and the clearings of the pine forest affected by fire. The less disturbed aspects of the association are found on rocky ledges, in contact with chasmophytic vegetation, best characterised in locality Il Finestrone, where they also find shelter from possible fire damage.
Based on the criteria B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) criteria, the penultimate risk assessment for P. greuteri (
Sicily and its satellite islands represent one of the main hotspots of plant biodiversity individuated in the Mediterranean Basin (Médail & Quézel 1997), showing and exceptionally high rate of endemism, as highlighted by several authors either from the floristic (
The field surveys carried out have shown that P. greuteri is strictly localised on rock ledges and incoherent north-facing screes located within two narrow stream incisions, on carbonatic substrates, at altitudes between 300-500 m a.s.l., in the thermo-Mediterranean bioclimatic zone, with a sub-humid ombrotype. Due to their physiognomy and the dominance of this enigmatic broadleaved lauriphyll, these communities are markedly different from other Mediterranean forest communities, particularly due to the dense lauriphyll foliage and the silvery colour of the young leaves and branch tips. In fact, this species suffers considerably from summer drought (July and August), given the characteristics of the leaf blade that tolerates little direct sunlight. Although scarce, from a purely physiognomic point of view, such scrubland aspects are very rare in the panorama of phytocoenoses related to the order Pistacio-Rhamnetalia alaterni and to the whole class Quercetea ilicis, and it is therefore proposed here to refer them to a new lithophilous, thermophilous and shade-tolerant coenosis Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri ass. nova, framed in the Oleo-Ceratonion alliance. The only woody communities that show a certain physiognomic-structural analogy with those dominated by P. greuteri are those characterised by the dominance or co-dominance of Bupleurum fruticosum, i. e. Hippocrepido emeri-Bupleuretum fruticosi, described by
Considering the multiple disturbances affecting the species - also due to increasing anthropogenic pressure and widespread urbanisation of the nearby territory - P. greuteri results to be seriously threatened with extinction in the wild. Inspite of the recent demographic increase of the maquis community where it belongs, P. greuteri remains an intrisically vulnerable species due to its peculiar ecological requirements, which allow this species to survive only on the cool and shady slopes of the two aforementioned gullies located on the eastern slope of Mt. Inici, either on coarse and mobile screes (subass. typicum) or on the outcropping rocks of some ledges (subass. euphorbietosum bivonae).
QUERCETEA ILICIS Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Nègre 1952
PISTACIO LENTISCI-RHAMNETALIA ALATERNI Rivas-Mart. 1975
Oleo sylvestris-Ceratonion siliquae Br.-Bl. ex Guinochet & Drouineau 1944
Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri ass. nova
typicum subass. nova
euphorbietosum bivonae subass. nova
Asparago acutifolii-Ziziphetum loti Gianguzzi, Ilardi & Raimondo 1996; Asparago albi-Artemisietum arborescentis Gianguzzi, Cuttonaro, Cusimano & Romano 2016; Calicotomo infestae-Juniperetum turbinatae Brullo, Gianguzzi, La Mantia & Siracusa 2009; Chamaeropo humilis-Oleetum sylvestris Gianguzzi & Bazan 2019; Chamaeropo humilis-Quercetum calliprini Brullo & Marcenò 1985; Chamaeropo humilis-Quercetum calliprini Brullo & Marcenò 1985; Chamaeropo humilis-Sarcopoterietum spinosi Barbagallo, Brullo & Fagotto 1979; Ephedro fragilis-Lycietum europaei Brullo & Marcenò 1985; Euphorbio characiae-Anagyridetum foetidae Gianguzzi, Cuttonaro, Cusimano & Romano 2016; Hippocrepido emerici-Bupleuretum fruticosi Brullo, Minissale, Scelsi & Spampinato 1993; Myrto communis-Pistacietum lentisci (Molinier 1954 em. O.Bolòs 1962) Rivas-Mart. 1975; Oleo sylvestris-Euphorbietum dendroidis Trinajstić 1974; Pistacio lentisci-Chamaeropetum humilis Brullo & Marcenò 1985; Pistacio terebinthi-Celtidetum aetnensis Gianguzzi, Cusimano & Romano 2014; Pyro amygdaliformis-Calicotometum infestae Brullo, Gianguzzi, La Mantia & Siracusa 2009; Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis (Trinajstić 1984) Géhu & Biondi 1997 subass. typicum; Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis (Trinajstić 1984) Géhu & Biondi 1997 subass. euphorbietosum bivonae (Gianguzzi, Ilardi & Raimondo 1996) Gianguzzi, Cuttonaro, Cusimano & Romano 2016; Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis (Trinajstić 1984) Géhu & Biondi 1997 subass. phlomidetosum fruticosae (Brullo & Marcenò 1985) Gianguzzi, Cuttonaro, Cusimano & Romano 2016; Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis (Trinajstić 1984) Géhu & Biondi 1997 subass. rhamnetosum oleoidis (Brullo & Marcenò 1985) Gianguzzi, Cuttonaro, Cusimano & Romano 2016; Ruto chalepensis-Oleetum sylvestris Gianguzzi & Bazan 2019; Salvio fruticosae-Phlomidetum fruticosae Barbagallo, Brullo & Fagotto 1979; Sarcopoterio spinosi-Chamaeropetum humilis Barbagallo, Brullo & Fagotto 1979; Teucrio fruticantis-Rhamnetum alaterni Brullo, Minissale, Scelsi & Spampinato 1993.
The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and to the staff of the editorial board, whose suggestions and critical remarks significantly improved the final version of the manuscript. Information and comments provided by Leonardo Scuderi (Trapani), the discoverer of the second population of Ptilostemon greuteri, improved the final quality of the manuscript. This work was carried out with financial support from Università degli Studi di Palermo (FFR D13_001682, resp. Prof. L. Gianguzzi). Some basic information of this contribution comes from the draft of an ongoing project aimed at the conservation of P. greuteri, supported by the Audemars Piguet Foundation.
Table
1: Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. typicum, from BRULLO & MARCENÒ (1985), Tab. 19 (sub Oleo-Euphorbietum dendroidis).
2: Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. phlomidetosum fruticosae, BRULLO & MARCENÒ (1985), Tab. 20, rels 1–6.
3: Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. euphorbietosum bivonae, from GIANGUZZI & LA MANTIA (2009), Tab. 11.
4: Rhamno alaterni-Euphorbietum dendroidis subass. rhamnetosum oleoidis, from
5: Pistacio lentisci-Chamaeropetum humilis, from BRULLO & MARCENÒ (1985), Tab. 22.
6: Pistacio terebinthi-Celtidetum aetnensis, from GIANGUZZI et al. (2014), Tab. 2.
7: Sarcopoterio spinosi-Chamaeropetum humilis, da
8: Teucrio fruticantis-Rhamnetum alaterni, from
9: Myrto communis-Pistacietum lentisci, from
10: Ephedro fragilis-Lycietum europaei, from BRULLO & MARCENÒ (1985), Tab. 24.
11: Asparago acutifolii-Ziziphetum loti, from
12: Chamaeropo humilis-Quercetum calliprini, from
13: Pyro amygdaliformis-Calicotometum infestae, from GIANGUZZI & LA MANTIA (2009), Tab. 12.
14: Salvio fruticosae-Phlomidetum fruticosae, da
15: Calicotomo infestae-Juniperetum turbinatae,
16: Ruto chalepensis-Oleetum sylvestris, from GIANGUZZI & BAZAN (2019) Tab.S1.
17: Chamaeropo humilis-Oleetum sylvestris, da GIANGUZZI & BAZAN (2019), Tab.S4.
18: Asparago albi-Artemisietum arborescentis, from GIANGUZZI et al. (2016), Tab. 6.
19: Euphorbio characiae-Anagyridetum foetidae, from GIANGUZZI et al. (2016), Tab. 7.
20: Hippocrepido emeri-Bupleuretum fruticosi, from
21: Aggr. with Bupleurum fruticosum, from
22: Spartio juncei-Bupleuretum fruticosi, from RAIMONDO & ILARDI (2009), Tab. 1.
23: Malvo olbiae-Ptilostemonetum greuteri ass. nova.