Research Article |
Corresponding author: Lorenzo Lazzaro ( lorenzo.lazzaro@unifi.it ) Academic editor: Silvia Del Vecchio
© 2022 Michele Mugnai, Emilio Corti, Andrea Coppi, Daniele Viciani, Lorenzo Lazzaro.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mugnai M, Corti E, Coppi A, Viciani D, Lazzaro L (2022) Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of communities hosting Ionopsidium savianum (Brassicaceae) growing on serpentine and limestone substrates. Plant Sociology 59(2): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/pls2022592/04
|
We analysed two different plant communities hosting Ionopsidium savianum (Brassicaceae), a species of EU interest included in the Habitats Directive 92/43/CEE annexes, for which specific studies on the ecology of communities where the species grows are lacking and more in-depth knowledge is needed. We examined two important sites of occurrence of this species in Tuscany with different soil types, namely limestone (Mt. Calvi) and serpentine (Mt. Pelato), to determine the structural and functional profile of the communities hosting this species in such different contexts. At each site, we surveyed the plant communities with I. savianum in ten 1 m2 quadrats to determine information on communities' species composition and total plant cover, as well as taxonomic (species richness, and Shannon H’ index), phylogenetic (phylogenetic diversity, mean nearest taxon distance and mean pairwise distance) and functional diversity (focusing on Rao’s Q, leaf functional traits and adaptive strategies community weighted mean). We took into account site location, soil type, slope aspect and microrelief as plot-level environmental factors. The two communities were highly diverging from multiple points of view. Differences were in species composition, richness and diversity, with Mt. Calvi hosting higher diversity. The indices of phylogenetic diversity were influenced significantly by site and microrelief, allowing the presence of peculiar niches occupied by the fern Asplenium ceterach. From the functional point of view, communities at Mt. Calvi showed a higher functional diversity and a higher specific leaf area. Plant height was influenced by the slope aspect and was higher on north-facing slopes. In terms of Grime’s adaptive strategies, the Mt. Pelato communities resulted to be more stress tolerant than those surveyed at Mt. Calvi. Here, a decrease in stress-tolerant strategy associated with an increase in ruderal strategy was detected in communities on north-facing slopes.
Assembly rules, community ecology, CSR plant strategy, plant traits, serpentine soils, phylogeny
Ionopsidium savianum (Caruel) Ball ex Arcang. is a species belonging to Brassicaceae family, that occurs only in Northern Spain and in a few regions of Central Italy, namely Tuscany, Umbria and Latium (
Important hints to help fill the picture of relationships among species in a community can be offered by the evaluation of phylogenetic diversity. Indeed, the use of molecular phylogenies may help analyze the forces that influence patterns of biodiversity and biogeography, and in depicting the interactions among co-occurring species (
Moreover, considering that soil type is one of the most important ecological factors for plant communities’ evolution and development, and is often pivotal in plant species diversification (
In this study, we aimed at examining differences in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of plant communities hosting I. savianum in two distant areas with limestone and serpentine substrates. This information is helpful in filling important gaps in the knowledge of the ecology of I. savianum, considering that specific studies on communities where the species grows are lacking and only phytosociological information can be usually found (
In Tuscany, Ionopsidium savianum has only been reported in three locations: Mt. Calvi, Mt. Pelato, and Mt. Carvoli (
Mt. Calvi is located in Campiglia Marittima municipality. It has a maximum elevation of 646 meters a.s.l. The site is characterized by limestone on top (where I. savianum grows) and granite in the lower part of the hill. The vegetation is represented mostly by a mixed broadleaved forest, with holm oak (Quercus ilex) and deciduous oaks (mostly Q. pubescens), but the higher portion of the mountain is characterized by open grassland mostly referable to the class Festuco-Brometea, with very sparse cover of shrubs (mostly Quercus spp.) and some degree of pastoral activities (sheep grazing). The slopes of the site are subjected to intense mining activities. The area is comprised within the Special Areas of Conservation “Monte Calvi di Campiglia” (SCI/SAC IT5160008).
Mt. Pelato is located in the municipality of Rosignano Marittimo and consist in a low hill (378 meters a.s.l.) close to the Tyrrhenian Sea mainly formed by serpentine rocks. Together with the typical Mediterranean climate, this strongly determines its vegetation which mostly consists of Mediterranean sclerophyllous shrublands. The hilltop and the south-facing slopes are characterized by a stunt and open garrigue-like vegetation, highly adapted to the rocky ultramafic soil.
A census of all the individuals of Ionopsidium savianum was carried out in both the study areas in March 2019, recording with a GPS device the position of all detectable plant clusters distant at least 3 meters from each other. Subsequently, among all GPS points, we randomly selected 10 points (at least 10 meters apart) in each study area (total of 20 sampling points) for the survey of the plant communities, completed in the subsequent days (mid-April 2019). Plant names are according to the Portal to the Flora of Italy vers. 2021.2 (http://dryades.units.it/floritaly/), while the syntaxa names follow The Italian Vegetation Prodrome (
Each point was used to place (on the North-Western corner) a ready-made 1 × 1 m quadrat frame (Fig.
To assess the functional features and the adaptive strategy of sampled communities, we measured a specific set of traits of species constituting 80% of the total coverage of each plot (
The taxonomic diversity of plant communities was evaluated as species richness (SR) and species diversity (expressed as Shannon H’).
A phylogenetic tree of the sampled communities was built from the megaphylogeny of vascular plants (PhytoPhylo) in
Functional diversity at the plot level was evaluated using Rao’s quadratic entropy (
To calculate the relative contribution of CSR parameters for each species we used the StrateFy analysis tool, which allows calculating the CSR coordinates of the species using the values of LA, SLA and LDMC (
To assess the compositional features of the sampled communities we performed a canonical correspondences analysis (CCA) on the specie per plot matrix (i.e. 97 species × 20 plots). Species cover values were arc-sine transformed. Site, northerness and microrelief were used as explanatory variables and the significance of the constrained axes was tested with 4,999 unrestricted permutations and summarized by adopting the false discovery rate (
The effect of site and local-plot conditions on total plant cover, taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity, as well as on the CMW-adaptive strategy, was studied by fitting a series of models with site, northerness, microrelief and their interaction terms used as predictors. To avoid model overfitting (given our low number of replicates) we used the framework of multi-model inference through the Information-Theoretic Approach (
The CCA has been run using the software Canoco 5 vers. 5.15 (
The sampling resulted in 97 species (Suppl. Material 1, Table S1), with 14 shared species among the two habitats, 57 species exclusive of Mt. Calvi and 26 of Mt. Pelato. Plot-level environmental variables sampled or calculated are shown in Suppl. Material 2, Table S2.
According to the CCA, the species composition of plots resulted largely different among the two sites (p-value < 0.001, variance explained 17.5%, see Fig.
The indices of taxonomic diversity were all significantly affected by the Site (which showed significant coefficients and generally high importance scores), but not by the plot-level conditions (Table
All the indices of phylogenetic diversity resulted influenced by site and microrelief. Indeed, the effect of the latter changed among the two different sites (in all cases the interaction term site:microrelief was highly significant and with high importance scores; Table
Functional diversity expressed as Rao’s quadratic entropy was significantly different among the two sites (the term site was highly significant and showed a very high importance score; Table
Canonical correspondences analysis (CCA) ordination plot based on species composition of the communities at Mt. Calvi and Mt. Pelato. Site, northerness and microrelief are used as explanatory variables. Blue empty triangles represent the species, while filled red triangles represent plot centroids according to the site. Only 30 best-fitting species are shown (the first 30 species showing the highest correlation with the first CCA axis). See Suppl. Material 2, Table S2 for species names abbreviations.
Results of indicator species analysis of plant species through comparison of the two study areas (Mt. Pelato and Mt. Calvi). Only species showing significant indicator values (P-value <0.05) are shown.
Species | Indicator value | P-value |
Mt. Calvi | ||
Ionopsidium savianum | 0.97 | 0.004 |
Dactylis glomerata | 0.90 | 0.001 |
Geranium purpureum | 0.90 | 0.001 |
Daucus carota | 0.90 | 0.002 |
Hypochaeris achyrophorus | 0.87 | 0.006 |
Cerastium glomeratum | 0.68 | 0.046 |
Anemone apennina | 0.60 | 0.007 |
Anisantha madritensis | 0.60 | 0.024 |
Crepis sancta | 0.57 | 0.043 |
Crupina crupinastrum | 0.50 | 0.029 |
Lysimachia linum.stellatum | 0.50 | 0.029 |
Satureja montana | 0.50 | 0.037 |
Sherardia arvensis | 0.50 | 0.030 |
Viola arvensis | 0.50 | 0.028 |
Mt. Pelato | ||
Centaurea aplolepa | 0.80 | 0.001 |
Cerastium ligusticum | 0.80 | 0.002 |
Ornithogalum exscapum | 0.80 | 0.001 |
Sesleria pichiana | 0.80 | 0.001 |
Iberis umbellata | 0.73 | 0.005 |
Onosma echioides | 0.70 | 0.006 |
Plantago subulata | 0.60 | 0.011 |
Allium moschatum | 0.50 | 0.040 |
Odontarrhena bertolonii | 0.50 | 0.023 |
Results for the multimodel inference on the role of site, northerness and microrelief in explaining the variation in total plant cover and taxonomic diversity of the monitored plots. Averaged coefficient and relative importance for each environmental predictor are given for the best linear models (AICc < 4). Significance codes: P-value < .001 ‘***’; P-value < .01 ‘**’; P-value < .05 ‘*’.
Response variable | Term | Relative Importance | Estimate | Adjusted SE | z-value | P-value | |
Total plant cover | (Intercept) | - | 0.72 | 0.23 | 3.05 | 0.002 | ** |
Site | 1.00 | -1.43 | 0.33 | 4.28 | <0.001 | *** | |
Northerness | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.98 | 0.327 | ||
Microrelief | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 0.594 | ||
Species richness | (Intercept) | - | 0.65 | 0.24 | 2.65 | 0.008 | *** |
Northerness | 0.59 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 1.58 | 0.115 | ||
Site | 0.99 | -1.30 | 0.35 | 3.71 | <0.001 | *** | |
Microrelief | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.77 | 0.440 | ||
Northerness:Site | 0.10 | -0.23 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 0.520 | ||
Diversity (H') | (Intercept) | - | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.93 | 0.351 | |
Site | 0.74 | -0.90 | 0.44 | 2.07 | 0.039 | * | |
Northerness | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 1.31 | 0.190 | ||
Microrelief | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 1.14 | 0.255 |
Results for the multimodel inference on the role of site, northerness and microrelief in explaining the variation in phylogenetic diversity of the monitored plots. Averaged coefficient and relative importance for each environmental predictor are given for the best linear models (AICc < 4). PD.ses = standardized effect size of phylogenetic diversity, MNTD.ses = standardized effect size of mean nearest taxon distance, MPD.ses = standardized effect size of mean pairwise distance. Significance codes: P-value < .001 ‘***’; P-value < .01 ‘**’; P-value < .05 ‘*’.
Response variable | Term | Relative Importance | Estimate | Adjusted SE | z-value | P-value | |
PD.ses | (Intercept) | - | -0.19 | 0.28 | 0.68 | 0.496 | |
Microrelief | 0.81 | -0.22 | 0.21 | 1.04 | 0.298 | ||
Site | 0.79 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 1.41 | 0.158 | ||
Microrelief:Site | 0.74 | 1.78 | 0.53 | 3.34 | <0.001 | *** | |
MNTD.ses | (Intercept) | - | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.936 | |
Microrelief | 0.74 | -0.47 | 0.22 | 2.16 | 0.031 | * | |
Site | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.906 | ||
Microrelief:Site | 0.65 | 1.78 | 0.55 | 3.27 | 0.001 | ** | |
MPD.ses* | (Intercept) | - | -0.48 | 0.20 | -2.39 | 0.030 | * |
Microrelief | 1.00 | -0.04 | 0.16 | -0.27 | 0.788 | ||
Site | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.28 | 3.71 | 0.002 | ** | |
Microrelief:Site | 0.98 | 1.68 | 0.40 | 4.24 | <0.001 | *** |
Effect of site and microrelief on the indices of phylogenetic diversity. A) standardized effect size of phylogenetic diversity (PD.ses); B) standardized effect size of mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD.ses); C) standardized effect size of mean pairwise distance (MPD.ses). Sites: red circles = Mt. Calvi, blue triangles = Mt. Pelato.
A) Functional diversity expressed as Rao’s quadratic entropy in function of site. B-F) Community weighted mean for the tested traits B) Specific leaf area (mm2/mg) and C) Plant mean height in function of site and northerness, D) Ternary diagram reporting the Grime's Competitive Stress-tolerant Ruderal (CSR) adaptive ecological strategies at the plot level, E) Stress-tolerant and F) Ruderal strategy in function of site and northerness. Sites: red circles = Mt. Calvi, blue triangles = Mt. Pelato.
Results for the multimodel inference on the role of site, northerness and microrelief in explaining the variation in functional diversity of the monitored plots. Averaged coefficient and relative importance for each environmental predictor are given for the best linear models (AICc < 4). Significance codes: P-value < .001 ‘***’; P-value < .01 ‘**’; P-value < .05 ‘*’.
Response variable | Term | Relative importance | Estimate | Adjusted SE | z-value | P-Value | |
Rao’s quadratic entropy | (Intercept) | - | 0.55 | 0.28 | 1.95 | 0.051 | . |
Site | 0.93 | -1.11 | 0.40 | 2.75 | 0.006 | ** | |
Northerness | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.96 | 0.337 | ||
Microrelief | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 1.17 | 0.244 | ||
Microrelief:Site | 0.10 | -0.68 | 0.55 | 1.24 | 0.216 | ||
Leaf area | (Intercept) | - | 0.05 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.867 | |
Microrelief | 0.67 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 1.91 | 0.057 | . | |
Northerness | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 1.29 | 0.198 | ||
Site | 0.35 | -0.36 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.424 | ||
Northerness:Site | 0.11 | -0.88 | 0.46 | 1.91 | 0.056 | . | |
Leaf dry matter content | (Intercept) | - | -0.01 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.959 | |
Microrelief | 0.37 | -0.28 | 0.24 | 1.14 | 0.256 | ||
Northerness | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 0.421 | ||
Site | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.652 | ||
Specific leaf area | (Intercept) | - | 0.74 | 0.21 | 3.54 | <0.001 | *** |
Site | 1.00 | -1.53 | 0.29 | 5.27 | <0.001 | *** | |
Northerness | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 1.52 | 0.129 | ||
Northerness:Site | 0.36 | -0.56 | 0.28 | 1.97 | 0.049 | * | |
Microrelief | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.953 | ||
Plant height | (Intercept) | - | 0.12 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.688 | |
Northerness | 0.78 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 2.00 | 0.046 | * | |
Site | 0.46 | -0.60 | 0.45 | 1.33 | 0.184 | ||
Microrelief | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.914 | ||
Northerness:Site | 0.06 | -0.37 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.424 | ||
C | (Intercept) | - | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.883 | |
Microrelief | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 1.71 | 0.087 | . | |
Northerness | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 1.51 | 0.131 | ||
Site | 0.29 | -0.34 | 0.47 | 0.73 | 0.467 | ||
Microrelief:Northerness | 0.05 | -0.09 | 0.48 | 0.20 | 0.844 | ||
Northerness:Site | 0.06 | -0.75 | 0.48 | 1.58 | 0.114 | ||
S | (Intercept) | - | -0.55 | 0.19 | 2.90 | 0.004 | ** |
Northerness | 1.00 | -0.71 | 0.21 | 3.37 | <0.001 | *** | |
Site | 0.94 | 1.26 | 0.27 | 4.74 | <0.001 | *** | |
Northerness:Site | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.28 | 2.46 | 0.014 | * | |
Microrelief | 0.40 | -0.17 | 0.13 | 1.30 | 0.194 | ||
R | (Intercept) | - | 0.67 | 0.17 | 4.07 | <0.001 | *** |
Northerness | 0.93 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 2.74 | 0.006 | ** | |
Site | 1.00 | -1.47 | 0.23 | 6.38 | < 0.001 | *** | |
Northerness:Site | 0.79 | -0.58 | 0.24 | 2.46 | 0.014 | * | |
Microrelief | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.70 | 0.485 |
Within this contribution, we aimed at analyzing the taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional features of two diverse plant communities hosting Ionopsidium savianum, growing at two important sites of occurrence of this species in Tuscany, with very different soil types: limestone (Mt. Calvi) and serpentine rocks (Mt. Pelato). The two communities investigated resulted to be different from multiple points of view.
Firstly, they differed taxonomically in terms of species composition, species richness, total cover and Shannon diversity, with Mt. Pelato showing lower values for all these indices. Such differentiation appears mainly explained by the different types of substrate in the two sites. Indeed, the substrate can affect substantially also the same vegetation types, like in the case of species-rich Nardus stricta grasslands hosting a higher vascular plant diversity on calcareous than on siliceous bedrock (
Interestingly, microrelief resulted as the only factor shaping the phylogenetic structure of communities, though in a different way in the two sites. While at Mt. Calvi there was almost no variation in the indices of phylogenetic diversity, at Mt. Pelato there was in all three indices a significant positive correlation with microrelief. This pattern may be the result of the occurrence of particular ecological conditions linked to more rugged soils (i.e. with higher microrelief), which allows the establishment of different phylogenetic groups. Indeed, the two sites with higher microrelief at Mt. Pelato are the only ones hosting a fern (Asplenium ceterach L.). It has already been shown that the presence of a single species characterized by a deep separation in the phylogeny of the communities may raise substantial differences in phylogenetic trends (
Finally, the two communities showed significant differences in the level of functional diversity and displayed a differentiation in terms of leaf traits and dominant CSR strategy. Noteworthy, the higher mean species richness detected at Mt. Calvi was paralleled by a higher functional diversity. This is consistent with studies on the relationship between species diversity and functional diversity, which generally predict that increasing species diversity results in increasing functional diversity (
The higher SLA detected on Mt. Calvi, may be linked to the higher abundances in this site of species with a resource-acquisition strategy, which usually show high growth rates and photosynthetic efficiency (
In conclusion, our results revealed important differences between the communities analysed, highlighting quite different features in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity, as well as in the dominant ecological strategies. Our data bring evidence for the capability of this species to be part of communities that can highly differ from the ecological point of view even if are structurally and physiognomically similar. These indications may be useful from a conservation point of view as they indicate the need of maintaining the structure of vegetation, for instance with a recursive disturbance, to allow the presence of this protected species. Nevertheless, further studies, including also non-Tuscan occurrence sites, are needed in order to better depict the ecological preferences of this species, considering that Latium and Umbria sites cover a wider range of biogeographical and ecological conditions.
Table S1
Data type: table
Explanation note: Species per plot community matrix, with species in the rows and plot in the columns (percentage cover). "**" mark the species for which functional traits have been measured.
Table S2
Data type: table
Explanation note: Environmental variables of the 20 sampled plots. See main manuscript for a more detailed description of the variables. All values are given at the plot level.