Research Article
Print
Research Article
Acidophilous grasslands in the Locarnese region (Southern Switzerland): description and classification of main plant communities
expand article infoDanièle Lagnaz, Giacomo Trotta§|, Patrice Prunier, Bertil Krüsi, Francesco Boscutti|
‡ Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland
§ University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| University of Udine, Udine, Italy
¶ University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
Open Access

Abstract

This paper presents a phytosociological study of dry and mesophilous meadows and pastures in the Locarnese region (Insubria - Southern Switzerland). Seventy-one vegetation relevés were analysed using both hierarchical classification and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination. Seven main clusters were identified and described as follows: (i) xerophytic grasslands on sandy soil dominated by Koeleria macrantha; (ii) mesophilous meadows with Arrhenatherum elatius and Centaurea transalpina; (iii) semi-dry meadows with Chrysopogon gryllus; (iv) semi-dry grasslands with Carex fritschii and Thalictrum minus; (v) nutrient-poor Phyteuma betonicifolium-Festuca nigrescens montane zone grasslands; Nardus stricta grasslands dominated by (vi) Festuca paniculata or (vii) Carex pilulifera. From a phytosociological point of view, a new association named Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis, classified into the Nardo strictae-Agrostion tenuis alliance was proposed. In addition, we confirmed the presence of the Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli association, within the Bromion erecti, which up to now was provisional only.

Keywords

dry meadows, Festuco-Brometea, Insubria, Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, Nardetea strictae, phytosociology, pastures

Introduction

The Semi-natural temperate grasslands are plant communities that arose from the non-intensive use of pastures and meadows (Küster and Keenleyside 2009). European semi-dry grasslands are among the most important hotspots of vascular plant diversity (Wilson et al. 2012). Grasslands are a prominent feature in present‐day landscapes, but both the intensification of management practices and land abandonment during the past decades have resulted in a widespread loss of traditional grasslands, their homogenization and a concomitant loss of biodiversity (Poschlod et al. 2009; Prévosto et al. 2011).

The first study on Swiss grassland vegetation was published in 1887 by Stebler & Schröter. Since then, studies have been performed in various regions of Switzerland (Studer-Ehrensberger 1995). A synthetic overview of mesophilous species-rich meadows is provided by Studer-Ehrensberger (2000). Literature on Swiss meadows has been reviewed for the classes Caricetea curvuleae, Elyno-Seslerietea and Molinio-Arrhenatheretea as part of the classification system of Swiss plant associations PhytoSuisse (Prunier et al. 2014, 2019). The elaboration of the classification of mesophilous meadows and pastures is primarily based on the relevant national literature (Koch 1926; Marschall 1947, 1951; Berset 1965; Dietl 1972, 1983) as well as for dry meadows (Zoller 1954; Braun-Blanquet 1961, 1976; Meyer 1976; Delarze 1986; Eggenberg et al. 2001).

In Switzerland, so far, only few studies have dealt with the flora and vegetation of the Insubrian region South of the Alps (Schröter 1936; Oberdorfer 1964; Reisigl 1996). In particular, Chrysopogon gryllus meadows (Koch 1943; Meyer 1976, 1977) and grasslands with Festuca paniculata (Vittoz et al. 2005) were considered. An overview of the dry grasslands of the lowlands in the whole Insubrian range was also provided (Studer-Ehrensberger 1993).

For the Canton of Ticino, early comprehensive studies were performed by Jäggli (1908) and Bär (1914). Further studies were carried out by the “Prati magri ticinesi” confederation project at the beginning of the 1990s (Antognoli 1995; Häfelfinger 1996; Pestalozzi 1990). However, the phytosociological classification of the siliceous communities of the Locarnese region has been neglected so far (but see Bär 1914; Pestalozzi 1990). Current Swiss reference literature (Delarze et al. 2015; Prunier et al. 2019) is accurate for the grassland communities of the northern Alps, but is incomplete with regard to those in the Southern Alps, in particular the meadows and pastures on siliceous soils. Nutrient-poor montane zone grasslands with Festuca rubra and Agrostis capillaris have already been described (Thomet et al. 1989; Pestalozzi 1990; Häfelfinger 1996; Studer-Ehrensberger 2000; Dietl in Klötzli et al. 2010) but were not integrated in the current classification systems in Switzerland (Delarze et al. 2015; Prunier et al. 2019). The same holds true for the xerophytic grasslands on sandy soils (Studer-Ehrensberger 1993).

This paper proposes a phytosociological overview of the siliceous meadows and pastures in the foothills and montane zone of the Locarnese region (200–1,500 m a.s.l.). The aims of the study were to describe and classify grassland communities occurring in the area. The study is expected to shed new light on the phytosociological classification of these grasslands and to test the occurrence of new plant associations specific to the Insubrian region.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area covered approximately 230 km2 in the Canton of Ticino (Fig. 1), including Valle Onsernone, Valle Vergeletto, the Swiss lakeside of Lago Maggiore, Centovalli, the Terre di Pedemonte, and part of the Valle Maggia. The region is characterized by a complex dendritic drainage system and steep gradients typical of mountain regions, which contributes to high landscape and vegetation diversity in a relatively small area (Spinedi and Isotta 2004). The altitude ranges from 200 m a.s.l. (Losone) to 2,187 m a.s.l. (Gridone). Due to the gradual abandonment of agriculture starting from the 1950s, agricultural surfaces now account for less than 5% of the studied area (Gianoni et al. 2015).

From a biogeographical point of view, the Locarnese region is particularly interesting due to its geological and climatic features. These characteristics result in a unique floristic diversity that was early recognized (Schröter 1936; Oberdorfer 1964).

From a geological point of view, the Locarnese has a special position. The Insubric Line, a fault line between the European and African plates, passes across the Centovalli. It marks the boundary between the Central Alps and the Southern Alps and is the southern limit of Alpine metamorphism. A mylonite belt surrounds this line, with ultramafic, mafic and paragneisses to the South, and gneiss, metagranitoide and mica-slate to the North (Schmid et al. 1987).

The Insubrian climate (Fig. 2) is characterised by high annual precipitations (2,060 mm average in Mosogno). Winters are mild and relatively dry with an absence of strong frost, summers are marked by recurrent violent showers, spring and fall seasons with heavy precipitations (Spinedi and Isotta 2004; Pautasso 2013; Ufficio federale di meteorologia e climatologia MeteoSvizzera 2022a, 2022b).

In the foothill zone, forests are composed by deciduous tree species. Forests dominated by Castanea sativa are the most abundant and account for 20% of the total forested area in Ticino (Dipartimento del territorio 2008). On siliceous soil, Quercus sp.-Betula pendula forests, belonging to the Quercion-robori petraeae alliance, is the potential natural vegetation. Above an altitude of 800 m a.s.l., the main forest types are characterised by Fagus sylvatica and Abies alba (Schmid 1939; Reisigl 1996). Mild winters and high mean annual rainfall favour the occurrence of subatlantic species, e.g. Festuca filiformis, Cytisus scoparius and Teucrium scorodonia. Submediterrean (e.g. Chrysopogon gryllus) and mountain plants (e.g. Festuca paniculata) also contributed to the local flora. Warm temperatures e summer drought favour also the occurrence of some steppic plant species from the East, like Thesium linophyllum or Peucedanum oreoselinum (Koch 1943).

Figure 1. 

Study area in the Locarnese region, Ticino - Switzerland. Copyright: data swisstopo, https://map.geo.admin.ch/.

Figure 2. 

Thermo-pluviometric diagram for 1991–2020. Average monthly temperature and rainfall in Locarno/Monti, 366 m a.s.l. Data obtained from the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss (Ufficio federale di meteorologia e climatologia MeteoSvizzera 2022a, 2022b)

Data collection and analysis

 Seventy-one vegetation relevés were analyzed. This includes 70 surveys conducted during spring and summer of 2016 and 2017, as well as one survey from the national inventory of dry meadows and pastures (Eggenberg et al. 2001).

All relevés were performed using the Braun-Blanquet approach (Braun-Blanquet 1964). The plots were circular areas of 25 m2. The 70 relevés were selected using a two-step procedure. First, grassland areas were identified by combining information from a 1:10,000 national map and photointerpretation of Swiss aerial images (2004–2006) (Swiss Confederation geographical information portal). Subsequently, the grasslands to be studied were selected along an elevation gradient from 200 to 1,500 m a.s.l., distributed in the whole area. In Valle Maggia only the floodplain was considered. Secondly, plots were selected following a preferential design (Cáceres et al. 2015). The plots were selected based on the following criteria: (i) minimal size of at least 1000 m2; (ii) cover of abandonment indicator species Molinia arundinacea and Pteridium aquilinum < 30%; Location and date of each relevé are listed in Appendix 1. Plot with high cover values of Molinia arundinacea and Pteridium aquilinum were not considered as potentially involved in vegetation dynamics due to management abandonment, as these two species have been proved to become invasive during the first stages of mowing abandonment.

The species cover values were transformed into ordinal scale values according to van der Maarel (1979). The data were analysed by a multivariate approach using both hierarchical cluster analysis and unconstrained ordination methods. In order to minimize the influence of occasional species, only species with a frequency higher than 5% were considered. Different asymmetrical association measures (Chord, Hellinger, Bray-Curtis and Bray-Curtis log transformed indices) and aggregation methods (Single Linkage, Complete Linkage, Average Agglomerative Clustering and Ward’s Minimum Variance Clustering) were combined as proposed by Legendre and Legendre (1998). The choice of the best combination of index and aggregation methods was performed using cophenetic correlation analysis (Legendre and Legendre 1998). This led to the selection of the Bray-Curtis index and the average agglomerative clustering Weighted Pair-Group Method (WPGMA) as best combination. Ordination was performed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), based on the Bray-Curtis similarity index with nine dimensions (20 tries, stress = 0.0579).

Indicators for the four main clusters and eight sub-clusters were determined using Indicator Species Analysis (ISA) as proposed by Dufrêne and Legendre (1997) to define the species fidelity values (Φ) and their significance. Fidelity values are statistics commonly used to determine the association between species and vegetation types, corresponding to the Pearson’s phi coefficient of association. For the main groups (4 clusters), only significant species (p-value<0.05) with 10,000 permutations were considered. For the subset of the sub-groups, the p-value was increased (p-value<0.1). Species that occurred in at least 75 % of the relevés in the considered cluster were identified as “high frequency taxa”. Species with cover/abundance indices ≥ 3 in at least one relevé in the cluster were considered to be “dominant taxa”, as proposed by Di Pietro et al. (2017). Only species with a minimum frequency of 20% were listed in the phytosociological tables for the considered cluster. Sporadic species can be found in Appendix II.

Ecological characterization of the clusters was performed using weighted mean indicator values according to Landolt et al. (2010) for temperature (T), continentality (K), light (L), moisture (F), soil reaction (R), nutrients (N) and Humus (H).

Phytosociological attributions of species and floristic nomenclature were performed according to Flora Indicativa (Landolt et al. 2010), supplemented with Chytrý (2010). Some species were considered as aggregates, namely Achillea millefolium, Alchemilla vulgaris, Hieracium murorum, Rubus fruticosus and Festuca ovina aggr., except for Festuca filiformis. The syntaxonomic system for Europe, EuroVegChecklist was considered as reference (Mucina et al. 2016).

Calculation of mean Landolt’s indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) was performed using the VEGEDAZ vegetation database management programme (Küchler 2019). All mean relevés values were then plotted with box-plot representation for each sub-cluster, including also the elevation distribution. Soil pH was also qualitatively evaluated at each relevé site by a field colorimetric test applied to a small surficial soil sample collected on site. pH colorimetric method is based on the property of acid-base indicator dyes, which produce colour depending on the pH of the soil sample. Statistical analyses were carried out using R (R Core Team 2023). Similarity matrices, cluster analysis and ordination were performed using the vegan R package (Oksanen et al. 2019); Indicator Species Analysis was performed using the labdv R package (Roberts 2019).

Results and discussion

Overview

The results of the cluster analysis are shown in Figure 3. The analysis revealed two main groups: group “A” included grasslands on sandy soils of floodplains with Koeleria macranta (Φ 0.97; p-value<0.001) and Artemisia campestris (Φ 0.80; p-value<0.001); group “B” was composed by grasslands with the presence of Festuca nigrescens (Φ 0.70; p-value<0.01). In group “B” it was possible to distinguish three types of grasslands: group “B1” contained mesophilous meadows with a high frequency of Arrhenatherum elatius (Φ 0.59; p-value<0.001) and Centaurea transalpina (Φ 0.52; p-value<0.01); group “B2” contained semi-dry grasslands characterized by Brachypodium rupestre (Φ 0.55; p-value<0.001) and Carex fritschii (Φ 0.54; p-value<0.01); and group “B3” contained Nardus stricta grasslands (Φ 0.73; p-value<0.001). Based on the chosen indicators, the clusters were attributed to four alliances: Stipo-Poion xerophilae (A, five relevés), Arrhenatherion elatioris (B1, twenty-two relevés) Bromion erecti (eighteen relevés) and Nardo-Agrostion (B3; twenty-six relevés). Furthermore, six associations were determined Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae (a and b, five relevés), Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum (c, twenty relevés), Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli (e, five relevés), Phyteumo-Mesobrometum, (f, thirteen relevés), Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis, (g, thirteen relevés) and Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae (h, thirteen relevés). One cluster, in the Arrhenatherion alliance, was considered to be an outlier (d, two relevés, see Appendix III): one relevé was dominated by Festuca nigrescens with a cover value of 5, the second one was a very rich meadow on sandy soil.

The ordination diagram obtained using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) calculated along the first two axes (Fig. 4), showed a distinct grouping along both axes. The distribution of the grasslands along the first axis (NMDS 1) was related to the soil pH. Along this axis, it was possible to notice an increase in species typical of very acidic soils, such as Carex pilulifera, Vaccinium myrtillus and Calluna vulgaris. The distribution of the clusters along the second axis (NMDS 2) may represent a gradient of soil humidity with steppic species, like Artemisia campestris and Chrysopogon gryllus, and species typical of fresh to moderately moist soils, like Narcissus x verbanensis, Phleum rhaeticum or Stellaria graminea.

Figure 3. 

Dendrogramme of 71 phytosociological relevés (Bray-Curtis Index, WPGMA). A: Grasslands with Koeleria macrantha; B: Grasslands with Festuca nigrescens; A1: Stipo-Poion xerophilae; B1: Arrhenatherion; B2: Bromion erecti; B3: Nardo-Agrostion; a: Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae; b: Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae, mesophilic variant c: Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum; d: outlier; e: Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli; f: Phyteumo-Mesobrometum; g: Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis; h: Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae.

Figure 4. 

Ordination diagram of the total 71 relevés (NMDS). a: Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae; b: Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae, mesophilic variant c: Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum; d: outlier; e: Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli; f: Phyteumo-Mesobrometum; g: Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis; h: Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae (for species abbreviations see Appendix IV).

Description of the identified plant communities

Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae Lonati and Lonati 2007 (Tab. 1)

Table 1.

Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae Lonati et Lonati 2007 .

Relevé number 72 42 8 7 66 Presence
Altitude (m a.s.l.) 286 310 230 220 229
Aspect - - - - -
Slope (degree) 0 0 0 0 0
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 21 17 26 25 20
Total coverage (%) . 90 90 90 90
Characteristic and differential species of Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae
Koeleria macrantha (Lam.) P. Beauv. + 3 1 1 2 5
Rumex acetosella L. s.l. . 1 1 2 1 4
Characteristic species of Stipo-Poion xerophilae and Festucetalia valesiaceae
Achillea collina + 1 1 . . 3
Festuca ovina aggr. (Festuca trachyphylla R. Tracey pro maxima parte) 2 1 . . . 2
Carex liparocarpos Gaudin . 1 . . . 1
Pseudolysimachion spicatum (L.) Opiz . . . + . 1
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea and subordinate units . . . . .
Artemisia campestris L. s.l. + 2 . r + 4
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. 1 . 1 2 1 4
Euphorbia cyparissias L. . 1 1 1 1 4
Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. . 1 + + + 4
Ranunculus bulbosus L. + . r r + 4
Thymus pulegioides L. . + + + 1 4
Bromus erectus Huds. . . 1 2 2 3
Dianthus carthusianorum L. s.l. 1 r . . + 3
Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. + . + 1 . 3
Potentilla neumanniana Rchb. 1 + . 1 . 3
Anthericum liliago L. . . . 1 + 2
Centaurea splendens L. . . . + + 2
Trifolium montanum L. . . 2 + . 2
Centaurea scabiosa L. . . + . . 1
Euphrasia stricta J. F. Lehm. . . . . 1 1
Galium verum L. s.l. . . + . . 1
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. . . 2 . . 1
Orchis morio L. . . . 1 . 1
Orchis ustulata L. . . . r . 1
Salvia pratensis L. . . + . . 1
Thesium linophyllon L. . . . 1 . 1
Hypochaeris maculata L. . . . + . 1
Plantago media L. + . . . . 1
Poa angustifolia L. . . . 1 . 1
Companion species
Koelerio-Corynephoretea and subordinate units
Jasione montana L. + + . . + 3
Aira caryophyllea L. 2 + . . . 2
Hypochaeris radicata L. 1 . . . . 1
Sedum sexangulare L. + . . . . 1
Trifolium arvense L. . . . . + 1
Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Plantago lanceolata L. 1 . 1 + 1 4
Agrostis capillaris L. 2 . . . 1 2
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. + . 1 . . 2
Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet . . 1 r . 2
Dactylis glomerata L. . . 1 . . 1
Erigeron annuus (L.) Desf. s.l. . . . . 1 1
Festuca nigrescens Lam. . . + . . 1
Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult. + . . . . 1
Other species
Peucedanum oreoselinum (L.) Moench 1 + 2 2 3 5
Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin. . . 1 2 . 2
Hypericum perforatum L. . . r . + 2
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull . . . r . 1
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link /S + . . . . 1
Danthonia decumbens (L.) DC. 1 . . . . 1
Echium vulgare L. . + . . . 1
Festuca filiformis Pourr. . 1 . . . 1
Hieracium pilosella aggr. . . 1 . . 1
Hieracium piloselloides Vill. . + . . . 1
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. . . + . . 1
Thalictrum minus L. . . + . . 1

Characteristic and differential species : Koeleria macrantha, Rumex acetosella.

High frequency Taxa : Artemisia campestris, Carex caryophyllea, Euphorbia cyparissias, Koeleria macrantha, Lotus corniculatus, Peucedanum oreoselinum, Plantago lanceolata, Ranunculus bulbosus, Rumex acetosella, Thymus pulegioides.

Species composition : This community was dominated by Koeleria macrantha (Φ 0.88; p-value<0.001) and Peucedanum oreoselinum (Φ 0.45; p-value=0.07), accompanied by less demanding xerothermophytes, e.g. Hieracium pilosella, Galium verum, Thymus pulegioides, Carex caryophyllea, Potentilla neumanniana and Helianthemum nummularium. Among the other species, Rumex acetosella (Φ 0.40; p-value=0.02) and Euphorbia cyparissias (Φ 0.90; p-value<0.001) showed significant values for the ISA. Pioneer grassland on sand species, like Jasione montana, Trifolium arvense or Aira caryophyllea, and mesic meadows species, like Achillea millefolium aggr, Plantago lanceolata were present. The clustering split the community into two groups. One relevé (number 71) had a higher cover of Festuca trachyphylla, Aira caryophyllea, Hypochaeris radicata and typical dry grassland on sandy soil species. The others (42, 8, 7, 66) were in different secondary transitional stages dominated by semi-dry grassland species, like Bromus erectus, Lotus corniculatus, Trifolium montanum and the presence of the protected species Orchis ustulata and Orchis morio. The number of species per relevé ranged between 21 and 25, with an average of 21.8.

Geographic distribution : These grasslands were found along the Maggia and the Melezza river. This community can be found in the entire Insubria region from Torino to Brescia (Studer-Ehrensberger 1993).

Synecology : The pH ranged between 4.5 and 5.0. The mean weighted Landolt indicator values were as follows: temperature (T) 3.58, continentality (K) 3.13, light (L) 3.85, moisture (F) 1.68, soil reaction (R) 2.90 and nutrients (N) 2.13, Humus (H) 2.89 (Fig. 5). The community is present on silicious stabilized sandy soil. That is no longer flooded along river terraces, representing a secondary successional stage maintained by agricultural practices The altitude in the hillzone ranged from 220 m a.s.l. to 310 m a.s.l. The surfaces were either mowed or extensively grazed by sheep. Each plot was on a site listed in the national inventory of dry meadows and pastures.

Figure 5. 

Boxplots showing the variability of altitude and other environmental indicators (i.e. Landolt's moisture, light, temperature, continentality, soil reaction, nutrients, humus) for each plant community. The abbreviations used are referred to the following plant association: Phy-Fes for Phyteumo-Festucetum, Car-Nar for Carici-Nardetum, Cen-Arr for Centaureo-Arrhenatheretum, Hol-Chr for Holco-Chrysopogonetum, Poo-Fes for Poo-Festucetum and Phy-Mes for Phyteumo-Mesobrometum.

Syntaxonomical discussion : This plant community is included to the Stipo-Poion xerophilae alliance by the occurrence of Achillea collina, Festuca trachyphylla and Carex liparocarpos. This plant community was initially described in Insubria by Studer-Ehrensberger (1993) as the "Jasione montana-Koeleria macrantha community" within the Koelerio-Phleion alliance. She hypothesized that its presence was linked to the Insubrian climate. Lonati & Lonati (2007) identified Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae, which belongs to the Stipo-Poion carniolicae alliance, also confined to the Insubrian region with a pronounced subatlantic climate. Although Lonati & Lonati (2007) did not reference Studer-Ehrensberger's work, a comparison of the species lists and relevé locations suggests that the Jasione montana-Koeleria macrantha community is synonymous with Poo-bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae. Both combined a high number of species characteristic of Festuco-Brometea with species principally occurring in the Koelerio-Corynephoretea class. Similar meso-xeric grasslands had previously been classified as the Jasiono montanae-Festucetum ovinae association in the Hyperico perforati-Scleranthion perennis alliance (Becker et al. 2012) within the Koelerio-Corynephoretea canescentis class. According to Chytrý (2010), all three alliances share diagnostic and constant species, such as Festuca ovina aggr. (cfr. F. trachyphylla), Hieracium pilosella, Jasione montana, Rumex acetosella, Thymus pulegioides, and Hypericum perforatum, all of which are found in our relevés. The high percentage of semi-dry meadow grasses (Koeleria macrantha, Bromus erectus, Carex caryophyllea) in these relevés brings them closer to the Festuco-Brometea class.

The species in Plot 71 of the inventory of dry grasslands are very similar to Poo-bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae. However, the data does not specify which species of Festuca ovina aggr. is present. Festuca trachyphylla could only be confirmed in our own relevé 42. Relevés 8, 7, and 66 have a much higher proportion of mesophilic species, which could potentially represent a degradational stage due to pasture and are considered as a mesophilic variant without Festuca trachyphylla.

Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli Lagnaz, Trotta, Prunier, Krüsi et Boscutti 2023 ex Meyer 1976 (Tab. 2)

Table 2.

Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli Lagnaz, Trotta, Prunier, Krüsi et Boscutti ex Meyer 1976 .

Relevé number 54 65 13 6 14 Presence
Altitude (m a.s.l) 820 445 373 478 507
Aspect S S S SO S
Slope (degree) 40 25 30 30 20
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 28 28 35 30 30
Total coverage (%) 90 90 100 100 100
Characteristic and differential species of Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli
Danthonia decumbens (L.) DC. 1 2 1 2 1 5
Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roem. & Schult. + 1 1 2 1 5
Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin. . 2 1 2 3 4
Bromion erecti and Brachypodietalia pinnati
Thymus pulegioides L. + 1 1 2 2 5
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. 1 1 . 1 1 4
Silene nutans L. r + r . + 4
Lotus corniculatus L. . + 1 1 1 4
Bromus erectus Huds. . 1 1 . 3 3
Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. + . + . 1 3
Polygala vulgaris L. s.l. . + + . 1 3
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. . . . 1 1 2
Ranunculus bulbosus L. . + . + . 2
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea
Anthericum liliago L. + r + . + 4
Briza media L. + + . + . 3
Characteristic species Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. 1 + 3 3 1 5
Agrostis capillaris L. . 1 1 . + 3
Festuca nigrescens Lam. . . + 1 + 3
Holcus lanatus L. . . 2 1 + 3
Ajuga reptans L. . . + 1 . 2
Prunella vulgaris L. . . + + . 2
Centaurea transalpina DC. . + + . . 2
Plantago lanceolata L. . . . + 1 2
Rumex acetosa L. . . . + 1 2
Trifolium pratense L. . . . + r 2
Characteristic species of Nardetea strictae and subordinate units
Stachys officinalis (L.) Trevis. . + + 1 + 4
Carex pilulifera L. . 1 2 1 . 3
Carex pallescens L. . 1 + . . 2
Other species
Festuca filiformis Pourr. 2 1 2 2 2 5
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. 1 1 1 1 . 4
Cruciata glabra (L.) Ehrend. . . + 1 + 3
Hypochaeris radicata L. + + . + . 3
Molinia arundinacea Schrank 3 1 . . . 2
Carex fritschii Waisb. 2 . 1 . . 2
Thalictrum minus L. + + . . . 2
Clinopodium vulgare L. . . + . + 2
Peucedanum oreoselinum (L.) Moench + + . . . 2
Veronica officinalis L. . . 1 . + 2
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn . . r . + 2
Solidago virgaurea L. + . . + . 2
Vincetoxicum hirundinaria Medik. r . . . + 2
Lathyrus linifolius (Reichard) Bässler + . + . . 2

Lectotypus : Tab. 1, relevé 75 in Meyer (1976)

According to the International Code of Phytosociology (Theurillat et al. 2021), the name published by Meyer (1976) is not valid as it is a provisional name (Art. 3b). Therefore, we propose to validate the original name (Art. 6).

Characteristic and differential species : Brachypodium rupestre, Chrysopogon gryllus, Danthonia decumbens

High frequency Taxa : Achillea millefolium aggr., Anthericum liliago, Anthoxantum odoratum, Brachypodium rupestre, Carex caryophyllea, Carex pilulifera, Festuca filiformis, Lotus corniculatus, Silene nutans, Thymus pulegoides.

Species composition : This community was characterised by the dominance of Chrysopogon gryllus (Φ 0.3; p-value<0.05) and Anthoxantum odoratum. One relevé showed dominance of Chrysopogon gryllus combined with Bromus erectus. Other species with a significant fidelity according to ISA analysis were Danthonia decumbens (Φ 0.74; p-value<0.001) and Brachypodium rupestre (Φ 0.37; p-value<0.05). The protected species, Serapias vomeracea, was found in one relevé. Mesophilous meadow species, like Plantago lanceolata, Centaurea transalpina and Rumex acetosa were combined with typical semi-dry meadow species, such Bromus erectus, Carex caryophyllea, and Silene nutans. The latter had a higher frequency. The number of species per relevé ranged between 28 and 35, with an average of 30.2. One relevé (54) was an outlier with a dominance of Molinia arundinacea and other fringe vegetation species.

Geographic distribution : These grasslands are present in the Terre di Pedemonte and the outer part of Centovalli.

Synecology : They are present on exposed southern slopes (max. 30 degrees) in the hill belt of the Terre di Pedemonte and the outer area of Centovalli. In the Terre die Pedemonte, the altitude for this plant community ranged between 373 m a.s.l. and 507 m a.s.l. One relevé was located in Centovalli at 820 m a.s.l. and the pH was near 4.5. The Landolt indicator values were as follows: temperature (T) 3.41, continentality (K) 2.82, light (L) 3.55, moisture (F) 2.37, soil reaction (R) 2.66 and nutrients (N) 2.34 (Fig. 5). The surfaces were a combination of mowed and extensive pastures.

Syntaxonomical discussion : The association belongs to the alliance Bromion erecti by the occurrence of the characteristics species Thymus pulegoides, Silene nutans, Luzula campestris, Ranunculus bulbosus. In Switzerland, plant communities with Chrysopogon gryllus are limited to the Canton of Ticino. Chrysopogon gryllus has a wide amplitude and can be found also in different xerophytic communities in the central Alps extending to the Balkans, where its sociologic optimum occurs in the associations of the East continental order Festucetalia valesiacae (Ilijanić & Topić, 1989; Redzic, 1999). Chrysopogon gryllus grasslands in Ticino were first described by Koch (1943), as Andropogonetum grylli insubricum. It included siliceous and basophilous variants. The author defined Festuca filiformis, Carex pilulifera, Agrostis capillaris as differential species for the two variants. Meyer (1976) referred the two variants to Carici humilis-Chrysopogonetum grylli (basophilous) and Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli prov. (acidophilous). Studer-Ehrensberger (1993) includes Holco-Chrysopogonetum grilli prov. in a new association, Phyteumo-Mesobrometum, within Bromion alliance. This attribution can be discussed. The Phyteumo-Mesobrometum association is characterized by a higher number of species in mown meadows, such as Arrhenatherum elatius, Trisetum flavescens, Cerastium fontanum. Furthermore, the dominance of Chrysopogon gryllus along with Danthonia decumbens and their absence in the Phyteumo-Mesobrometum grasslands validate the association described by Meyer (1976) Korneck (1978) placed semi-dry meadows on siliceous soils in the Mesobromion alliance. Recent phytosociological references agree that the Mesobormion alliance is limited to calcareous soil while dry meadows on siliceous soil should be placed in the Koelerio-Phleion alliance (Chytrý 2010; Biondi et al. 2014; Mucina et al. 2016). In the Locarnese region, typical species of Koelerion-Phleion are missing. Therefore, we propose to classify this association within the Bromion alliance. The occurrence of many mesophilous species like Brachypodium rupestre, Holcus lanatus, Lotus corniculatus and Anthoxantum odoratum are probably due to a legacy of traditional agricultural practices. The reference natural guide of habitats in Switzerland (Delarze et al., 2015) is limited to Brachypodium pinnatum and did not consider Brachypodium rupestre. Generally, the frequency and dominance of Brachypodium pinnatum in grasslands is linked to the intensification of pasture (Ellenberg and Leuschner 2010) or the abandonment of regular management, meaning Brachypodium pinnatum grasslands have been considered to be transitory vegetation stages (Häfelfinger, 1996; Bonanomi & Allegrezza, 2004). However, Brachypodium rupestre communities are well known where diverse associations have been described (Ubaldi 1988, Blasi et al. 2000, Di Pietro et al. 2015, Prunier et al. 2018). Based on works from Biondi et al. (2005), the Polygalo mediterraneae-Bromion erecti includes mesophilous non-calciphilous grasslands of the Apennines (Di Pietro et al. 2015). The option of creating a new sub-alliance or alliance should be considered in any further study.

Phyteumo-Mesobrometum Studer-Ehrensberger 1993 (Tab. 3)

Table 3.

Phyteumo-Mesobrometum Studer-Ehrensberger 1993 .

Relevé number 22 50 49 52 11 53 16 17 33 37 57 19 59 Presence
Altitude m a.s.l. 811 1013 1069 911 403 849 555 560 334 603 782 840 1274
Aspect SE S S SE S E SE SE SE E SE SO SE
Slope (degree) 30 10 50 30 30 30 20 30 20 20 45 45 30
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 38 41 29 38 20 31 35 17 24 39 35 33 31
Total coverage (%) 100 90 95 95 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 100
Characteristic and differential species of Phyteumo-Mesobrometum
Thymus pulegioides L. 2 2 1 1 + 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 13
Thalictrum minus L. 1 + 1 + . + 1 1 1 + 1 r 1 12
Carex fritschii Waisb. . . 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 11
Characteristic species of Bromion erecti and Brachypodietalia pinnati
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. 1 2 + 1 1 . 2 2 2 2 . 1 1 11
Silene nutans L. . + . + . + r + + 1 1 + 1 10
Ranunculus bulbosus L. 2 + . + 2 + + . . 1 1 + . 9
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. 2 + 1 1 . 1 2 1 . . . . . 7
Lotus corniculatus L. . + . + . . + . . + + 1 + 7
Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. 2 2 . 1 . . . . . 1 2 2 2 7
Bromus erectus Huds. . . . 1 . . + + . 2 2 . . 5
Helictotrichon pubescens (Huds.) Pilg. . . + . . + . . . . + . . 3
Poa angustifolia L. . . 1 . 2 . + . . . . . . 3
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea and subordinate units
Achillea collina (Becker ex Wirtg.) Heimerl 1 + r + 1 + 1 . . + 1 1 + 11
Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roem. & Schult. + 2 3 2 . . + . 1 1 1 + 1 10
Briza media L. + + . + . . . + . + . 1 2 7
Salvia pratensis L. . 1 . . r . 1 + r + + . . 7
Dianthus carthusianorum L. s.l. 2 . . 1 . . . 1 . . + r + 6
Festuca ovina aggr. . + 1 1 . + . . . . . . + 5
Anthericum liliago L. . . r + . . . . . . 1 . . 3
Hieracium piloselloides Vill. r . . + . . . . . + . . . 3
Characteristic species of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. + 1 . . . 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 10
Festuca nigrescens Lam. 2 2 1 3 1 . 1 . 2 2 + . 1 10
Leontodon hispidus L. + + . . . 1 + . 1 + 1 r 1 9
Viola tricolor L. 1 . . + + 2 + 1 . + + . + 9
Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) J. & C. Presl r 1 + . 2 + . . + 1 . 1 . 8
Plantago lanceolata L. 1 + . . . . + r . + + + 1 8
Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet 1 . . . r + . . + . + + + 7
Rumex acetosa L. 1 . . . . 1 1 + . + + 1 . 7
Agrostis capillaris L. . + . . + 1 . . . + 1 . 1 6
Holcus lanatus L. . 1 . . . . + . 1 + + 1 . 6
Dactylis glomerata L. . + + . . . . . . r + . + 5
Trifolium pratense L. + . . . r . . . . r + 1 . 5
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv. + + . . . + . . . . . 2 + 5
Lathyrus pratensis L. . + r . . . . . . . + + . 4
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke . + . . . . . r . + . . + 4
Veronica chamaedrys L. + + . . . . . . + + . . . 4
Trifolium repens L. + 1 + . . . . . . . . . . 3
Leucanthemum vulgare aggr. . . . . . + . . 1 + . . . 3
Other species
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. . 1 + + . + + . . 1 + + . 8
Clinopodium vulgare L. . . + + r . 1 . . . . + 1 6
Festuca filiformis Pourr. 2 . . . . 2 1 2 . . 1 1 . 6
Galium rubrum L. . 1 + . . . + . . . + 1 + 6
Peucedanum oreoselinum (L.) Moench r . . + . . . . 1 1 . r . 5
Rumex acetosella L. s.l. . + r . + + . . 1 . . . . 5
Cruciata glabra (L.) Ehrend. 1 . . . . . 1 . 2 1 . . . 4
Vincetoxicum hirundinaria Medik. . . 2 + . . . . . . . r 1 4
Avenella flexuosa (L.) Drejer r + . . . 1 . . . . . . . 3
Carex pairae F. W. Schultz + + 1 . . . . . . . . . . 3
Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin. . . . 1 . . 1 2 . . . . . 3
Hypericum perforatum L. . + . + . + . . . . . . . 3
Nardus stricta L. . + . + . + . . . . . . . 3
Poa variegata Lam. . + . + . 1 . . . . . . . 3
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. . . . + . + . . . . + . . 3
Scabiosa lucida Vill. . + . . . + . . . . . . + 3
Silene viscaria (L.) Borkh. 1 . . . . r . . . r . . . 3
Vicia sativa subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh. + . . . . . + . . . . + . 3

Characteristic and differential species : Carex fritschii (Φ 0.50; p-value<0.001), Thymus pulegoides (Φ 0.22; p-value<0.1), Thalictrum minus (Φ 0.30; p-value<0.05)

High frequency Taxa : Luzula campestris, Achillea millefolium aggr., Brachypodium rupestre, Silene nutans, Anthoxantum odoratum, Festuca nigrescens, Ranunculus bulbosus.

Species composition : All the diagnostic species showed a significant fidelity to this association (Carex fritschii, Φ 0.50, p-value<0.001; Thymus pulegoides, Φ 0.22, p-value<0.1; Thalictrum minus, Φ 0.30, p-value<0.05). Two variants could be distinguished: one variant (plots 22, 49, 50, 52) was drier than the second one (plots 11, 16, 17, 19, 33, 37, 53, 57, 59). The first one comprised three meadows of national importance. They contained Festuca ovina aggr. and a more abundant cover of species typical of dry grasslands, like Helianthemum nummularium, Dianthus carthusianorum and Carex caryophyllea and a presence of very dry indicators, like Sedum annuum and Sedum telephium. These plots were also characterized by the presence or dominance of species indicating short-term abandonment, like Carex pairae, Vincetoxicum hirundinaria or dominance of Brachypodium rupestre. The second variant was characterized by the presence of Carex fritschii with a cover abundance between 2 and 3 in all surveys. Anthoxantum odoratum was dominant and species typical of semi-dry meadows were also present, like Centaurea scabiosa, Arabis hirsuta, Galium verum and Pimpinella saxifraga. Species typically from Arrhenatheretelia like Centaurea transalpina, Galium album, Poa pratensis were present in the second variant and absent in the first one. Bromus erectus was present but never dominant. The protected species, Lilium bulbiferum and Orchis ustulata, were also found. The number of species per relevé ranged between 17 and 41, with an average of 31.6.

Geographic distribution : These grasslands had a wide amplitude and were spread throughout the study area.

Synecology : These grasslands were found on exposed southern and eastern slopes (from 10 to 45 degrees in gradient). The altitudes ranged from 334 m a.s.l. to 1274 m a.s.l. The pH ranged between 4.0 and 4.5. The Landolt indicator values were as followed: temperature (T) 3.35, continentality (K) 2.98, light (L) 3.56, moisture (F) 2.31, soil reaction (R) 2.85 and nutrients (N) 2.42, Humus (H) 3.18 (Fig. 5). Not all the areas seemed to have been mowed every year. A combination of mowing and grazing could also be noticed on the field. In some cases, this plant community can be found on old river terraces.

Syntaxonomical discussion : The association belongs to the alliance Bromion erecti by the occurrence of the characteristics species Ranunculus bulbosus, Luzula campestris, Silene nutans. Semi-dry grasslands on silicious soils in Ticino were described by Studer-Ehrensberger (1993) as Phyteumo-Mesobrometum. She distinguished two subassociations: chrysopogonetosum grylli and achilletosum millefoli. The subassociation achilletosum millefoli has many similarities with the relevés of the Locarnese, as they share many species (e.g. Phyteuma betoncifolium, Bromus erectus, Thalictrum minus). The main differences concern the cover of Bromus erectus and the presence of Carex fritschii. Bromus erectus is often dominant according to Studer-Ehrensberger and Carex fristchii is absent. Our relevés showed a presence of Bromus erectus, but this was never dominant, unlike Carex fristschii. We consider the relevés with a high cover of Carex fritschii as a locally variant associated with specific ecological and management attributes linked to elevation and mowing frequency.

Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum Oberd. 1964 nom. mut. prop. Prunier et al. 2019 (Tab. 4)

Table 4.

Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum Oberd. 1964 nom. mut. prop. Prunier et al. (2019) .

Relevé number 29 30 24 35 34 36 15 21 25 48 10 20 9 23 12 51 2 3 47 58 Presence
Altitude m a.s.l. 711 701 700 308 339 360 550 676 666 780 222 823 335 701 367 855 1160 1174 1057 1180
Aspect N N SE SE SE E O S N SO E SO NE SE NO SE E E SE SE
Slope (degree) 10 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 10 20 0 30 0 40 10 0 35 30 45 30
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 26 25 19 24 11 25 19 27 25 25 23 21 20 25 22 25 25 23 30 35
Total coverage (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 95 100 100 100 100 100
Characteristic and differential species of Centaureo-Arrhenatheretum
Centaurea transalpina (Schleich. ex DC.) Nyman 2 . 1 2 + 1 1 + 2 + + . . + r . . + . + 14
Characteristic species of Arrhenatherion elatioris and Arrhenatheretalia elatioris
Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) J. & C. Presl + 2 . + + 1 . 3 + 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 18
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke . + + 1 1 1 . . 1 + 2 . 1 r 1 + 1 + 1 1 16
Rumex acetosa L. + + . 1 . 1 1 1 2 + . . . 1 + + 1 . + + 14
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv. 1 + 1 . . . . 2 2 1 1 2 . 1 . + + 2 1 + 14
Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet . . + 1 . + 1 . 1 . 2 1 . . . + 1 1 + + 12
Holcus lanatus L. . . 2 2 . . 1 2 . + . 1 . 1 . . . + 1 + 10
Galium album Mill. 1 1 1 . . . . 1 + . . . + + . + . . + . 9
Leucanthemum vulgare aggr. r . . 2 . . . 1 1 1 . . . . . . 1 + . + 8
Viola tricolor L. . . . 1 . + . . . . + . 1 . . + 2 . 1 1 8
Poa pratensis L. . . . 1 2 2 . . . . . . . . + + . . . + 6
Lolium perenne L. . . . 1 1 + + . . . . . . . . . + . . + 6
Erigeron annuus (L.) Desf. s.l. . . . . . . . r . r . . r + . . . . . . 4
Characteristic species of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Achillea millefolium aggr. 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 + 1 1 + 1 + + + 1 + 1 20
Dactylis glomerata L. + r 2 + + 1 + 1 r + 2 + 2 2 + . 1 2 1 + 19
Plantago lanceolata L. 1 + 2 2 2 + 1 1 + + 1 + 2 1 1 2 2 . + 1 19
Festuca nigrescens Lam. + 1 2 . . 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 18
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. 1 1 . 2 4 2 3 2 2 1 2 . 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 18
Trifolium pratense L. 1 1 2 1 . + 2 2 2 1 . 1 1 2 r + + 1 1 + 18
Leontodon hispidus L. 2 2 + 2 2 1 + 1 2 + . r 1 . . + . . + 1 15
Ranunculus acris L. + . . + 1 1 . 1 . . . . . . + + + 1 + + 11
Trifolium repens L. . 1 1 1 . + + 2 1 + . . . . . + . 1 . + 11
Agrostis capillaris L. 1 2 . 1 . . . 1 3 . + . . . + . . . 1 1 9
Chaerophyllum villarsii W. D. J. Koch 3 . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . 2 2 + 1 6
Lathyrus pratensis L. . . . . . . . 1 . + . + . 1 + + . . . . 6
Prunella vulgaris L. . . . . . . . + 1 . . . . + . . + + . . 5
Ranunculus friesianus Jord. . 1 2 . . . + . 1 . . + . . . . . . . . 5
Pimpinella major (L.) Huds. . r . . . . r . . + . . . . r . . . . . 4
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea and subordinate units
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. . 1 . 1 . . + . 1 . . 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 13
Thymus pulegioides L. + 1 . . . . . . + + . 1 + 2 1 2 2 + 2 1 13
Veronica chamaedrys L. . . . . . + 2 1 1 . . + + + 1 + + . + . 11
Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. 2 . + . . . . + . + + . . . . . . 1 + 1 8
Ranunculus bulbosus L. . 1 . . . . . . . 1 + 1 . . 1 1 . . r 1 8
Poa angustifolia L. . . 1 1 . + . . . . + . + . . . . . . . 5
Briza media L. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 1 2 4
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . 2 . . 1 + 4
Helictotrichon pubescens (Huds.) Pilg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 1 . + 4
Salvia pratensis L. . . . . . r . . . + 1 . . r . . . . . . 4
Other species
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. + 1 . . . . . + . . . + . 1 + + 2 2 2 + 11
Thalictrum minus L. 3 1 . 1 . 1 1 2 . . + 1 . 1 . . 1 . 2 . 11
Carex pairae F. W. Schultz . . + + . r . + . . + + 1 1 . . . . . + 9
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. . 1 + . . . + . 1 . . . . r + . 2 1 . . 8
Carex fritschii Waisb. 1 . 1 . . + . 1 . . + 3 . . + . . . . . 7
Rumex acetosella L. s.l. . . . + . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 . 1 . . . + 7
Peucedanum oreoselinum (L.) Moench 2 2 . . . r . + . + 1 . . . . . . . . . 6
Carex pallescens L. 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + + + 5
Clinopodium vulgare L. + . . . . . . . . + 1 . . . . . . . + 2 5
Myosotis arvensis Hill . . . . . + . . 1 . + . + . . . . . . + 5
Stellaria graminea L. r 2 . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . + . 4

Original name : Centaurea dubiae-Arrhenatheretum elatioris Oberdorfer 1964, art. 43

Synonyms : Centaureo carniolicae-Arrhenatheretum elatioris Oberdorfer 1964 corr. Poldini et Oriolo 1994, Arrhenatheretum elatioris Pedrotti 1964 non Scherrer 1925, Arrhenatheretum elatioris Buffa et al. 1989 non Scherrer 1925

Lectotypus : Tab. 9, relevé 4 in Oberdorfer (1964) by Poldini and Oriolo (1994)

Characteristic and differential species : Centaurea transalpina.

High frequency Taxa : Achillea millefolium aggr., Arrhenatherum elatius, Silene vulgaris, Festuca nigrescens, Dactylis glomerata, Plantago lanceolata, Anthoxantum odoratum, Trifolium pratense, Leontodon hispidus.

Species composition : These grass-rich meadows were generally dominated by Arrhenatherum elatius (Φ 0.45; p-value=0.06) and Anthoxanthum odoratum. Centaurea transalpina was the only other species whit a significant ISA value (Φ 0.58; p-value<0.01). Trisetum flavescens was present in all plots above 650 m a.s.l. but was never dominant. One meadow (relevé 29) showed signs of extensive management, with a dominance of Chaerophyllum villarsii and Thalictrum minus. All plots were characterized by nutrient rich grassland species, like Dactylis glomerata, Trifolium repens, Ranunculus friesianus. Agrostis capillaris and Viola tricolor indicated soil acidity. The presence of species from the Southern part of the Alps was typical for this association, particularly Centaurea transalpina and Achillea roseo-alba (which was aggregated into Achillea millefolium in the present work). Two variants could be distinguished: the first one contained meadows (relevés 15, 21, 24, 25, 34, 35, 36) that were more intensively managed on flat areas or gentle slopes (10-20 degrees) and was found below 700 m. The number of species was lower (average 24.7) than the second variant (relevés 2, 3, 9, 10, 12, 20, 23, 47, 48, 51, 58). The second variant had an average of 31.9 species. These were present on slopes up to 45 degrees. Some of them were found on formerly cultivated terraces. In one meadow, we found the locally protected species, Lilium bulbiferum subsp. croceum. These grasslands were generally found above 700 m. They had a high frequency and cover of montane species like Chaerophyllum villarsii and Phyteuma orbiculare. They could be considered as a transitional stage to Centaureo transalpinae-Trisetetum flavescentis. The number of species per relevé ranged between 11 for the most intensively managed meadow to 35, with an average of 23.8.

Geographic distribution : This association is found South of the Alps in Ticino and Northern East Italy, from Comasco to Friuli (Poldini & Oriolo 1994; Studer-Ehrensberger 2000; Allegrezza & Biondi 2011) as in Slovenia (Velev 2018).

Synecology : The pH ranged between 4.5 and 5.0. This association had a wide amplitude. It was found across the whole study area in the hill and the lower montane zones at altitudes between 222 m a.s.l. and 1180 m a.s.l. The Landolt indicator values were as follows: temperature (T) 3.20, continentality (K) 3.02, light (L) 3.45, moisture (F) 2.66, soil reaction (R) 2.88 and nutrients (N) 2.92, Humus (H) 3.20 (Fig. 5). The areas were mowed. It was the only type of grassland in the study area used for hay production.

Syntaxonomical discussion : The association belongs to the alliance Arrhenatherion elatioris by the occurrence of the characteristic species Arrhenatherum elatius, Silene vulgaris, Rumex acetosa, Galium album, Viola tricolor, and Poa pratensis. Oberdorfer (1964) first described this association for the insubrian region. The phytosociological attribution of this community was due to the frequent occurrence of species only present in south side of the Alps, like Achillea roseo-alba and Centaurea transalpina. Poldini & Oriolo (1994) distinguished between the Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum association in the Arrhenatherion alliance and a montane association called Centaureo transalpinae-Trisetetum flavescentis in the Polygono-Trisetion alliance, which corresponds to the Trisetetum flavescentis insubricum subassociation described by Marschall (1947) in the Leventina. As most of the diagnostic species, like Geranium sylvaticum, Heracleum sphondyllium and Carum carvi were absent and the Arrhenatherion species more frequent, this association could be excluded.

Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis ass. nova (Tab. 5, Relevé 41 holotypus)

Table 5.

Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis ass. nova

Relevé number 27 28 39 41 5 18 68 64 46 43 44 60 61 Presence
Altitude m a.s.l. 1050 899 978 927 924 747 1465 1342 1115 1261 1100 1406 1384
Aspect NE N E NO E NO S S S S S E S
Slope (degree) 45 20 20 20 15 30 25 40 10 20 45 30 40
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 22 22 25 29 44 36 19 37 24 33 34 31 40
Total coverage (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 100 100
Characteristic and differential Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. . 1 2 1 2 1 + + 1 1 1 + 1 12
Festuca nigrescens Lam. 2 3 4 3 2 1 . . 4 2 1 1 2 11
Poa chaixii Vill. + + + + . . + 1 2 + 1 + + 11
Chaerophyllum villarsii W. D. J. Koch . . . 1 . + . 1 . 2 2 1 1 7
Ranunculus montanus aggr. . . 1 + . . + + . + + . + 7
Crocus albiflorus Kit. . . . 1 + + . + + . . . + 6
Phleum rhaeticum (Humphries) Rauschert + 1 . 1 . + + . . . . + . 6
Characteristic species of Nardo strictae-Agrostion and Nardetalia
Carex pallescens L. . . + . 2 1 + 1 + 1 1 . + 9
Avenella flexuosa (L.) Drejer 2 4 . . . 2 1 . . . . . 1 5
Paradisea liliastrum (L.) Bertol. . r . + . r . + . . . . r 5
Stellaria graminea L. + + 1 1 . . . . . . . . . 4
Carex pilulifera L. 2 2 . . . . . . . . . 2 1 4
Galium pumilum Murray r . . . + . 1 + . . . . . 4
Poa variegata Lam. . . . . + . 2 . . . . 2 1 4
Stachys officinalis (L.) Trevis. r . . . 1 . . + . . . . . 3
Viola canina s.l. 1 . . . + . . . . . 1 . . 3
Characteristic species of Nardetea strictae and subordinate units
Nardus stricta L. . + 1 + . . 2 1 1 1 . 1 1 9
Alchemilla hybrida aggr. sensu K. Lauber r . . . . . . . . + 1 1 1 5
Characteristic species of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Achillea millefolium aggr. 1 . + 1 2 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
Agrostis capillaris L. 1 + 1 + 1 1 1 2 + . + 1 1 12
Veronica chamaedrys L. 1 . + + + . . + + + 1 . + 9
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke . . + + 1 . + . + 1 + + 1 9
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. 1 . 1 3 2 2 + . . . 1 1 . 8
Dactylis glomerata L. . . r . + . . r + 2 2 + + 8
Trifolium pratense L. . . . r 1 1 . + . + + + + 8
Viola tricolor L. . . + . + . . . 1 + + 1 . 6
Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet . . . . + . . . + + + . + 5
Rumex acetosa L. . . + . 2 . . . + . + . + 5
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv. . + + . . . + . . . + . 2 5
Leontodon hispidus L. . . . . 1 . . . . + + 2 . 4
Plantago lanceolata L. . . . . . . . . . + + + . 3
Trifolium repens L. . . . . 1 + . + . . . . . 3
Narcissus verbanensis (Herb.) M. Roem. . . 2 1 . . . . . . . . . 2
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea and subordinate units
Thymus pulegioides L. 2 1 + + 3 + + 1 + . 2 1 1 12
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. + 1 + 1 2 2 . 1 . . . + 1 9
Briza media L. . . . . + . . + 1 + 2 2 1 7
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. . . . . 1 . . 1 2 2 1 1 1 7
Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roem. & Schult. 3 + . . + + . 2 . . . + . 6
Silene nutans L. r . r . 2 1 . . . r . 1 . 6
Festuca ovina aggr. . r . . . . 1 1 . + + r . 6
Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. . . . . + 1 . + . + + . . 5
Polygala vulgaris L. s.l. r . . . 2 . + + . . . . . 4
Ranunculus bulbosus L. . . . . 1 . . . . . . + 1 3
Other species
Rumex acetosella L. s.l. . r + + + + . + + 1 + + + 11
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. 2 1 1 2 2 + + 1 . . . . . 8
Festuca filiformis Pourr. . . + + 1 1 . + . . . 1 . 6
Galium rubrum L. . . . . . . . + 1 + + + 1 6
Vincetoxicum hirundinaria Medik. . . . r . . + + r r 2 . . 6
Thalictrum minus L. . . . + . 1 . + + . + . 1 6
Veronica officinalis L. + + . . 1 1 . . . + . . . 5
Hypericum perforatum L. . . . + . . . . 1 1 + . . 4
Carex fritschii Waisb. . . . 2 1 1 . . . . . . . 3
Solidago virgaurea L. . . . . 2 + . + . . . . . 3
Arabis ciliata Clairv. . . . . . . . . . . + + + 3
Rosa spec. . . . . . . . r . . . + r 3

Characteristic and differential species : Festuca nigrescens, Phyteuma betonicifolium, Crocus albiflorus, Phleum rhaeticum, Poa chaixii, Ranunculus montanus, Chaerophyllum villarsii.

High frequency Taxa : Achillea millefolium aggr., Agrostis capillaris, Rumex acetosella, Thymus pulegoides.

Species composition : All diagnostic species showed a high fidelity to the association (Festuca nigrescens Φ 0.32, p-value<0.05; Phyteuma betonicifolium Φ 0.32, p-value<0.05; Crocus albiflorus, Φ 0.29, p-value<0.05; Phleum rhaeticum, Φ 0.40, p-value<0.05; Poa chaixii, Φ 0.4; p-value<0.05; Ranunculus montanus, Φ 0.49, p-value<0.05). These meadows were characterized by a mix of montane belt mesic meadow species (e.g. Chaerophyllum villarsii, Phleum rhaeticum), montane and subalpine belt mat-grass dry pasture species (Nardus stricta, Avenella flexuosa, Stellaria graminea), and meso-xerophytic grassland species (e.g. Thymus pulegoides, Silene nutans, Lotus corniculatus, Ranunculus bulbosus). In many relevés Festuca nigrescens was dominant. Two variants were distinguished. In the first one (5, 18, 27, 28, 39, 41) Festuca nigrescens was always present and was dominant in half of the relevés. Two protected species were found in the first variant: Lilium bulbiferum and Narcissus verbanensis. In the second variant (43, 44, 46, 60, 61, 64, 68) there was a higher frequency of species typical of Nardus stricta grasslands, like Nardus stricta, Carex pallescens, Alchemilla hybrida aggr., Galium rubrum, Poa chaixii. The number of species per relevé ranged between 19 and 44, with an average of 30.5.

Geographic distribution : The first variant included four relevés from the Centovalli, one from the lakeside and one from the Onsernone Valley. The second variant included four relevés from the Onsernone valley and three from the Vergeletto valley.

Synecology : Grasslands belonging to the first variant were North facing and at altitudes ranging from 747 m a.s.l. to 1050 m a.s.l. The ones in the second variant were found in the upper mountain belt and were mostly South facing. The altitude ranged from 1100 to 1,465 m a.s.l. The pH ranged between 4.0 and 4.5. The Landolt indicator values were as follows: temperature (T) 2.92, continentality (K) 2.95, light (L) 3.36, moisture (F) 2.63, soil reaction (R) 2.59 and nutrients (N) 2.55, Humus (H) 3.31 (Fig. 5). The new association is consistent with other Festuca rubra and Agrostis capillaris meadows as traditional communities of hay meadows in central Europe (Studer-Ehrensberger 2000, Poschlod et al. 2009). They are linked to extensive management without or with very little fertilisation, on nutrient poor soils. In our relevés, some were only mowed, but most of them exhibit a combination of extensive grazing and mowing. One of them (relevé 44) seemed abandoned or at least was no longer maintained on a regular basis and had a high cover of Vincetoxicum hirundinaria.

Syntaxonomical discussion : The association is included in the alliance Nardo strictae-Agrostion tenuis by the occurrence of the characteristic species Avenella flexuosa, Phyteuma betonicifolium, Carex pallescens, Poa variegata. In Ticino, Festuca rubra-Agrostis capillaris meadows have been described by different authors (Pestalozzi 1990, Häfelfinger 1996, Studer-Ehrensberger 2000, Dietl in Klötzli et al. 2010). Dietl in Klötzli et al. (2010) and Studer-Ehrensberger (2000) agree that the classification of these grasslands is difficult because of their intermediate position between well-defined alliances (Arrhenatherion, Polygono-Trisetion, Mesobromion, Nardus grasslands), which leads to a lack of diagnostic species. The attribution of this plant community is complicated by the fact that there are several approaches to classifying alliances within the Nardetalia order. Some consider two separate alliances Violion and Nardo-Agrostion to be in the same order (Mucina et al. 1993, Chytrý 2010, Mucina et al. 2016). Others consider the two alliances to be in separate orders (Biondi et al. 2014), or none of them (Delarze et al. 2015). The ordination diagram (Fig. 4) confirms the intermediate position of these grasslands between the Nardo-Agrostion and the Arrhenatherion. However, the cluster analysis (Fig. 3), clearly positions these surveys in relation to the Nardo-Agrostion grasslands.

We could consider placing these grasslands in the Violion alliance (acidophilous nutrient poor grasslands), as our relevés have a lot of species in common with the Polygalo-Nardetum described in Friuli (Poldini & Oriolo, 1997). The fact that Nardus stricta should be dominant in this association (Poldini & Oriolo 1997; Chytrý 2010) and was not in our surveys, and the fact that Violion occurs mostly in lowland to submontane belts, led us to follow Mucina et al. (2016) and classify it within the Nardo-Agrostion.

Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae Marschall and Dietl 1974 (Tab. 6)

Table 6.

Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae Marschall and Dietl 1974 .

Relevé number 31 55 4 62 63 1 38 26 40 32 67 70 71 Presence
Altitude m a.s.l. 1496 1013 - 1273 1243 1044 1012 1060 989 1498 1425 1101 1037
Aspect S SO - S SO SE SE SE NE y SO N S
Slope 30 30 - 25 0 45 40 10 45 10 10 20 0
Relevé area (m2) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Species number 21 19 22 34 25 16 9 14 12 7 9 15 19
Total coverage (%) 100 95 100 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Characteristic and differential species of Carici piluliferae-Nardetum
Carex pilulifera L. 1 1 3 1 1 5 5 1 2 2 1 2 1 13
Nardus stricta L. . 2 3 1 2 1 1 4 3 4 4 1 2 12
Characteristic species of Nardo strictae-Agrostion and Nardetalia
Avenella flexuosa (L.) Drejer 1 . . . . . + + 2 3 2 2 1 8
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. + 1 + + + + . . . . . + + 8
Festuca nigrescens Lam. . . . . + . . 1 2 . + 1 + 6
Carex pallescens L. . + . . + . . + . . + . . 4
Poa variegata Lam. 2 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Danthonia decumbens (L.) DC. r . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link /S 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Characteristic species of Nardetea strictae and subordinate units
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. . . . . . . . r + . . 1 . 3
Characteristic species of Juncetea trifidii and subordinate units
Festuca paniculata (L.) Schinz & Thell. 4 3 . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Hieracium lactucella Wallr. + . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Characteristic species of Festuco-Brometea and subordinate units
Anthericum liliago L. . . + . . + + . . . . + + 5
Thymus pulegioides L. . 1 1 2 2 . . . . . . . + 5
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. 2 . . 1 2 . . . . . . 1 . 4
Festuca ovina aggr. 1 . 2 2 2 . . . . . . . . 4
Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. . . 1 2 + + . . . . . . . 4
Silene nutans L. . 1 1 + + . . . . . . . . 4
Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roem. & Schult. . . . 1 1 1 . . . . . . . 3
Briza media L. . . 1 + . + . . . . . . . 3
Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. . . . + + . . . . . + . . 3
Ranunculus bulbosus L. . . . 1 . + . . . . . 1 . 3
Veronica chamaedrys L. . + . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Characteristic species of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and subordinate units
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. . 1 1 . . . . . 1 1 + . . 5
Leontodon hispidus L. + . + + + . . . . . . . 1 5
Rumex acetosa L. . + . . . 1 . + + . . . + 5
Poa chaixii Vill. . . . . + + . . + . . . + 4
Plantago lanceolata L. . . + + + . . . . . . . . 3
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke . + . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Viola tricolor L. . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Holcus lanatus L. . + . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Rorippa stylosa (Pers.) Mansf. & Rothm. + . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Other species
Festuca filiformis Pourr. 1 3 1 1 1 + 1 1 . . . 2 3 10
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. + + . . . . + + 1 r . + + 8
Veronica officinalis L. . + . + . + . + . . . . + 5
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Galium rubrum L. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Vaccinium myrtillus L. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. r . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Rubus fruticosus aggr. sensu Landolt /S + . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Synonyms : Nardetum alpigenum ss-ass. à Carex pilulifera et Polygala serpyllifolia Berset 1969, Omalotheco sylvaticae-Nardetum strictae Gillet in Ferrez et al. 2011

Characteristic and differential species : Carex pilulifera, Nardus stricta.

High frequency Taxa : Carex pilulifera, Nardus stricta.

Species composition : Avenella flexuosa, Carex pilulifera (Φ 0.55; p-value<0.1), Festuca filiformis, Nardus stricta (Φ 0.61; p-value<0.01) were the dominant species. Three variants could be distinguished: the first one (relevés 4, 62, 63) presented several semi-dry meadow species like Festuca ovina aggr., Helianthemum nummularium, Thymus pulegoides and Silene nutans. The second variant (relevés 1, 26, 32, 38, 40, 67, 70, 71) was very poor in species (mean 16), mostly dominated by Carex pilulifera or Nardus stricta (cover-abundance 4 or 5), the third characherized by dominance of Festuca paniculata (cover-abundance 3, resp. 4) and Festuca filiformis. The number of species per relevé ranged between 7 and 34, with an average of 17.1.

Geographic distribution : Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae was present throughout the whole studied area, except from the Vergeletto Valley. One relevé was from Pizzo Leone, five from the Onsernone Valley and five from Centovalli and two on the lakeside of Lago Maggiore.

Synecology : These grasslands were mostly on exposed southern slopes at altitudes between 989 to 1,498 m a.s.l. The slopes varied from flat to 40 degrees. With a mean of 26 species, the first variant had significantly more species than the second variant and third variant. Two of them belong to the federal inventory of dry meadows and pastures of national importance. The Landolt indicator values were as follows: temperature (T) 2.95, continentality (K) 2.78, light (L) 3.37, moisture (F) 2.57, soil reaction (R) 2.26, nutrients (N) 2.38 and Humus (H) 3.33 (Fig. 5).

Syntaxonomical discussion : The association is included in the alliance Nardo strictae-Agrostion by the high frequency and abundance of Phyteuma betonicifolium, Festuca nigrescens, and Carex pallescens. The Nardus-rich grasslands in Ticino are well known. Bär (1914) described them as “Nardus-desert”, in reference to the low number of species. In Europe, not much literature can be found about this association. Only the French prodrome and the swiss reference system retain it (de Foucault 2012; Prunier et al. 2019). Most of the descriptions are related to the Jura region (Gallandat et al. 1995; Vittoz 1998; Ferrez et al. 2011). The first variant (relevés 4, 62, 63) is clearly distinguished from the second (relevés 1, 26, 32, 38, 40, 67, 70, 71) by the presence of xero-termophilic species, such as Festuca ovina aggr. and Thymus pulegoides. An affiliation to the association Thymo-Festucetum was an option. However, the Indicator Species Analysis (ISA) did not showed statistically significant values. For this reason, these surveys were not separated from the other Nardus grasslands.

Conclusions

This study has contributed to providing new phytosociological knowledge for a region that has been poorly studied. We found six associations distributed in four alliances and three classes (Tab. 7). It has confirmed the existence of secondary grasslands in riverbeds, Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae. It has also confirmed the presence of two of semi-dry grasslands on siliceous soils, Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli, which has been, until now, provisional association and Phyteumo-Mesobrometum. This study has also contributed to a better understanding of the phytosociological attribution of nutrient-poor montane grasslands, with the description of the novel association Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis, in the Nardo-Agrostion alliance. The most widespread plant community was the Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum association, within the Arrhenatherion alliance. Unlike the northern Alps, where this alliance is replaced by Polygono-Trisetion at around 700 m a.s.l., it has been found up to 1,180 m a.s.l. on South-facing slopes. Also represented throughout the study area, Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae have been found on very acidic soils at altitudes ranging from 989 m a.s.l. to 1,425 m a.s.l.

A further consideration about dry grassland composition and conservation concerns the frequency and abundance of Brachypodium rupestre. This species resulted dominant in some stands across different investigated plant communities suggesting for its plausible encroachment behaviour, especially where a regular mowing or grazing is missing.

Since the number of surveys is low for some plant communities, future studies should also shed light on the attribution of grasslands with Festuca paniculata and confirm the presence of the Thymo-Festucetum association within the Nardo-Agrostion alliance.

Table 7.

Synoptic table .

Class (FB: Festuco-Brometea, MA: Molino-Arrhenatheretea, NS: Nardetea strictae) FB FB FB MA NS NS
Association PoFe HoCh ThCa CeAr PhFe CaNa
Relevés numbers 5 5 13 20 13 13
Characteristic and differential species of Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae (PoFe)
Koeleria pyramidata (Lam.) P. Beauv. 100 0 8 0 8 0
Rumex acetosella L. s.l. 80 40 54 35 38 38
Characteristic and differential species of Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli (HoCh)
Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roem. & Schult. 0 100 77 15 46 23
Danthonia decumbens (L.) DC. 20 100 8 0 8 23
Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin. 40 80 23 0 0 0
Characteristic and differential species of Phyteumo-Mesobrometum (PhMe)
Thymus pulegioides L. 80 100 100 65 92 38
Thalictrum minus L. 20 40 92 55 46 15
Carex fritschii Waisb. 0 40 85 35 23 0
Characteristic and differential species of Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum (CeAr)
Centaurea transalpina (Schleich. ex DC.) Nyman 0 40 15 70 0 0
Characteristic and differential species of Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis ass. nova (PhFe)
Phyteuma betonicifolium Vill. 20 20 62 55 92 62
Festuca nigrescens Lam. 20 60 77 90 85 62
Poa chaixii Vill. 0 0 15 10 85 31
Ranunculus montanus aggr. 0 0 0 5 54 0
Chaerophyllum villarsii W. D. J. Koch 0 0 0 30 54 8
Crocus albiflorus Kit. 0 0 8 10 46 8
Phleum rhaeticum (Humphries) Rauschert 0 0 0 0 46 8
Characteristic and differential species of Carici piluliferae-Nardetum (CaNa) 0
Carex pilulifera L. 0 60 8 5 31 100
Nardus stricta L. 0 0 23 0 69 92
Festuco-Brometea and affiliates
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. 80 80 54 20 54 31
Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. 80 80 54 40 38 23
Ranunculus bulbosus L. 80 40 77 40 23 23
Helianthemum nummularium (L.) Mill. 60 60 54 5 8 31
Bromus erectus Huds. 60 60 38 5 0 0
Silene nutans L. 0 80 77 15 46 31
Luzula campestris (L.) DC. 20 40 85 65 69 23
Anthericum liliago L. 40 80 23 0 8 38
Dianthus carthusianorum L. s.l. 60 20 46 5 8 15
Briza media L. 0 60 54 20 54 23
Festuca ovina aggr. 40 20 38 0 46 31
Salvia pratensis L. 20 0 54 20 0 0
Potentilla neumanniana Rchb. 60 0 0 0 0 0
Poa angustifolia L. 20 0 23 25 0 0
Trifolium montanum L. 40 0 0 5 0 0
Veronica chamaedrys L. 0 0 31 55 69 15
Viola canina s.l. 0 20 8 5 23 0
Helictotrichon pubescens (Huds.) Pilg. 0 0 23 20 0 0
Silene viscaria (L.) Borkh. 0 0 23 0 0 0
Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and affiliates
Achillea millefolium aggr. 60 80 85 100 92 8
Dactylis glomerata L. 20 0 38 95 62 0
Plantago lanceolata L. 80 40 62 95 23 23
Anthoxanthum odoratum L. 40 100 77 90 62 38
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke 0 20 31 80 69 23
Leontodon hispidus L. 0 0 69 75 31 38
Rumex acetosa L. 0 20 38 70 85 0
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv. 0 0 38 70 38 8
Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet 40 0 54 60 38 8
Trifolium repens L. 0 0 23 55 23 8
Ranunculus acris L. 0 0 0 55 0 0
Holcus lanatus L. 0 60 46 50 8 8
Agrostis capillaris L. 40 60 46 45 92 15
Viola tricolor L. 0 0 69 40 46 15
Leucanthemum vulgare aggr. 0 20 23 40 8 0
Lathyrus pratensis L. 0 0 31 30 8 0
Poa pratensis L. 0 0 15 30 8 0
Lolium perenne L. 0 0 0 30 0 0
Ranunculus friesianus Jord. 0 0 0 25 8 0
Prunella vulgaris L. 0 40 0 25 0 0
Hypochaeris radicata L. 20 60 15 15 8 15
Ajuga reptans L. 0 40 8 5 0 0
Rorippa stylosa (Pers.) Mansf. & Rothm. 0 0 0 5 0 8
Nardetea strictae and affiliates
Avenella flexuosa (L.) Drejer 0 20 23 5 38 62
Carex pallescens L. 0 40 8 25 69 31
Alchemilla hybrida aggr. sensu K. Lauber 0 0 8 0 38 15
Polygala vulgaris L. s.l. 0 60 8 10 31 15
Stachys officinalis (L.) Trevis. 0 80 15 5 23 15
Stellaria graminea L. 0 0 0 20 31 9
Galium pumilum Murray 0 0 15 10 31 0
Scabiosa lucida Vill. 0 20 23 15 15 8
Other species
Peucedanum oreoselinum (L.) Moench 100 40 38 30 8 0
Festuca filiformis Pourr. 20 100 46 0 46 77
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. 0 80 23 40 62 62
Galium rubrum L. 0 20 46 5 46 23
Veronica officinalis L. 0 40 8 10 38 38
Vincetoxicum hirundinaria Medik. 0 40 31 0 46 15
Clinopodium vulgare L. 0 40 46 25 15 0
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn 0 40 0 5 8 15
Cruciata glabra (L.) Ehrend. 0 60 31 10 8 0
Hypericum perforatum L. 40 0 23 5 31 8
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull 20 0 0 0 0 23
Hieracium pilosella aggr. 20 20 23 0 0 15
Rubus fruticosus aggr. sensu Landolt /S 0 20 0 0 0 15
Festuca paniculata (L.) Schinz & Thell. 0 20 0 0 0 23
Hieracium lactucella Wallr. 0 0 8 0 8 8
Vaccinium myrtillus L. 0 0 0 0 8 23
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link 20 0 0 0 0 8
Molinia arundinacea Schrank 0 40 8 5 8 8
Carex pairae F. W. Schultz 0 0 23 45 0 0
Solidago virgaurea L. 0 40 0 5 23 0
Rosa spec. 0 20 15 0 23 0
Lathyrus linifolius (Reichard) Bässler 0 40 0 10 8 0
Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. 0 0 0 0 0 8
Arabis ciliata Clairv. 0 0 8 5 23 9
Aira caryophyllea L. 40 0 0 0 0 0
Myosotis arvensis Hill 0 0 8 25 0 0

Syntaxonomic scheme

FESTUCO VALESIACAE-BROMETEA ERECTI Br.-Bl. & Tüxen ex Br.-Bl. 1949

BRACHYPODIETALIA PINNATI Korneck 1974

Bromion erecti Koch 1926

Holco-Chrysopogonetum grylli Lagnaz, Trotta, Prunier, Krüsi et Boscutti 2023 ex Meyer 1976

Phyteumo-Mesobrometum Studer-Ehrensberger, 1993

FESTUCETALIA VALESIACEAE Br.-Bl. et Tüxen ex Br.-Bl. 1949

Stipo-Poion xerophilae Br.-Bl. & Richard 1949

Poo bulbosae-Festucetum trachyphyllae Lonati & Lonati, 2007

MOLINIO-ARRHENATHERETEA Tüxen 1937

ARRHENATHERETALIA ELATIORIS Tüxen 1931

Arrhenatherion elatioris Koch 1926

Centaureo transalpinae-Arrhenatheretum Oberd. 1964 nom. mut. prop. Prunier et. al 2019

NARDETEA STRICTAE Rivas Goday in Rivas Goday & Rivas-Martínez 1963

NARDETALIA Preising 1950

Nardo strictae-Agrostion tenuis Sillinger 1933

Phyteumo betonicifolii-Festucetum nigrescentis ass. nova Carici piluliferae-Nardetum strictae Marschall and Dietl 1974

Acknowledgements

We thank Jean-Bernard Bächtiger for the field work support.

We greatly thank the Editor, the anonimous reviewer, and the reviewer Bruno Foggi for the insightful comments that greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Bibliography

  • Allegrezza M, Biondi E (2011) Syntaxonomic revision of the Arrhenatherum elatius grasslands of central Italy. Fitosociologia 48: 23–40.
  • Antognoli C (1995) 5 Prati magri ticinesi tra passato e futuro. Società ticinese di scienze naturali. Lugano: 169 pp.
  • Becker T, Schmiege C, Bergmeier E, Dengler J, Nowak B (2012) Nutrient-poor grasslands on siliceous soil in the lower Aar valley (Middle Hesse, Germany)-neglected vegetation types in the intersection range of four classes. Tuexenia 32: 281–318.
  • Berset J (1965) Pâturages, prairies et marais montagnards et subalpins des Préalpes fribourgeoises. Ed. Univ., 1965. Ed. Univ.
  • Biondi E, Allegrezza M, Zuccarello V (2005) Syntaxonomic revision of the Apennine grasslands belonging to Brometalia erecti, and an analysis of their relationships with the xerophilous vegetation of Rosmarinetea officinalis (Italy). Phytocoenologia 35: 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2005/0035-0129
  • Blasi C, Di Pietro R, Fortini P (2000) A phytosociological analysis of abandoned olive-grove grasslands of Ausoni mountains (Tyrrhenian district of Central Italy). Plant Biosystems 134: 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500012331350475
  • Bonanomi G, Allegrezza M (2004) Effetti della colonizzazione di Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roemer et Schultes sulla diversità di alcune fitocenosi erbacee dell'Appennino centrale. Fitosociologia 41: 51–69.
  • Braun-Blanquet J (1961) Band 1 Die inneralpine Trockenvegetation: von der Provence bis zur Steiermark. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 273 pp.
  • Braun-Blanquet J (1976) Heft 58 Fragmenta Phytosociologica Raetica III, IV und VII. Geobotanisches Institut ETH/Stiftung Rübel, Zürich, 49 pp.
  • Braun-Blanquet J, Tüxen R (1943) Übersicht der höheren Vegetationseinheiten Mitteleuropas: (unter Ausschluß der Hochgebirge). la Charit.
  • Braun-Blanquet J, Richard R (1949) Groupements végétaux et sols du bassin de Sierre. Bulletin de la Murithienne: 106–134.
  • Cáceres MD, Chytrý M, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Botta‐Dukát Z, Capelo J et al. (2015) A comparative framework for broad-scale plot-based vegetation classification. Applied Vegetation Science 18: 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12179
  • Chytrý M (Ed.) (2010) Travinná a keříčková vegetace: Grassland and heathland vegetation. 2., upr. vyd. Academia, Praha, 526 pp.
  • Delarze R (1986) Approche biocénotique des pelouses steppiques valaisannes. Lausanne
  • Delarze R, Gonseth Y, Eggenberg S, Vust M (2015) Lebensräume der Schweiz. Ökologie - Gefährdung - Kennarten. 3. Auflage. Ott Verlag, Bern, 456 pp.
  • Di Pietro R, Germani D, Fortini P (2017) A phytosociological investigation on the mixed hemycryptophitic and therophitic grasslands of the Cornicolani mountains (Lazio Region-central Italy). Plant Sociology 54: 107–128. https://doi.org/10.7338/pls2017541/05
  • Di Pietro R, Theurillat J-P, Capelo J, Fernández-González F, Terzi M, Carni A, Mucina L (2015) Nomenclature and syntaxonomic notes on some high-rank syntaxa of the European grassland vegetation. Lazaroa 36: 79–103. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev-LAZA.2015.v36.50835
  • Dietl W (1972) Die Vegetationskartierung als Grundlage für die Planung einer umfassenden Alpverbesserung im Raume von Glaubenbüelen (Obwalden): Kontaktzone von Kalk- und Flyschalpen). Doctoral Thesis. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000088735
  • Dipartimento del territorio (2008) Piano forestale cantonale. Repubblica e Cantone Ticino, Dipartimento del territorio, Divisione dell'ambiente, Bellinzona, 42 pp.
  • Eggenberg S, Dalang T, Dipner M, Mayer C (2001) Cartographie et évaluation des prairies et pâturages secs d'importance nationale: rapport technique. OFEFP, Berne, 251 pp.
  • Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) 8104 Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. 6th ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1333 pp.
  • Ferrez Y, Bailly G, Beaufils T, Collaud R, Caillet M, Fernez T et al. (2011) Synopsis des groupements végétaux de Franche-Comté. Société botanique de Franche-Comté, Conservatoire botanique national de Franche-Comté, Pontarlier. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00683776 (January 7, 2021).
  • Foucault B de (2012) Contribution au prodrome des végétations de France: les Nardetea strictae Rivas Goday in Rivas Goday & Rivas-Mart. 1963. Journal de Botanique de la Société Botanique de France 59: 241–344. https://doi.org/10.3406/jobot.2012.1159
  • Gallandat J-D, Gillet F, Havlicek E, Perrenoud A (1995) Patubois-Typologie et systémique phyto-écologiques des pâturages boisés du Jura suisse. Université de Neuchâtel, 461pp.
  • Gianoni P, Padovan E, Andres F, Wastavino M (2015) Qualità del paesaggio in agricoltura nel territorio del Parco Nazionale del Locarnese. Cantone Ticino, Ufficio della consulenza agricola, Bellinzona, 76 pp.
  • Häfelfinger S (1996) Brachevegetation und von mageren Wiesen ausgehende Brachenentwicklung in der montanen Stufe des Kantons Tessin. Systematisch-Geobotanisches Institut der Universität Bern
  • Ilijanić L, Topić J (1989) Fitocenološki odnosi vrste Chrysopogon gryllus u Jugoslaviji. Acta Botanica Croatica 48: 75–82.
  • Jäggli M (1908) Monografia floristica del Monte Camoghè (presso Bellinzona). Salvioni
  • Dietl W in Klötzli F, Marti K, Schubiger-Bossard C, Walther G-R (2010) Vegetation Europas: das Offenland im vegetationskundlich-ökologischen Überblick; unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schweiz. Ott Verlag.
  • Koch W (1943) Der Andropogonetum grylli insubricum, eine Trockenwiesen-Assoziation des Südtessin. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 53A: 579–594.
  • Korneck D (1974) xerothermvegetation in Rheinland-Pfalz und Nachbargebieten.
  • Korneck D (1978) Teil 2 Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, Teil 2. Zweite, stark bearb. Auflage: 355 pp.
  • Küster H, Keenleyside C (2009) The origin and use of agricultural grasslands in Europe. In: Grasslands of Europe of high nature value. KNNV Publishing, Zeist: 9–14.
  • Landolt E, Bäumler B, Erhardt A, Hegg O, Klötzli F, Lämmler W et al. (2010) Flora indicativa: ökologische Zeigerwerte und biologische Kennzeichen zur Flora der Schweiz und der Alpen = Ecological indicator values and biological attributes of the flora of Switzerland and the Alps. Haupt, Bern, 376 pp.
  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd english edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Lonati M, Lonati S (2007) Le praterie xerofile a Festuca trachyphylla (Hackel) Krajina nella bassa Valsesia (Piemonte, Italia). Fitosociologia 44: 109–118.
  • van der Maarel E (1979) Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052021
  • Marschall F (1947) Heft 26 Die Goldhaferwiese (Trisetetum flavescentis) der Schweiz: eine soziologisch-ökologische Studie. Hans Huber, Bern.
  • Meyer M (1976) Heft 57 Pflanzensoziologische und ökologische Untersuchungen an insubrischen Trockenwiesen karbonathaltiger Standorte. Stiftung Rübel, 145 pp.
  • Meyer M (1977) Vergleich verschiedener Chrysopogon gryllus-reicher Trockenwiesen des insubrischen Klimabereiches und angrenzender Gebiete. Vegetatio 35: 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097220
  • Mucina L, Gabherr T, Ellmauer T (1993) I Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena.
  • Mucina L, Bültmann H, Dierßen K, Theurillat J-P, Raus T, Čarni A et al. (2016) Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Peet R (Ed.). Applied Vegetation Science 19: 3–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257
  • Oberdorfer E (1964) Der insubrische Vegetationskomplex, seine Struktur und Abgrenzung gegen die submediterrane Vegetation in Oberitalien und in der Südschweiz. Beiträge zur naturkundlichen Forschung in Südwestdeutschland hrsg. von den Badischen Landessammlung 23: 141–187.
  • Pestalozzi H (1990) Wiesen und Weiden von Bordei/ Centovalli TI: pflanzensoziologische, ökologische und futterbauliche Untersuchungen im Hinblick auf eine naturgemässe Bewirtschaftung. Systematisch-Geobotanisches Institut der Universität Bern
  • Poldini L, Oriolo G (1994) La vegetazione dei prati da sfalcio e dei prati intensivi (Arrhenatheretalia e Poo-Trisetalia in Friuli (NE Italia). Studia Geobotanica 14: 3–48.
  • Poldini L, Oriolo G (1997) La vegetazione dei pascoli a Nardus stricta e delle praterie subalpine acidofile in Friuli (NE-Italia). Fitosociologia 34: 127–158.
  • Poschlod P, Baumann A, Karlik P (2009) Origin and development of grasslands in Central Europe. In: Grasslands in Europe of high nature value. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004278103_003
  • Prévosto B, Kuiters L, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Dölle M, Schmidt W, Hoffmann M et al. (2011) Impacts of Land Abandonment on Vegetation: Successional Pathways in European Habitats. Folia Geobotanica 46: 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-010-9096-z
  • Prunier P, Boissezon A, Figeat L, Mombrial F, Steffen J (2018) Référentiel syntaxonomique genevois: inventaire et descriptif succinct des associations végétales présentes dans le canton de Genève.
  • Prunier P, Greulich F, Béguin C, Delarze R, Hegg O, Klötlzi F, Pantke R, Steiger P, Vittoz P (2014) Un référentiel pour les associations végétales de Suisse: PhytoSuisse. Documents Phytosociologiques, Série 3.
  • Redzic S (1999) The syntaxonomical differentiation of the Festuco-Brometea Br.-Bl. & R.Tx. 1943 Ex Klika & Hadac 1944 in the Balkans. Annali di Botanica 57. https://doi.org/10.4462/annbotrm-9056
  • Reisigl H (1996) Insubrien und das Gardaseegebiet-Vegetation, Florengeschichte, Endemismus. Ann Mus Civ Rovereto 11: 9–25.
  • Schmid E (1939) Die Stellung Insubriens im Alpenbereich. Verh. Schweiz. Nat. forsch. Ges.: 65–. $6
  • Schmid S, Zingg A, Handy M (1987) The kinematics of movements along the insubric Line and the emplacement of the lvrea Zone J'ecronuphysics, 135 (1987) 47–66. Tectonophysics 135: 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90151-X
  • Schröter C (1936) Flora des Südens:dh "Insubriens", des südlichen Tessins und Graubündens und das Gebietes der oberitalienischen Seen (Langensee bis und mit Gardasee). Rascher.
  • Škodová I, Janišová M, Hegedüšová K, Borsukevych L, Smatanová J, Kish R, Píš V (2015) Sub-montane semi-natural grassland communities in the Eastern Carpathians (Ukraine). Tuexenia 35: 355–380.
  • Spinedi F, Isotta F (2004) Il clima del Ticino. dati Meteosvizzera 2: 4–39.
  • Stebler P, Schröter C (1887) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Matten und Weiden der Schweiz. Landw. Jb. Schweiz 1: 93–148.
  • Studer-Ehrensberger K (1993) Pflanzensoziologische Untersuchungen an extensiv genutzten Rasen des Alpensüdfusses mit besonderem Schwergewicht im Insubrischen Raum. Bern
  • Studer-Ehrensberger K (1995) Geschichte und Naturschutz von artenreichen Kulturwiesen in der Schweiz: eine Zusammenschau. Botanica Helvetica 105: 3–16.
  • Studer-Ehrensberger K (2000) Synthesis of semi-natural grassland vegetation of a biogeographically heterogeneous area: mesophilous species-rich meadows in Switzerland. Folia Geobotanica 35: 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803120
  • Theurillat J-P, Willner W, Fernández‐González F, Bültmann H, Čarni A, Gigante D, Mucina L, Weber H (2021) International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition. Applied Vegetation Science 24: e12491. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12491
  • Thomet P, Schmid W, Daccord R, Dietl W, Galland N., Jeangros B., Meister E, Scehovic J, Schmidlin J, Troxler J, Zihlmann U (1989) Erhaltung von artenreichen Wiesen: Untersuchungen zum landwirtschaftlichen Wert und zur Integration von artenreichen Wiesen in den Landwirtschaftsbetrieb sowie Analyse der Erfahrungen auf Kantonsebene zur Erhaltung dieser biologisch wertvollen Landschaftselemente. NFP 22, Liebefeld-Bern
  • Tuxen R (1937) Die Pflanzengesellschften Nordwestdeutschlands. Mitteilungen der Floristisch-soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft in Niedersachsen. 3: 170p.
  • Ubaldi D (1988) Nuove associazioni vegetali del Montefeltro e dell'alta valle del Foglia. Proposte e ricerche, Univ. Ancona, Camerino, Macerata, Urbino 20: 38–47.
  • Velev N (2018) Arrhenatheretalia elatioris uncritical checklist of Europe. Phytologia Balcanica 24: 99–147.
  • Vittoz P (1998) Flore et végétation du Parc jurassien vaudois: typologie, écologie et dynamique des milieux. Thèse de doctorat. Université de Lausanne
  • Zoller H (1954) Heft 33 Die Typen der Bromus erectus-Wiesen des Schweizer Juras: ihre Abhängigkeit von den Standortsbedingungen und wirtschaftlichen Einflüssen und ihre Beziehungen zur ursprünglichen Vegetation. Huber, Bern, 309 pp.
login to comment